Postman review
What do you like best about the product?
Giving the proper ui so we can use it and can get result
What do you dislike about the product?
Can not give good ui for large data come from api
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Can test apish without ui and tester can verify it without any backend support
Testing your apis is easy with Postman
What do you like best about the product?
Postman has lot of features when it comes to API testing.
You want to try out different apis with Different headers, body, authorization part, its easy to do it (basic understanding of postman is required).
I use this to test devops, azure based apis on periodic basis.
Implmenting & sharing your API collection is also seemless just export and import it!
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing that I dislike about postman as of now
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing out various Azure devops API's for the expected output and automating various tasks in Azure pipeline (after testing the API's via Postman).
Postman - Connect to sources, use different API, API Testing, API Automation anything you want !!
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to configure and use. It is free for simple usage.
What do you dislike about the product?
If we want to test the performance and optimize the code it requires some amount to use the services.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are using it to connect to different sources and get data from the sources. Also we use it to automate the API testing.
Best tool to test different kind of API's
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of grouping requests by domain, parameterizing common features such as credential and URL management. Additionally, I find the ability to execute scripts after calls very useful, allowing for extended testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Editing environment variables does not have a user-friendly interface.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allows early development of APIs without the need for a user-end application. This allows development teams to work independently on the backend and frontend without finalizing the implementation of the APIs.
The Best way to test Links with API
What do you like best about the product?
We operate software that integrates with other platforms through APIs, and Postman simplifies the process of testing and debugging those connections.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far, I haven’t encountered any drawbacks in this software.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It enables us to confidently validate and troubleshoot our APIs in advance, ensuring everything works smoothly before sharing with external stakeholders
Optimizing workflows and reducing manual effort with versatile API features
What is our primary use case?
We use Postman for our day-to-day operations, investigations, and other tasks.
The value of Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, is significant in maintaining and updating API projects, even though we don't use workspaces. I have an idea about the team workspace where I can invite my colleagues, and we can run on the API calls and all the functionalities we try to implement, which are transparent and visible to the other team members or invited members with access to that workspace. It's more about personal workspace and shareable workspace; you can do all your own work and shareable is something that you have to explore with someone else.
We don't have Postman integrated with our CI/CD pipelines; that's not under my expertise, but we do have it.
We use Postman Web; it's not that we bought Postman and integrated it with our cloud environments. It's only an end-user Postman we utilize, not at a full scripting level.
What is most valuable?
From my perspective, Postman offers great features, so I get a better opportunity to run bulk tasks through single command lines and single APIs, and we have an internal Postman AI tool, which helps improvise the code and analyze the quality if you find any errors. Instead of going into Google or ChatGPT or Gemini, the internal Postman AI is superior, and we also schedule certain calls for our operations. It helps reduce almost 90% of the manual effort in processes that we feel could take a lot of manual work.
What needs improvement?
I would appreciate seeing Postman become more automated. We need easier calls in the workflows. I tried to utilize the flows, but it wasn't clear under the documentation, and implementing it required more investigation. Eventually, we understood it, but we still need improvements in flows.
The environments, respective repositories, and collections we have are good for segregation. Another excellent aspect is that when we close Postman, it doesn't straight away terminate everything; it stores the values, which is very useful, as it has data storage and response storage benefits.
Regarding specific features that I'd want to see included in the next releases of Postman, I must say I'm not very involved with it daily. We utilize it in a randomized way—a couple of days or weeks in a month—based on our work dependencies.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Postman for about a year, during my training.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I haven't experienced any crashes or downtimes with Postman; I find it stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, I do find it scalable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I haven't used any other API testing tools apart from Postman.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Postman was easy for individual calls. For the flows, it required additional work.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Postman was one of the best solutions we found while researching, and we got training on it. We have been utilizing Postman from day one during training sessions, and when we checked for others, Postman offered a much easier user experience than the alternatives.
What other advice do I have?
I can say that I'm using Postman with the REST APIs. The adaptability of Postman's support for both REST and SOAP APIs, as well as various data formats such as JSON and XML, is not something we do at that level of Postman. It's about our single time usage or consecutive runs usage, but not at that automation level. We do use a little scripting with REST APIs.
I don't utilize Postman's monitoring capabilities. I don't know anything about the pricing, as I'm working only on the free version of Postman.
Given my experience with Postman, my advice for other organizations or users considering it is that it's pretty simple to use Postman, except for the flows. For the flows, I expect to see more live examples or test cases within the documentation to utilize and learn it more effectively.
I would rate Postman as a product an eight out of ten.
Great for easy API testing
What do you like best about the product?
Great UI and saving history of API testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Lacks some network data features that can be useful for debugging.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Quick API testing.
Postman experience
What do you like best about the product?
It is very straightforward to use and very reliable.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like running it from the browser and I have challenges linking it to the desktop application.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing endpoints in development and testing out third party integrations.
APIs testing- Postman way to go
What do you like best about the product?
Api testing, details like response size, time, dns time and various api support like rest, rpc, graphql etc.
What do you dislike about the product?
Slower than cli based tool, ui focus is more and automation focus is less
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Manual api testing made very early, organizing and sharing api collections, chaining request and workflow testing, collaboration and versioning
Cost efficiency and user satisfaction improve with diverse tool integration
What is our primary use case?
I have not yet used Selenium within the last 12 months; I just completed some POCs, but not actually used it.
There are many other tools that we are working on aside from Selenium.
We use TestIM, Katalon, and those are all UI function tools, and in terms of API, we are working on Postman and Ready API.
Personally, I have been using Postman for seven or eight years plus.
What is most valuable?
Postman is the easiest tool I know, there's no challenge at all. In fact, most of the Postman testing that we do is all locally, but when I say deployment, that deployment is for cloud, and whenever we want to run it in CI/CD, it's all on Azure and AWS, so it's one of the easiest things.
Postman doesn't require much time to deploy, just a few minutes or so. This applies to almost all the tools that we're working on; Selenium is one of the most mature automation framework tools we have, so there's no issue with that.
I don't find anything difficult based on my experience, but the organization of collection, running, and assertions in the last few years have been really good for me; the environment is managed well.
Postman is one of the easiest tools; I have not seen anybody complaining because it's just one Google search away.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
What needs improvement?
I wouldn't say there are weak points or drawbacks for Postman, but there are definitely features that could be improved; for example, if you derive it from Ready API, maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
For how long have I used the solution?
Personally, I have been using Postman for seven or eight years plus.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support for Postman is all good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
What was our ROI?
I don't have exact numbers, but since 70% of APIs are automated, you can say that a minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation; for example, if I take 10 hours to test an API for every release, I can do it in half that time or much faster.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options.
On a per-person basis, I would rate it seven to eight for pricing because whatever they are offering at that price gives huge satisfaction.
What other advice do I have?
We have various projects, and not all the projects use Postman, as we use REST Assured, Ready API, and Postman in two ways: one is manual, where you feed and update the data every time, and the second is automation, where we use both manual and automation methods.
I would recommend this product to others because it's much easier, has a cheaper free version available, is widely used, and has a lot of examples and documentation available.
There are over 50 users of the free version, but for the paid version, there are five plus users.
We're talking about engineers, and that number might vary, but that's the current status I can estimate.
On a scale of one to ten, I rate Postman an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
