My main use case for Anaconda Business is centralized package management and security and compliance for a private repository and team collaboration with enterprise integration in my work.

For example, my company has 50 data scientists working on different machine learning projects. Normally, everyone installs packages such as NumPy, Pandas, or TensorFlow directly from the public internet, which can cause problems including different versions of the same package causing conflicts, security vulnerabilities, or unapproved licenses, and a lack of control over what is being downloaded from the internet. With Anaconda Business, the IT admin team can host a central private repository of approved packages, block or restrict unapproved or risky packages, and ensure everyone in the company installs the same secure versions of libraries.

Anaconda Business has positively impacted my organization by enhancing security and compliance, providing a consistent environment across teams, improving productivity, ensuring reliable package availability even offline, streamlining governance and control, and allowing better integration with enterprise systems.

Before using Anaconda Business, our data scientists faced issues such as package version conflicts and broken dependencies when setting up environments for new projects, which has now improved productivity.

Anaconda Business's best features in my experience are a secure, curated package repository, centralized package management, access control and governance, enterprise deployment options, reproducible environments, integration with enterprise tools, and commercial support and SLAs.

Out of those, I find myself relying on centralized package management the most day-to-day as an especially valuable feature.

Interaction and speed can be improved.

I have been using Anaconda Business for one year.

Anaconda Business is stable in my experience; I do not encounter any downtime or issues.

Anaconda Business's scalability has been able to grow with my organization's needs.

I have not interacted with their support team, so I do not have an opinion on customer support.

Anaconda Business is the first solution we have used.

I have seen a return on investment; our employees can complete tasks in less time compared to previously, which is a great help.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.

Before choosing Anaconda Business, I evaluated other options such as Miniconda.

Anaconda Business is good. My advice for others looking into using Anaconda Business is that it is best to collaborate with teams, it is easy to use, and its scalability is better. I give this product a rating of 9 out of 10.

Anaconda Business serves as the main solution for security and compliance, scanning packages and vulnerabilities for our organization while ensuring air-gapped and on-premise environment safe access.

Anaconda Business helps with security and compliance by blocking public packages that have malwares or license risks, keeping our company data, science, and environment secure and compliant.

It mostly helps with security and compliance by providing a safe and curated package repository and checking for vulnerabilities by scanning it, so our teams can only use trusted, approved Python or R packages.

The best features Anaconda Business offers in my experience include a secured package repository, vulnerability scanning, team collaboration tools, and enterprise integration, license, and user tracking.

The repository feature of Anaconda Business ensures that only trusted, verified Python or R packages can be used, and for integration and licensing, it helps to meet compliance requirements that we need, mainly aiding in safe, controlled, and easy Python or R management for enterprise data.

Anaconda Business positively impacts our organization by protecting us from compliance and security risks while keeping the environment consistent, allowing our team to focus on insight and innovation instead of worrying about setups, security, and software issues.

Anaconda Business provides a 60 to 70% faster environment setup, zero security incidents, lower compliance costs, and better productivity.

Anaconda Business can be improved by offering faster package updates, an enhanced user interface, better cloud integration, more detailed analytics, and improved collaboration tools.

While it is already a strong security control, it could be better with faster updates, easier usage, and deeper integration.

Anaconda Business can be improved in terms of collaborative platform features or by making it faster.

I have been using Anaconda Business for the past one year.

Anaconda Business is stable in my experience.

I rate Anaconda Business's scalability a nine.

I would rate the customer support a seven. I have not had any experiences with Anaconda Business customer support.

I did not previously use a different solution; this is the first one and we are using it from the beginning.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.

We are developers and not a partner; we provide some of our support or development to our clients, but we do not have a business relationship with the vendor beyond being a customer.

I have seen a return on investment with time saved by 50% and less downtime, allowing the team to deliver projects faster with fewer errors.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.

Before choosing Anaconda Business, we first thought about Docker.

I rate Anaconda Business 8 out of 10.

I chose 8 out of 10 due to the need for a faster environment and the collaboration tools can be improved.

I advise others looking into using Anaconda Business that it is best to use it over Docker or other options since it is faster, easy to use, and easy to collaborate.

I found this interview good, better, faster, and friendly, and I do not think anything should change for the future. My overall review rating for Anaconda Business is 8 out of 10.

I use Anaconda for predictions, building models, and incorporating them within the product for specific use cases.

Anaconda is an open-source platform that can integrate numerous other kits and models in one place. It offers effective package management capabilities that are beneficial. By having control over the integrations, I can do them myself without limitations.

There is room for improvement, especially regarding deployment. The process could be streamlined as the number of actions needed to deploy is quite large compared to other tools.

I have been using Anaconda for the past eight or nine years.

The stability of Anaconda is comparable to other tools used in data science. There are always performance issues within data science, but Anaconda is not different from others.

Anaconda does not have scalability restrictions as it depends on the type of machine running it.

I have no experience with Anaconda's technical support.

I have used other data science platforms like H2O.ai and Dataiku but prefer Anaconda due to its open-source nature, which allows better control over what I can do.

Anaconda is an open-source tool, so I do not pay anything for it. It is compatible with every tool, regardless of whether it is open source or a paid package.

I have previously used Dataiku, H2O.ai, and Databricks for data science solutions.

The biggest disadvantage is the amount of time needed for deployment to production. My overall experience with Anaconda is positive, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Anaconda for data science model and development, specifically for coding in Python. We use it mainly for forecasting and predicting models within the environment of Anaconda Python.

Anaconda has been very beneficial for our organization. The integration between different utility projects and the overall efficiency for data science and machine learning tasks has been very helpful. It provides a coding environment that saves time in setting up individual tools.

Anaconda has multiple valuable features. It provides a unified platform where you can install Jupyter, Python Spider, and other related tools without needing separate installations. The ability to work on multiple programming languages like Python, R, and Ruby is also significant. One of the best aspects is the community support.

Anaconda consumes a significant amount of processing memory when working on it. This is something that needs improvement as it can impact performance.

I have been using Anaconda for four years.

Anaconda is stable ninety percent of the time. However, there are occasional delays due to high memory consumption.

There is generally no need to scale Anaconda. The tool has minimum system requirements that need to be met for optimal performance.

Anaconda has great community support, and its technical support is also helpful.

The initial setup of Anaconda is straightforward. One person is enough for the installation and deployment.

Anaconda is cost-saving as it is open-source and the installation is easy. There is no need for a pricing structure for the basic version.

Anaconda does not require a pricing structure, and it is available as an open-source tool. The features of Python, Jupyter, and others are free to use.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I use the tool for Jupyter Notebook.

The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.

Anaconda could benefit from improvement in its user interface to make it more attractive and user-friendly. Currently, it's boring.

I have been using the product for five years.

Four to five developers use the product.

I haven't contacted the tool's support team for any help or questions. I primarily use it for one of its services, and I write my own code within that service, so I haven't felt the need to contact support.

The product is straightforward and self-explanatory. Users can easily follow the next steps provided and install it without much difficulty.

The tool is open-source.

Some basic tutorials can be found on YouTube, which can help you understand how Anaconda services work. Watching these tutorials can make it easier for someone to use the product. Using it for the first time can be considered at a medium difficulty level, neither too easy nor too difficult. The package management system has greatly improved my development process. I can easily install and incorporate any package I need into my work. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Voice Configuration and Environmental Management Capabilities are the most valuable features.

If we want to do some big applications, then we need to install a lot of packages. It also takes up a lot of space.

I have been using Anaconda for six years.

It is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment took twenty to thirty minutes.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Anaconda can't handle heavy workloads. From an improvement perspective, I want Anaconda to be able to handle heavy workloads.

For some enterprise versions or wherever there is a need for cloud-based tools to deal with large amounts of data, I feel that it would be good if Anaconda has a partnership or is able to integrate with Databricks.

I have experience with Anaconda for years.

In my company, around 10 to 30 people were using the product.

In my company, I use Databricks 90 percent of the time.

I have not encountered any challenges during the deployment process of Anaconda, especially considering that I haven't worked on heavy data.

My company uses the free version of the tool. There is also a paid version of the tool available.

In terms of development, Anaconda is better than Databricks because computing costs are involved while using the latter tool. If the data is not too large and if a company can work on sample scripts while ensuring that within the organization, everything gets standardized, development can be done on Anaconda, and then users can run production scripts on Databricks because it is popularly used considering the heavy data it can manage.

I have used the product for data engineering and for ML models.

Anaconda's ability to streamline our company's workflow in data analysis has pros and cons attached to it. In terms of pros, Anaconda's advantage over Databricks revolves around the use of system resources. Everything in Databricks is on an online computing basis, where our company uses the product's resources, but our own resources aren't utilized. In our company, we have heavy machines with us, but they aren't used when we use Databricks. I think some small-scale workloads can be handled in Anaconda. In terms of the entire lifecycle, I think Databricks has a lot of advantages over Anaconda. You have features that help you revive old models or deploy your models within the same Databricks. Databricks offers an end-to-end lifecycle over Anaconda.

Working with the integrations of various libraries and tools within Anaconda, I have not faced any issues. Anaconda offers advantages to its users when the workload or data is not much. I am not sure if the paid version of the product is on a computing basis, but if it is, then there is not much of a difference between Anaconda and the other products in the market. As per my understanding, even the enterprise version can be hosted on the company servers, so there are not many costs involved.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. The product can be useful in multiple sectors other than the financial sector. In the financial sector, Anaconda can be useful if the workloads are very low, there are many non-priority tasks, and the data is not much used. Issues occur when teams working in collaboration want to use Anaconda and Databricks together. I can use Anaconda for non-heavy tasks. I can go with Databricks for heavy tasks. It would be good if Anaconda and Databricks could have integration capabilities. For computing, you can use Anaconda and the resources from Databricks.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.