RunMyJobs (EMEA)
Redwood SoftwareReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
312 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Crystal-Clear Execution History and Strong Governance
What do you like best about the product?
What stands out for me is how clearly it shows execution history. When a business user says, “The report didn’t come,” I don’t have to guess. I can immediately see whether the job ran, how long it took, and exactly where it stopped.That governance reduces accidental impact on live operations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the navigation between job definitions, calendars, and queues requires switching multiple views. It’s organized, but not always quick for first-time users.It’s not fully self-service for business teams, which can slow minor improvements.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our reporting cycle used to depend heavily on coordination calls between departments. Now processes are automated based on completion signals instead of verbal confirmation. It has reduced reruns and late-night troubleshooting sessions.
Rock-Solid Reliability: Set It Up Once and It Just Runs
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most is the reliability. Once a job is configured and tested, it just runs without constant babysitting. I really like how it integrates with cloud services and APIs. The alerting and notification system is very effective. The scalability is impressive. We manage thousands of jobs daily without performance issues. Governance features like role-based access control help us maintain compliance across teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
The UI can feel overwhelming initially. For new team members, it takes time to understand job chains, calendars, and dependencies. Debugging failed jobs sometimes requires jumping between logs and definitions. Some error messages are too technical and not always clear for first-level support staff. Initial setup and design require proper planning.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of fragmented scheduling across multiple systems. Earlier, different teams used different schedulers, which caused coordination issues. It removes manual intervention from complex workflows. It solves the problem of visibility. Earlier, we had to log into multiple servers to check job status. It standardizes automation across the organization.
Transformative Cloud-Native Automation with Real-time Monitoring
What do you like best about the product?
I use RunMyJobs to automate and orchestrate our business-critical processes across multiple systems. I appreciate the real-time monitoring and alerting, which allow us to quickly identify and resolve issues. The scalability and flexibility of the platform are also valuable. I like how intuitive and centralized it is, and the dashboard provides clear visibility to all scheduled jobs and workflows, making monitoring easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
The user interface, while functional, can feel a little complex for new users. The platform is powerful and reliable but refinement in usability and documentation would make it even better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use RunMyJobs to automate and orchestrate our business-critical processes, eliminating manual job scheduling, reducing errors, and preventing job failures and missed deadlines. It offers real-time monitoring, scalability, and a centralized platform, making process management efficient and easy.
Rock-Solid SAP Job Scheduling with Precise Dependencies and Detailed Logs
What do you like best about the product?
What I genuinely like is how stable it feels once everything is configured correctly. We run a lot of SAP background jobs overnight, and earlier we had random failures that needed manual follow-up. With RunMyJobs, I feel more confident leaving things unattended because the dependency handling is very precise. The logging is detailed enough that I don’t need to SSH into systems unless absolutely necessary. It saves time during incidents.
What do you dislike about the product?
Learning curve is real. Documentation is detailed but not always practical.Sometimes small changes require formal deployment processes, which slows down quick fixes. For business users, it’s not very intuitive without technical support.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We had fragmented automation using shell scripts, Windows schedulers, and manual interventions. Consolidating everything into RunMyJobs improved audit tracking and reduced operational risk.It has improved internal trust because reports are always delivered on schedule.
Excellent Alerts and Job Monitoring That Speed Up Troubleshooting
What do you like best about the product?
From a support standpoint, alerts and job monitoring are extremely helpful. When something fails, I get clear information about where and why it happened, which speeds up troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
Licensing and feature boundaries can be confusing. Sometimes it’s not immediately clear which capabilities are included versus add-ons, which makes planning harder
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of reactive support. Instead of users reporting issues after business impact has already occurred, RMJ alerts us proactively. This has improved our SLA performance and reduced the number of escalations we receive.
Confidence and Transparency for Unattended Runs
What do you like best about the product?
What I personally like most is the confidence it gives during unattended runs. Earlier, during night shifts, I constantly checked whether dependent jobs triggered correctly.When someone modifies a job parameter or schedule, I can track it without sending emails to half the team. That transparency improves accountability.
What do you dislike about the product?
Bulk updates are not as simple as I expected. When multiple jobs need small configuration changes, it becomes slightly repetitive.Without hands-on exposure, it’s hard to grasp advanced scheduling logic.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We deal with file transfers between systems that must happen in strict order. Earlier, if one file was delayed, the downstream process would still run and create reconciliation issues.Now, during audits, we can clearly demonstrate execution history, ownership, and changes.
Centralized Workflow Orchestration with Powerful Native SAP Integration
What do you like best about the product?
It centralizes batch jobs, file transfers, SAP processes, cloud workflows, and more into one platform instead of juggling multiple schedulers. Especially for organizations running complex SAP landscapes, the native integration is a major advantage. You can orchestrate highly complex, cross-platform workflows with clear visibility and control.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some areas prioritize functionality over user experience, which may require training for non-technical users.The flexibility is a strength, but initial setup and advanced workflow design can be time-intensive.For smaller organizations, enterprise pricing may feel high compared to simpler schedulers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
RunMyJobs solves the challenge of complex workload orchestration across hybrid systems. Instead of managing multiple schedulers, scripts, and platforms separately, it provides one central automation engine that can:
Coordinate jobs across on-premise and cloud environments
Automate SAP processes and file transfers reliably
Handle dependencies, alerts, and error recovery automatically
Standardize workload scheduling instead of relying on ad-hoc scripts
Provide visibility and auditability for compliance and operations
Coordinate jobs across on-premise and cloud environments
Automate SAP processes and file transfers reliably
Handle dependencies, alerts, and error recovery automatically
Standardize workload scheduling instead of relying on ad-hoc scripts
Provide visibility and auditability for compliance and operations
Seamless SAP Integration with Business-Driven Scheduling
What do you like best about the product?
I really value how well it integrates with SAP environments. Business calendars, job chains, and event-based triggers align closely with how our business actually operates, not just how IT wants to schedule things.
What do you dislike about the product?
Reporting could be more flexible. While the data is there, creating customized reports for management sometimes requires extra steps or support involvement.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the issue of unreliable batch processing. Month-end and quarter-end runs used to be stressful, with manual checks and late nights. With RMJ, processes are predictable and transparent, which has significantly reduced business risk and pressure during critical periods.
Rock-Solid Scheduling for Time-Sensitive Production Reporting
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most is how it handles time-sensitive production processes. In our manufacturing environment, certain reports must run exactly after plant data is finalized — not before.That reliability gives confidence during peak load periods.
What do you dislike about the product?
When something fails, understanding the root cause sometimes requires navigating through multiple log sections. It’s powerful, but not always quick for first-level troubleshooting.It’s not something you casually adjust in production. That’s good for control, but sometimes slows urgent fixes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Earlier, if one upstream data file was delayed, reports would still generate with incomplete numbers. Now processes depend on actual completion signals.With automated orchestration, there’s less human dependency. It has reduced operational risk and improved morning reporting accuracy.
Automates Billing Cycles with Reliable, Phase-by-Phase Workflow Control
What do you like best about the product?
What I personally value most is how it controls billing cycles without manual coordination. Our invoicing process depends on multiple upstream validations, and RMJ ensures each phase completes before the next begins.It’s especially useful for routine health-check scripts that must run consistently.
What do you dislike about the product?
The system requires careful design thinking. If a workflow is not structured properly at the beginning, making changes later can feel layered and time-consuming. It’s designed more for structured enterprise processes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved recurring billing delays caused by jobs running on fixed schedules instead of actual completion status.Now conditional dependencies prevent that, reducing rework and follow-up clarifications.Now the process reacts to real-time conditions. That improved invoice accuracy and reduced correction efforts.
showing 91 - 100