IBM Instana Observability Operator
IBM SoftwareReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
449 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Instant Service Discovery and Game-Changing Alerting for Faster Incident Response
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the agent deployment because it discovers services instantly without requiring us to do a lot of configuration. I also appreciate the alerting system; it has been a game changer for improving our incident response times. On top of that, the dynamic service maps help us derive actionable insights, which are essential for our application performance monitoring.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can take a significant amount of time and effort to train new users on its advanced functionality and full set of features. In my opinion, it’s also noticeably pricier than other APM tools I’ve worked with.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
My experience with IBM Instana in our organization has been largely positive. Before deploying it, we struggled to identify performance issues quickly. Since implementing it, it has helped us resolve incidents faster and has also given us real-time monitoring capabilities, which makes it easier to spot and address problems as they arise.
Real-Time Monitoring with Initial UI Challenges
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM Instana for application performance monitoring, which efficiently shows our application's performance in real time and quickly identifies problems. I like that it's built for real-time monitoring and reduces manual work. I appreciate the live service map, which updates in real time and fits well with our DevOps and SRE workflows.
What do you dislike about the product?
Costs can become high at scale and the UI can feel overwhelming at first. Specifically, the service view and topology map can be challenging due to too much information being shown at once.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana for real-time application performance monitoring, which helps in quickly finding and resolving performance issues, outages, and errors efficiently. It also reduces manual work and fits well with DevOps/SRE workflows with features like the live service map.
Real-Time Monitoring with Swift Troubleshooting
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM Instana for real-time application monitoring, and it helps me quickly detect issues and easily identify root causes across services. It makes troubleshooting faster with the clear traces and smart alerts. IBM Instana works especially well with microservices and Kubernetes environments, and I appreciate the easy setup and clean dashboard. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines. Most services were auto-detected with minimal manual configuration, which made the initial setup quick and straightforward for our team. I switched to IBM Instana from a traditional monitoring tool, and it provides better real-time visibility and faster root cause analysis.
What do you dislike about the product?
Alerts can sometimes be too sensitive and generate noise. Improving alerts tuning and noise reduction would be helpful. More flexible dashboard customization and simpler pricing would improve the overall experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana for real-time application monitoring and observability, quickly detecting issues and identifying root causes across services. It reduces service failures and troubleshooting time with clear traces and smart alerts, especially in microservices and Kubernetes environments.
Real-Time Monitoring and Auto-Tracing That Speeds Up Root-Cause Analysis
What do you like best about the product?
I like the way it monitoring real time and automatic tracing features.
It help me to quickly identify the root cause of any problem without manual checking multiple logs in microservices and api.
Service dependency map and error detection save a lot of debugging time.
It help me to quickly identify the root cause of any problem without manual checking multiple logs in microservices and api.
Service dependency map and error detection save a lot of debugging time.
What do you dislike about the product?
Ui feel complex for new user.
Some filter are not very easy to grap like, i were confuse initially which option i have to click to see logs, metrics.
But overall better experience
Some filter are not very easy to grap like, i were confuse initially which option i have to click to see logs, metrics.
But overall better experience
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Previously i use a lot of time , debugging etc to find error in production, it make easy to identify slow api and failure with the help of real-time monitoring, automatic service mapping
Comprehensive APM with Auto-Discovery and Minimal Overhead
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM Instana as our primary application performance monitoring tool across our microservices architecture, and I love how it offers real-time observability without manual instrumentation. Instana makes troubleshooting a lot easier with its end-to-end visibility, which means we’re no longer guessing which service or component is causing issues. I appreciate the friction Instana removes from our day-to-day monitoring and incident response. The UI is clean and intuitive, making navigation seamless even under pressure. The strong correlation across signals, low operational overhead, and helpful service and endpoint views are standout features for me. Instana fits perfectly within fast-moving, CI/CD-driven environments, automatically adapting as services scale and change. It's dependable, quick at providing answers during incidents, and the first place we go when something goes wrong.
What do you dislike about the product?
Even though IBM Instana works really well overall, there are a few areas where I think it could improve. The biggest downside is cost. As your environment grows—more services, more hosts, more traces—the pricing can add up quickly. It’s something you really have to keep an eye on, especially in large or rapidly scaling Kubernetes setups. While the built-in views are good, custom dashboarding feels a bit limited compared to tools like Grafana. If you want highly tailored visualizations for specific teams or use cases, it can feel restrictive. Instana is powerful, but that also means it can be overwhelming at first. New team members sometimes struggle to understand all the views, concepts, and how to effectively navigate traces and dependencies. Instana does a great job with metrics and traces, but if your troubleshooting process is very log-centric, you may still need to rely heavily on another tool. The logs-to-traces experience could be smoother. In very dynamic systems, the automatic discovery and alerting can sometimes surface more information than you need. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it takes some tuning to keep things focused and relevant.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana for real-time observability into our systems' health without manual instrumentation. It solves visibility issues, speeds up root cause analysis, reduces alert noise, and adapts well to fast-moving environments, allowing us to proactively manage and quickly resolve production issues.
Robust Monitoring with Excellent Automated Tracing
What do you like best about the product?
I like IBM Instana for several reasons. The automatic discovery and instrumentation are great because, once it's connected, it detects services, APIs, databases, and infrastructure components on its own, which saves a lot of setup time. I really appreciate the end-to-end distributed tracing feature. It lets me click on a single request and see its entire journey, which makes debugging incredibly straightforward and removes the guesswork. The alerting system is another aspect I enjoy—alerts are meaningful and tied to actual performance degradation or error rate changes, so it reduces noise and alert fatigue. Additionally, Instana works well with microservices and container environments, automatically keeping everything mapped and updated, which is very helpful in cloud-native environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find cost and scalability challenging for smaller teams. IBM Instana seems designed for enterprise environments, and for smaller projects or startups, it can feel a bit heavy and potentially expensive compared to lighter monitoring tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana to solve the problem of visibility in complex systems, with end-to-end tracing to pinpoint slowdowns or failures. It automatically discovers and instruments components, saving setup time. The alerting system minimizes noise, and it excels in microservices and container environments by keeping everything updated automatically.
Insightful Monitoring with Room for Cost Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I use IBM Instana for cloud monitoring and appreciate the insights and granular information it provides for VM resources. It supports observability for my cluster setup and helps me with root cause analysis, which is really useful for analyzing issues in my clusters or containers. This feature helps me understand the clusters better and optimize my resources, identifying issues early before going production-ready, thus minimizing MTTR and increasing productivity. I also like the cost optimization feature that offers a lot of cost savings on resources. Additionally, the initial setup was quite simple, and the guide on the official site is good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Maybe the product cost could be reduced. Like SaaS is 21USD per MVS per month, with this price long term usage would be difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana for cloud monitoring, gaining insights, and granular VM resource information. It's great for observability in my cluster setup. The root cause analysis helps minimize MTTR and the cost optimization saves resources and increases productivity.
Fast, Automated Monitoring and Observability with IBM Instana
What do you like best about the product?
IBM Instana is a amazing tool for monitoring and observability, and stands out for its speed and automation and its realtime service topology map is really useful which visually shows how our micro-services connect, allowing faster root cause analysis.
What do you dislike about the product?
When it comes to highly tailored monitoring, you often need manual configs and workarounds.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Now a days, modern apps are not that simple, they have micro services, containers and cloud platforms connectivity, so IBM Instana provides us with advance monitoring. It almost instantly detects all our service containers and dependencies in real time.
Transforms IT Monitoring with Real-Time Insights
What do you like best about the product?
I really value IBM Instana's dynamic graph and asset visualization. It makes it exceptionally easy for any project manager, regardless of technical depth, to quickly understand specifics of low performance or security challenges. The intuitive navigation system is incredibly powerful for performing high-speed log and trace searches that link IT traces directly to a business context, ensuring that our development cycle remains fast and our lead times stay competitive.
What do you dislike about the product?
If there are areas that need more attention, it would be transaction transparency in a high customer integration. While it actually has standard stacks, transaction handling for third-party components can sometimes be opaque, making cross-connection mapping and multiple environments difficult. I also believe there is significant room for improvement in AI-driven automated remediation. While the recently announced agent tech AI features are promising and out of the box, the ability to execute the next best action on automated scripts without human intervention is still maturing and often requires a lot of manual fine-tuning to avoid false positives.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use IBM Instana as a centralized observability engine to address data challenges and lack of transparency, reducing downtime and focusing on innovation. It provides real-time monitoring and automated discovery, cutting troubleshooting time significantly and enhancing strategic development.
Unified Monitoring with Real-Time Precision
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate IBM Instana's dynamic graph and automatic discovery capabilities. These features eliminate the exhaustive manual configuration and constant tagging required by other enterprise tools, as Instana maps out the dependencies on its own. The one-second granularity is a game-changer as it allows us to pinpoint every single cell to a service and endpoint without needing custom instruction code. This feature has completely transformed how we handle distributed tracing across all microservices. I also love how easy the initial setup was for us, and I'd rate it a nine out of 10 for recommendation.
What do you dislike about the product?
While automated features are world-class, the performance does fall a bit short when it comes to long-term historical data retention and deep trend analysis. It is built for now, but looking back over several months of data to find very subtle patterns can be restrictive. I also feel like the native dashboard could be more flexible. While the APIs for reporting are solid, the out-of-the-box visualization options sometimes feel a bit rigid when you are trying to build a single pane of glass for non-technical stakeholders.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
IBM Instana solved our monitoring data fragmentation issue. It unified our monitoring, drastically reducing MTTR by automatically correlating events across layers, eliminating manual labor to understand database latency impacts on user journeys.
showing 1 - 10