Evaluating Jama Connect
What do you like best about the product?
Simple and efficient UI - While offering all top features to be expected from such as tool (requirement management traceability, baselines management, risk management, reviews, etc.) and a lot of flexibility with its configuration capabilities, the decision of the team to engage with Jama came for a great deal from its simple and intuitive user interface.
Tremendous customer support - While during the evaluation process of the other tools the team had to process the manual or follow length tutorials and onboarding sessions, with Jama the learning curve has been much faster: less than half of the time spent in onboarding/training session with far better results).
What do you dislike about the product?
The configuration, for instance of relationship rules is system-wide and not per-project which is not ideal for contract development / manufacturing as he customer has its own specific needs. However, it is easy to understand the rationale behind it to streamline and standardize all developments within most companies. Fortunately, we can still create as many configurations as we like, one for each project if needed. That will just make the administrators job a bit less easy while having no impact on all the other users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Manage requirements in a single place without all the pain and suffering to maintain traceability in endless traceability tables, including test coverage and test results.
- Limit the risks of quality issue due to undetected gaps in the traceability.
- Allows better and faster management of late-stage changes reducing their impact in terms of both delays and cost.
- As a bonus it offers the possiblity to handle risk management and risk anaylsis in its FMEA templates.
Mainly used for requirements management, but its validation piece is not time-efficient at all
What is most valuable?
We use Jama Connect mainly for requirements management. The solution's most valuable features are tracking and the spider web diagram linking the different types of items. I find it very useful to be able to structure a project as simple or as complex as you want, depending on your needs.
They also allow you to pick items off the menu or customize and configure them to create the structure of what you want. I find that pretty intuitive.
What needs improvement?
Like anything, Jama Connect relies highly on the company's culture because I found the whole review process to sound good, but it does not work in reality. Companies that use the tool are all pretty immature with requirements management, and therefore, they don't have the culture of doing that. You're always chasing them up and end up having review meetings, and no one pays attention to those review notices.
The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all. It's very desktop verification and validation. You need to have it running and loading, which is not efficient. It's very cumbersome and overhead-intensive for verification management.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Jama Connect for six to seven years.
What other advice do I have?
Mining companies are using the solution. I would recommend the solution to other users, depending on what it's used for. I find it quite good and intuitive, and I like it. Its physical layout and the way it presents itself using the icons and graphs are all quite nice. It is particularly helpful for people who don't really know that world very well. I find the solution quite easy for them to learn.
I am technically a user of Jama Connect. The clients are the customers, and they get it from different resellers. I've done training on the product using the in-house support, but the client pays for that. I've been an administrator for different clients to set them up, but I'm not actually the client. I do consultancy work for the clients. So, I'm more just a user and advisor.
Overall, I rate the solution a six or seven out of ten.
Easy to use and setup
What do you like best about the product?
Jama is easy to use because the traceablity that is defined in the system also generate a complete overview of the trace tree.
The example that are in the system gives good input for how to setup your own project.
The possible to have data automatically propagate through the traces are a feature aI never seen before and help in keeping the information flow precise and updated live.
What do you dislike about the product?
The output documents of elements in the system is tough learning curve to get a good understanding of.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is a great solution for have a live tool to create, trace and review requirements. It help trace requirements to elements such as Risk Management, User/Stakeholder Needs, Standards and Regulations, Design Output and Verification activites.
With the defined traces it is also easy to make a impact assesment of changes to elements.
Good solution for long-term documentation needs, provides visibility metrics and impact analysis but collaboration features are not as strong
What is our primary use case?
Jama Connect helps in many aspects. We primarily use it for documentation, which is a good solution for long-term documentation needs. It aids in the maintainability of the Connect and ensures traceability of our development team to win. We also utilize it for the product itself.
How has it helped my organization?
Jama Connect aided our team in leveraging AI for product development. We have integrated it with our dedicated tools, like our working tools in Jira.
What is most valuable?
Jama Connect provides visibility metrics and impact analysis. The relationship mapping feature is especially helpful, as it allows us to connect different requirements and compliance-related documentation. This enables us to effectively develop solution planning.
What needs improvement?
The collaboration features are not as strong. While the review aspect is good within Jama Connect, there is a lack of integration with remote tools like Confluence or Jira. This is an area that could be improved.
Additionally, Jama Connect does not support Control IO or other tools used for visual representation of requirements. This makes it less attractive for preparing design documentation.
There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation. For instance, if the tool could automatically generate a profile based on the documents or artifacts a user interacts with, it would be beneficial.
Currently, users have to navigate through multiple sections to find specific information. A profile feature could streamline this process.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for the past four and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is pretty stable. I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is very poor when it comes to scalability. I would rate the scalability a four out of ten. There are more than a thousand end users.
It is used daily in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
It was neither too difficult nor too easy.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment was done in-house. It took a few days for us.
What was our ROI?
It's mainly about time saving.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it, with some improvements.
Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Jama Software
What do you like best about the product?
Jama is not only a 'document oriented' ALM tool, it gives the organization the ability to map the project structure the product structure making it an easy entry point for R&D folks. Configured properly, it is a real technical and regulatory 'single source of truth.
What do you dislike about the product?
For a standard user, requirement exportation feature is a bit limitied
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Improve requirements visibility (for tech team)
Improve requirements management (traceability)
Improve requirement documentation
Users have the ability to view and manage all test cases directly within the platform and execute them
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for tracking product requirements, including mechanical specs, electrical specs and software.
How has it helped my organization?
It is necessary to input all the information into Jama Connect. If you fail to include all the specifications and features, you won't reap any benefits. Instead, it would lead to confusion and a waste of time. However, once you input everything and start utilizing the tool to its full potential, you will see the benefits. Consider the current state of specifications management; they are often spread across various platforms like Microsoft Word or Google Docs, causing disorganization. Jama Connect provides a unified solution, offering significant benefits.
What is most valuable?
In Jama Connect, users have the capability to view and manage all test cases directly within the platform and execute them. The entire product specification, spanning various domains such as electrical, mechanical, software, and testing, is consolidated within Jama Connect. This eliminates the need to navigate through multiple systems. Traditionally, test trails are separate entities from development or integration processes. With Jama Connect, everything, including testing, is integrated within a single system. This streamlines workflows and eliminates the need to switch between different platforms. Additionally, Jama Connect offers specialized features and training to enhance productivity and efficiency.
What needs improvement?
The solution is expensive. Jama Connect is one of the top systems for documentation and project tracking. It offers robust tracking and review capabilities, although it may require some time investment to fully utilize its features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Jama Connect for two years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Confluence is a competitor.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
What other advice do I have?
Insights are readily available within Jama Connect, allowing users to promptly access them through the platform's messaging system. Installers find the system to be straightforward and well-integrated, which enhances its overall effectiveness.
It provides rich metadata, ensuring that every test case directly corresponds to the requirement. Furthermore, it integrates with engineering requirements documents, facilitating interconnectedness and easy access. One of its most notable features is the ability to track coverage and the current status of the product.
Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
JAMA connect for Medical Devices
What do you like best about the product?
- Ease of use facilitate User integration
- Effective customer support and onboarding planification
- Unlimited free reviewer role
- Versatility of the tool to comply with company processes and align teams on these processes
- Risk management module
- Cloud hosted
What do you dislike about the product?
- Paid Additonal Features such as JAMA Connect Interchange should be part of the "core" solution
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Instant traceability and impact analysis
Useful for lifecycle management of medical devices and has simple UI
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for the lifecycle management of medical devices.
What is most valuable?
I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors.
You don't need any special training to use Jama Connect. It provides enough guidance for anyone to understand, is detailed, and has a better interface than others.
The tool integrates with others, such as Amazon and Excel, making importing and exporting data effortless. We can also have PDF tools.
What needs improvement?
I think there's room for improvement, especially with the review process. Reviews should be integrated with requirement evaluation instead of being separate from it. The review should not run parallel to the requirement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for two months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has been stable. The server has never gone down, and there have been no issues with data mismatching or loss.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team is quite responsive. They strive to resolve any issues within a maximum of 48 hours. Overall, the support from Jama Connect is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
The tool's deployment is the easiest compared to its alternatives. I'm assisting my client, a medical or pharmaceutical device manufacturing company, with deploying Jama Connect on their system. It takes about a month to deploy, mainly due to the migration process. We're working on ensuring that the data migration goes without distortion. The deployment process becomes quicker once everything is set up and the required data attributes are established.
We need to clear certain attributes on the plugin from the product.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend the solution to medical life science projects. Jama Connect is easy to use and understand. The interface is simple, and everything you need is just a click away. I rate it a seven out of ten.
Jama Connect effectively resolved our requirements management issues
What do you like best about the product?
- Intuitve usability in the Cloud Version due to lean design and good/clever implemented functions
- Very mature features for Requirement Management incl. Risk Assesments (Functional Safety, Cyber Security, FMEA) and good features for supporting topics like Test Management
- Superb Customer Service with helpful documents, guidelines and support sessions for all Problems arround the Software and further more the Requirement Management itself
- Adaption for users from other tools (like Doors or Polarion) is no big deal
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing model & extra costs for every integration e.g. REQif import/export, Jira Integration
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Jama allows us to capture and organize requirements in one central location
- It solvs our documentation, "where or what" is the latest version and release issues
- Requirement Improvment Process is now comfortable by using the "Review Center" Feature
Good software for requirements management
What do you like best about the product?
We were using the Cloud version of Jama Connect and it is amazing to be able to use the software and not worry about hosting part. We are still able to configure the useful stuff, but don't have to care about updates or other maintenance activities.
What do you dislike about the product?
The support is good and knowledgable, but the speed of response could be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We needed a database for easy management of requirements with their entire lifecycle, JAMA is assiting with this.