
OpenVPN Access Server (5 Connected Devices) / Self-Hosted VPN
Secure access control has protected client platforms and supports reliable SLA commitments
What is our primary use case?
OpenVPN Access Server is our main solution to ensure that the VPN is properly connected at the client's location so that they are able to access our system, as we have a platform for inventory invoice management.
Just as there are typical firewalls in a system, such as Cloudflare 1.1.1.1, I use OpenVPN Access Server to allow access from specific IPs and block access to specific IPs in my invoice management platform.
How has it helped my organization?
OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted my organization by helping us design a reliable infrastructure and even providing definite SLA metrics to our clients.
We have different SLA levels such as L0, L1, L2, and L3 in a typical IT scenario. Some clients need immediate access within 24 hours, while other clients, depending on their SLA levels, need support within one to two days. There are also some clients who are low priority and need support within five days or a week. This is how we organize our SLA structure. The high-priority clients who are hosted on our private server need immediate resolution, or a penalty is applied.
What is most valuable?
The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers are the secure access to the portal and the ability to stop irrelevant IPs from accessing our system.
The secure access feature and blocking irrelevant IPs help my team on a day-to-day basis by protecting us. The unnecessary load on the servers is avoided in the first place. The regular backups that are taken are also easily available for our clients. Even the support team feels updated with all such features.
What needs improvement?
OpenVPN Access Server needs improvement as it requires definite marketing in the East Africa region so that many people have access to it. It should also be available offline and not always dependent on the internet. It should have AI-based observability metrics as well.
From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for the past three years.
How are customer service and support?
Others who are looking to use OpenVPN Access Server should evaluate the proper feature benefits and costing as per their use cases.
What other advice do I have?
From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.
I found this interview to be good, but it can be improved with a more manual touch. My overall review rating for this product is 9 out of 10.
Flexible, Easy, and Secure Access to Windows Desktops and Apps
Secure remote access has streamlined our hybrid cloud workflows and reduced onboarding effort
What is our primary use case?
I use OpenVPN Access Server as a VPN to access many of the applications. For example, I access a DataDog website where I monitor many tools and all, using OpenVPN Access Server.
I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for about 12 to 13 months, and our main use is managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure and staging environments. We rely heavily on it to establish stable, secure connections so the team can access databases, internal applications, and server dashboards safely from anywhere.
We use a hybrid cloud setup for our deployment of OpenVPN Access Server, which is hosted on virtual machines within our private cloud infrastructure to securely gatekeep our internal applications, main databases, and core staging environments.
For public cloud resources in our hybrid setup, we primarily use AWS and Microsoft Azure to host several of our front-facing applications, customer portals, and some record testing environments. Having OpenVPN Access Server tied into this mix is great because it allows our team to securely hop between our internal private network and these public cloud resources without needing multiple different VPN clients or configuration setups.
What is most valuable?
OpenVPN Access Server offers a secure remote access VPN, web-based administration console, multi-factor authentication MFA support, integration with LDAP, Active Directory, RADIUS, SAML, centralized user and device management, client software for Windows, macOS and Linux OS, Android and iOS.
The admin web UI is easily at the top of the list of best features, making managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to mess around with a command line. Another standout is the built-in client portal that lets users log in and download their own pre-configured profiles, saving the IT team a ton of manual setup. Additionally, it has a multi-factor authentication code that flexibly integrates with Active Directory and provides the enterprise-grade security we need.
Overall, OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by giving us a highly reliable, stable environment for remote work. We handle critical infrastructure and having a secure gateway that doesn't drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win. It has greatly improved our security posture without adding administrative headaches because our engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a hitch, ensuring our support and operational workload runs smoothly around the clock.
What needs improvement?
The main area for improvement is the pricing model, as the concurrent user license gets expensive quickly as our organization grows. More flexible or tiered pricing options would be a huge plus. Another area is the configuration disconnect, where while the admin web UI handles about 90% of what we need, the moment we need deep advanced routing customizations or to tweak specific variables, we still have to drop back into the command-line interface to make those changes. It would be great to see these deeper configurations fully integrated into the web portal. Additionally, native support for newer, lighter protocols like WireGuard built straight into the platform alongside standard OpenVPN for better performance efficiency would be beneficial.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for almost 15 to 15 plus years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
OpenVPN Access Server is very stable, and we have a hassle-free work experience using it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
OpenVPN Access Server's scalability is much better, ensuring we can handle our growing needs.
How are customer service and support?
For customer support, I rate OpenVPN Access Server 9 out of 10. The ticketing system is responsive, and the technical team knows the product inside and out. Additionally, with such a massive community, we can almost always find immediate answers in their forum or documentation without needing to open a ticket. My advice is to map out your user access groups and routing subnets before configuring the server; this makes it easier to enforce least privilege.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously relied on a legacy IPsec VPN solution and the standard open-source community edition of OpenVPN. We switched due to the administrative bottleneck, as managing the open-source version required our team to handle everything through the command-line interface, creating individual user configuration files to track down connection failures. It did not have a centralized dashboard or a user portal, which resulted in a massive number of internal support tickets. Moving to OpenVPN Access Server solved all of that by providing the web admin portal and seamless SAML integration, completely automating user management and relieving our administrators.
What was our ROI?
Regarding the return on investment from OpenVPN Access Server, it really comes down to the drastic drop in onboarding and engineering time. Before we implemented it, our senior technical staff had to spend 20 to 30 minutes per user manually generating cryptographic keys, setting up routing rules, and securely transferring profile files to each employee. This was a significant drain on highly skilled personnel, but now with our SAML identity provider integration, the entire workflow takes under two minutes. The platform automatically reads the user role and maps them to the correct network subnets instantly, saving us countless hours of administration overhead every month, allowing our engineering team to focus on managing critical infrastructure rather than grinding through access tickets. For us, that efficiency completely justifies our licensing cost.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for OpenVPN Access Server is fine and very straightforward, and we did not face any hassles accessing it. The pricing, setup cost, and licensing were within our limits and budget, making it very user-friendly.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing OpenVPN Access Server, we evaluated other options, looking closely at WireGuard and Cisco AnyConnect. Cisco AnyConnect was a strong enterprise contender, but it felt overly complex for our hybrid cloud needs and required locking into their ecosystem, which we wanted to avoid. We valued WireGuard for its raw connection speed and lightweight protocol, but it lacked the necessary enterprise features including a built-in administrative web portal, straightforward SAML integration, and robust access control list. Ultimately, OpenVPN Access Server won out because it offered the ease of management and advanced user governance features we needed.
What other advice do I have?
If I had to give advice to others looking into using OpenVPN Access Server, my biggest recommendation is to carefully map out your user access groups and routing subnets on paper before diving into the configuration. The platform makes it incredibly easy to enforce least privilege and zero-trust principles, but the setup goes smoother if you have a clear architecture of who needs to access what private resources. Utilize the two free concurrent connections to test your identity provider integration, enforce multi-factor authentication, and provide the automation workflow during the testing phase to illustrate how much administrative time you will save, making it easier to justify the licensing cost when scaling up. I rate my overall experience with OpenVPN Access Server an 8 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Secure remote access has simplified user management and reduced support workload
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server involves managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure. We rely heavily on established secure connections so the team can certainly access the database, internal applications, server dashboards, and the web admin UI makes it straightforward to manage user cases and integrates well with our existing authentication setup, which gives us significant time savings on the IT support side.
A quick specific example of how my team uses OpenVPN Access Server day to day includes the admin web UI being at the top of the list because it makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. Lastly, the authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication, which enhances our IT support experience on a daily basis.
How has it helped my organization?
OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by providing a high, reliable, stable environment, especially for remote work. We handle critical infrastructure, and having a secure gateway that does not drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win, greatly improving our security posture without adding administrative headaches, as engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a hitch, ensuring that our operations workflow runs smoothly around the clock and offering total peace of mind regarding remote access security.
Regarding specific outcomes, the clear impact of OpenVPN Access Server has been a massive drop in VPN-related support tickets. We previously handled profile issues, broken connections, and credential setups manually which used to be a daily headache for the IT team. Those tickets have now dropped by seventy percent to eighty percent, roughly because of the self-service client portal. It saves significant time on user onboarding as it used to take administration about twenty to thirty minutes to generate and securely send configuration files, but now, thanks to Active Directory integration, it takes hardly two to three minutes, resulting in considerable hours saved weekly and monthly.
What is most valuable?
The main feature of OpenVPN Access Server that stands out to me is the admin UI, and it is very well integrated with the Active Directory multifactor authentication, which provides the kind of enterprise-grade security we have been looking for, and we are very happy with that.
The admin web UI makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. The authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication.
What needs improvement?
The main area for OpenVPN Access Server improvement is its pricing model, as the concurrent user license gets expensive quickly as the organization grows, so more flexible pricing options would be a huge plus for AVIARC. Another area I would specify is the configuration disconnect, as the admin UI handles about ninety percent of what you need, but when it comes to advanced routing customization, tweaking specific variables requires dropping back into the command line interface. It would be great to see those deeper configurations integrated into the web portal for ease of use, along with support for newer, lighter protocols like WireGuard built straight into the platform for better performance and efficiency.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for about three and a half to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
OpenVPN Access Server demonstrates absolute stability with no issues regarding its reliability, scalability, or other concerns.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
OpenVPN Access Server scales very well from a technical standpoint. You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration to handle a massive surge in concurrent users. The only real constraint to its scalability is financial, as the concurrent user licensing model leads to expenses increasing quickly as you scale up to support larger teams, meaning while the software handles growth seamlessly, your budget is the main thing you need to plan around.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate customer support nine out of ten. The ticketing system is responsive, and the technical team knows the product inside and out. Moreover, due to the massive community around VPNs, you can almost always find immediate answers in their forum documentation without needing to open a ticket.
How was the initial setup?
Installing and setting up OpenVPN Access Server is very easy, especially compared to the community edition of OpenVPN. In our environment, we deployed it without a manual script or built-in installation from scratch, simply pulling a pre-configured image directly onto our virtual machine. The initial setup wizard guided us through core settings like admin password configuration and a primary network interface through the terminal, from where we immediately transitioned to the web UI to handle the rest of the configuration, which included setting up routing paths and subnets. It took less than an hour for the fully functional server to be up, which is a massive time-saver for our engineering team.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using OpenVPN Access Server is to map out your user access groups and routing subnets before configuring the server, as the tool makes enforcing least privilege incredibly easy, but it is smoother with clearly defined access policies on paper first. I would also recommend taking full advantage of the two free concurrent connections to test out the SAML or Active Directory integrations completely before purchasing licenses, allowing you to prove the workflow and see how much time it can save your IT team before making a financial commitment. I would rate this product an eight out of ten overall.
Easy to Use, Quiet in the Background, and Regularly Updated
Intuitive Interface and Easy Network Profile Switching Across Any OS
Easy to Deploy, User-Friendly, Powerful and Reliable VPN.
Pricing can also become a concern as the number of users grows, since the licensing model may feel expensive compared with alternatives like WireGuard-based solutions or cloud-native VPN options. Integrations are functional, but they are not always as seamless as expected with modern identity providers, monitoring tools, or cloud environments.
Performance is generally stable, but depending on configuration and server resources, throughput may not always match lighter VPN solutions. It would be helpful to see a more modern UI, simpler deployment guides, clearer pricing tiers, stronger built-in monitoring, and easier integration with cloud platforms and identity management systems.
The main benefit is that it gives us a centralized way to manage VPN users, permissions, and connections. This is especially useful for teams that need to access private resources from different locations. It also helps reduce risk by keeping sensitive services behind the VPN instead of opening ports publicly.
Overall, OpenVPN Access Server provides a practical and reliable solution for remote connectivity, secure server access, and controlled network access. It benefits us by improving security, simplifying remote work, and giving administrators better visibility and control over who can connect to the network.
Simple Deployment with Room for Security Enhancements
Secure remote access has protected critical data and now simplifies role-based user management
What is our primary use case?
One of the main use cases for OpenVPN Access Server is managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure and staging environments.
We rely heavily on it to establish stable and secure connections so the team can access the database, internal applications, and server data safely from the server dashboard anywhere in the world.
The web admin UI makes it straightforward to manage user access and it integrates well with our existing authentication setup, which saves us a lot of time on the IT support side.
Our main way of using OpenVPN Access Server is primarily for security, where it saves us from hacking and prevents data from going outside of our secure connection by using this VPN.
What is most valuable?
The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers include security, which protects our data so that no one can access our connection.
We have one secure connection which we are using with OpenVPN, and providing secure remote access for our technical teams to connect to our infrastructure is definitely the main way that we use it in day-to-day life.
The admin web UI is at the top of the list because it makes managing user access incredibly simple without having to use the command line.
Another best feature is its built-in client portal where users can log in and download their own pre-configured profiles, which saves the IT team a ton of manual setup work.
Lastly, the authentication flexibility, specifically how smoothly it integrates with Active Directory and multi-factor authentication, gives us exactly the kind of enterprise-grade security we need.
The web UI and the authentication integration have massively improved our team's daily productivity.
On the IT management side, we do not have to waste time manually writing configuration files or handling complex command line setups just to onboard someone into the company.
Since it syncs seamlessly with our existing authentication and multi-factor setup, user management is basically automated.
For the rest of the team, they can log in to the portal, get what they need, and connect in seconds.
It has cut down on connection-related support tickets, letting everyone focus on their actual work without any technical issues.
OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by giving us a highly reliable, stable environment for remote work.
Since we handle critical infrastructure, having a secure gateway that does not drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win.
It has greatly improved our security posture without adding administrative headaches because our engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a glitch.
It ensures our support and operational workflows run smoothly around the clock, giving us total peace of mind regarding work access security.
What needs improvement?
An area for improvement is the pricing model. The concurrent user licenses get expensive pretty quickly as your organization grows, so more flexible pricing options would be a huge plus.
Another area is configurational disconnect. While the admin web UI handles about 90% of what you need, the moment you have to do deep, advanced routing customization, you still have to drop back to the command line interface to make those changes.
It would be great to see those deeper configurations completely integrated into the web portal.
Lastly, it would be awesome to see native support for newer, lighter protocols through WireGuard built straight into the platform alongside standard OpenVPN for better performance efficiency.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in the current field for 2.8 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never faced any network or internet connection speed issues when I am connected to OpenVPN Access Server compared to other VPN solutions. I feel that it is highly stable and perfectly fine for day-to-day corporate work.
For tasks involving accessing databases, managing server infrastructure, or using our internal applications, I really do not notice any lag.
Compared to older VPN protocols through IPsec, it feels much smoother and establishes connections faster.
I do not feel any connection speed issues when using OpenVPN Access Server. Everything looks simple and smooth, and I have not encountered any issues.
OpenVPN Access Server is 100% stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of OpenVPN Access Server is very natural and incredibly stable. In my experience, we rarely ever deal with unexpected service drops.
It just sits there and does its job, which gives us a lot of peace of mind when our teams are accessing critical infrastructure.
From a purely technical standpoint, it scales very well. You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration if you need to handle a massive surge in concurrent users.
The only real constraint to its scalability is not technical; it is financial because of the concurrent user licensing model.
Scaling up to support much larger teams gets expensive quickly. So while the software handles growth seamlessly, the budget is really the main thing that we have to plan around as we scale.
How are customer service and support?
It is very easy to raise a ticket with them. We also have email support and a direct help desk we can contact via their service desk number and email, and we can raise tickets using their website portal. It is very easy.
I would definitely rate customer support 10 out of 10. They really respond to our queries so fast and help us in resolving issues.
How was the initial setup?
Installing and setting it up is very easy, especially compared to the community edition of OpenVPN. For example, when we deployed it in our environment, we did not have to build it from scratch or manually script out the installation.
We just pulled a pre-configured image directly onto our virtual machine, and the initial setup wizard walked us through the core settings including setting up the admin password and configuring the primary network interface right in the terminal.
From there, we immediately transitioned over to the web UI to handle the rest of the configuration including setting up our routing paths and subnets.
It took less than an hour to get the fully functioning server up, which is massive time saved for our engineering team.
What about the implementation team?
We use a local authentication method, which is primarily using SAML authentication integration to tie everything into our primary identity provider. We also utilize local authentication for emergency administrator backup accounts.
In terms of effectiveness, I would rate the SAML integration a solid 9 out of 10. It makes mapping user roles and enforcing multi-factor authentication incredibly smooth, meaning our users get a seamless single sign-on experience.
The only tiny friction point is that setting up the initial attribute mapping for custom security groups can be a little tedious in the interface, but once it is logged in, it runs flawlessly and completely automates our lifecycle management for access easier.
I have utilized the access control features of OpenVPN Access Server, and I would rate it 9.5 out of 10.
Instead of letting everyone onto the entire network once they connect, we can use the access control list to restrict access strictly by group or user roles.
Our engineering groups are given precise routing rules so they can hit specific staging subnets and databases, while other teams are restricted to only the internal applications they need for daily work.
It allows us to implement the zero trust principle very effectively at the network level without making the configuration overly complicated for our administrators.
What was our ROI?
We definitely see a clear return on investment from using OpenVPN Access Server, mostly driven by operational time savings and efficiency.
From a technical administrative perspective, the biggest metric is the reduction in manual onboarding time.
It used to take our engineers around 20 to 30 minutes per user to generate keys and distribute profile configurations manually.
Now, with the SAML and Active Directory integration, the process is down to under two minutes, which frees up our senior staff to focus on critical infrastructure tasks instead of managing access tickets.
Additionally, the client portal is so user-friendly that we have seen a massive reduction in routing IT support tickets related to connection drops or profile issues.
While the user licensing cost can add up, the savings in engineering hours and reduction in overhead for support make it a net positive investment for our organization.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I use it for a client, so I do not have much information regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing.
But from what I have gathered, the pricing and setup costs are a little more expensive compared to any other VPN solutions, according to some of my seniors who have been working on this tool for the last five to six years.
The only thing I can advise is that the licensing cost is quite expensive, but it saves a lot of time for our IT engineers so that your senior IT engineers can focus on other ongoing IT issues in the company culture or any other tools they have.
It mainly saves time in configuring user profiles, as everything is automated. It is very easy to configure the rules of our organization, and it blindly follows them in order to create user profiles.
The user-friendly interface allows everyone to understand it easily, and it is easy to install.
What other advice do I have?
We purchase it from AWS Marketplace.
We use the role-defining features, and it has had a huge impact on how we enforce least privilege. Because it integrates so well with our identity provider via SAML, users are automatically placed into their respective groups based on their actual roles the moment they authenticate.
This makes enforcing least privilege practically effortless on our end. Instead of an administrator having to manually assign permissions to individual users every single time, the server reads the group role and immediately locks down or opens up access to a specific subnet based on the profile.
It ensures our security policy is strictly followed without creating any extra manual work or friction for our IT team or support team.
The user interface for OpenVPN Access Server is very user-friendly, very easy to understand, very easy to configure, and very easy to install in our virtual machines.
On the end-user side, the client web portal is completely foolproof. It is incredibly simple, allowing users to log in, see exactly what they need, and download their pre-configured connection profiles without any confusion.
On the administrative side, the admin web UI is highly organized and straightforward. It moves away from complex command-line configuration and lays out user management, routing rules, and authentication settings in a very logical menu system.
My only real critique is that it looks a bit traditional or dated compared to some modern SaaS dashboards, but from a purely functional perspective, it gets the job done cleanly and makes managing an entire team really intuitive.
Regarding AI capabilities, OpenVPN Access Server does not actually have built-in AI features right now. It is primarily a straightforward core networking and security tool.
However, looking at its overall governance and traditional security, it is exceptionally solid. The platform excels at access control, encryption standards, and secure logging, which gives us great oversight and compliance tracking for who is accessing our network infrastructure.
Regarding the accuracy and reliability of its output, OpenVPN Access Server does not actually have any native or built-in AI capabilities right now.
It is strictly a dedicated virtual private network and secure routing platform.
But if we look at the accuracy and reliability of its output from a pure networking standpoint, meaning connection stability, correct routing rules, and steady traffic management, it is incredibly reliable.
When you configure an access rule or subnet mapping, it works exactly as intended without bugs or random drops.
The platform is rock-solid on performance and does exactly what it is configured to do. It does not use artificial intelligence to get that done.
I would rate this product an overall 8 out of 10.