I work with Control-M from a commercial aspect and engage with IT and operation teams across different industries, which gives me direct exposure to how Control-M is used in real production environments. My role is to deliver tangible value to these teams.
Control-M SaaS
BMC SoftwareExternal reviews
171 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Job Monitoring and Consistent Process Management
What do you like best about the product?
I use Control-M to monitor job execution and agent health across multiple environments. The dependency view and run history make it easy to see what is blocked, delayed, or failed. It helps keep recurring platform processes consistent and predictable.
What do you dislike about the product?
The tool needs good standards to stay organized. Without regular cleanup and alert tuning, the workspace can become noisy and harder to manage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M centralizes scheduling and monitoring, reducing manual checks and speeding up incident response. It improves reliability and helps the platform team keep services running smoothly.
Streamlined Job Management and Seamless CI/CD Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I use Control-M to manage scheduled and background jobs alongside application releases. The API-based approach lets us version job changes, review them, and promote them through environments with our CI/CD process. This makes deployments more controlled and easier to roll back.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initial setup needs planning, and without clear standards the workspace can get cluttered. Some integrations also take extra effort to configure.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M helps coordinate complex background tasks that CI/CD tools don’t handle well. It improves reliability, reduces release risk, and gives clear visibility when something goes wrong.
Effortless Job Scheduling and Reliable Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I use Control-M to build job chains with clear dependencies and schedules. It helps ensure tasks run in the right order and only when conditions are met. I often review job history and outputs to confirm changes worked as expected after deployments.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some automation features take time to learn, and keeping job definitions consistent requires discipline. A few configuration steps could be simpler.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M replaces manual scripts with structured automation. It improves reliability, reduces failed jobs, and makes automation easier to support and maintain.
Effortless Integration and Centralized Monitoring
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate how easily it integrates with major leading applications such as SAP, Salesforce, and AWS. Additionally, its centralized monitoring view makes it convenient to access and identify the status of batch executions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Currently, the reporting capabilities are quite limited. I hope BMC will invest more in enhancing the reporting features in the future.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M is currently responsible for automating the majority of our batch executions. In addition, it assists us in triggering our workflows within both SAP and Mulesoft.
Effortless Implementation and Outstanding Support
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of Implementation, Customer Support, Ease of Integration
What do you dislike about the product?
there is no such kind, but we are little late in cloud journey
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
automate so many manual processes and in detailed error visibility to find the process easier
Automation has improved operational visibility and has supported reliable business processes
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The valuable features of Control-M depend on the specific customer needs. Some customers have business-critical processes, strict SLAs, and hybrid or multi-cloud environments where Control-M provides end-to-end visibility of all these processes. Control-M also offers different modules, such as MFT, which allows users to transfer files with the tool. As a commercial professional, I cannot personally attest to specific features since I do not typically use the tool directly, but I can share what customers have told me they value about the product.
What needs improvement?
As a commercial professional, I think one of the downsides of Control-M is that not all people know they can use a tool such as Control-M, and they think that Control-M is going to be very expensive, which is the reason why they don't want to use it or seek more information about it. However, when they are accustomed to using this type of tool or Control-M as a scheduler, they feel better with it and with their role inside their enterprise. For example, if they don't have any scheduler, they don't know that they can use a scheduler to automate different business processes. When they recognize that they can use this type of tool, one of the objectives is to reduce costs. They may spend money in the short term, but in the medium or long term, they will probably have more benefits than risk.
Control-M has everything that a person needs because the problem is not high cost. Control-M is available on-premises and in the cloud, and they are having more apps every week with the app integrator. I don't have anything that I dislike about Control-M. Possible areas for improvement could include documentation, configuration, and pricing. Being more flexible and having out-of-the-box reporting for business stakeholders would be beneficial. Continuing to simplify licensing and packaging for smaller customers would also help improve customer conversations. Reporting is often mentioned as an area where Control-M could continue to evolve. Many customers would appreciate more out-of-the-box business-friendly reports. Control-M has operability with SLA-focused reports, but developing something with less customization would be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Control-M for more or less two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I think that some instability is normal because everything is in the cloud, and I can remember a few months when the AWS cloud crashed. If you see the SLA reports or responses from different customers, they are very happy with the tool. Control-M achieves more or less 98% or 99% uptime in the cloud, which is a fantastic rate. I think 100% is impossible to achieve, and 99.8% is a good number.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Control-M, developed by BMC, which was previously part of BMC Helix and is now BMC Software, is focusing on Digital Business Automation processes. They are developing many different modules in Control-M, and the scalability is fantastic. Probably in a couple of years, Control-M is going to be the best scheduler. Currently, they are competing with other schedulers such as Redwood, Broadcom, and Stonebranch, but in a couple of years, maybe one or two years, Control-M is not going to have any competitors.
How are customer service and support?
I have used technical support from BMC when we need to do demos for instances in the BMC tool. The technical support team are very good professionals and they do their jobs excellently. Since I don't use Control-M directly, if I have a problem with Control-M, the technical team from my enterprise would need to talk with the technical team from BMC. I usually talk with the commercial team from BMC rather than the technical team. I talk with the technical team when I need to make a demo, proof of concept, or proof of value, and we need to customize the future instance for the client. If I need to rate the technical support from BMC, I would give them a 10 because whenever I want to do something with them, they answer me, and I am very happy with them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I don't use any alternative schedulers. I know that you can talk about Redwood, Broadcom, or Stonebranch, but I don't use any one of these schedulers.
How was the initial setup?
I don't have a lot of contact with deployment. Probably if I think about some customers, they tell me that there is also interest in simplifying upgrades and environment standardization, particularly for organizations with multiple Control-M instances. If you talk with a small customer, they are going to be happy with deployment, upgrades, or the environment.
Control-M has an upgrade more or less every year or every two years. If you want to use the latest upgrade, you need to upgrade your tool.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation team depends on the person doing the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The current pricing is good. Other vendors such as Broadcom are increasing their prices, so right now, Control-M is not one of the highest-cost schedulers. My customers have never told me anything negative about the pricing or licensing. BMC can be very amenable with the pricing of the tool. I have small customers, and I think that is a good point of view because they think they can't have the budget for a tool such as Control-M, but they do have the budget. Control-M is a tool for every kind of customer. You can sell Control-M for 15K on-premises and you can sell it for 7 million or 11 million. I think that people need to change their thinking because Control-M is not just an expensive tool. It is a tool for everyone, for every enterprise.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I would rate Control-M at nine.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Unified Job Management with Seamless DevOps Integration
What do you like best about the product?
Control-M Provide single point of control manage scheduling monitoring jobs on various platforms. even now it supports for hybrid and multi-cloud environment. it provides well integration with Devops tools. Control-M having a great user community and customer support.
What do you dislike about the product?
Although Control-M is great tools, it gives great flexibility, but there is slight dislike about the high price modeling.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M solve several critical problems in workload automation and orchestration. it provides end to end orchestration across on premise, hybrid and multi-cloud platform, and ensuring jobs and business requirement runs smoothly without manual intervention.his reduces operational complexity and improves reliability for critical workflows.
Centralized Orchestration and Visibility Make Control-M Stand Out
What do you like best about the product?
I like below things of control-m
1.Centralized Orchestration
2.Dependency Management
3. Audit and Compliance
4. Visibility and Alert Mechanism
1.Centralized Orchestration
2.Dependency Management
3. Audit and Compliance
4. Visibility and Alert Mechanism
What do you dislike about the product?
I dislike below number of things of control-m .
1.Licenscing cost
2.Complex Setup
3.High Resource utilization .
4.Upgrade and Patch Management
1.Licenscing cost
2.Complex Setup
3.High Resource utilization .
4.Upgrade and Patch Management
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
1. I would said the main problem that control-m solving for me is that as administrator we need to maintain the kpi of sox report and controlm's audit and annotation mechanism help us to provide the audit details .
2. Its cross platform support things multiple hosts jobs can be run and managed in one workflow
3.SLA Management keep us alerting if a job delay is there .
2. Its cross platform support things multiple hosts jobs can be run and managed in one workflow
3.SLA Management keep us alerting if a job delay is there .
Centralized Workflow Management with Seamless Multi-Cloud Integration
What do you like best about the product?
Integration with multi cloud platform and a number of different applications which gives a centralized view of entire workflows.
What do you dislike about the product?
- Their inability to support scheduling Legacy app servers.
- Pricing is on a higher side.
- Pricing is on a higher side.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Helps maintain SLA for workflows.
- Helps identify the issues more quickly.
- Proactive alerts for Critical batch chains.
- Helps identify the issues more quickly.
- Proactive alerts for Critical batch chains.
Streamlined Automation with Control-M, Needs UI Enhancements
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the Control-M API because it minimizes manual intervention for activities in Control-M. The Control-M BIM, SAAS portal, and Reporting feature are very helpful in my daily activities. The Simplified Control-M App view for jobs, SLA, and automation is also something I appreciate. It was easy to search for any job, get notified about job failure and delay.
What do you dislike about the product?
The execution of jobs based on loops needs improvement, and there's a need to check both the application and Control-M UI for root cause analysis. Managing cloud-related jobs alongside on-prem jobs is a bit cumbersome. The UI could be more user-friendly by providing more convenient options, like searching for agentless hosts connected via an agent and finding specific agents linked to agentless hosts. Additionally, the centralized connection profile lacks sufficient information in the initial view, requiring further exploration to find details about the host where MFT/DB is installed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M avoids manual intervention during activities and automation, provides quick information on critical chain failures and delays, and simplifies job searching while notifying failures and delays. The Control-M API minimizes manual tasks, and its BIM, SaaS portal, and reporting features aid daily activities.
showing 1 - 10