BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
2,631 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Testing your apps for all browsers
What do you like best about the product?
Very helpful in testing web and mobile apps in different browsers for compatibility
What do you dislike about the product?
what ever limited use of Browser stack we have done, it looks good
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
web and mobile apps in different browsers for compatibility
Effortless Testing with Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate BrowserStack for offering a full range of real devices, which is essential for us as a service company with customers who are very particular about application compatibility. The ease of use when it comes to installing APK or IPA files is a big plus, especially when I want to upgrade the APK with new features or test a web app on multiple browsers. I'm also starting to like the AI features. The initial setup is easy, and it fits well with our needs.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the iOS app installation slower than I'd like. When installing an app after selecting the device, it takes a good amount of time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack provides a full range of real devices for testing, which is crucial for our service company. It's easy to install APK or IPA files and test web apps across multiple browsers. I also enjoy the new AI features.
Essential Tool for Effortless UI Testing and Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
As a frontend/React developer, it really saves time when validating UI, date/time issues, responsiveness, and browser-specific bugs without needing multiple physical devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional slowness or session lag, especially during peak hours or when using real mobile devices.
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can quickly test my React UI on real browsers and real mobile devices from one place.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
User-Friendly Platform with Room for Faster Device Previews
What do you like best about the product?
Intuitive, responsive platform. Easy to navigate. Lots of different devices to test on.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasionally takes a long time to swap between device types when previewing content.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can see what my content will look like on devices I don't physically have access to, so I can see what content is responsible all screen sizes and what isn't.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing with Seamless Automation Integration
What do you like best about the product?
It saves a lot of time because everything runs online and setup is easy. The interface is simple, and it works well with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines. It’s very helpful for teams that need cross-browser testing. However, it can feel expensive, sometimes the sessions are slow or laggy, and device availability can be an issue during busy times. Overall, BrowserStack is a good and reliable testing platform, but the price and performance issues may not suit everyone.
What do you dislike about the product?
well nothing as of now but sometime session disconnects alot but its not usual.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
t removes the hassle of setting up multiple environments and saves a lot of time by providing instant access to real devices in the cloud. This helps me quickly catch cross-browser and device-specific issues, improves test coverage, and speeds up both manual and automated testing.
Effortless Parallel Testing and Seamless Integrations
What do you like best about the product?
Parallel execution actually works reliably. When we run our full suite across multiple OS-browser combinations, the time savings are huge. The integration with popular frameworks (Selenium, Appium, Playwright, Cypress) is straightforward, you don’t waste time wrestling with configs. The session dashboard is clean: logs, video, network timelines, console output - all in one place. Debugging flakiness becomes much easier. Being able to run tests on real mobile + desktop devices without maintaining hardware is a massive operational relief. Build insights (pass/fail trends, flaky test detection, failure clustering) help identify problem tests faster.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional device allocation delays during peak hours can slow down CI pipelines. Video playback during debugging sometimes feels slightly laggy for animation-heavy flows. Network logs are useful but could be more detailed for deep investigation. If the suite has many retries, the dashboard can get cluttered without proper naming conventions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It eliminates the need to manage Selenium grids, Appium servers, or physical device racks, zero time wasted on infra. Makes cross-platform testing scalable. We can validate the same feature across Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge, and multiple OS versions in parallel. Reduces investigation time dramatically because every failure comes with video, logs, screenshots, and environment details. Fits cleanly into CI pipelines, our automated suite runs on every pull request, which improves code quality before merging. Helps catch environment-specific bugs early (especially WebKit/Safari quirks and Android OEM inconsistencies). Increases release confidence because automation coverage becomes both broader and more stable.
Real Device Testing Made Effortless and Reliable
What do you like best about the product?
As a QA engineer, being able to test on real hardware instead of just some fake simulator is the best thing, because those simulators always lie, right? It just means when I find a bug, I know its a real bug the customer will actually hit. And the ability to fire up a test on some obscure old browser in like, two seconds? So smooth. It just makes the whole testing process way less painful.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main thing is that it can get real slow and laggy sometimes. You're trying to quickly check an animation on an old Android, but the mouse movements and screen updates are delayed, and it throws off the whole test.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack basically solves the nightmare of device fragmentation. Before this, we had to either buy a giant rack of test phones and computers, or just kinda cross our fingers that the site would not break on some obscure browser. Now, We just use BrowserStack and know for sure it works on literally everything.
Highly Efficient Testing Tool for Web and Mobile Apps
What do you like best about the product?
Looking from my eyes browserstack seems very efficient software for testing website as well as mobile applications.
I also refer to my friend who are working in IT industry
I also refer to my friend who are working in IT industry
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing seems to be dislike. As it is very efficient tools they are providing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing our mobile applications and helping hands in friends group
User-Friendly Cross-Browser Testing with Excellent Support
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack for its user-friendly interface and the convenience it offers for cross-browser testing. It provides a wide range of features, such as live testing, mobile testing, and debugging, which I find very useful. Integrating it into our system was straightforward, and it also connects easily with CI/CD pipelines. The customer support is excellent, and I find myself using it frequently.
What do you dislike about the product?
I like most of the features, but there are a few common issues I haven't liked about BrowserStack. It is expensive, and the debugging capabilities are limited on some devices. Additionally, the performance feels slower compared to using a real device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Sometimes, we encounter situations where real devices are not available. In those cases, we use BrowserStack instead, which helps us save both time and costs. Additionally, there is no need for in-house maintenance.
Comprehensive Testing Tools for All Devices
What do you like best about the product?
A range of testing tools is available, allowing us to perform tests on a variety of different devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
At this moment, I have nothing to dislike.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
There is a wide range of devices available for us to test on, which makes things much more convenient since we don't have to rely on having any physical devices ourselves.
showing 151 - 160