Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Provided a reliable connectivity and transfer of data across multiple systems
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of writing code using COBOL or from Front end and the possible abstraction it provides to developers.
Fail-safe and reliable for high volume production deployments.
Fail-safe and reliable for high volume production deployments.
What do you dislike about the product?
Has to be a bit more user friendly. May be ease of calling or using from scripting language like rexx or ability to write quick stubs..
Should be more easy-to-use test new deployments.
Should be more easy-to-use test new deployments.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Connectivity across systems
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Na
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
MQ as Middleware
What do you like best about the product?
We used MQ as middleware to make data transfer secure.
What do you dislike about the product?
The MQ configuration appears old-fashioned.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We used MQ to communicate between Oracle Service BUS and CICS applications.
The use of MQ ensured that we did not lose data.
The use of MQ ensured that we did not lose data.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
MQ guarantees the safe transport of data.
MQ is useful for not overloading the servers.
MQ is useful for not overloading the servers.
IBM MQ on zos user in Banking firm
What do you like best about the product?
I have been using IBM MQ as a messaging middleware in Banking payment landscape. MQ enables interaction between interfacing system seamlessly. We have been noticed the system resilience and availability since MQ is adopted as a strategic path within the bank. We are a happy consumer.
What do you dislike about the product?
Things for improvement: DPL bridger performance issues.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
MQ keeps the business interaction between systems intact and less maintenance.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's trusted product line from ibm
IBM MQ is the Backbone of Middleware domain
What do you like best about the product?
IBM MQ is probably one of the oldest middleware solutions provided by IBM. MQ means messaging queuing which essentially works as a transport medium to transport any sort of message or data from source to the destination. MQ has all types of resources like queues, channels, queue manager, process definitions, etc.
IBM MQ can offer you point to point and clustered setup based on your network requirement. If you have only 2 parties where one is the source and the other destination then P2P is more advantageous, but if you have many queue managers and they are interlinked with different services they support then have a clustered setup and establishing a full repository accompanied with few partial repositories would be a good option for you.
IBM MQ is capable of handling the highest security implementations possible. We have upgraded the latest TLS on the system and it was successfully deployed with new cert exchange also happening without any issues. There can also be security at CLN
IBM MQ can offer you point to point and clustered setup based on your network requirement. If you have only 2 parties where one is the source and the other destination then P2P is more advantageous, but if you have many queue managers and they are interlinked with different services they support then have a clustered setup and establishing a full repository accompanied with few partial repositories would be a good option for you.
IBM MQ is capable of handling the highest security implementations possible. We have upgraded the latest TLS on the system and it was successfully deployed with new cert exchange also happening without any issues. There can also be security at CLN
What do you dislike about the product?
IBM MQ has been there forever and they have always tried to perfect it more and more in each version. My biggest concern with the software is the patching process, if you encounter any bug they will give you a temporary solution but you will need to wait till the next patch comes out for that bug to be addressed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our whole middleware system is based on MQ interfacing with Websphere message broker and Websphere Datapower Gateway. The beauty of IBM MQ is that it is wire-speed, stable, can not be hacked, non-repudiable, integrity is intact and surity of messaf
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you are looking for an Enterprise level solution for handling transport of data from source to the destination safe, secure, non-repudiation, intact an
Market leader in Middleware Technology
What do you like best about the product?
IBM MQ is a proprietary software from IBM. We have purchased the Enterprise edition in which you can create as many new queue managers and connections you want. The best part about it is that is the safest option for a message delivery system. It offers you non- repudiation, integrity of the message, checksum and all this is happening at wire speed for literally millions of transactions each day. The software has a bit of learning curve but once you fully understand the functionality, you realise how powerful, stable and fast it is compared to any other competitive products. IBM MQ is the best software available in the market for setting up a new PUB-SUB model or a full & partial repositories clustering model or even a one to one connection queue manager model. I have never seen better resource management that IBM MQ does in the clustering.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, no complaints from the software as such. But, IBM support team takes a lot of time to respond if you raise a problem ticket to them. We have to open a SEV 1 call bridge to get them on call and that support is very expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I have been working on IBM MQ for more than 5 years now. We have delivered so many projects where the new platform was IBM MQ and they have been going on for ages without any issues, just regular health checks on queue managers and channel connections between them. It integrates so smoothly with IBM DataPower and IBM Message Broker which makes the transportation, orchestration and rendering of the messages so easy to implement.
Secure reliable message transfer
What do you like best about the product?
It has so fast, secure, reliable message transfer capabilities. It can connect to variety of products.
What do you dislike about the product?
The cost of buying the product is higher and It needs to have a rest api to get the messages.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integration solutions between legacy and modern day systems
First look at MQ on Cloud
What do you like best about the product?
The easy way you could set up a queue manager and the keys
What do you dislike about the product?
This was my first look at this conference, so it will take a little while for me to find my dislikes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I work in the transportation field. So problems around moving, tracking trains. Also billing.
MQ - Robust Messaging
What do you like best about the product?
MQ's robust and solid presence for over 25 years has shown over the years. I am fortunate to have been involved with using this product for the last 12 years. We have always had support for everything we need from troubleshooting to implementation and usage.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to see an authorization based web console provided with MQ that can span over a large enterprise without any performance issues.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use MQ for messaging between stores, DCs and our Home Office. Its ease of implementation and maintenance has been very beneficial in our environment.
IBM MQ Administrator
What do you like best about the product?
I like the integration with Event Streams [Apache Kafka] and the ability to perform asynchronous messages across different technological platforms.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dislike some of the usage based licensing models for this product.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Asynchronous messaging, event streaming, and legacy
Recommendations to others considering the product:
MQ seems to be headed in the right direction, no complaints other than some of the licensing models seem strangely designed.
MQTT with MQ
What do you like best about the product?
Was the first MQTT implementation available to us
What do you dislike about the product?
MQTT plugin was not really reliable, tended to hang, didnt respond
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Used the MQTT Plugin
showing 81 - 90