Sign in
Sign in
or
Create a new account
Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Invicti

Invicti Security

Reviews from AWS customer

3 AWS reviews

External reviews

119 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.

4-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    reviewer2789682

Automated security checks have reduced release time and improve web API and CI/CD protection

  • December 21, 2025
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I'm using Acunetix to automate security checks. Acunetix helped me catch common vulnerability issues early and improved the overall security posture of the application before development, specifically in APIs and web apps.

What helped me most with Acunetix is the scan of web APIs. It detects issues including SQL injection, CI/CD issues, and authentication flaws very clearly.

The web scan API part was handled by one of my team members. However, I was able to help with CI/CD integration. I have integrated Acunetix in the pipelines to perform pre-release checks and catch issues before production.

What is most valuable?

Acunetix really helped with my security scan issues and made it easier. I don't have to be a security expert to understand what needs to be fixed, which really saved time.

Acunetix has saved me a lot of time in security checks and automating security testing with the workflow without adding too much complexity.

With Acunetix, my QA or security expert would previously take one day to do a deep dive scan, but with automation, I can wrap it up within thirty to forty minutes.

What needs improvement?

I think currently on full scans of large apps, Acunetix takes time, so it can improve the timing part.

I would rate Acunetix a nine. For the one point deduction, I would like to add that it can offer some customization, may require some learning for the advanced part, and the time it takes on large apps.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Acunetix for the past one month.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise anyone or any startup looking to engage in the security part to directly use Acunetix, as this will help in most aspects. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

    Kaushal D.

Comprehensive and Reliable Web Vulnerability Scanner

  • November 08, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Acunetix delivers precise and rapid vulnerability scanning through an intuitive interface. The platform generates comprehensive reports and offers prompt remediation guidance, ensuring thorough coverage for both web applications and APIs. This makes the process of conducting security assessments efficient and dependable.
What do you dislike about the product?
At times, scans can be quite resource-intensive and may take longer to complete when working with large applications. Additionally, I feel that the pricing structure could be more accommodating, especially for smaller teams or projects with a limited scope.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Acunetix assists in detecting and addressing security vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, XSS, and misconfigurations early in the development process. By automating routine web application scans, it enhances our overall security posture and helps us save time.

    KashifJamil

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

  • May 27, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing.

The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing, penetration testing, PCI DSS reporting, and multi-user environment support, which excels in SQL injection and cross-site scripting detection.

What is most valuable?

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything.

Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything.

The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments.

The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

What needs improvement?

Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Acunetix for almost seven to eight years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The setup is straightforward, with nothing difficult in Acunetix.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Acunetix is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For scalability, Acunetix easily scales for larger environments and larger systems.

How are customer service and support?

Invectis Support provides good service when contacted.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have more experience with IBM products, specifically IBM QRadar.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment, installation, and training take approximately two to three days.

What was our ROI?

Every second customer sees ROI with Acunetix.

What other advice do I have?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively.

Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offering a friendly interface, support for CI/CD, and excellent vulnerability scanning capabilities.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Acunetix 9 out of 10.

    Deepesh V.

Acunetix for API security

  • December 16, 2024
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Integration into Development workflows, broad api vulnerability coverage, automated and proof based scans and ease of use and implementaion with good UI.
What do you dislike about the product?
Customer support issues with more detailed technical issues, cost involving the frequency of use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Help discover security vulnerabilities.
Help secure API's.
Help integration in pipelines.
Benifits: Increased efficiency, sacalability and security.

    Abdullah Ozkan

Comprehensive tool with manual intervention support for web applications

  • November 20, 2024
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.

What is most valuable?

I mainly configure the tool for web applications, and I evaluate all products on the market. I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention. It offers support for specific scenarios like CAPTCHA and supports the ability to manage actions and updates from the internet.

What needs improvement?

I have experienced some problems yet can't recall the details. There was an issue related to updates from the internet, however, the support program was helpful in addressing it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I am an ongoing customer.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I don't fully understand the scalability features. Overall, it is adequate for our use case.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast. I am highly satisfied with the response time and quality of support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I use Invicti for application security testing.

How was the initial setup?

One person is enough for the installation.

What was our ROI?

The tool is helpful for us. It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I can see Burp Suite as an alternative.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.

    AnubhavGoswami

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

  • October 07, 2024
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses.

How has it helped my organization?

By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users.

What is most valuable?

It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as it works as a unique selling point due to how attractive and descriptive the reports are.

What needs improvement?

The interface API and other functionalities are very good. However, the cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Acunetix for almost two years.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support provided by Acunetix is absolutely great. We received support from them at every point in time.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used Nessus in one of my previous organizations due to cost reasons. However, my current organization decided to go with Acunetix.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy because we had a proper software team consisting of developers, database administrators, and application teams. With the help of the vendor, we were able to implement it successfully. It took approximately three to four months.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was carried out with the help of a consultant.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is being handled by the procurement team, yet it is on the higher side, and there is a recommendation to reduce it.

What other advice do I have?

I would generally recommend Acunetix to any organization in the IT-enabled sector. However, I have not worked for a non-IT organization, so I cannot comment on that.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

    Gareth P.

Acunetix is an easy to use, cost-effective DAST solution

  • August 23, 2024
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Acunetix has a user-friendly UI, is easy to configure and run and produces reliable results.
What do you dislike about the product?
The licensing model is not as granular as it could be which means that planning is needed for scaling up or down.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The need to assess the security of new applications developed within the organisation.

    JanetMuhia

Provides proof of exploit, gives the specific code affected and enables a shift-left approach in the development process

  • August 12, 2024
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We are a consultant company.

How has it helped my organization?

Just by scanning, Acunetix provides proof of exploit and gives the specific code affected. You can also see a categorized list of vulnerabilities. From there, you can easily create a report.

It integrates with multiple tools in the CI/CD pipeline, like Jira and web application firewalls.

Acunetix automation improved our customer's security testing process. By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process. This helps find vulnerabilities earlier rather than after the application is published.

What is most valuable?

The interactive transaction feature is a winning point for us. It's a great selling point. Also, the ability to provide an inventory of currently used APIs is very helpful.

What needs improvement?

There is room for improvement in the pricing.

Tenable is better integrated and offers many tools in a bundle. I would like to see the same thing in Acunetix. Otherwise, I'm satisfied with Acunetix's performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using it for three years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We propose this product for smaller or bigger businesses.

But mostly to bigger enterprises. It's because of the reputation it has with bigger companies.

How are customer service and support?

Acunetix provides good support. No complaints.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Acunetix stands out with its metrics, features, and Proof of Exploit. Other solutions we've used don't have those.

There is also Tenable.io Web App Scanning. Tenable's advantage is how it handles vulnerability management. For example, if you have Ansible vulnerability management, you can see both sets of information in a single pane. The only other difference might be pricing, but I'm not entirely sure about that.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. Considering everything is in place, it will take about two weeks.

What about the implementation team?

We usually help our customers implement the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is reasonable. We don't have many complaints from customers.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Acunetix to others for their web vulnerability scanning needs.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

    reviewer2406861

Provides web application testing and identify security risks

  • May 31, 2024
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for web application testing.

What is most valuable?

The solution identify security risks.

What needs improvement?

There could be extensions that help us perform test cases related to AI bots or element-based testing. Implementing such extensions internally could be beneficial for enhancing the testing capabilities.

Sometimes it takes too much time to complete, maybe because the application is huge or we have not properly configured the scan settings. Due to these challenges, the scan often stops in between.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Acunetix for seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability depends on the license that we avail. I rate the solution’s scalability a nine or ten out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support is helpful, but sometimes the response are a bit delayed. They respond within 24 hours.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward and takes an hour to complete.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product pricing is average.

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend the solution as we didn't have some specific extensions for any failure testing and SSO related testing.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

    Adetunji Adeoje

Helps to scan web applications but needs to include agent analysis

  • February 07, 2024
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We use the product for dynamic analysis. It also helps us to scan web applications.

What is most valuable?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What needs improvement?

Acunetix needs to include agent analysis.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate Acunetix's scalability a seven out of ten. My company has five to four users.

How was the initial setup?

I rate the tool's deployment a nine out of ten.

What was our ROI?

We have seen good ROI with the tool's use.

What other advice do I have?

Acunetix is good and helps to scan properly. I rate it a nine out of ten.

showing 1 - 10