My company uses Kong Enterprise for ISC, so if we need data in one place or one application, we use the solution to retrieve the data with the help of REST API.
External reviews
314 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
The tool offers its users with great integration capabilities and a good overall stability
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it seamlessly supports a vast number of tools. The integration capabilities the tool offers are smooth, and I don't see any hiccups there.
What needs improvement?
There is a tool called Apigee. Apigee has a portal where you can inspect the APIs and do a live tracing of the API, features that are missing in Kong Enterprise and Azure API Management. I am unsure if something else needs to be considered for improvement. Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays. With live tracing of the APIs, you can see how the request is going and where it gets stuck, what the actual input was, what the response is, and all that information we can see with the help of live requests, which is impossible in Kong Enterprise. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the solution. With Kong Enterprise, you can examine after the fact, but why it happens can't be examined.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have experience with Kong Enterprise. My company is a customer of the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has been stable so far in my company.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I can't comment on the solution's stability since my company is still in its development phase.
How are customer service and support?
For support, a group was created with the help of Microsoft Teams. My company hasn't contacted the actual support team of Kong Enterprise.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Apigee in the past. You can do the live tracing of APIs in Apigee, but it is not possible in Kong Enterprise.
How was the initial setup?
The solution's deployment was done in a couple of weeks.
Our company has not gone live with the product since we are still in the solution's development phase.
The solution's deployment model has changed from an on-premises to a cloud one.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
It was not my company but our company's service provider who gave us Kong Enterprise.
What other advice do I have?
Kong Enterprise is a good solution with a few missing features, especially the one provided by Apigee, which is the live tracing of APIs.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
The solution provides protocol transformation and allows each client to have a specific UI experience
What is our primary use case?
We had worked for a client from the travel industry who wanted to propose an API manager. They had built microservices on Java and another integration tool. They wanted to apply policies, register their APIs in the API manager, and enforce policies and plugins, like client ID, client secret, throttling, rate limiting, and protocol transformation. The client wanted to apply these things to their APIs.
What is most valuable?
Protocol transformation is the most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise.
Kong Enterprise allows a lot of customizations that provide a specific UI experience for each client.
What needs improvement?
The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kong Enterprise for the past six to eight months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not seen any stability issues so far with Kong Enterprise. None of our customers have reported any issues with the solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Kong Enterprise is a scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
No setup is required for Kong Enterprise because it has a complete cloud setup. You pay for a license, get credentials, and start registering your API and applying policies. It's completely cloud-based. We also have some open-source options where you set up the API manager on your Kubernetes clusters or dockers and register your API in the on-prem Kong API manager.
What other advice do I have?
The solution requires maintenance, but I haven’t heard of any maintenance challenges so far.
A user's decision to choose Kong Enterprise or MuleSoft varies from use case to use case. Users should do a detailed technical assessment before choosing Kong Enterprise, MuleSoft API manager, or any other API manager tools available in the market.
Overall, I rate Kong Enterprise an eight out of ten.
Best gateway in the market
What do you like best about the product?
Lightweight with low cost on infrastructure to run.
Major features come out of the box enterprise plugin
Support multi-cloud deployment and integration
Easy to customize the developer portal
Major features come out of the box enterprise plugin
Support multi-cloud deployment and integration
Easy to customize the developer portal
What do you dislike about the product?
Product Roadmap - time to delivery can be improved
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Gateway service for all our microservice-based architecture. Runs on container and also support ingress controller requirement.
Fast and easy
What do you like best about the product?
Fast and high throughput support as always.
What do you dislike about the product?
Api dependency is fixed now and works smooth
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use it as an open-source API gateway for managing my microservices. I also used it for verifying JWT.
Kong API Gateway Review for API aggregation
What do you like best about the product?
now the API Gateway is much more stable.
What do you dislike about the product?
Things lloks good. i do not have anything to advice for
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As I mostly use microservices (docker containers), so kong is a really good option as an API Gateway. it's support for docker is really good and easy. that is why I use cong for projects.
Amazing & Lighting Fast API Gateway
What do you like best about the product?
Light Weight, Easy to Install & Configure and Super Fast
What do you dislike about the product?
Traceability Features & Access of Logs, RBAC
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
API Management
API Security
API throtling
API Security
API throtling
Kong API Gateway
What do you like best about the product?
The first thing of Kong API that ilI like the Most is it's popularity among the World. Can be used in both Hybrid and Multi cloud, it's well optimised for Microservices. It supports Load Balancing of API that's what the most I like of it. We can do clustering, checking health, monitoring few more things. It can even run in Kubernetes. It's Open Source the most Important thing.
What do you dislike about the product?
The part that I don't like of Kong API gateway is we need more Integration with Kubernetes. Need more Medium post on Kong API gateways. Some times issue with connection it's get refused sometimes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The most Important thing that Kong API gateway solving for me is that it have a large community that you can use to grow. It's open source making itself a large community. Scaling plays a main role as we need to it when traffic is high or when the network is congested Kong is the solution for this use it, if we are facing issue with scalling.
Best API gateway tool -Load Balancing and reverse Proxy workd pretty well and configured.
What do you like best about the product?
Kong offers a unified platform that effectively manages all APIs, ensuring uniform security, monitoring, and traffic control across a large number of services.
Kong allows you to define routing rules and policies to control how API requests are distributed to backend services.
Kong allows you to define routing rules and policies to control how API requests are distributed to backend services.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes -Its essential to carefully configure and optimize it to minimize any potential performance impact.Limited plugins as well.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Kong offers good traffic control capabilities, including load balancing and request routing. It enables us to efficiently distribute incoming API requests across multiple backend services, ensuring scalability, high availability, and optimal resource utilization.
We use it for API Gteway for Microservices application.
We use it for API Gteway for Microservices application.
Kong API gateway - gateway to success
What do you like best about the product?
Configurability, ease of use, Informative logging
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation seems to be not complete in terms of troubleshooting.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helping to manage the complete API ingress.
Great ecosystem
What do you like best about the product?
Its app ecosystem enables standardization for authentication across organization applications.
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation could be improved to flatten newcomers learning curve.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Authentication and authorization can be easily standardize thereby offloading a great deal of operational complexity.
showing 91 - 100