BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,631 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Device Simulators Make Testing Easy
What do you like best about the product?
Being able to use the devices Simulators
What do you dislike about the product?
Feel like its a bit too costly but I get it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its helps me to use multiple devices for my testing.
Great Features, But Real-Device Mobile Automation Costs Are Too High
What do you like best about the product?
Lots of useful and highly accurate results that we are getting.
What do you dislike about the product?
The cost is very high. Running mobile app automation checks on a real device is also really expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile app automation on real device
All-in-One QA Solution That Truly Streamlines Our Work
What do you like best about the product?
The all-in-one solution for QAs because it really streamlines our work
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes I feel that when testing native manually it feels unnatural, but I believe its normal
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can do a lot in less time and its actually saving me time to think quality in a different level
Great Low-Code Automation & Cross-Browser Testing, but Sales Outreach Is Pushy
What do you like best about the product?
Low Code no code automation and cross browser testing
What do you dislike about the product?
Get pestered a lot by sales team to purchase more
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Being bale to test across modern browsers without the need to invest in a device that you will frequently replace
Easy, Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with a Huge Range of Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing very easy without needing physical devices. I like the wide range of real browsers and devices it provides, which helps catch UI and compatibility issues early. The platform is simple to use, reliable, and saves a lot of setup time for testing across different environments. Live testing and debugging feel smooth and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions can feel slightly slow, especially when testing on older devices or during peak usage hours. Pricing can also be a bit high for small teams. In a few cases, browser or device sessions disconnect unexpectedly, which can interrupt testing and require restarting the session.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing applications across multiple browsers, operating systems, and devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. It helps identify browser-specific and device-specific issues early in the development cycle, which reduces production bugs. This saves significant time and effort for the QA team and improves overall software quality by ensuring a consistent user experience across platforms.
Eliminating Test Noise, Using Test Observability to Stabilize Playwright Suites
What do you like best about the product?
Test Observability features is a standout, providing a high level view of our playwright build health that standard logs just can't match. I love the Flaky test detection shown in my dashboard, which helps us isolate unstable tests before they pollute and CI/CD pipeline result. The ability to see failure categories and durations at a glance allows my team to priority is based on real impact. And it has turned our road test data into actionable insights for the entire engineering team.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have noticed that the dashboard can occasionally leg when loading very high volume build histories with thousands of individual test cases. And lastly the price for high parallelism observability can become quite steep as you scale.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack has solved our problem of "noisy" test results where it was difficult to distinguish between genuine regressions and environment related flakiness. By utilizing the failure categorization seen in my screenshot we have reduced our to be investigated queue by nearly 40%. This has directly benefited our release velocity as developer can now trust the build status without seconds guessing every failure.
Seamless Cross-Platform Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing apps on mobile platforms, and I really like its seamless and faster ability to switch between any OS. It's very helpful for testing the same feature on different operating systems. It's especially beneficial for UI-specific layouts. Setting up BrowserStack was also a breeze, taking just a few minutes.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes installing the app code takes longer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing apps on mobile without needing actual devices. It's seamless and fast to switch between OS, which helps with testing features and UI layouts efficiently.
Practice solution for modern cross browser testing
What do you like best about the product?
Good for Real Device. Easy to used for new user.
Cross Browser support very good.
Able to automation on mobile and web also.
String support from customer support.
Implement easy.
Cross Browser support very good.
Able to automation on mobile and web also.
String support from customer support.
Implement easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
On Automation slow shows the result.
In automation flaky test cases observed due to timeout or network issue.
cost is not good for personal use.
UI is not good they need to work on that.
In automation flaky test cases observed due to timeout or network issue.
cost is not good for personal use.
UI is not good they need to work on that.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its solve environment dependent for all user widely.
they provide 100+ real browser + OS support.
No setup for BS.
Latest OS for Mobile device that provide its solve lots of testing problem.
they provide 100+ real browser + OS support.
No setup for BS.
Latest OS for Mobile device that provide its solve lots of testing problem.
Essential for Cross-Browser and Device Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test our application on different browsers and real devices to find bugs that are specific to certain devices or browser versions. I especially enjoy the broad variety of devices and browsers that are available to select. In cases where bugs occur or when I want to test our product on common devices or browsers that I don't have access to, BrowserStack comes in handy. The initial setup was quite straightforward, making it easy to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing comes into my mind
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test our application on different browsers and real devices to reproduce device or browser-specific bugs. It comes in handy when we don't have the specific devices for testing, allowing us to ensure compatibility across a broad range of platforms.
Instant Access to Real Devices Makes Testing Seamless
What do you like best about the product?
App Live gives instant access to real Android and iOS devices, which removes the usual delays caused by device unavailability or lab scheduling. The touch interactions feel natural enough to validate gestures, scrolling behavior, and UI responsiveness, things emulators often fail to reflect accurately. I rely heavily on App Live when reproducing customer-reported issues, because matching the exact device and OS version is straightforward. Device logs, screenshots, and session recordings help capture evidence immediately, making bug reports much clearer for developers. Features like device rotation, network simulation, and app reinstalling within the same session save a lot of setup time during exploratory testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Popular devices can take time to become available during peak usage hours. For animation-heavy apps, there can be slight latency in visual rendering. Older devices sometimes feel slow, which can impact the speed of exploratory testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Eliminates the need to maintain and upgrade a physical mobile device lab. Enables quick reproduction of production issues on exact device-OS combinations. Improves test coverage by making it easy to validate behavior across multiple devices in one session. Speeds up bug reporting by attaching real device evidence instead of screenshots from emulators. Helps QA teams run effective exploratory testing without infrastructure overhead.
showing 1 - 10