Hyperglance gave us greater control over our cloud infrastructure
What do you like best about the product?
I tried Hyperglance in a work environment where we needed to have greater control over our cloud infrastructure, and the truth is that the experience was quite positive.
What do you dislike about the product?
Regarding the price, it is not a cheap solution, but if you manage a moderately large infrastructure, I think it pays off relatively easily thanks to the optimization it allows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cost control. It helped me identify resources that were oversized or directly unused. It's not that it works magic, but it does give you the necessary information to make smarter decisions and save.
Unified cloud visibility has improved cost control and onboarding but needs simpler interface and pricing
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for Hyperglance is cloud analysis, which helps us visualize the infrastructure and serves as a cost-effective cloud management system for our organization.
We initially faced an issue with AWS where costs were very high and tracking dependencies was difficult. We switched to Hyperglance to have a single view of the cloud, which addresses costs, architecture, and dependencies together. This allows us to consolidate our cloud infrastructure from AWS and Kubernetes into one unified location.
What is most valuable?
Hyperglance provides visibility that creates a unified view of the entire cloud system, allowing us to debug much faster than we were able to initially. With this visibility, new engineers being onboarded find it easier to understand the infrastructure. Cost optimization is also a significant benefit we gain from Hyperglance, as we are able to see unused resources, which aids in budgeting.
Beyond easier onboarding and faster debugging, Hyperglance automatically identifies idle servers, reducing costs by shutting them down and creating Jira tickets automatically.
The unified view offered by Hyperglance is a huge benefit that we have been able to see. These features stand out for us because it becomes easier to make decisions when all of the information is in a single, simple, unified view. This simplicity makes it easier to debug and for new team members to understand the infrastructure, as they can see budget costs and consider options regarding budgeting, ultimately increasing capacity and speeding up decision-making.
Hyperglance is greatly scalable because, as soon as we scale it to a greater architecture or a larger number of servers, it quickly identifies unused resources, making debugging faster and enhancing budget tracking. We also receive automatic anomaly alerts, so I would say it performs very well in terms of scalability.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance has a multi-cloud visualization system and automates many things; however, a downside is that the user interface feels somewhat complex when you start. When we first began using Hyperglance, the user interface felt complex initially, but once you become familiar with it, it becomes easier to use. It is powerful, but it is not very easy for a beginner to adapt to.
The user interface of Hyperglance might feel complex in the initial stages, and I would also say that it can be somewhat expensive for small teams or early-stage startups. Hyperglance could be costly for someone with simple infrastructure. Therefore, I think the cost aspect and the user interface could be improved.
Hyperglance is a powerful tool when it comes to cloud operations, functioning as a control system. However, for an early-stage startup that does not have much reliance or is not heavily dependent on cloud operations, it might not be a good option for them. If the cost could be reduced and onboarding made a little easier, early-stage startups would benefit greatly from Hyperglance.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Hyperglance for nine months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Hyperglance is stable in its performance.
How are customer service and support?
I have not faced any issues that required customer support, so I cannot comment on that. However, I think the product is really good, and we have not had many issues that would necessitate support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, we were using AWS before switching to Hyperglance.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment from Hyperglance, as we are now able to identify waste very efficiently. We have achieved approximately twenty percent cost reduction due to the shutdown of idle servers, and we have also seen approximately eight to ten percent improvement in time, providing significant benefits from Hyperglance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost was pretty steep, and we were not initially very certain about taking Hyperglance due to its price. However, it is a very powerful tool, and I have not been the one handling the pricing and licensing aspects.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other options before choosing Hyperglance, but I cannot elaborate on this as I am not familiar with those specific options.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Hyperglance is to first assess their team's needs. If there is a small team that does not rely heavily on cloud services and does not need multi-cloud complexity, they might be fine without it. However, if they have a heavy reliance on cloud services and need visibility, automated shutdown of idle servers, and budget tracking, I would definitely suggest Hyperglance. Although it might be complex initially, once you become familiar with it, it is an excellent tool.
For Fintech teams or those who rely heavily on cloud services, Hyperglance might be a great tool, even though the user interface might feel complex at first. I would rate this review a seven overall.
Clear Real-Time Cloud Cost Visibility with Actionable Optimizations
What do you like best about the product?
Hyperglance gives clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and resource usage.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hyperglance can feel like overkill for smaller setups with limited cloud usage. There’s also a bit of a learning curve before you can fully take advantage of all its features. Pricing can be on the higher side as well, especially when compared to native cloud cost tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance provides clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and overall resource usage. It helps pinpoint waste and automatically recommends practical, actionable optimizations. In my experience, it’s best suited for multi-cloud or more complex environments where you want cost and security insights brought together in one unified view.
Interactive Cloud Visualizations and Cost Optimization Insights
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is its visualization of complex cloud architecture through interactive diagrams. It makes our infrastructure much easier to understand. Also, the cost optimization feature is very good—its insights help us identify and terminate unused resources, which helps us save on our cloud costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I didn’t like about Hyperglance is that the platform feels complex, and I think there’s a learning curve for new users when they first start using it. Also, the initial setup took some time to get everything configured correctly. On top of that, I think pricing can be a concern for small teams that are just starting out.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem it solves is understanding complex cloud architectures by providing a clear visual view of all resources and their relationships. It also helps with cost management: using Hyperglance, I can identify unused, untagged, and zombie resources that can be terminated, which saves a lot of cost.
Clear Cloud Infrastructure Visuals That Make Issues Easy to Spot
What do you like best about the product?
i like the clear visual representation of the cloud infrastructure that makes it easy to understand complex environments and spot issues fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
the interface is bit complex at first for new users and some advance features take time to fully understand
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of managing complex cloud environments and understanding them. It provides clear visuals for infrastructure, cost, and security, which helps me quickly identify issues, reduce risks, and make better decisions.
Unified multi-cloud view has improved cost control and strengthened self-hosted security
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Hyperglance for the past two to three years. I use Hyperglance primarily for cloud management and FinOps platform management. Additionally, I use it for the unified multi-cloud view where it provides a single plane where I can manage my different types of Kubernetes clusters in a single interface.
What is most valuable?
The best features Hyperglance offers in my experience are real-time 3D visualization, FinOps and cost optimization, no-code automation, and unified cloud view.
I find myself relying on the unified multi-cloud view the most, as it helps us to manage and keep monitoring on our different types of Kubernetes and other clusters at a single platform.
Hyperglance has impacted my organization positively in many ways; we got a single view of our multiple cluster managements, and it also improved our security. It helped us with our self-hosted security as many software-as-a-service tools cannot. Hyperglance provided a self-hosted own cloud where we can manage our self PVC and virtual network, so that our data never leaves our environment.
What needs improvement?
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design.
They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it.
The reason I did not give it a 10 is that they also need some improvements like resource handling; they can effectively manage environments, and also for licensing purposes.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Hyperglance's scalability is good, but some users report that it has a lag and slow loading time when visualizing a large resource count.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Hyperglance, as we have been using Hyperglance from the start.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Hyperglance, I did not evaluate any other options.
What other advice do I have?
If others are looking into using Hyperglance, my advice is that they can switch. I gave this review a rating of 9.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Excellent Real-Time Cloud Visibility with Intuitive Topology & Dependency Views
What do you like best about the product?
HyperGlance provides excellent real-time visibility into our cloud infrastructure and makes it simple for us to understand complex situations through visualization. We can simply relate resources and follow their service relationships inside the system thanks to the topology and dependency views. Compared to other methods, it helps us comprehend dependencies, misconfigurations, and affect areas in our system more faster, which in and of itself saves us operational time in numerous ways. Because it presents our infrastructure data in an organized and easy-to-navigate format, the tool also facilitates our daily practice of cloud system observation and troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside is the initial setup and configuration. The UI could also be improved, and the pricing feels high.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
One of the biggest obstacles in managing modern cloud infrastructure is the lack of visibility and the sheer complexity involved, and Hyperglance helps BlockMosaic tackle both. When you’re working across multiple cloud platforms—such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud—it can be difficult to maintain a clear view of resources, dependencies, and overall system health. By providing a single, visual map of the entire infrastructure, Hyperglance simplifies monitoring and makes it easier to understand what’s connected to what.
Real-Time Infrastructure Cost Insights Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I like how I can get all the information of the cost of my infrastructure in real time
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much, it does my work accordingly to what I need
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As we were experimenting and our size of cluster grew observation and keeping track of cost became difficult and Hyperglance solved our exact same problem
Real-Time Dashboards That Make Key Insights Easy to Grasp
What do you like best about the product?
Visualize real time dashboards
At one glance, displays all effective information in a simpler manner, automated diagram for easy understanding
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing is too high and the security is limited. Not too flexible for operational purposes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Crisp and consize real time data
Robust Real-Time Data Control with Automated Compliance Triggers
What do you like best about the product?
As it is just the starting phase of the usage, what I have liked about Hyperglance is the robust control over data utilization in a real time, which makes the user to catch the and rectify over dependency, moreover the automated compliance trigger makes it is to identify the threat.
What do you dislike about the product?
well as being the starting phase the add on cost on the additional features increases the budget allocation. Modification should be based on team size and users base
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is currently easing the usage and optimum usage and UI view, that is currently supporting our micro departments, Moreover the Insight based on the data insight which is eventually help in re-establishing of static efforts of our organization within a server less environment.
