BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,636 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Really helpful debugging very specific cases
What do you like best about the product?
Really great to debug some very specific cases
Real devices debugging
CI/CD integration
Real devices debugging
CI/CD integration
What do you dislike about the product?
The UI can be a bit slow
Free Trial could be a bit longer per OS. Sometimes you're still trying to understand how it works and you are already kicked out. Once you go to a new device you lost all your steps.
Free Trial could be a bit longer per OS. Sometimes you're still trying to understand how it works and you are already kicked out. Once you go to a new device you lost all your steps.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile App Testing and Automation Testing mainly. Mobile App testing is great for those who can't have all devices to test.
Testing Made Easy: My Positive Experience with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack saved my sanity (and countless hours) with its massive device lab and smooth testing. No more browser compatibility headaches, just real-world results at my fingertips. A developer's dream!
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing can be steep for smaller projects, making me yearn for a pay-as-you-go option.
Occasional hiccups with the local tunnel setup sometimes disrupt my testing groove.
Occasional hiccups with the local tunnel setup sometimes disrupt my testing groove.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Local testing often misses quirks in different browsers and devices. BrowserStack lets you catch issues before users do, resulting in a more stable and polished product.
It just works, everytime.
What do you like best about the product?
It's not buggy. Site and page renderings are consistent, accurate, and fully functional.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hmmm, not sure there's anything. It's useful and manageable.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It confirms the functionality and rendering of the sites.
Automates Selenium Testing
What do you like best about the product?
It's a pain to manually run selenium tests, this removes a lot of that burden.
What do you dislike about the product?
Emulation can only go so far for hardware issues
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automating cross-device testing
Great tool for cross-browser testing
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack has excellent performance for Mac & iOS devices, which is critical for our company's needs. I use it almost every day, and I definitely can say it's a convenient and must-have tool for every QA team. Since my team migrated from another emulation solution our productivity has increased, so I think it was a good decision to choose BS
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't have any concerns about BS functionality
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack replaces dozens of real devices for a large QA team. Every team member has access to a specified device by demand
BrowserStack for Mobile and Accessibility Testing
What do you like best about the product?
There are plenty of devices to choose from. And the newly added accessibility check is great.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it feels like a little lagging by using the devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our team is able to test on different type of devices with BrowserStack as we don't need to keep updating the physical devices.
A very cost-effective way to test on real devices
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack gives me confidence that my software will work on real devices, because unlike testing with other methods (e.g. cypress with a different-sized browser) I know that there won't be differences between a simulated device and the real thing. BrowserStack has a system that I'd love to make myself but would never have the time or money to do half-as-well for even a few devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
- Using BrowserStack is harder, laggier and generally a worse experience than testing on real devices.
- There are (ironically) issues if you're not using Chrome
- There are (ironically) issues if you're not using Chrome
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me test web apps without having to own the hardware I test it on. This is particularly relevant on iOS devices where the Safari version varies with the OS and there's no effective way to install different versions on a device.
Great product but expensive.
What do you like best about the product?
I like being able to live test on various types of browsers and mobile devices. It's very easy to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like being limited on the number of minutes I can use when testing. We have a team of 5, and $150/mo is way to expensive when all we want to do is test sites we build on mobile and desktop.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use this tool to test websites I have built on different browsers and mobile devices. It's great to test on the "real" device when I don't have access to the physical devices.
Go to Tool for Web and Mobile testing
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack provides real devices for testing instead of emulators which others do. Latency is very less and devices are smooth it feels like i am using a real device. Biometric, sim card with numbers and an ocean of devices are some of the best things. i suggest every organization to prefer browserstack they are leader in market share and also leader in providing effecient devices. customer support is also a best thing they help you on chat with relevant information. for automation they integrate well with any framework
What do you dislike about the product?
i dont find any dislike. i have used all the competitors of browserstack and i feel they are above all of them
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of buying real devices and test on it. now we can just go to browserstack and perform all task which we normally do on real devices
Browserstack is a solution to your mobile app testing coverage problem.
What do you like best about the product?
1. Easy to use
2. Good customer support
3. Can be used as many times I want to.
4. Easy to implement test environment.
5. Multiple devices coverage.
2. Good customer support
3. Can be used as many times I want to.
4. Easy to implement test environment.
5. Multiple devices coverage.
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Devices frequently disconnecting even when session is being used.
2. When we use kill app feature, it does not kill the active app in foreground only, instead kills all the ative apps which is really annoying.
3. We should be able to select device from a specific country, instead of auto select from pool from the country which we don't want. For example, I should be shown option of number of devices available in India, Germany, US and I should be able to select from where i want. As my application reports the country where device exists and thats a problem for me in analyzing the analytics.
4. Using 2 devices at same time slows down the performance.
5. Device settings are not accessible which we particularly need, for example device id cannot be fetched. Only few settings are available in side menu, should be more options available.
6. Integration with automation tool should be more easier.
2. When we use kill app feature, it does not kill the active app in foreground only, instead kills all the ative apps which is really annoying.
3. We should be able to select device from a specific country, instead of auto select from pool from the country which we don't want. For example, I should be shown option of number of devices available in India, Germany, US and I should be able to select from where i want. As my application reports the country where device exists and thats a problem for me in analyzing the analytics.
4. Using 2 devices at same time slows down the performance.
5. Device settings are not accessible which we particularly need, for example device id cannot be fetched. Only few settings are available in side menu, should be more options available.
6. Integration with automation tool should be more easier.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multiple devices coverage.
Ease to access devices.
Ease to access devices.
showing 1,501 - 1,510