I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team. 

I find Wrike's form system very valuable. I can share forms with my collaborators, and they can fill them out, providing me with the necessary information. Another useful feature is the communication platform, which makes it easy to tag someone and communicate efficiently. Additionally, the integration with Microsoft Office is great. I can create a card on Wrike directly from my MS Teams chat, which is convenient.

The tool generates Gantt charts whenever information is presented in tabular format. 

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website.

The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features. 

I have been working with the product for more than one year. 

I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten. 

I rate the tool's deployment ease as seven out of ten. It can be completed in 30 minutes. 

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend it to others. 

We use Wrike mainly for Project and Task Management, some aspects of ticketing systems, correspondence, and reporting. We also use Wrike for request forms and formal communication related to projects/tasks, analytics, and insight. Our work revolves mainly around the AEC industry and Property Management (along with supporting departments), so Wrike is a great tool to integrate all of that.

We heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, and managing all sorts of projects and tasks; having a correspondence history is convenient. having general awareness of the project and company status, helps with that too.

It's full of unique and interesting features. Wrike keep everything centralized in one place, and that goes along with our CDE principles for any platform we manage in our organization. It enables cross-tagging of certain items, sharing, reporting, and having insight into multiple places of our work.

Sometimes, when you have a bigger project, item dependencies can take a while to update, other than that no complaints. In future releases, I would like to see correspondence with members who are not direct members of our account (and/or not using Wrike at all) or communication with people out of the organization.

We have been using it for about two years, but we had a period dedicated to implementation, which took around a year. Since we have a relatively complex company structure, we had invested some time configuring all aspects to accompany all department's needs.

Stable platform, the customer service is one of the best.

It is convenient. I would leave a rating of ten out of ten.

I must give the customer service and support team a ten because I have reached out a few times, and they were prompt. I haven't waited more than one hour. I'll give the good technical support straight up a ten out of ten.

Positive

Wrike is very convenient and easy to use. In my opinion,  those who have the time and resources to invest in implementing this tool will benefit the most.

It returns the investment in the long run, as it makes everything systematic and organized.

We've been using it for a few years now. This is a relative one but seems like Wrike is worth of our resources.

We have used Microsoft Project and Planner.

The value of Wrike might not be evident right from the get-go, so you need to spend some time with it. With the right approach to implementation, it certainly is a valuable tool.

The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality. After creating it, I can tag a task and select which folder the task belongs to. So I only need to modify one task, and all the folders will be automatically updated from this task. The thumbnail functionality is another useful function of Wrike, which is quite uncommon in many software.

The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team. We are a startup, and we have a small team. Wrike's price is almost $1,400, and even if I want to work with Wrike, our team members may not allow me to use it.

Wrike should add more functions to its mobile app because, currently, the mobile app only has a few functions that we cannot edit or modify.

I have been using Wrike for four years.

I rate Wrike an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate Wrike a seven out of ten for scalability.

Wrike’s technical support is very professional.

Positive

Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400.

Wrike has more advantages than other software management materials.

I would like to use Wrike even more in the future. However, I only use the free version since its price is too high. I will use Wrike for my personal uses, but I will need to persuade my team to use Wrike for my company.

Overall, I rate Wrike a seven out of ten.

We use Wrike to manage our work.

Visibility and organization are the most valuable features of Wrike.

Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features. There are many requests on the website that have not been addressed.

The price has room for improvement.

I would like the ability to add dependencies between projects. Currently, we can add predecessors and successors to a task within a project. I would like the ability to link the projects together by adding dependencies to their start and end dates.

I have been using Wrike for two and a half years.

Wrike is a stable solution.

The technical support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward.

Wrike is expensive.

I give Wrike a seven out of ten. The functionality works well, but they are not adding any additional features that seem logical or simple to add. Wrike adds features that they think are good but they don't listen to their customers well.

We have 350 people that use the solution.

I recommend Wrike if it meets an organization's requirements.

The tool helps us to collaborate for marketing. It helps us come together and review. The solution also helps us with commenting and assigning. 

The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds. 

The product needs to send direct emails to customers updating the latest aspects since it is better to hear directly. 

I have been working with the product since 2012. 

The tool is stable. I haven't encountered any bugs. 

The solution is scalable. My company has 150 users for the product. 

We were impressed with the tool's integrations and scalability. Hence, we chose it. 

The solution's setup is easy for small organizations. However, it is complicated for larger organizations where you require training since there are many people trying to adapt to it. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. We use the product's desktop and browser versions. The tool is dynamic and capable of adjusting to our different workflows. The product is an enterprise solution, so you need to consider the number of people using it and the budget before choosing it. The success of the product's implementation is fully dependent on your leadership and management.