I am using EHRConnect to integrate our healthcare application with multiple EHR systems.
Has reduced integration time significantly and allows faster onboarding through visual workflows and pre-built templates
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
EHRConnect cut our EHR integration development time from six months to two weeks per hospital. Our small development team can now handle multiple hospital integrations simultaneously using the pre-built workflow templates. This accelerated our go-to-market significantly.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features include the visual workflow builder, which allows non-developers to understand and modify integrations. The agentic workflow library provides pre-built templates for common scenarios such as patient data synchronization, which saved weeks of development. Smart on FHIR and HL7 support enables compatibility with both modern and legacy EHR systems.
What needs improvement?
There could be more documentation for advanced customization scenarios. Additional pre-built workflows for specialty-specific use cases such as cardiology and oncology would be helpful. Better real-time debugging tools for troubleshooting live integrations would be beneficial. In the next release, features like a built-in HL7 message simulator for testing, more granular audit logging, and workflow version control with rollback capability are expected.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We evaluated building custom integrations in-house. We switched because maintaining separate codebases for Epic, Cerner, and athenahealth was unsustainable. EHRConnect's unified platform reduced our technical debt.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is important to factor in the setup fee upfront. The monthly tier pricing is fair. We are on the $8,000/month tier, which allows up to five integrations and is still 60% cheaper than maintaining custom integrations with dedicated engineers. I calculate ROI based on developer time saved.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated building custom integrations in-house. EHRConnect's unified platform reduced our technical debt. We also looked at Redox and Mirth Connect. We chose EHRConnect for its better AWS integration, as we are already on AWS, a more modern visual workflow builder, and ready-made templates instead of starting from scratch.
What other advice do I have?
EHRConnect is great for healthtech startups or hospitals needing multi-EHR connectivity. The support team is responsive. Setup took two weeks, including AWS infrastructure provisioning. I recommend starting with one to two hospital pilots before scaling up.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
showing 1 - 1