BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,410 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
A Reliable Tool for Real-World Testing Across Devices
What do you like best about the product?
As a UX Engineer, one of the most valuable aspects of BrowserStack is its ability to let me test on real devices and operating systems remotely. This has been a game-changer for ensuring consistent user experiences across platforms without needing a physical device lab. The interface is intuitive, and spinning up a test environment takes just a few clicks. It’s especially helpful when debugging layout issues or performance quirks that only appear on specific device-browser combinations.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the platform is powerful, occasionally, the remote sessions can feel slightly laggy, especially when testing animations or transitions, which can make it harder to assess performance nuances. I’d also love to see deeper integrations with design tools or prototyping platforms in the future.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With BrowserStack, I can instantly access real devices and environments remotely, which means I can catch layout bugs, performance issues, and compatibility problems early in the development cycle. This has significantly improved the quality of our releases and reduced the number of post-launch fixes.
Great experience to test mobile devices
What do you like best about the product?
It has variety of mobile devices to test
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes takes a lot of time to load some devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
How to see some apps or sections from pages in different screen sizes and they reflow properly
The functionality is valuable, but there is room for improvement in performance.
What do you like best about the product?
As an individual developer, BrowserStack Live allows me to perform real device debugging and style comparisons across multiple devices/browsers without the need for my own equipment. It's easy to use, has low implementation costs, and I use it before every regular regression test. The screenshot/recording evidence is also sufficient, and it really enhances my efficiency.
What do you dislike about the product?
The device loading and session switching are relatively slow during peak hours, with occasional lag, and some models (such as the SIM-equipped iPhone) have a long cold start waiting time, affecting the continuity of debugging experience. If the startup speed and stability can be further optimized, it would be more worthwhile for long-term use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the difficulties I faced as an individual developer in multi-device compatibility and side-by-side comparison: it used to be very difficult to simultaneously check styles and interactions on the iPhone, Android, iPad, and desktop browsers, and it was also inconvenient to reproduce issues in an intranet environment.
Very useful for testing on different browsers and devices
What do you like best about the product?
I am using BrowserStack from last 3 years, and it helped me a lot in my daily testing work. What i like most is that i can run tests on real devices available on the cloud without having to maintain them separately. I utilize it for both manual and automation testing and integrating it with my Selenium Java framework and that was easy setup. Parallel runs of tests are a huge time saver for me, particularly for sanity and regression checks on our e-commerce site. The support team was also responsive whenever i needed assistance.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the test runs are a bit slower compared to local execution, when executing a large test suite. A decent internet connection is also necessary for good performance. Apart from that, the overall experience has been fantastic
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With BrowserStack, I don’t need to keep different devices with me. I can just pick any device or browser from the cloud and run my tests. It also helps me to run tests in parallel and see what is happening in real time, which saves a lot of time and makes debugging easier
cross-browser and mobile app testing made simple
What do you like best about the product?
Makes cross-browser and cross-device testing seamless. I can instantly spin up real devices (iOS/Android) and different browser versions without maintaining my own device lab. The UI is intuitive, speed is good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing can also be a bit steep for small teams or freelancers. Would love to see more generous free usage for individual developers and testers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Able to test our mobile apps across different brands, operating systems, and mobile devices without manually setting up multiple test environments. It saved us time and improved our release quality.
Reliable tool for cross-browser and device testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes it easy to test across a wide range of browsers and devices without having to manage an in-house device lab. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, which helps streamline automated testing. The variety of platforms available saves our QA team a lot of time and ensures better coverage for real user environments
What do you dislike about the product?
At times, there can be slight performance delays and lag during live testing sessions, especially when multiple users are on the system, especially on Android devices. Pricing can also feel a bit high for smaller teams, but overall, the value is strong for medium to large QA teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps our team test across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without maintaining a physical device lab. This ensures faster validation of features, improved cross-browser coverage, and more reliable results when compared to manual in-house testing. It also saves us significant time during regression cycles and reduces the risk of missing issues that only occur in specific environments.
Reliable cross-browser testing made easy
What do you like best about the product?
I really like how seamless it is to spin up different browsers and devices on demand. It saves me a huge amount of time, and I don’t need to worry about setting up local test environments. The integrations with CI/CD tools are also very handy, making it easier to catch issues earlier in the development cycle.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions can be a little slower than running tests locally, especially for more complex builds. The pricing can also feel high for smaller teams, and a few niche devices or older browsers aren’t always available. That said, it’s still a lot more convenient than managing everything in-house.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices without the need to maintain physical hardware or multiple VMs. It ensures that our applications work for all end users, reduces manual setup time, and helps us release faster with more confidence.
Cost cutting mobile testing made easy
What do you like best about the product?
Devise testing made easy for basic and medium features
What do you dislike about the product?
some physical gestures detection missing for some devicses
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile testing without physical devices
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform
What do you like best about the product?
I've been using BrowserStack for almost an year primarily for cross-browser and cross-device testing, and overall, it's been a valuable part of our QA workflow.
The platform offers a wide range of real devices and browsers, which has helped us identify environment-specific issues early. The Live Testing, Automate, and App Live features are particularly useful.
Integration with frameworks like Playwright, Selenium, and CI/CD tools is smooth, and the documentation is mostly clear. Personally I have not tried with this integration however other team members of our organisation have used this.
1.Real device testing gives us confidence before production releases.
2.Parallel test runs really speed up regression testing.
The platform offers a wide range of real devices and browsers, which has helped us identify environment-specific issues early. The Live Testing, Automate, and App Live features are particularly useful.
Integration with frameworks like Playwright, Selenium, and CI/CD tools is smooth, and the documentation is mostly clear. Personally I have not tried with this integration however other team members of our organisation have used this.
1.Real device testing gives us confidence before production releases.
2.Parallel test runs really speed up regression testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
1.Network log enabled Device performances are slower.
2.sometime it gets abruptly closed and we have to restart the device and install the builds again.
3.Occasionally, some devices are slow to load or disconnect during long sessions.
4.it should allow to use multiple sessions per user
2.sometime it gets abruptly closed and we have to restart the device and install the builds again.
3.Occasionally, some devices are slow to load or disconnect during long sessions.
4.it should allow to use multiple sessions per user
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
1.Real device testing gives us confidence before production releases.
2.Parallel test runs really speed up regression testing.
3.Especially we have multiple apps across andorid & IOS which makes our life easier by using browser stack also cost cutting to the company as huge new new device gets launched every 6months or year ,where they need not to spend on the physical device purchase
2.Parallel test runs really speed up regression testing.
3.Especially we have multiple apps across andorid & IOS which makes our life easier by using browser stack also cost cutting to the company as huge new new device gets launched every 6months or year ,where they need not to spend on the physical device purchase
It's a great product for testing mobile solutions.
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is a highly praised platform for offering a wide range of real devices and browsers for testing, allowing you to validate applications and websites across different operating systems conveniently and without the need for physical labs. It stands out for its ease of use, integration with various CI/CD tools, support for automated testing, and the ability to replicate scenarios close to real-world user experience, ensuring greater reliability in results. Furthermore, the variety of mobile devices and browsers available is a major advantage for teams that need to ensure compatibility and quality across different environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
On the other hand, BrowserStack has some drawbacks that can impact the user experience. Its cost is considered high, especially for smaller teams or projects with limited budgets. In some cases, testing can be slow, especially when user traffic is high, and real-time performance isn't always perfect. Another aspect is that, despite the wide variety of devices, newer models may still be missing shortly after market launch, which can limit immediate testing on new hardware or specific operating system versions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves compatibility issues across devices, browsers, and operating systems, allowing you to test websites and applications in real-world environments without the need for a physical lab. It ensures greater test reliability by offering remote access to a wide variety of devices and easily integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automation. This reduces infrastructure costs, accelerates parallel test execution, and facilitates collaboration among distributed teams, ensuring quality and performance across diverse user contexts.
showing 41 - 50