We are using CrowdStrike Falcon for endpoint protection across the organization.

I think the UI could be improved, but the technical support said CrowdStrike will improve the UI in the near future. But right now, it’s so messy.

We have been using it maybe since last year.

It's stable, and we already forgot—it just installed and forgot.

Technical support is quite good. We can just WhatsApp the technical easily.

This is our first time using CrowdStrike.

It's easy to implement the product and we are already up and running in five minutes.

The pricing is still manageable. I think it's about five or six thousand per year. No additional cost for maintenance or support; it's all included in the quotation.

I don’t know if I need to recommend it. I think the overall solution should be rated a ten out of ten.

We are a small company using CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security for next-generation endpoint security and antivirus protection. We do not have dedicated threat hunters on the platform and primarily use it for endpoint protection.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security helps us ensure that our endpoints are protected, which was essential for achieving the Cyber Essentials Plus certification. It also allows us to demonstrate to partners that we are diligent about protecting both our data and theirs.

The most effective feature is the machine learning aspect, which detects unauthorized scripts and potential data exfiltration. It provides alerts on suspicious command executions, helping us safeguard our systems.

The user interface needs improvement as it's sometimes difficult to locate specific dashboards or reports. Simplifying the naming of elements in the UI could make it easier and more intuitive for users.

We have been using the solution for about six months.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon for companies of all sizes, from small businesses like ours to some of the largest companies in the world.

We do not expect to get a direct ROI. It is an expense we are willing to pay to conform to Cyber Essentials Plus and demonstrate responsibility in protecting our data and that of our partners. It also helps in mitigating third-party risks.

The pricing for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is reasonable, especially for small companies with limited budgets. It is essential for achieving Cyber Essentials Plus and is cheaper than solutions like Splunk for Next Gen SEAM.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is not recommended for highly sensitive data environments, such as government intelligence services, where cloud products might not be suitable.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security extensively for maintaining endpoint security. It is mainly used to protect systems against malicious binaries. In our cloud environment, we use it by deploying agents on our cloud instances operating in AWS and GCP to protect these instances from malicious binaries.

The solution has significantly enhanced our incident response times when dealing with malware or possible malicious file activities. It allows me to log into machines and pull copies of suspected files, eliminating the need to physically obtain the machines for analysis.

The most valuable features are the real-time response, which allows me to log into a machine to pull files and check signatures for malicious activities, and the ability to restrict USB block storage usage on endpoints by policy.

There is room for improvement in the solution's ability to handle Linux systems. It does well for Windows, but it relies on binary scanning for Linux and lacks comprehensive rules for detecting suspicious behavior. I have had to develop my own custom rules in CrowdStrike for Linux.

I have been using this product extensively for about the past four years.

Apart from the recent media attention for causing some instability worldwide, the solution is quite stable and I haven't had any major concerns.

The solution scales very well, with the only limitation being the licensing purchased.

I have used Carbon Black extensively in the past.

The initial setup is mostly straightforward. They provide a simple way to deploy the endpoint, simplifying the installation process for users.

The solution is quite expensive. The pricing fluctuates based on various factors such as company size, and there is room for negotiation, but it is generally expensive enough that most midsize companies find it difficult to afford.

I would advise first-time users to monitor the number of endpoints regularly to ensure they are checking in. Additionally, they should add custom detections for Linux to identify unexpected behaviors, as the default detection for Linux is not very comprehensive.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I sell and resell CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security as part of my company's cybersecurity portfolio for endpoint detection platforms.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security assists in detecting malware and provides effective security solutions without the need for hardware servers, saving resources on infrastructure.

I find the easy installation process, quick detection capabilities, and the cloud-based console very useful for this solution.

CrowdStrike had a significant issue with Windows integration two months back. The pricing is very high and should be improved.

I have been working with and reselling CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security for five years.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very stable, and I would rate it at ten out of ten for stability.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is scalable. I would rate its scalability as seven out of ten.

The technical support is very easy to reach and helpful; I would rate it as ten out of ten.

My company is an integrator, and I handle the deployment and implementation process personally.

The pricing of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very high, and I would rate the current pricing as four out of ten.

I also work with Microsoft and ESET as part of my company's cybersecurity portfolio for endpoint detection platforms.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security because it provides excellent services for endpoint security and is very effective as a security solution.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We primarily use CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security as an XDR (Extended Detection and Response) solution, focusing on antivirus and malware protection.

It has been effective in protecting against common virus alerts, operating as a reliable security measure.

The most valuable feature is the auto-detection capability for threat hunting and issuing advisories on remedies.

The main area for improvement is pricing, as it is quite expensive. We are also curious about how it will interact with other AI tools, however, we have not encountered any limitations.

I use the solution lightly, not extensively.

It has been stable, with no observed glitches.

The solution is scalable enough, as we are managing more than 4,000 endpoints.

The customer support is very good, earning a rating of nine out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward as it is cloud-based and one person is sufficient for installation.

We are budget-conscious and look for cost-effective solutions that can do the job efficiently.

Pricing is expensive. That said, if it does the job and is cost-effective, we go for it.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

CrowdStrike Falcon is used primarily to enhance cloud security through a lot of automation in the platform. It provides benefits like automation, efficacy, and lower risk, allowing security analysts to focus on high-value tasks.

By deploying CrowdStrike Falcon, the organization can repurpose security analysts to focus on more high-value tasks due to the automation. It also optimizes on licensing because CrowdStrike covers a significant number of capabilities, which allows for the replacement of several vendors, thus reducing licensing and labor costs.

The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon include its automation capabilities, efficacy, and lower risk. It also helps optimize on licensing since it covers a wide range of capabilities.

The SIEM needs to be more developed. Additionally, AI features could be enhanced.

I have been using the solution for only one year.

On a scale of one to ten, the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is nine.

CrowdStrike Falcon is very scalable. I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.

As far as I know, the technical support for CrowdStrike is rated as another nine out of ten.

One person from the partner side and two people from the customer side are usually involved in the installation process.

One person from our side and about one or two people from the customer's side are generally involved.

CrowdStrike Falcon is definitely affordable compared to competitors in the market. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as eight out of ten, indicating some room for improvement.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We like the solution's management and monitoring tools for our network. We use it to monitor our network between workstations and outside our organization. The AI provides useful visualizations of our network on a dashboard.

The tool is expensive.

We started using the product early this year.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very expensive for us. Last month, we had a big issue that took much time and money to resolve. It slowed down our business and required our management team to get involved. We had a problem similar to the "Blue Screen of Death" issue many US companies faced. This incident used up many of our IT resources in just a few months. That's why we're looking for a replacement tool now.

It costs us about 400,000 US dollars, and we also spend about 10,000 US dollars more on other security products.

I rate the solution as one out of ten. We must replace this software. We plan to buy a replacement for it as soon as possible.

I use the solution in my company to collect information about protecting the endpoint, configuration assessment, and vulnerability assessment.

The solution's most valuable feature is its threat emulation part, but there are many other important features for cybersecurity security, including endpoint protection. However, vulnerability management is for prevention, and so on.

In terms of the improvements, a detailed profile for the users for the administration of the assets will be provided so they can see the events directly on the platform if needed. In order to see events, with our policies, it should be possible from the specific assets; a user should be able to see the events related to the datasets. One of the main concerns about the tool is that the solution provides features without detailed profiles for those who should see what type of information.

The tool should do some more tests before going for updates automatically.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security for around a year. I am a user of the tool.

In terms of stability, a few days ago, there was a huge issue with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security. There are some issues with the tool's stability. Many airports faced issues as airplanes were delayed in July 2024. It was a large event that left a bad impact worldwide.

I rate the tool's stability as a six out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The tool is used in telecommunications.

Around 20 people use the tool with the administration team.

I think there is a plan to increase the number of users, and it is necessary to provide this information for the different operational areas where there are a lot of people.

The support team is not able to resolve our issues in a timely manner. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

The product's initial setup phase is easy. If ten is easy, I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight out of ten.

It takes a long time to deploy the product since we have a large pack of devices here. We have a lot of different types of devices, so we need to be careful when implementing the functionalities and the agents.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model, but we are planning to go to the cloud.

The solution can be deployed in around six months.

My company has evaluated tools for vulnerability management.

In terms of the threat detection capabilities, it is a good product. It is a good tool, considering all the information it provides and the automation it delivers.

In terms of the automation part, the tool has some rules that can be applied automatically. I can identify or be aware about a specific event with the help of the tool.

In terms of the improvements I have seen in my company using the tool, I would say that it offers a clear visualization of all the threats that could be on our network. I can see all types of vulnerabilities that could be dangerous or critical for us.

For now, it seems the tool is a good solution for protecting endpoints and mainly for the areas that are using Windows-operated systems.

I recommend the tool to others. It seems that when we installed the agent, it became a solution that could provide a lot of information in a centralized way.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is user-friendly.

The tool's scalability is low.

I have been working with the product for one year.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability a four out of ten. My company has 2000 users.

I haven't contacted support yet.

I rate the tool's installation a seven out of ten. You need two resources to maintain it.

I rate the overall solution a five out of ten.

We give MDR services to many clients and extend the basic capabilities with these modules.

The automation capabilities that the tool has in order to automate responses and actions.

It's quite easy to use, as I understand the feedback from the team.

It is effective for detecting and mitigating threats.

We are automating a lot. So, it offers good automated response capabilities.

There are some issues with certain applications. We have been having some problems with Microsoft Teams and other applications.

So, there were some integration issues with this product.

The main concerns are occasional maintenance issues, less than perfect stability, and complexity compared to SentinelOne.

We have been CrowdStrike partners for three years and have been using ASPM for one year.

The agent is usually stable, but there have been recent instances of high CPU usage. In general, it works fine.

Overall, I would rate the stability a nine out of ten, one being unstable and ten being very stable. So, there's always room for improvement.

In our experience with clients no larger than 10,000 endpoints, it's scalable.

I am not sure about the large infrastructure for around 20,000 to 50,000 endpoints because it is complex for a large infrastructure.

The customer service and support are satisfactory.

We are CrowdStrike partners and have a client that uses Kaspersky, but we are looking at what kind of analysis and comparisons are available in the market.

It's easy. In general, all of the CrowdStrike modules and deployments are easy.

We provide support to the client, and the IT people install it. There are no problems because some clients have better tools to deploy, but there are many ways to do the deployment. It's easy, and we have a 24/7 support team. Deployment doesn't consume many hours.

It's easy to maintain, but sometimes there are issues with particular applications. Those have to be worked around, but in general, there are no other issues.

One engineer is enough to deploy the solution.

It's not the cheapest, but the price is fair. Some clients find it expensive, but it's scalable and has many modules.

So, the price is not too high, it is okay.

We have tried others but ultimately decided to provide MDR service only with CrowdStrike. We tested Microsoft and Palo Alto Cortex.

We do a lot of incident response, and we chose CrowdStrike for its superior features in that field. The alerts are clearer, and the capabilities are much better than the others.

But, it's a complex product. SentinelOne, for example, is much easier to use but lacks the same capabilities. For an EDR, it's better to have experts handling it and utilizing all the features CrowdStrike offers.

So, CrowdStrike is a bit complex compared to SentinelOne. It's more complex because it has more features and configuration options, but not inherently complex. The solution is complex because it's very good and has a lot of customization options.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.