We have the identity provider for all the authentication processes. However, sometimes, we need access to different applications for customers or clients that are not integrated into the identity provider. For these, we need to store a password to gain access. For example, we use the CyberArk Password Vault for third-party services. This vault needs to be shared with many people in our company.

This allows us to store passwords and create privileged access for some users without them needing to know the password. The system inputs the password into the endpoint URLs they use for authentication, but the users never see the password. This is crucial because people may leave the company, posing a high risk. If we had integrated it into the identity provider, we would have policies for active directory users but not for users outside the company.

For example, our development teams need to connect to databases, systems, and cloud services during development. The developers don’t get access to third-party services. We use the solution to manage this access. The application being developed and deployed integrates with CyberArk Password Vault services.

The main challenge was integrating with in-house IT and business applications, which are not standard. We needed to create special updates for that kind of integration.

I have been working with the product for three to four years.

The solution is 99 percent scalable.

Sometimes, support is not easy because you need to share the company's architecture. Maybe they are on time, but they don't understand the specifics we're talking about. Communication can be an issue, especially when speaking with people whose first language isn't English. There can be difficulties with understanding and making sense of conversations. So, outsourcing support can sometimes be challenging.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's deployment is complex.

I have been working with the new services and don't see any additional issues at this hour. The key requirement is to have people who understand not only the tool but also the concepts and how to view it from an architectural perspective.

One problem is that people may not know how to work with the tool, and another is that they don't understand the concepts. So, I think focusing on proof of concepts is good. For example, what I do at first is request information for identity providers and key management services.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

I use the solution mainly for credential tasks. For instance, if the company I work for has recent data stored in a privileged report and needs security from cyber attackers, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is used. The solution helps provide access only to authorized users and rotate passwords every sixty or ninety days. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager also allows the configuration of the password either manually or automatically.

In our organization, Privileged Session Managers (PSM) assist in recording sessions of a particular server using the solution. The product allows users to utilize different permissions, such as end-user, auditor, and administrator permissions. For CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, administrators have the major access to implement tasks like creating, changing, rotating the password and adding new users.

The most valuable feature of this tool is the password rotation feature. Another vital feature of the solution is the Safe feature, which acts as a container. Only accounts included within the Safe can access a particular server.

The solution allows the distinguished use of PSM and PSMP for a Windows and Linux server, respectively. The tool makes all session recordings compulsory and cannot be tampered with. It also eliminates hard-coded credentials and supports demand-based applications.

CyberArk is very popular and provides a lot of features compared to competitors' PAM tools, which is why many customers are migrating to CyberArk's Privileged Access Manager.

The solution should be able to completely mitigate internal threats. For instance, if an employee of a company saves the CyberArk passwords in a system, then another employee might be able to use it and log in, so there remains an internal threat when using the solution.

The feature of giving user access through a Safe should be modified. The solution should allow users access directly through an account, and the Safe concept needs to be improved.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for the past two years.

In my organization, about ninety to one hundred people are using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

It's easy to setup and install CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. Multiple components need to be installed for the solution. Often, the PVWA, PSM, and CPM need to be installed. If an organization has a Linux account, then PSMP needs to be installed for using the solution. While installing the solution, the Vaults need to be defined, if it's a standalone Vault or a cluster Vault. A cluster Vault is mostly implemented for disaster recovery to replicate data when something happens to the main Vault.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.

I would recommend the solution to others depending on their goals. If the aim is to protect an organization's data and use PAM, then one should use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. If the goals include detecting malicious activity, onboarding privileged accounts, and maintaining data accounts, then an organization should adopt the solution.

I have used the solution's session monitoring capabilities to monitor user activities. The solution's session monitoring feature can be useful for monitoring a user while the person logs in or performs other molecular activities.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is difficult and time-consuming to learn in comparison to other IAM tools. There are multiple components, like the vault, that need to be understood before using the solution. But basic administrator tasks like onboarding accounts and rotating passwords will be easy for a beginner user of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. A beginner-level user of the solution may face challenges with secret rotating, management and AIM handling.

I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager an eight out of ten.

Primarily, I import accounts from our critical systems.

Knowing that our passwords are stored securely within the vault has been a big improvement. It eliminates the need for users to store passwords in less secure locations.

We want to integrate it with our IT service management platform and our SOC solution, but that's a future project.

The password protection itself is the most important feature. It's something we didn't have before.

Moreover, the interface is intuitive. It is clear and user-friendly.

The session monitoring and recording feature is also a good feature feature, but we're currently experiencing an issue with session monitoring not working correctly. We're working with CyberArk to resolve it.

We aren't able to view active sessions or historical recordings of sessions.

It is complex, which is something I know CyberArk is working on. They're trying to simplify certain administration tasks because a common critique is the level of complexity. But overall, we can do everything we need with it.

So, CyberArk could still focus on making it more user-friendly.

I have been using it for a year.

So far, we haven't had any scalability problems.

We have around 50 licensed users – primarily administrators. We currently manage about 5,000 accounts with CyberArk.

Sometimes, the initial response time is a bit slow, but once the customer service and support take on a case, they resolve issues quickly.

CyberArk handled the primary setup tasks. We worked with a partner to implement additional components and now have the knowledge to manage the solution ourselves.

The implementation process took around eight months.

There has been an ROI.

We expect to see a full return on investment within the next three years. This was part of our long-term security plan.

It is expensive, but the cost is justified considering the security it provides. Compared to other solutions, it is costly. We have not tried other solutions, but the price is high.

We only license Password Vault.

My company evaluated another solution like Delinea but preferred CyberArk due to its robustness and flexibility.

I like its flexibility, while adding some complexity, allows us to fully customize the solution to our needs.

One of the main advantages is the way we can connect from outside. We use a portal that provides secure access to our systems without needing a VPN. We just scan a QR code, and we're connected. We do not need to use a password and we are in through the QR code scan.

I would recommend using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It's a very complete solution for what we need.

Previously, we used to share passwords for service and normal admin accounts among team members. However, since we started managing it through the product, we've transitioned to individual admin accounts or implemented dual control for shared accounts. With dual control, exclusive checking and checkout options are available, and passwords are not stored in clear text anywhere in the credentials.

The solution's most valuable features are automatic password rotation, privilege manager, and secret manager. Previously, IT personnel had admin rights on their regular accounts, allowing them to log in to domain controllers. However, this posed a security risk as compromised accounts could grant unauthorized access to domain controllers. To mitigate this risk, we implemented separate DA accounts for IT staff. These DA accounts were restricted from logging in to domain controllers and did not have associated email addresses. They were dedicated AD accounts solely for accessing domain controllers, and the solution handled their management.

Previously, manually rotating admin credentials was a time-consuming task. However, implementing the tool's automatic password management feature has made this process easier. We've configured defined policies within the solution to dictate when these credentials should be changed.

The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper.

I have been using the product for eight to nine years.

I rate the product's stability a seven out of ten.

I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten.

The tool's support gets worse each year. Support is outsourced to smaller companies, which doesn't work fine. Its support was good eight to nine years back. Over the years, it hasn't improved but degraded.

I work with BeyondTrust. BeyondTrust's UI and support are good and never lag. BeyondTrust is also cheaper.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's implementation timeline largely depends on the size and complexity of the infrastructure. A smaller infrastructure with around a thousand servers can typically be implemented within a week or two. However, the implementation process may extend to four or five months for more extensive infrastructures with tens or hundreds of thousands of workstations and accounts. The tool's transition into a security-focused product necessitates strong integration with security orchestration platforms. Prebuilt packages with ready-made integrations are required instead of developing everything from scratch. It lags in automation.

We have seen 40-50 percent improvements after using the solution.

I rate the product a seven out of ten.

CyberArk is a good, profitable, and most valuable solution.

While testing the functionality of PAM, we weren't merely conducting a standard PAM evaluation. We aimed to establish a connection and successfully received a response from the target PAM component.

The product’s pricing could be improved.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager as a partner and implementor.

The product is stable. If you make some changes or something, it's stable.

The solution is scalable. We cater it to enterprise businesses.

Customer support takes too much time to provide some response. When you open some cases, sometimes it takes one or two weeks to get some people to know the problem and how they will help us.

The initial setup takes a few days to complete.

I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The product is expensive.

I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for password vaulting, password rotation, session management, and secret management.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault must incorporate connectors for password and session managers in the marketplace.

I have been working with the product for seven years.

The product is highly stable.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is highly scalable. My company has over 3000 users. We use it regularly.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's support quality is good, but there are delays.

I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. Experienced engineers can complete the deployment in a few days. We need three to four resources to complete the deployment.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault reduces risks.

I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.

I rate CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault a nine out of ten.

The accounts are maintained automatically. Hence, resource and administration costs are less.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's deployment is complex for resources with little experience. Tech support needs to be improved as well based on quality and knowledge.

I have been working with the product for more than five years.

The product is very stable.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is scalable.

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's deployment can be done with two to three resources.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten.