The service itself is very good, but it might require some more time to mature.
What do you like best about the product?
- It is very flexible.
- It joins catalog with self-service.
- Support is fast
- User interface is simple
- It joins catalog with self-service.
- Support is fast
- User interface is simple
What do you dislike about the product?
- Plenty of bugs
- Some key features still missing
- Not enough managed integrations (have to install some exporters)
- Some user interface actions are not self intuitive (might cause data loss when not expected)
- No native version control integration (e.g. Git file changes)
- No managed self-service inte4grations (e.g. Helm is one of the most common standards used to install applications, self-service actions could be automatically created based on Helm chart definition and then this definition could be used to display data in catalog)
- Some key features still missing
- Not enough managed integrations (have to install some exporters)
- Some user interface actions are not self intuitive (might cause data loss when not expected)
- No native version control integration (e.g. Git file changes)
- No managed self-service inte4grations (e.g. Helm is one of the most common standards used to install applications, self-service actions could be automatically created based on Helm chart definition and then this definition could be used to display data in catalog)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Primarily catalog automation (up to date information about our services, automtic integrations and automatic generation of "missing information" reports, in this case we use scoreboards and tables).
We are also using it to provide self-service actions.
The main problem it's solving is management complexity of similar self-hosted services (e.g. Backstage)
We are also using it to provide self-service actions.
The main problem it's solving is management complexity of similar self-hosted services (e.g. Backstage)