Sign in
Sign in
or
Create a new account
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Sonatype Nexus Repository Pro (Self-Hosted)

Sonatype

Reviews from AWS customer

1 AWS reviews
  • 5 star
    0
  • 4 star
    1
  • 3 star
    0
  • 2 star
    0
  • 1 star
    0

External reviews

26 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.

    Thien Phan

Stores artifacts reliably with secure access and detailed file auditing

  • August 26, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I am using the Sonatype Nexus Repository and it's working well with the corporation. I have not purchased the Sonatype Nexus Repository license. Currently, I'm using the free open-source version because its functionality fits the corporation's needs. We do not need to buy for now, but we will purchase it in the future.

I'm using the Sonatype Nexus Repository to store the artifact files, specifically the build files from my company. The project builds into many binary files and images, so I store all of that on Sonatype Nexus Repository. We have retention days for all artifacts. Whenever the server needs to get the binary file, it requests it from the Sonatype Nexus Repository and takes the correct file for deployment. Instead of ECR, AWS has something called ECR and some other services to store binary files, but the Sonatype Nexus Repository open-source is sufficient without any cost.

The Sonatype Nexus Repository is running on AWS Cloud, on EKS as a service. The current functions fit our corporation, and we're presently using it free without the need for a license. However, we plan to buy a license in the future.

What is most valuable?

I integrate the Sonatype Nexus Repository with AWS. The Sonatype Nexus Repository offers detailed file information such as SHA and checksum, which is useful for auditing and ensuring file consistency against unauthorized changes.

Hosting, proxying, and grouping repositories in Sonatype Nexus Repository have no impact on development process time and are perceived as very fast. It simplifies version management by storing a consistent library version, avoiding conflicts.

User policies and granular access control, though not integrated with LDAP or Azure Entra, work well for specific action configurations.

What needs improvement?

We want to change the AWS credentials into an assume role instead of a fixed credential for authentication, but Sonatype Nexus Repository does not support this feature yet. This is a point of exploration for us.

We installed the Sonatype Nexus Repository using an open-source Helm chart but need to test it for credential-less AWS integration. We may seek support in the future.

One of the challenging aspects of the Sonatype Nexus Repository is understanding its procedures, as job scheduling is not fully explained in documentation and logs are cumbersome and unhelpful for issues such as troubleshooting push file errors.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the Sonatype Nexus Repository for nine months.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The setup was done using the Helm chart from Sonatype Nexus Repository. The setup itself is easy but configuring background jobs is difficult since they run at specific times and impact performance but cannot be tested easily.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have been using the Sonatype Nexus Repository for nine months and it has not experienced any downtime or errors, which makes it a reliable solution for our needs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Because we are using the open-source Sonatype Nexus Repository, it is limited to a fixed zone or region. It cannot be changed to support multi-region or multi-zone deployment. Currently, it does not provide high availability.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before using the Sonatype Nexus Repository, we used Harbor to store image files. For artifacts and binary files, we stored them on GitLab. After implementing the Sonatype Nexus Repository, our process became simpler and easier to understand, making it a better solution.

How was the initial setup?

I performed the initial setup and deployment for the Sonatype Nexus Repository using the Helm chart. The setup process required reading extensive documentation about policies, users, storage configuration, credentials, login procedures, and metrics. These aspects were straightforward, but the background job setup was more challenging as we had to wait several days to observe the actions from the background jobs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated several solutions including JFrog, ECR from AWS, and Black Duck. However, these options were too complicated and offered more functionality than we needed. The Sonatype Nexus Repository aligned with our vision, so we chose it after testing all alternatives.

What other advice do I have?

I am a customer and end user of Sonatype Nexus Repository. We will examine the code more thoroughly and need to test it first. Since we installed the Sonatype Nexus Repository using an open-source Helm chart, we need to test its integration with AWS without credentials before potentially contacting support.

Our team pushes libraries to the Sonatype Nexus Repository to store them with fixed versions. Before using Sonatype Nexus Repository, we pulled from external sources, which sometimes caused issues with library versions changing and breaking code.

One of the notable features of Sonatype Nexus Repository is the detailed file information provided for stored files, including SHA and checksums.

I rate the Sonatype Nexus Repository 9.5 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

    Ardhiya C.

Easy to use repository for sharing artifacts within team

  • March 11, 2024
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
I like that it is very easy to use. We are able to simple login to the repository as admins and view all the artifacts that are being used by various proxies and also by various teams. It is also helpful to upload binaries from any server and retrieve them using simple commands. We use Nexus Repository in our daily BAU activities in our devops team.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like the fact that there isnt a better UI for viewing logs. When you are logged in as admins and you would like to view and capture logs, we have to manually set the timer and keep scrolling rather than it being automated.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are able to centrally store artifacts and binaries required for our project. As a team, it is very easy to access these packages and also get version information effectively. Through this centralized repository, we are able to retrieve these artifacts and also their information and use it for developement or provide support to our project accordingly.

    Juan Diego P.

Perfect solution for artifact management

  • January 16, 2024
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Fit all my needs for artifact management. Easy to use, flexible, and easy to integrate into our CI/CD processes.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, it's difficult to understand all the different options provided, and default pricing plans don't always fit any company's needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Single source of truth for our artifacts.

    CuneytGurses

A stable solution that provides a central platform for storing build artifacts, saving us significant maintenance and hardware costs.

  • November 09, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

Our primary tool is Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager. We use it for NPM, Maven, and Docker repositories. Additionally, we utilize Nexus Firewall for repository governance. Looking ahead, I'm considering implementing Nexus Repository Manager 3 as an alternative. This would help us manage packages from Nexus IQ Server and support various package formats such as NPM, Maven, and Docker.

We rely on Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager as our main tool, employing it for NPM, Maven, and Docker repositories. In addition, Nexus Firewall plays a crucial role in our repository governance. As we plan for the future, I'm exploring the option of incorporating Nexus Repository Manager 3. This move would enhance our ability to manage packages from Nexus IQ Server and cater to different package formats like NPM, Maven, and Docker.

What is most valuable?

Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In this regard, Nexus Repository Manager 3 stands out for its comprehensive coverage, accommodating a vast array of packages widely utilized across the globe. This inclusivity enables easy access to a diverse range of packages, making it a pivotal aspect of its functionality.

What needs improvement?

Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently, the grouping functionality is not robust, particularly for Docker images within a group. The support for this aspect seems to be contingent on the license type. For instance, with the Voss license type, there is a noticeable absence of support for this feature. This is an area that could benefit from enhancement in the upcoming updates.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Sonatype Nexus Repository for five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I am, personally, quite satisfied with the stability and would rate it 8 out of 10.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability of this solution a four out of ten. The reason being, it's not very scalable, and significant efforts are required to enhance scalability. There are noticeable limitations that need to be addressed for smoother scalability.Currently, there are approximately forty-eight users working with Nexus Repository in our company. As for future plans, I don't foresee a significant increase in the usage of Nexus Repository.

How are customer service and support?

While it's true that there is no explicit support for various license types, the summer type seems to be highly favored and encouraged among users. It holds a prominent position, perhaps earning a rating of seven for its effectiveness and user adoption.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

It is easy and I would rate it 8 out of 10.The entire deployment process, including installation, manual testing, and all implementation phases, typically takes around one week but only one person is usually sufficient to handle the entire deployment efficiently.

What other advice do I have?

I can confidently recommend this solution. The main reason is its stability. In comparison to other competitors, especially when I consider alternatives like Project X, Nexus stands out as a stable and reliable choice. This reliability is a key factor that makes me feel comfortable recommending it to other users. Based on its performance, I would rate it 8 out of 10.

    Bernard Parinas

Easy-to-scale product with a valuable scanning feature

  • November 06, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We use Sonatype Nexus Repository as a proxy for external packages for internet users. It also helps us manage internal packages and works as a repository for container images.

How has it helped my organization?

The product helped our organization improve runtime efficiency. We do not have to connect third-party vendors while building external packages or storing container-approved images. It allows end-to-end life cycle accessibility.

What is most valuable?

Sonatype Nexus Repository has a valuable internal scanner feature. It automatically scans external artifacts, such as Fortify SAST, before storing them in the repository.

What needs improvement?

There could be more add-on features for the product. They should provide automation for adding container images and artifacts in compliance with security requirements.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Sonatype Nexus Repository for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the product's stability a seven out of ten. Sometimes, there are challenges in mitigating intermittent incidents. There might be factors such as network issues impacting communication.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 20,000 to 40,000 end users for the product. It is easy to scale. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. We use it 24/7.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support team takes time to respond and depends on the nature of the request. We have to keep contacting them. However, the process to create tickets is simple.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked on POCs for different products.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple if you have access to container images. It is a seamless process for upgrading as well. Everything is well documented on the vendor’s official site. They form regular maintenance to comply with organizational requirements. They have a good maintenance process for updating and addressing issues. We have a team of 100 executives working on the current project to maintain components.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Sonatype Nexus Repository an eight out of ten. I advise others to update the business continuity plan for components regularly, i.e., semi-annually or quarterly. Use container images for the next migration or maintenance update. They should secure the user interface. Additionally, they should ensure a good storage process and plan a retention policy for all attacks.

    Axel Niering

Provides proxy repository to Maven and stable solution

  • October 06, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

It's our building background. We use it as a proxy repository to Maven, for example, and we use it to store our own good results and to bring them into production. So it's a turning point for this.

How has it helped my organization?

It works well together with the Nexus IQ. We can check our incoming artifacts from third parties with the help of the Nexus Secure server, which correlates with the Nexus support.

And we can provide good results or products to customers where they can download it from there and bring it into production on servers or something like that. So it's everything in this field.

What is most valuable?

The quality of documentation is good. I can find what I'm looking for every time. Except, there are some mistakes or errors in the backpacks. So, in this case I have to contact support.

What needs improvement?

It is not as well-suited for managing NPM packages as it is for managing Maven packages.

So, there are potential challenges in seamlessly integrating with non-Maven technologies.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this for five years. I am using Sonatype Nexus Repository version 3.48.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product has been stable since the deployment. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We are not using any scaling mechanisms which are provided with this product. We would just use more CPU, something like that. But it's okay. There's not much need for scalability here. Not so many people are accessing the repository right now. So it works fine for us.

There are over 130 end users using this solution.

How are customer service and support?

The customer service and support are good because if there are some problems, we can open a ticket there. And usually, we get help within a day at the latest. Often much earlier.

They are good regarding their speed of response, and the staff is very good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was not challenging. We've changed from Nexus 2, which we have used earlier. So, this was a migration process, which was just a simple turn-on. Just that system is a step on, but however, it worked fine. So there was no real problem.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment took around two months. Two to three people were involved in the process.

We have around five administrators for the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing cost is transparent and cheap. Overall, it is a very good price.

We pay for a license, and the support is connected to it. We regularly communicate with our customer success engineer. And we have the technical support and the documentation. So, there's no extra charge for the support included in the license.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Our company used JFrog.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend examining your processes to determine if they align with this tool, as its history is heavily concentrated on Maven. If your operations involve Maven, this solution is likely the most suitable.

As we primarily focus on Java and Maven, I would give this solution a rating of nine out of ten in such cases.

However, if your emphasis shifts towards NPM products or NuGet, using Nexus is still feasible but may require more effort. The tool is more centered around Maven, making it a bit challenging to seamlessly integrate with NPM.

In such scenarios, opting for a different product might be more favorable. Nevertheless, if your environment revolves around Java or related technologies, Nexus stands out as a top-notch product in the market.

    Financial Services

Excellent product covers all needs of the artefacts management

  • August 10, 2023
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Covers all the repo types for all types of CI builds which ticks the boxes for all development teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
Indexing and caching aren't great from the administration side of things.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It covers all aspects of artefact management both repo and build automation as part of both CI and CD pipelines

    Ganesh L.

it uniquely precise and accurate nexus scales accross every SDLC phases

  • July 10, 2023
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
The best part here is that it has its intelligence of open source tracking vulnerabilities and many licenses types and integrates seamlessly with all the respective microservice applications and also with all the CI/CD tools without any risks by continuous monitoring
What do you dislike about the product?
Repo source code integration with sona type can be enhanced more because some limitations are there which need to be improved as the API's are not plugged in properly when I checked in DevOps pipeline devlopement activities
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hosted central repository from the different namespace of automated version control replacement and the project-related dependencies/libraries and supports many artifacts

    Information Technology and Services

Artifact Repo : Nexus

  • July 06, 2023
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
The fact that it supports multiple repository types like maven, docker, BAR files etc
What do you dislike about the product?
It utilizes a lot of system resources, especially when there is a huge amount of artifacts stored.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We store the BAR files after every build. So every BAR file of previous version is stored and organized efficiently.

    Umashankar M.

Artifacts repository

  • July 04, 2023
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Artifact Management, Support for multiple package formats
What do you dislike about the product?
Resource Requirement, Maintenance and upgrade
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Centralized artifact management, Dependency management and Efficient collaboration.

showing 1 - 10