BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,173 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Much needed for QAEs
What do you like best about the product?
It helps find the bugs that not every eye can capture. Especially the edge cases for cross browser testing. It is convenient to record video directly and attach in the JIRA.
What do you dislike about the product?
It has very limited access to the cloud devices as compared to other websites.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When participating in bug bash with high level knowledge about the product, this helps us find edge cases with cross browser testing.
Points out the failing one among multiple API
Helps test application in different OEMs virtually though it is limitedly available.
Points out the failing one among multiple API
Helps test application in different OEMs virtually though it is limitedly available.
A Reliable Tool for Real-World Testing Across Devices
What do you like best about the product?
As a UX Engineer, one of the most valuable aspects of BrowserStack is its ability to let me test on real devices and operating systems remotely. This has been a game-changer for ensuring consistent user experiences across platforms without needing a physical device lab. The interface is intuitive, and spinning up a test environment takes just a few clicks. It’s especially helpful when debugging layout issues or performance quirks that only appear on specific device-browser combinations.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the platform is powerful, occasionally, the remote sessions can feel slightly laggy, especially when testing animations or transitions, which can make it harder to assess performance nuances. I’d also love to see deeper integrations with design tools or prototyping platforms in the future.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With BrowserStack, I can instantly access real devices and environments remotely, which means I can catch layout bugs, performance issues, and compatibility problems early in the development cycle. This has significantly improved the quality of our releases and reduced the number of post-launch fixes.
Great experience to test mobile devices
What do you like best about the product?
It has variety of mobile devices to test
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes takes a lot of time to load some devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
How to see some apps or sections from pages in different screen sizes and they reflow properly
The functionality is valuable, but there is room for improvement in performance.
What do you like best about the product?
As an individual developer, BrowserStack Live allows me to perform real device debugging and style comparisons across multiple devices/browsers without the need for my own equipment. It's easy to use, has low implementation costs, and I use it before every regular regression test. The screenshot/recording evidence is also sufficient, and it really enhances my efficiency.
What do you dislike about the product?
The device loading and session switching are relatively slow during peak hours, with occasional lag, and some models (such as the SIM-equipped iPhone) have a long cold start waiting time, affecting the continuity of debugging experience. If the startup speed and stability can be further optimized, it would be more worthwhile for long-term use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the difficulties I faced as an individual developer in multi-device compatibility and side-by-side comparison: it used to be very difficult to simultaneously check styles and interactions on the iPhone, Android, iPad, and desktop browsers, and it was also inconvenient to reproduce issues in an intranet environment.
Very useful for testing on different browsers and devices
What do you like best about the product?
I am using BrowserStack from last 3 years, and it helped me a lot in my daily testing work. What i like most is that i can run tests on real devices available on the cloud without having to maintain them separately. I utilize it for both manual and automation testing and integrating it with my Selenium Java framework and that was easy setup. Parallel runs of tests are a huge time saver for me, particularly for sanity and regression checks on our e-commerce site. The support team was also responsive whenever i needed assistance.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the test runs are a bit slower compared to local execution, when executing a large test suite. A decent internet connection is also necessary for good performance. Apart from that, the overall experience has been fantastic
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With BrowserStack, I don’t need to keep different devices with me. I can just pick any device or browser from the cloud and run my tests. It also helps me to run tests in parallel and see what is happening in real time, which saves a lot of time and makes debugging easier
cross-browser and mobile app testing made simple
What do you like best about the product?
Makes cross-browser and cross-device testing seamless. I can instantly spin up real devices (iOS/Android) and different browser versions without maintaining my own device lab. The UI is intuitive, speed is good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing can also be a bit steep for small teams or freelancers. Would love to see more generous free usage for individual developers and testers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Able to test our mobile apps across different brands, operating systems, and mobile devices without manually setting up multiple test environments. It saved us time and improved our release quality.
Reliable tool for cross-browser and device testing
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes it easy to test across a wide range of browsers and devices without having to manage an in-house device lab. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, which helps streamline automated testing. The variety of platforms available saves our QA team a lot of time and ensures better coverage for real user environments
What do you dislike about the product?
At times, there can be slight performance delays and lag during live testing sessions, especially when multiple users are on the system, especially on Android devices. Pricing can also feel a bit high for smaller teams, but overall, the value is strong for medium to large QA teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps our team test across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without maintaining a physical device lab. This ensures faster validation of features, improved cross-browser coverage, and more reliable results when compared to manual in-house testing. It also saves us significant time during regression cycles and reduces the risk of missing issues that only occur in specific environments.
Reliable cross-browser testing made easy
What do you like best about the product?
I really like how seamless it is to spin up different browsers and devices on demand. It saves me a huge amount of time, and I don’t need to worry about setting up local test environments. The integrations with CI/CD tools are also very handy, making it easier to catch issues earlier in the development cycle.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the sessions can be a little slower than running tests locally, especially for more complex builds. The pricing can also feel high for smaller teams, and a few niche devices or older browsers aren’t always available. That said, it’s still a lot more convenient than managing everything in-house.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices without the need to maintain physical hardware or multiple VMs. It ensures that our applications work for all end users, reduces manual setup time, and helps us release faster with more confidence.
Cost cutting mobile testing made easy
What do you like best about the product?
Devise testing made easy for basic and medium features
What do you dislike about the product?
some physical gestures detection missing for some devicses
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mobile testing without physical devices
Essential Tool for Cross-Device Ecommerce Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for ecommerce app testing with multiple devices. It solves cross-device and cross-browser compatibility issues, reduces the need for maintaining physical devices, speeds up regression testing, and helps us identify UI and performance bugs at early stages across different OS and screen sizes. I really like the ease of use and access to network logs, which means we don't have to rely on developers to get network-enabled builds, allowing us to debug issues directly during testing. The initial setup was very easy since we had corporate one-time sign-in authentication. We're happy using BrowserStack, and I would rate it 8 out of 10 in terms of recommending it to a friend or colleague.
What do you dislike about the product?
It sometimes crashes or becomes very slow when network logs are enabled. Also, many of the devices don't have the option to enable network logs, which limits debugging capabilities.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to solve cross-device and cross-browser compatibility issues, reducing the need for physical devices, and speeding up regression testing. It helps identify UI and performance bugs early and offers ease of use with access to network logs for debugging.
showing 811 - 820