My main use case for CircleCI involves different CI capabilities, mostly building containers and general applications. I use CircleCI for building containers and applications, specifically for our GoLang application. We have an ECS application written in GoLang which runs scans against the infrastructure. Regardless, it is completely built and managed. The configs are also stored in Bitbucket, and CircleCI is connected to it, running all the builds, processes, and deployment in the end to the ECS.
CircleCI - MCP Server
CircleCIExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Automated container builds have accelerated our Go deployments and simplified AWS workflows
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The best features CircleCI offers are probably the modules, which have great extendability. I use the modules or extendability in CircleCI primarily for classic pushes to AWS, and those include registry sign-ons and other cases.
CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to build quicker and do things quicker. It does the job really well. These extensions are called Workflows. I have used some AWS Workflows, and there are multiple others.
CircleCI helps you build and do things quicker. It is difficult to say if there were specific improvements, but there is general reliability and probably improvements overall.
What needs improvement?
I have no idea how CircleCI can be improved. I am a user, not a developer of CI tools. I do not really have anything to add about the needed improvements, even small things that could make my experience better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CircleCI for around a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CircleCI is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CircleCI's scalability is great. I have never had any problems with it.
How are customer service and support?
I did not deal with CircleCI's customer support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used multiple solutions. The very first one was GitLab, but it was just an experiment, because there are quite a few limitations that we had with GitLab, so we had to switch.
What was our ROI?
I cannot say if I have seen a return on investment. It is very difficult to tell.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I only used CircleCI on the free tier.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing CircleCI, I evaluated other options, specifically Jenkins.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using CircleCI is to read more documentation. The documentation is really good. I would rate this review an 8.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Fast, User-Friendly, but Keep an Eye on Costs
Automated CI/CD pipelines have transformed deployment speed and collaboration for my teams
What is our primary use case?
I have been using CircleCI for over three years as part of my DevOps toolchain.
I use CircleCI to automate CI/CD pipelines, including build, test, and deployment workflows across multiple applications. In one pipeline, I deploy an application to my Kubernetes cluster on AWS in the cloud, and I use CircleCI to automate that deployment in the form of a pipeline.
CircleCI is helping me automate my deployment workflows effectively, and it is a fit use case for the same. I have been using it for many application deployments, and it is working for end-to-end deployment.
What is most valuable?
CircleCI offers fast parallel builds, easy integration with GitHub, and the ability to deploy applications on Kubernetes pods, which are amazing features.
Fast parallel builds and GitHub integration have definitely helped my team reach faster time to market for our applications. Previously, our deployment used to take a couple of hours when doing it manually, but with CircleCI pipeline, our hours-long job has been converted to a couple of minutes.
Its simplicity, fast pipeline execution, and strong GitHub and GitLab integrations are definitely unique advantages I discovered while using CircleCI.
Time saved is one of the key aspects I have seen since using CircleCI. I have noticed fewer deployment errors, and it has helped me with easy debugging. Time saved is directly proportional to the cost and effort saved.
CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by integrating directly with my Git repositories as a fully managed SaaS platform.
CircleCI has a great impact on my team's collaboration and communication, with around 25 to 40 developers and DevOps engineers using it daily across multiple repositories and environments, helping us use it at scale.
CircleCI has significantly increased our release frequency and deployment speed compared to before I started using it.
CircleCI improves security for my organization by enforcing automated checks in the pipeline and securely managing secrets through environment variables while providing auditable deployments.
CircleCI integrates seamlessly with my DevOps toolchain by connecting directly to GitHub, container registries, and my cloud platform AWS, allowing the entire CI/CD flow from code commit to deployment and monitoring with minimal manual effort.
What needs improvement?
I believe debugging complex pipelines and managing credits can sometimes be challenging, especially for large workflows, so these areas can be improved.
The user interface can definitely be improved to debug complex pipelines. I would benefit from better AI-generated insights where I can debug the pipelines easily without going through detailed logging.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for more than 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CircleCI has been very stable in my experience with consistent pipeline executions and minimal platform-related issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CircleCI scales well as my team and repositories grow, allowing me to run multiple concurrent pipelines without performance degradation.
I have not encountered any limitations with CircleCI's scalability as my projects have grown. However, managing pipeline complexity and optimizing credits usage required additional planning, which was manageable.
How are customer service and support?
CircleCI team has been responsive and knowledgeable whenever I sought assistance.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I used Jenkins but moved to CircleCI to reduce maintenance overhead and simplify pipeline management, as CircleCI provided faster setup, better scalability, and a more streamlined developer experience.
How was the initial setup?
CircleCI documentation is generally clear and well-structured, making it easy to get started and implement standard CI/CD workflows.
What was our ROI?
CircleCI has significantly reduced build and deployment times, saving substantial engineering hours and effort for me, which has directly improved my productivity and release velocity, reflecting incredible ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with CircleCI's pricing model is quite straightforward with no upfront setup cost, and the licensing is flexible based on my usage. Costs can increase as pipeline usage scales, but they remain predictable and manageable with proper monitoring.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing CircleCI, I evaluated Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and GitLab CI/CD. CircleCI stood out due to its ease of use, faster execution, and lower operational overhead.
What other advice do I have?
CircleCI has been a reliable and efficient platform for me that has helped streamline my delivery process and CI/CD process. With continued enhancements around cost visibility and advanced pipeline management, it can deliver even greater value.
My advice for others looking into using CircleCI is to invest time in pipeline design and cost monitoring early to get the best long-term value from the platform. CircleCI would be a strong choice for those who want fast, reliable CI/CD with minimal operational overhead.
I would rate this review an 8 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Very very good tool easy to login from github
Solid Tool for easy CI
It is a great platform to coordinate your CI/CD
A review of CircleCi
Besides, the solution is innovative. From ideas, reach concrete solutions and make them better through automation.
Also, It is a viable solution which is user friendly through the configuration of yaml files.
CircleCI is one of the best continuous integration and continuous delivery platform
You can easily create projects in CircleCI and configure config.yml to define your CI pipeline.
We have set up multiple projects in CircleCI, and CI pipelines are working fine.
CircleCI also gives an option to setup a self-hosted runner where you are not dependent on Circle CI backend infra to run your pipelines.
We ran multiple CI/CD pipelines in Circle CI and did not see many issues.
We have also set up self-hosted runners in Circle CI which is helping us to use our own infra to run pipelines.
CircleCI is easy to setup and manage.
A good CI/CD tool
CircleCI Integration: Review and Implementation
Continuous Integration,
Scalability and Parallelism,
Multi-platform and Multi-language Support,
Visibility and Monitoring