Informatica Data Quality offers functionalities such as profiling and address standardization. It identifies discrepancies in data through profiling, providing statistical insights similar to other data quality tools. What sets IDQ apart is its integration with PowerCenter, Informatica's flagship data integration tool. IDQ includes a developer tool with a wide range of transformations like Cost, Standardizer, and Cleanser, which are essential for data quality management. It operates as a batch-based tool, distinguishing itself in the market. While IDQ focuses on these aspects, it doesn't directly relate to tools like TDM or MDM, which are separate solutions.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Offers profiling and address standardization but can be complicated
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Whenever I open and close Informatica Data Quality, I get consistent results. However, since I moved away from Informatica in the last two to three years, I have also evaluated other products. There is an ETL tool by SAP, specifically Business Objects Data Services, which has some pros and cons. It can integrate more files.
What is most valuable?
We use parts and standardization for most of our testing. We purchase the US Postal Service address database, which is updated periodically. Many useful tools, such as Google Maps, can detect and mark new businesses or changes in business locations. Informatica captures and updates this information. Some periodic maintenance is involved, but setting it up is not overly complicated.
What needs improvement?
Informatica Data Quality has its data warehouse, primarily using Oracle and some SQL databases. You need a database to host the data. The cleansed version of the data is stored in the data warehouse. It integrates with PowerCenter and other Informatica tools. The integration details can be complex, but a regional setup is involved in this process.
Profiling smaller datasets, such as 10,000-50,000 records, worked fine. However, unexpected issues could arise with larger datasets, such as thousands of records or more, especially with tables containing many columns. Handling tables with fifty or more columns can be challenging, even in Excel. A mismatch in data types could cause the entire system to crash.
Continual enhancements are being made to address these issues, which can be unique to specific industries like finance and healthcare.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
What other advice do I have?
I have worked with Informatica Data Quality up to version 10.4, around 2020, about two or three years ago. During that time, there was a code bug at the driver level when connecting to hardware. When attempting to profile data, the system would crash. We had to collaborate with engineers from Informatica to fix the bug, which was eventually resolved in the 10.5.1 release.
Informatica Data Quality has its client tool. You can build your code on your laptop and then upload it to the database metadata. However, for some parts of the development, you might need to log into the server to complete the tasks.
Informatica Data Quality can build dashboards and integrate with reporting tools like Tableau and Power BI. It also supports integration with tools like Microsoft, Cognos Business Intelligence, and SAP Crystal Reports. This flexibility is a crucial feature of Informatica. As for SaaS, Informatica does offer SaaS options. Additionally, it can interface with statistical software like SAS, allowing users to build code in SAS and then import it into Informatica. This simplifies the process and eliminates the need for manual coding.
If you remove the PowerCenter tools, the next closest competitor would be IBM's InfoSphere DataStage. Additionally, there are free, not free, and less expensive community editions of various tools. For instance, Talend offers an open-source ETL tool, while Pentaho has a miniature business version of ETL. Microsoft itself provides ETL tools like SSIS and reporting tools. Data quality is not necessarily tied to any vendor—data is data, and various tools can manage anything that flows in.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Provides data cataloging and lineage with metadata management but lacks integration
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for data cataloging and lineage.
What is most valuable?
The valuable feature is metadata management. If you want to trace sensitive data, you can auto-classify them. You can search for sensitive information through EDC. Using Discovery, you can identify if there is any type of data set.
What needs improvement?
EDC is only used for cataloging and meetings. Currently, not many different databases are integrated with it. The ETL logic should be visible within the tool. If EDC is integrated with Axon, you will see the data lineage and catalog because of EDC. If EDC is removed, you cannot see any lineage or catalog.
We need EDC on the application level. Currently, it is only at a system level. It can be shown as an application layer between policies or regulations. This kind of feature can be enabled.
The integration with other data management tools can be enhanced. For instance, there is no integration with tools like Collibra or Hubview.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
EDC needs many ports to run. Therefore, to improve performance, you need to increase the number of cores.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy and takes two weeks to complete. One person is enough to deploy it.
What was our ROI?
EDC gives you a better understanding of architecture and the system used. You cannot use EDC completely unless you have access.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
EDC is a standalone application, so it doesn’t really make much sense. It doesn’t give you a lot of features that way; it’s primarily for cataloging and classification. Nobody would buy EDC as a standalone application. When people are buying EDC, it’s always with Axon.
I recommend buying the solution altogether with Axon.
Overall, I rate the solution as seven out of ten.
Easy to learn and used for data governance
What is our primary use case?
Informatica Axon is typically used for data governance, where we establish policies and business glossaries.
What is most valuable?
Users can benefit from Axon's business lineage. Axon has something called Overlay, which can be used to extend the technical lineage. You can also extend it to stakeholders, all the compliance policies, and all the overlaying business rules. All of these can be seen in the same lineage.
What needs improvement?
I want to get a deeper understanding of the logic that is being used in the ETL. Informatica Axon does not provide complete transparency about the level of detailing you need and the logic used in ETL. I cannot use Google Fusion for ETL because I don't have a connector within Informatica Axon. I am stuck if I don't have a connector with an ETL tool.
One of the biggest disadvantages of Informatica is that it's very expensive. Many clients don't want to go with Informatica Axon because of its cost structure. You have to buy every component separately. If a customer wants governance, they obviously would need cataloging and lineage also.
Other tools like Collibra have cataloging, lineage, and governance in the same package. You don't need to buy them separately. With Informatica, you have to buy Axon for governance and EDC for cataloging and lineage. So, it becomes difficult for customers to pay for every component.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Informatica Axon for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven’t faced any stability issues with Informatica Axon.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is not really a factor in data governance because the volume and storage of metadata is not more than a couple of gigabytes.
How are customer service and support?
The solution provides good technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup is easy, but you typically need Informatica support to run some of the preliminary tests. I've heard that the solution will be available on the cloud. Once it is available as software as a service (SaaS), you don't need to install it; you only need to configure it.
What about the implementation team?
Typically, it takes around two days for the solution's installation and integration with the entire Active Directory and EDC. Then, it may take another day for testing. One engineer is enough to do all this work.
What was our ROI?
Only using Axon will not give you all the benefits, but you will see benefits when Axon, EDC, and IDQ are all plugged in together. It is difficult to get benefits from Axon as a standalone solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution's pricing model is easy, but it is very expensive.
What other advice do I have?
Informatica Axon has a Marketplace that comes at an additional cost. Other tools like Collibra have built-in collaboration features, and you don't need to buy them separately. Collaboration features like collaborating on data sets, tagging them, and making a request are available in the Informatica Axon Marketplace.
It's not difficult to maintain the tool as long as someone has been trained in administration because Axon has many components. You need to understand how to change the logo of your screen size and how to change the dashboard wizard.
You also need to understand the product's configurations with other tools, personalize your dashboard, customize it, and add roles. There is a learning curve there. You need to train a person to be an administrator, and once they are trained, they can do the role better.
There is an NLP enabled with the solution, but it is not really that great. There is still room for growth in Informatica Axon's AI space.
Although expensive, Informatica Axon is very easy to learn, and you don't need to customize it much. Once you have the tool, you start uploading things. The solution is very easy to use because it has proper documentation and user guides.
If you want to set up business rules, Informatica Axon will give you a readymade template and ask you to start filling it out. You will be told about the mandatory and non-mandatory fields, and as long as you understand what the fields are required for, it's very easy to start filling out. Someone new to governance can get the hang of it and easily start filling in the details. You can have Axon implemented very quickly.
I am more involved with governance, cataloging lineage, EDC, and IDQ. I am getting a little bit into master data management and data security.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Has multiple features for metadata collection and has data lineage and easy integration capabilities
What is our primary use case?
Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog was used by our company as proof of concept for projects related to comprehensive data governance.
What is most valuable?
The solution has multiple valuable features for metadata collection from multiple data sources or technologies. The solution manages data and acts as a central hub for setting up data governance processes.
The automated scanning of metadata from data sources is one of the most vital features of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The solution comprises attribute features and AI capabilities for automatic relationship discovery between different datasets.
Another powerful feature of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is data lineage. The whole path of data transformation from one location to another using certain technologies is represented in Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The solution integrates seamlessly with other products from the vendor and allows the creation of comprehensive data governance processes.
The aforementioned integrations facilitate the coverage of semantic layers in addition to the technical data. There is another business glossary product from Informatica that easily integrates with Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog to consume data harvested by Data Catalog, which makes a powerful combination.
What needs improvement?
The user interface of the product needs to be improved. Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog captures huge amounts of data and along with this data, the interface becomes comprehensible only for users with advanced technical knowledge. Even for advanced users, it becomes challenging to move around vast amounts of data collected by the solution.
Some competitors of Informatica are trying to implement some brilliant ideas, but they lack the coverage provided by Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The data lineage feature can also be further improved.
While using the solution, the data is being transmitted outside the client's network to the Informatica cloud, which can be a security concern; the vendor can solve this by enabling the product as part of a public cloud like Azure, AWS, or Google. The aforementioned scenario can be a concern for institutions like banks where there are legal restrictions and data needs to be fully under control.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog for a year. It was used in two different projects in our company, each of them concluded in six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of the product as seven out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is satisfying, but the turnaround or response time is quite long as the vendor needs to support a huge number of customers daily. At our company, we have noticed that there are experts in the support team who can provide effective solutions.
How was the initial setup?
The tool's initial setup is complex. I had experience with the on-prem deployment of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, but I believe the cloud version is easier to set up. The solution's deployment takes around three to six months.
About four to five professionals are required, including technical administrators and data governance experts, for the on-prem deployment of the solution; for cloud deployment, three professionals might be enough.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's a very expensive solution.
What other advice do I have?
Informatica covers the widest area of technologies in comparison to other vendors and they also have a network of partners who develop add-ons for extending functionalities or data source technologies which could be integrated with Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The solution provider has a wide partner ecosystem to provide features on APIs and special custom formats that could be imported or integrated into varying processes.
The solution's features can be extended and the vendor provides useful documentation and training on it. Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is a reliable platform due to its extensibility and cooperation with other partners. I would overall rate the product an eight out of ten. I would definitely recommend others to use the solution, given that there isn't a requirement for in-depth analysis.
The critical data lineage feature acts as a link between every aspect of data governance, including an explanation of the data journey and its history which reflects the business growth. The powerful AI capabilities of the solution allow you to automate the management of massive amounts of data, especially the aspect of associating technical metadata with business terms.
When dealing with millions of data attributes its not possible to manage data manually, therefore Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is needed to automate 60 to 80 percent of data association between business terms and harvested technical terms.
If the Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog deployment is carried out efficiently, it can greatly impact your organization and enable business capabilities to further improve business processes.
Offers data lineage feature along with duplicate identification and categorization benefits
What is our primary use case?
The solution helps with cataloging and obtaining the data lineage. Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog also helps in identifying vital datasets, including the critical data elements and cataloging them. In our company, we have to manage the life cycle of the critical data elements and maintain the business glossary.
The definitions of the critical data elements, their linkage, lineage, as well as the relationships are managed using the solution. Informatica has been in the industry for decades, so they are one of the top SMB partners.
At our company, along with the solution, we also use Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services REST API for app and system integrations in the packaging industry. Of our total portfolio, we integrated applications for about 20%, but we did not have any cloud presence; only a setup application was in the cloud. But for all the on-prem projects, the key components of the customer's product were integrated and governed by using Informatica.
What is most valuable?
Data lineage is a valuable feature when, at our company, we design the physical elements and the logical components and need to identify the relation between them.
The duplicate identification feature for two tickets, synonymous fields, or attributes is another vital aspect of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The categorization of whether data is critical or not in the business glossary is another vital feature of the tool.
What needs improvement?
The product is difficult for an untrained professional to operate. Specialized skills need to be acquired by learning the tool and executing it for data operations. Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog needs to be more user friendly, the UI is extremely complex.
For instance, if I have to view the tool, the first deterrent is that it gets highly technical. Thus, a limited number of professionals can understand the tool processes. Unless you are a data professional, it's very difficult to use Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. The tool operates with Power BI sometimes.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog for eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
At our company, we haven't faced any downtime or business issues with the solution. The solution allows a limited number of users, so it's easier for the vendor to manage stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I believe the solution is scalable and integrates satisfactorily. Our company was successful with scalability because, for the majority of our applications, where the key data was being hosted, we could integrate the apps quite easily with the cloud.
If Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is being used, scaling the data up or down shouldn't be a problem. The solution's cloud integrations make scalability easier, unlike the on-prem version, which requires implementing complex security protocols.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the customer support a nine out of ten. The product's support team has been highly responsive while solving the issues faced by our organization.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
At our company, during the product deployment, we had to asses our applications and APIs that would be connected, whether they were available out of the box or not. But the capabilities of customer connections are available with similar tools.
Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog offers custom connectivity. Therefore, the deployment process has been troublesome for our organization except for the mainframe. But as we kept using the tool we realized the integrations could be smoothly completed. At our company, we implement the product if customers are convinced to integrate the tool and make it their central, single source of data management for integrators and technicians.
The deployment of the solution took more than a year in our organization, which included upgrades, contract renewals, and demonstrations similar to IDMC, provided by the same vendor. For deploying the on-prem version of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, a team of five engineers was needed in our company to manage the whole deployment and support process.
A couple of business analysts are needed to gather the users' requirements. Our organization has about ten members who provide on-call support on Informatica for its customers, comprising developers, business analysts, and testers.
What was our ROI?
In our organization, we were able to derive about 70% of the critical data lineage.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's a costly solution. I would rate the pricing of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog as six out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
The automated data lineage feature utilization depends upon the integration, which is why, in our organization, we had all our key applications integrated that derived automated lineages. But there were unknown applications as well, which, due to the lack of integrations, needed to be manually plugged in.
The mainframe integration with Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is highly complex. At our organization, due to the aforementioned complexity, we had to import all the data of the mainframe into Informatica. If you are able to integrate the tool with your core applications and systems, then the data lineage duration is pretty simple and this structure is the same for competitor tools as well.
In our company, we might explore in the near future how Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog can assist with AI capabilities. I would overall rate the solution as eight out of ten. To anyone looking to use Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, I would say if they are willing to understand the company data, then the professional should gather sufficient technical knowledge about the product or take assistance from an Informatica expert because it's not a straightforward tool.
Secure and easy to use, but the support is not good, and the user interface must be more functionality-aligned
What is our primary use case?
We use the tool to implement customer, product, and entity masters. We also use TDM to generate synthetic data, but not in real-time scenarios.
What is most valuable?
It's a multi-domain master data management system. The solution is easier to use compared to the other solutions. The security is good. The governance model is good. All the elements that I expect are available in the product.
What needs improvement?
The user interface can be a bit more functionality-aligned.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for the last 15 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The support team does not provide much support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was okay. I rate the ease of setup a five out of ten. The tool can be deployed in a minimum of eight to ten months. The implementation requires at least a team of five members. Maintenance depends on the customer's requirements. If the customer's requirements keep changing, we need a team to maintain the tool. Otherwise, one or two Informatica developers are sufficient to maintain the product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is comparable.
What other advice do I have?
All the tools have similar capabilities. There is nothing superior in Informatica. I'm a software integrator. I work for an IT company. I'm not the consumer. I will recommend the product to others, but it depends on the customers’ needs.
If an organization needs a good customer master, product master, or partner master, Informatica MDM will be a good choice. The solution has been in the industry for quite a long time. It has all the elements I look for in a master data management system except for customer support. All other things are fine.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven and a half out of ten.
Provides good data quality and valuable features like match-merge engine and CLAIRE AI engine
What is our primary use case?
Informatica MDM is used for our customers' master data management journey. The solution meets our client's requirements for their customer-supplier or any other entities.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable features are its data quality, match-merge engine, and CLAIRE AI engine, which helps with AI automation.
What needs improvement?
Compared to other tools in the market, Informatica MDM is costly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Informatica MDM for 13 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Informatica MDM is highly stable compared to any other tool in the market.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Informatica MDM is a highly scalable solution. Our clients for Informatica MDM are mostly medium and enterprise businesses.
I rate the solution eight and a half out of ten for scalability.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support refuses to support us if we customize the tool. We customize the product based on the customer's needs, and we expect Informatica to provide support during that time as well.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup an eight out of ten for on-premises and nine out of ten for the cloud version. Setting up the tool in the cloud via IDMC doesn't take much time.
What about the implementation team?
The solution can be deployed within a few hours.
What was our ROI?
Our customers have seen a return on investment with the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Informatica MDM is an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing nine and a half out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend the solution to other users because of its reliability and stability. Compared to other product vendors, Informatica MDM always has additional features. Informatica MDM has a CLAIRE AI engine, which helps with AI automation.
Overall, I rate the solution eight and a half out of ten.
Offers satisfying stability and tech support with data architecture features
What is our primary use case?
At our company, we use Informatica MDM for data architecture and numerous other aspects of data warehouse, such as data designing or modeling. We recommend Informatica products to our customers based on their use cases, data volume, budget, and environment suitability.
What needs improvement?
The product isn't mature enough to provide suitable connectors to various data engines. The performance of the solution in transporting data between data lakes and Big data infrastructure is not up to the mark. At our company, we use a similar solution called Spark, which is much better than Informatica MDM in terms of performance and speed. The data support capabilities of Informatica MDM can be improved.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product without any bugs or glitches. But overall Kafka is a better product than Informatica MDM.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product exhibits satisfying scalability.
How are customer service and support?
The tech support is satisfying from the vendor. The support team was able to respond and solve the issues in a very short time. I would rate the tech support an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Informatica MDM easily integrates with the Informatica environment as well as with third-party tools. But for some integrations, for instance, when Informatica MDM is integrated with SAP, the functionality slows down drastically; the task that would take five minutes with Spark takes five hours with Informatica MDM.
The same scenario occurs when Kafka is integrated with Informatica MDM. For popular database integrations such as Oracle and SQL, Informatica MDM functions well enough.
The initial setup of the solution is straightforward. Our company professionals suggest that Informatica MDM should be on a Linux server instead of Windows.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is very expensive compared to other competitor tools. Informatica MDM is not meant for small businesses but rather used by large enterprises like banks or government organizations. Informatica MDM can be purchased as a stand-alone product and doesn't come in an Informatica bundle. The support for Informatica MDM is not included in the standard licensing fees and must be purchased separately.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend that others test Informatica MDM with different integration tools before making a purchase decision. I also advise others to evaluate the use cases before choosing a product. Other popular competitor tools in the market include Collibra and SAP MDG.
Informatica MDM fits our organization's use cases perfectly. When a customer of our company has a plethora of business products, VOCs need to be implemented, even if it's a different MDM solution than Informatica MDM.
Some customers depend on a single technology ERP, while others work with Oracle ERP or SAP, and sometimes they are using ERP and Informatica MDM in combination or migrating from one ERP to another. These use cases will impact the setup that already exists on the customer's site, and thus, the solution needs to be configured accordingly. I would rate Informatica MDM as eight out of ten.
Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket
What is our primary use case?
The main purpose of this tool is for file transfers related to our Python server.
How has it helped my organization?
The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.
I haven't had the chance to explore all the features in-depth since we've only been using them for a couple of months.
What is most valuable?
I appreciate that it's a cloud-based solution. With a good internet connection, it works smoothly.
It also offers multiple features.
What needs improvement?
There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one.
So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name.
Moreover, the support team could improve by adding things like file transfer status updates. Also, if someone modifies a job and then leaves the company, that shouldn't disrupt the job for active users. It would be better if the job continued to run smoothly regardless of who modified it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for seven to eight months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a pretty stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling is easy. It's not overly complex. In our team, we have around 10 to 12 people using it. Additionally, there's a separate IT team dedicated to IICS with over 50 people. Other private projects likely use IICS as well.
How are customer service and support?
We sometimes face challenges when implementing new features. In those cases, we contacted support, and they've been very helpful.
wWe're happy with the support team.
How was the initial setup?
It is a cloud service. We use AWS and Azure Cloud. I'm not fully sure about the installation details, but I know we use AWS and potentially other cloud features as well.
What other advice do I have?
If you have experience with similar tools or a general understanding of IT concepts, it's easier to grasp. Learning the features takes time, but with an IT background, you should be able to figure out the basics.
We all encounter challenges sometimes and need to learn new things. Overall, it's not overly difficult or overly simple. It's manageable if you have the right mindset.
It's definitely a good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket. It has many features to simplify your work and make your life easy. It's not overly difficult to learn, but proper training is essential to understand and make the most of all the features.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Provides efficient auto-classification features and a simple setup process
What needs improvement?
They could improve the product support for the Arabic language. Currently, there are limitations in processing and the interface itself regarding Arabic language support.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the platform's stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Our organization has 12 Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog users. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
We encountered a delayed response from the technical support team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We also use the Erwin Data Catalog, depending on the customer's requirements.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup process is easy. It takes around two days to complete.
What about the implementation team?
We get help from third-party vendors for product implementation.
What was our ROI?
The ROI from using Informatica EGC (Enterprise Data Catalog) can be substantial, as it helps everyone, from novices to experts and stakeholders, maximize their data's potential. It enables thorough understanding, insightful analysis, and seamless sharing of data assets. Features like adding business terms enhance data quality and governance, benefiting businesses across various sectors. Many customers have truly benefited from these options.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For 12 users, the platform's estimated annual cost is around $160,000.
What other advice do I have?
Our data management processes primarily use Informatica to connect to data sources, scan metadata to obtain physical data and perform data classification. Subsequently, we create business terms to establish a business glossary repository within the platform.
The features that have been most effective in improving our data governance include auto-classification and the ease of exploration and navigation within the tool. It can automatically connect or associate business terms with various options, providing flexibility beyond general capabilities.
The AI-driven discovery capability has significantly enhanced our data cataloging processes. Utilizing AI for auto-classification and discovery has been particularly beneficial. However, there is room for improvement in certain areas for understanding the data.
It has adapted well to changes in our data landscape, seamlessly accommodating new types of data sources. It offers flexibility in adding new data sources and supporting multiple data connectors.
Looking ahead to the future of Informatica Data Catalog, data lineage will be a significant trend influencing the product. These features are currently available, but there is potential for further enhancement and detail. It will enable organizations to comprehensively understand their data and its relationships with business processes and regulatory requirements.
I highly recommend it to others and rate it a nine out of ten.