In our organization, the main use case for using Hyperglance for up to 5,000 sources is to optimize the cost of the cloud by identifying wastage and right-sizing the resources. Apart from that, we also ensure to monitor the security and compliance part with automatic checks and alerts for any kind of violations which may be due to a policy. We also ensure to automate the remediation actions for identified issues. We also improve the efficiency related to operations. Hyperglance connects well whether it is AWS, Azure, GCP, or Kubernetes and works well with everything.
External reviews
54 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Overcoming complex deployment has improved cloud cost control and automated security checks
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance has helped us to save on the cost of cloud through waste reduction. We have saved around 38% in cloud cost. Apart from that, it has also helped us to improve the efficiency of the work by enabling real-time compliance checks with around 78% time saving, which was reported by our teams. It has also enhanced visibility and automates the fixing of costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our ROI on system failures and technology breaches.
What is most valuable?
We have been using Hyperglance for quite a while now, but the features which I personally feel are my personal favorites are that it supports a multi-cloud environment. It can work over Azure, AWS, GCP, and Kubernetes APIs for management unification. Apart from that, it also provides good real-time visualization, interactive diagrams, and dependency mapping for all the resources, which is a great thing. If we are able to map the dependencies at the right time, we are able to identify any issues. It also helps us to automate the recommendations for cost savings, trend analysis, and anomaly detection, which is again a great thing. Codeless automations for fixing common issues and optimizing resources is again a great feature of Hyperglance.
What needs improvement?
The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments. The initial setup and deployment could be a bit challenging.
The setup process of Hyperglance could be easier, and the configuration of network access and permissions for cloud APIs could be done in a more streamlined manner.
The deployment of Hyperglance was a bit tricky as it required network accesses and permissions for the cloud APIs. Our organization had multiple servers and everything was there, so it was a bit challenging for us. That can be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
In my organization, we have been using Hyperglance for almost six years now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability of Hyperglance is good. It can definitely handle enterprise-level traffic.
How are customer service and support?
Hyperglance customer support is very good. We had a word with them three months back when there was an issue with the configuration with one of the systems and they were really prompt and resolved our issue within 45 minutes, which was a very great thing.
I give the customer support a 10 for the customer service.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before Hyperglance, we did not use any solutions. This is the first time we have used this solution.
How was the initial setup?
Hyperglance integration is very good. It is getting integrated with other solutions and we do not feel any kind of glitches or connection errors while connecting with other APIs or applications.
What was our ROI?
We have definitely saved on the time we invested. Operational efficiency increased by 78%. Visibility and automation provided by Hyperglance have helped to prevent costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our rate of investment by 38%. We have also saved on cloud cost, around 30% to 35%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Hyperglance metering and billing experience is a great thing. As Hyperglance is a resource pricing-based model based on the number of cloud resources we are using, in this case up to 5,000, it is not a percentage of your cloud bill. It offers predictable and upfront pricing with no hidden fees, which makes it easy to forecast the cost, and we can easily manage them.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated other options before choosing Hyperglance. We evaluated CloudHealth by VMware, Turbonomic by IBM, Flexera Cloud Management, and CloudZero. Out of them, we found that the cost, security, and the multi-cloud environment is better here, so that is why we chose Hyperglance.
What other advice do I have?
Hyperglance is a great solution to use and it basically gives us this transparency over the billing and other costs, as it is based on the resource-based model. As we fluctuate the usage, we can increase the number of resources and go with that. It also offers a 14-day free trial to evaluate the platform before committing, which is a great thing. I am interested in analyst insights about other solutions. I have provided a review rating of 4 for this solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Improves resource visibility and automates compliance tasks across multi-cloud environments
What is our primary use case?
Hyperglance is known for its excellent visual interactive dashboards that provide a real-time overview of multi-cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes, which makes it significantly easier for teams to understand complex deployments and dependencies.
The platform maps all cloud resources, updates diagrams in real-time, and allows comprehensive search and filtering across infrastructure, which is the basic use case of Hyperglance.
Hyperglance can work with both cloud and hybrid environments, supporting reporting across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes, making it a game changer.
What is most valuable?
Hyperglance has helped our team replace the piecemeal solution and tedious manual documentation we used to do. It has also provided us automation for compliance and cost optimization, proving to be a time saver and directly reducing cloud waste.
Our team integrates it into daily workflows, connecting with tools such as Jira and Slack, serving both technical and compliance stakeholders. The main feature we appreciate is the pay-as-you-go model, accommodating changing infrastructure and sizing up to a 3,000 resource tier.
Customized rule-based automations, such as setting up product rules impacting security, have been beneficial. We have integrated the agentic AI with Hyperglance, assisting with automation and security, quality, and cost control actions.
The best features about Hyperglance include the agentless self-hosted deployment for data privacy and security, real-time interactive visualization of cloud resources, dependency mapping, and inventory or documentation exports in VSDX, PNG, or CSV formats.
It also provides customizable rule-based automations for security, compliance, and cost control actions, which aligns well with my experience in our organization.
Hyperglance integrates seamlessly with other AWS services we use, including S3, EC2, and Lambda, as well as tools such as Jira and Confluence, enabling smooth integration across various functionalities.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a version with similar services at a lower price point could be beneficial.
The cost for small businesses is the main concern. Apart from that, Hyperglance serves as a powerful asset for organizations needing visibility, automation, and control access across multi-cloud environments.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for more than ten years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Hyperglance is definitely a scalable product, and I give it a ten out of ten because it can handle growth from mid-size to large organizations.
How are customer service and support?
Hyperglance team provided excellent support, assisting us in the efficient deployment of the system.
I would rate customer support a ten out of ten, as they have consistently provided prompt responses and assistance whenever needed, reaching out within thirty-five to forty minutes in most cases.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before Hyperglance, we were using Zesty Cloud, but we switched due to rigid policies and pricing points.
How was the initial setup?
It was easy to deploy Hyperglance in our environment, as we already use AWS. Hyperglance team provided excellent support, assisting us in the efficient deployment of the system.
The configuration process was straightforward, and we did not encounter any challenges. Hyperglance team provided all necessary documents and instructions, making the learning curve easy to manage.
What was our ROI?
Hyperglance has provided a good value proposition by saving us time and enabling effective cloud management and security. Compared to competitors such as CloudChecker, CloudHealth, or CloudAdmin, Hyperglance stands out in ROI, visualization, automation, and pricing, saving us seventy-seven percent of our time and thirty-seven percent in costs.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The metering and billing experience with Hyperglance has been excellent, providing a robust pay-as-you-go model where we pay only for the services we require, allowing us flexibility based on our needs, which is an advantage over other platforms.
What other advice do I have?
Hyperglance has helped our organization significantly by providing services on a pay-as-you-go basis, intuitive visualization, robust automation, and real-time compliance monitoring across multi-cloud environments.
Overall, it delivers strong value in cost savings and operational efficiency, offering a competitive model. I give this review a five out of five rating.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Makes Cloud Monitoring and Troubleshooting Much Easier
What do you like best about the product?
Hyperglance provides me with a straightforward, real-time overview of my whole cloud environment without adding unnecessary complexity. I find the visual topology particularly useful, as it enables me to quickly identify issues, grasp how resources are connected, and monitor both security and cost risks. Another aspect I appreciate is its ability to operate across multiple clouds without requiring agents, which simplifies both the initial setup and continued use.
What do you dislike about the product?
At first, the interface can seem a bit overwhelming due to the sheer amount of information displayed on the screen. It takes a while to become familiar with all the features, and the initial learning curve is somewhat steep. I would also appreciate quicker updates to certain integrations, but overall, these are relatively minor concerns.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance allows me to quickly grasp what’s going on across my cloud environments without the hassle of searching through several different consoles. Its automatic highlighting of security and compliance issues not only saves me time but also lowers the chance of overlooking something critical. The visual topology feature speeds up troubleshooting, as I can immediately see how all components are linked. In general, it enhances visibility, cuts down on manual tasks, and helps maintain a cleaner, more secure cloud setup.
Real-Time Cloud Insights, But Pricing may be challenging
What do you like best about the product?
The platform offers real-time data visualizations for cloud resources, making it easier to monitor and understand usage as it happens.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing depends on how many cloud resources you use, and at times, you might notice some lag. The interface may be overwhelming in some cases
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Having access to a comprehensive, 3D visualization of the entire IT infrastructure is not just visually impressive, but also extremely helpful for grasping complex relationships and dependencies. It also makes it much easier to identify opportunities for cost reduction.
Have improved resource visibility and reduced costs through automated optimization tasks
What is our primary use case?
Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] is used in our organization to visualize, manage, and optimize multi-cloud infrastructures. It is very efficient and effective while we do that. Cloud cost optimization is what we use it for in the primary way, along with resource visualizations, and security and compliance monitoring. Ensuring that the cloud infrastructures meet the industry security and compliance standards is something very useful that Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provides.
Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] helps businesses monitor their cloud cost in real time by visualizing where money is being spent and identifying opportunities to reduce waste. It also provides actionable recommendations to optimize cloud expenses. This is especially valuable in environments with complex and large-scale deployments, allowing us to track and manage the cloud spending across multiple cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, or GCP.
Managing resources across multiple cloud platforms in a single interface is a significant advantage with Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go]. In our companies, we are using multiple cloud providers to avoid vendor lock-in, and this allows us to manage and optimize resources across all these platforms in one place.
What is most valuable?
The cost optimization and management features of Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are quite beneficial. Other than that, resource visualization and management are valuable, and the security features including security monitoring and compliance are also something good. Automated evaluations for optimizations and multi-cloud resource management are some of the main features which have been helpful.
Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] has positively impacted our organization through cost reduction for data workloads. In our company, we are running large-scale data tasks, such as machine learning models training on AWS EC2 instances, and we noticed escalating costs over time due to high-performance instances being used for non-intensive tasks. Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provided a visual representation of our cloud resources and usage, showing which EC2 instances were underutilized or overprovisioned. It recommended resizing the instances based on actual usage, which led to a reduction of 30% to 35% in cloud spending. The company was able to optimize instance types for data preprocessing and training, significantly lowering the compute cost without sacrificing performance. This helped our projects to keep within budget.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] needs to make the user experience more effective, especially for data science and tech teams. There are a few key areas for improvement. The current limitations in Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are heavily focused on cloud environments and may not offer the same visibility in hybrid infrastructure. Better hybrid integrations can be added, for example, with data centers, local storage, and private servers. More granular resource-level metrics for data science applications would excel the visualization for cloud resources. The cost forecasting and budgeting tools are available, but the predictive analytics can be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
In my current field, I have been working for two and a half years. Earlier I was an intern, and I have converted to full-time in the past nine months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] scales well for our team. The resource scale pricing available through AWS Marketplace seems good. The UI performance, resource count pricing, and the initial setup complexities were very good. As our project size grows, Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] helps us to keep them under control from a financial perspective. We will need to monitor how quickly our infrastructure is growing and then ensure our implementation is also resourced, planned, and handled with clarity.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] is proactive and helps us to achieve everything. Even with simple questions, they help us to work through things, and the support has been very proactive. Customer support is very active and good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten. It is very supportive, and the team has helped us from setup through any issues we face.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched from a different company to Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] for better resource visibility and optimization. The previous solution had streamlined cloud cost management, but Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] offered more simplified compliance and security monitoring. We made the switch for cost savings, efficiency gains, and real-time visibility.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The subscription fee for Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] was around $180 to $200. We have been using the enterprise plans for our organization. We have around 5,000 per month, and we can spend more because the scope of usage requires different support levels. With GCP, we used it on different platforms, and the cost was around 3,000, depending on the size of the team we are working with and the complexity we are building.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The other options we considered were Cloud by VMware, AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management and Billing, and Spot.io, which is Spot by NetApp. However, we started with Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go].
What other advice do I have?
Wherever cloud is being used and teams want to make efficient compliance in that particular organization, Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] is effective for the entire team because it has everything from real-time instances to clusters and storage, and everything would be covered. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.
Hyperglance is great for Cloud!
What do you like best about the product?
I like how we are able to utilize real time data visualizations of cloud resources. Makes it easier to identify, and build with dependencies. Also has automate compliance and alerting.
What do you dislike about the product?
Lagging performance, and sometimes the costs. pay-as-you-go pricing is based on the number of cloud resources, not a percentage of your cloud bill, which can lead to significant savings and a quick return on investment for many users. However, some reviews note that the cost may be high for small teams, and the comprehensive interface can be overwhelming for new users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hello, it is giving us an easy to utilize and view UI into the services that support our microservices ecosystem. Data driven insights to help drive refactoring efforts, static code analysis, and clean up of our infrastructure. Easy to utlize UI for our serverless efforts. Allows us to track costs per service [ex. Ec2/s3], per day/month/quarter/annual etc... And expense by resource type.
Clear, visual, and super helpful for cloud management
What do you like best about the product?
This tool makes it much easier to visualize and monitor cloud infrastructure. It has saved me a significant amount of time when trying to understand and track dependencies.
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be better if there were more real-time alerting options available, as well as greater flexibility to customize dashboards.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Shows all cloud resources and relationships in one view. Helps me spot issues quickly and manage infrastructure efficiently.
How Hyperglance Automates Cost Optimization and FinOps
What do you like best about the product?
the best thing about Hyperglance is its ability to turn complex, multi-cloud chaos into a clear, visual map where cost, security, and operational issues are not just identified, but can be fixed automatically.
What do you dislike about the product?
initial complexity and cost structure for smaller organizations.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
replacing time-consuming manual processes like inventory tracking and auditing with a real-time, interactive visual topology map of all cloud resources across platforms like AWS, Azure, and Kubernetes, which drastically reduces engineering hours spent on troubleshooting and documentation.
Helpful Tool for Cloud Cost and Security Management
What do you like best about the product?
The dashboards and reports offer a lot of flexibility, allowing us to create exactly what we need. We can set up alerts, monitor budgets, and observe trends, among other features.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance lags sometimes, especially when dealing with very large environments or big visual diagrams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows us to track where our cloud spending goes, identify unnecessary expenses, and maintain the security of our setup. As a result, we save time, reduce costs, and find it easier to manage our cloud projects.
Has improved governance and reduced manual work by providing real-time visibility and compliance checks across a complex cloud environment
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Hyperglance with up to 10,000 resources in GovCloud is managing cloud security, compliance, and resource visibility at scale. It helps monitor configurations, spot potential risks, and maintain governance across a large environment without needing multiple tools.
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance has improved our organization by giving us a single view of all resources across GovCloud. It helps us quickly identify misconfigurations, maintain compliance, and reduce manual work that used to take hours. The automated checks and clear visualization have made our cloud management process much more efficient and reliable.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features for me have been the real-time resource mapping and compliance checks. The mapping makes it easy to see relationships between resources, while the compliance tools help us stay aligned with security standards without extra effort. Together, they save time and reduce risk in managing a large GovCloud environment.
What needs improvement?
One area where Hyperglance could improve is performance speed when dealing with very large environments, as sometimes the visual maps take longer to load. The reporting could also be more customizable to fit different compliance frameworks. For future releases, it would be helpful to have deeper integration with more third-party security tools, enhanced alerting options, and expanded automation for remediation tasks. These additions would make the platform even more powerful for large-scale cloud management.
For how long have I used the solution?
I’ve been using Hyperglance for managing up to 10,000 resources in GovCloud for the past year. The tool has been reliable in giving me clear visibility and control over our cloud environment. It makes resource management, security checks, and compliance much easier compared to manual tracking. The interface is straightforward, and scaling hasn’t been an issue. Overall, it has saved me time and reduced errors when dealing with such a large number of resources.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously relied on native AWS tools along with a mix of spreadsheets to track resources. We switched to Hyperglance because managing up to 10,000 resources became too complex and time-consuming. Hyperglance gave us a single, centralized view with stronger compliance checks and better automation, which made the switch worthwhile.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for Hyperglance is fair considering the scale it supports, but it’s important to match the plan to the size of your environment. For teams managing thousands of resources, the value comes from the time saved and the reduced risk of compliance issues. I’d advise others to look beyond the cost and consider the efficiency gains and long-term savings it provides.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated a few other options such as CloudCheckr and native AWS Config. While those tools offered useful features, Hyperglance stood out because of its real-time visualization, compliance automation, and ability to handle large-scale GovCloud environments more efficiently.
What other advice do I have?
Hyperglance is a solid choice if you’re managing a large GovCloud environment and need clear visibility, compliance support, and automation. My advice would be to invest some time in setting up the dashboards and alerts to match your workflows. Once that’s done, the platform becomes a powerful time-saver.
showing 1 - 10