My main use case for the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is primarily from an antivirus perspective. We have approximately 1,200 servers where the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is deployed.

Previously, we used it mainly on legacy servers, but now we have implemented the latest version across our Windows Server 2006, 2020, and 2022 environments.

Additionally, we rely on the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform for daily health checks, including all vulnerability assessment (VA) activities. At times, certain exclusions are also required depending on the application or server requirements.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has improved our organization in several ways. It has enhanced our overall security posture by providing stronger antivirus protection and better visibility across all endpoints. With around 1,200 servers onboarded, we have seen a noticeable reduction in malware incidents and faster detection of potential threats.

The platform’s centralized management has also improved operational efficiency. Daily health checks, VA activities, and policy enforcement are easier to manage, which has reduced manual effort. Additionally, the ability to configure exclusions and fine-tune policies has helped maintain both performance and security.

Overall, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has provided more stability, improved endpoint compliance, and strengthened our preventive security controls.

The best features that the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers, and which stand out to me, are its reporting capabilities, exclusion policy handling, and detection features.

In terms of reporting and exclusion policies, the platform provides multiple options to generate customized reports, allowing us to filter data and extract exactly what we need. We receive daily requests from the client side for exclusions or process additions, and Trellix makes it easy to manage these efficiently.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform also provides several advanced capabilities, including EDR for comprehensive threat hunting and attack investigations, along with modules for firewall, web control, ATP, Exploit Prevention, real-time scanning, and on-demand scanning. These features work together to strengthen the overall security of our environment.

Overall, Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has positively impacted our organization by offering strong protection against malware and ransomware. It has significantly improved our ability to detect and block threats in real time, while features like ATP and Exploit Prevention help reduce malware incidents and mitigate zero-day attacks.

From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system.

I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions.

For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

I have been working in my current field for almost seven years.

In terms of scalability, the solution performs well overall. It is capable of handling a large number of endpoints without significant performance issues. However, as the environment grows, the complexity of managing policies, agent communication, and server load also increases. With on-premises deployments in particular, scaling requires careful planning of resources, database capacity, and infrastructure components.

While the solution is scalable, simplifying the architecture and improving the responsiveness of the management console would make it even more efficient for large enterprises.

In terms of scalability, the solution performs well overall. It is capable of handling a large number of endpoints without significant performance issues. However, as the environment grows, the complexity of managing policies, agent communication, and server load also increases. With on-premises deployments in particular, scaling requires careful planning of resources, database capacity, and infrastructure components.

While the solution is scalable, simplifying the architecture and improving the responsiveness of the management console would make it even more efficient for large enterprises.

Customer support for Trellix Endpoint Security Platform responds quickly, but if there are unresolved issues, they escalate it, which can sometimes be difficult.

I previously used CrowdStrike, Defender, Trend Micro, and Symantec, and I chose Trend Micro because it had the option to handle the console easily.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is deployed in a hybrid and on-premises setup; however, we are facing many issues on-premises.

We implemented the solution through a vendor team. Their level of expertise was good, and they handled the deployment efficiently. However, in some cases, deeper troubleshooting required escalation to senior engineers, which slightly impacted the overall experience. Overall, I would rate their expertise as above average.

I have seen a return on investment; I can say that we have saved money and required fewer employees because of the complicated architecture.

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been positive. Compared to other tools, the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers lower overall costs.

One of the strongest advantages of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is its cost-effectiveness.

I have evaluated other options based on price and the mechanisms used by Trellix Endpoint Security Platform.

If you are looking for a cost-effective solution, the Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is a good option, and it also offers support for legacy servers.

My company has a business relationship with Trellix Endpoint Security Platform as a partner.

Overall, I would rate this product seven out of ten.

Our customers primarily use Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) only for endpoint security, with some cases where they prepare for Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

The main use case for Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is to protect the end user and to block USB and other devices, which is why they prefer to go with Trellix. They also use it for DLP to protect email and other things in their environment.

They find Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) easy and user-friendly for their environment, which is why they choose Trellix. Additionally, it has a more manageable console compared to other products, which they felt were more difficult.

For incidents, we don't handle them directly because we provide the services for installation and management. We have our own SOC team that manages Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), offering support. Any incidents that occur are taken care of via email for our customers.

Some customers feel that the Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) agent consumes more memory and resources in their environment, which is a major issue we are facing. This causes their endpoints to consume more CPU under subscription, resulting in a feeling of slowness in their processes.

I have been working with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) for the last two years.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is easy to scale and we have not encountered any scalability issues.

The solution is easier to set up compared to Trend Micro. I would rate the setup of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) about a nine out of ten.

It takes approximately two to three days to deploy Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) since we just need to provide the consoles, deploy the agent and their policies, and verify that the agents are functioning.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a stable solution, and we have not faced any stability issues.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is easy to scale and there are no issues with scalability.

We are very happy with the technical support we receive from the Trellix team. I rate the support from Trellix a perfect ten.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not challenging to set up and is easier to implement compared to Trend Micro. I would rate the setup about a nine out of ten.

It takes approximately two to three days to deploy Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) since we just need to provide the consoles, deploy the agent and their policies, and verify that the agents are functioning.

Currently, we are working with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trend Micro, focusing only on Trellix.

I am not entirely sure about the integration capabilities Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) provides, and I am not very familiar with those features either.

For those wanting to use Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), I recommend it for protecting their environment in an easy way. It is straightforward to know and features no complicated deployment, and we also appreciate the support we receive.

My total rating for Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a ten out of ten.

Our biggest advantage is the compatibility with a variety of laptops. The compatibility with old laptops and new laptops is the most significant advantage.

We are not using the response automation functionality because we're only using it for encryption and for DLP, so there is no response automation we are utilizing.

We have to maintain it because when new versions of Windows are released, we must test the compatibility and functionality.

They have fixed the previous issues.

It has more to do with enhancements of features and functionality. There's nothing much which has come out, and it's been a product that we are running for so long with not many support cases that open up for us.

I would rate Trellix Endpoint Security overall as six and a half out of ten, closer to seven rather than six points.

The company is using it for cybersecurity, malware, and anti-malware.

We have customers who were facing challenges with traditional security solutions such as Trend Micro or Symantec that were not working. They would receive reports indicating no malware in their network. However, when we implemented Trellix Endpoint Security in their network, multiple types of malware was detected.

The solution is easy to manage, easy to implement, easy to install, and the support is excellent.

The detection capability of Trellix Endpoint Security is higher than traditional antivirus solutions.

The AI functionality has proven quite useful with the new version. Trellix Endpoint Security has introduced the new MVISION solution, MVISION Endpoint, which works completely on AI and machine learning.

The agent is very heavy, so we have to ensure that we have a lightweight agent for Windows systems.

We have been using the solution for almost 20 years now.

The cloud management console ensures there are no limits on scalability. It's quite scalable with no restrictions.

Support has been excellent overall.

The solution has been easy to manage, easy to implement, and very easy to install.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

I use Trellix Endpoint Security as the first line of defense for our users against any attack from outside.

Trellix Endpoint Security serves as our first line of defense against external threats. The product includes a threat intelligence tool that enhances threat prevention. Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks.

Trellix Endpoint Security needs some improvement in the dashboards. Artificial intelligence also requires improvement to further enhance the product.

I have been using Trellix Endpoint Security since 2004.

Trellix Endpoint Security is a stable product. I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.

Trellix Endpoint Security is scalable. I would rate its scalability as eight or nine out of ten.

Trellix Endpoint Security provides very good support. I would rate their customer service nine out of ten.

Before Trellix Endpoint Security, we did not work with other tools.

The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security is very easy and smooth, taking only one day with help from Trend Micro Support.

The implementation involved one person from our side and one person from the vendor's side. I participated in the process.

We have observed tremendous return on investment after implementing Trellix Endpoint Security as it is a more cost-effective solution compared to other products.

Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money, with no need for extra expenses for premium support.

We are aware of other brands like Symantec, but Trellix Endpoint Security became the chosen solution because it was less expensive.

Trellix Endpoint Security is a robust, old, tested, and cost-effective product. I would rate the overall solution as eight out of ten.

I use Trellix Endpoint Security on all of my Red Hat and Windows 11 endpoints.

Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware.

I cannot really point to any areas that need improvement at this moment. Continued available training is important for people coming in to use it.

I have had experience with Trellix products for about three years.

The solution is fairly stable, and I do not have any additional points on that.

It seems to be very scalable.

I rate customer service between an eight and nine. I have not had to use support too much, however, when I did, they were fairly responsive and able to resolve the issue.

I was using an older version of the same solution, which might have been McAfee.

The initial setup is fairly straightforward with the guide provided.

I had two other people involved in the deployment process. They were a system engineer and a network engineer.

There is a good return because I have not been compromised yet. That is the main thing.

I am familiar with other endpoint protection platforms (EPPs), however, I do not know any main differences off the top of my head.

I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable. I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Furthermore, continued training would be beneficial for those who are new to using it.

Our primary use case for Trellix Endpoint Security is to protect our customers' endpoints and servers from known malware and ransomware. We are also partners reselling Trellix solutions.

Trellix Endpoint Security has impacted our organization by being a reasonable choice for on-premise solutions, especially for customers in the banking sector requiring compliance.

The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention. If customers require a hybrid approach, it is available only in Trellix and not in other latest antivirus solutions.

What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature. There should be daily signature updates for protection.

Additionally, scalability should be improved as it presents challenges such as needing downtime.

I have been using the solution for the last two to three years.

I would rate the stability of the solution as a seven out of ten, indicating moderate satisfaction.

I would rate the scalability of the solution as a six out of ten, indicating some challenges due to downtime requirements.

Technical support is rated seven out of ten. The response time is a notable issue.

The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security is somewhat complex compared to other newer antivirus solutions such as ProStriq and TrendMicro, and I would rate it a five out of ten.

The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.

For new users considering Trellix Endpoint Security, it is advisable as it offers traditional antivirus with both on-prem and SaaS-based solutions, compliant with regulatory standards.

We use Trellix Endpoint Security for endpoint protection, including virus protection for desktops, laptops, and servers. The solution includes special dedicated modules, such as those for Microsoft SharePoint security.

Trellix Endpoint Security helps us support and secure a large number of endpoints efficiently. We have a lot of installations, supporting up to twenty thousand endpoints. With the central management system EPO, it has significantly improved our ability to manage security across these devices.

The EPO, the ePolicy Orchestrator, is the best endpoint protection central management system.

Trellix Endpoint Security has a lot of special small modules that I like very much, such as access protection, adaptive threat prevention, exclusion capabilities, and logging capabilities. Together with disk encryption or file encryption, it provides a comprehensive solution.

The detection and response capabilities need to be improved. The product is not sharp enough in catching viruses, and we often have to use additional components alongside the pure endpoint security. Symantec, for example, might be better in this area.

We have been working with Trellix Endpoint Security for about 20 years.

The stability of the solution is very high, I'd rate it around eight or nine out of ten.

Scalability is high; I'd rate it 20 out of ten if possible.

Technical support is correct and absolutely helpful. We had some issues during the migration from McAfee to Trellix, particularly with account migrations, but generally, support has been good.

I have used Fortinet Endpoint Management, Symantec, Kaspersky, Check Point, and others. Among these, I find that the EPO system of Trellix is the best.

I like the initial setup very much because Trellix Endpoint Security has a lot of special small modules and configurations. It's flexible and allows for detailed customizations.

The pricing of the solution is correct and justified for the value it provides.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.