We use the solution for third-party meetings.

The most valuable features of the solution are communication, screen sharing, and collaboration. Webex makes it easier to handle third-party online meetings and to interact with people and your partners.

Sometimes, the solution lags because of performance issues.

I have been using Webex for a couple of years.

The solution is stable, but sometimes it has issues with the performance.

Around 20 to 30 users in our organization, including engineers and developers, use Webex. The solution is not extensively used in our company.

We also use Microsoft Teams in our organization. We prefer Microsoft Teams because it is more integrated, has E5 licensing from Microsoft, and is easier for corporations to use.

The solution's initial setup is straightforward. I'm using it mainly for third-party interactions. To deploy Webex, you need to download an installer, deploy it, and then use it.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team in two to three minutes. An agent is installed on your machine to deploy the solution.

I use the solution for free because I don't use the solution's enterprise version.

The solution's video conferencing quality is good, and I rate it a nine out of ten. The solution's security features are end-to-end encrypted, and I rate them ten out of ten. The version we're using requires no technical team for deployment and maintenance. The solution has an enterprise version, but we're not currently using it.

I would recommend the solution to other users because it has good video conference quality. I mostly leverage the solution for third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

In our company, we had to increase the usage of Webex after we found out that when we were using Cisco's teleconference software, external users could not join meetings. When I create a meeting in Webex, my company can hold meetings and use teleconference software.

From an improvement perspective, Webex should be able to have recording features.

From an improvement perspective, it should be possible to integrate Webex with other platforms.

The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.

I have experience with Webex for years.

It is a very stable solution. I rate the solution's stability a six out of ten.

It is an easily scalable solution.

I don't know how many people in my company use the product. I conduct most of the meetings with the help of the tool for around 50 to 100 users. I also need to consider how some people prefer Zoom while others prefer Webex.

The product's initial setup phase is very straightforward.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The solution can be deployed once a user downloads, installs, takes care of the setup of a meeting, and then arranges for a device to attend it.

The solution can be deployed in less than ten minutes.

The product can be deployed with the help of the company's in-house team.

The product is worth the investment since it helps our company to hold meetings and other business-related sessions for people to attend. In my opinion, the ROI of the product is fine.

There is a need to buy a subscription-based license to use the product. You need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges of the product. You need to opt for a subscription-based licensing model for your organization. The product is a bit expensive.

In our company's day-to-day business operation, we use Webex to hold our internal meetings and for those who want to join certain meetings remotely. The tool is connected to two offices, the head office and a branch. The teleconference software part of Webex allows external users who need to join a meeting. Sometimes, Zoom or Microsoft Teams can be used as alternatives if there are some stability issues with Webex. One can switch between the options.

Webex has simplified remote work in our company the same way Zoom has helped us. Webex has helped with the meeting part, specifically virtual meetings. It has helped ease business. I also have to ensure that our staff or external execs join Webex sessions without any issues.

Speaking about the most valuable aspect of the product for team collaboration, I find the whiteboards and control or the ability to share, especially when troubleshooting with a remote user, useful. Webex allows its users to easily share screens with other users, so users can look at the screen to see what the other person or user is doing.

I have not tried the integration of Webex with Zoom. If people from Zoom and Webex can join a meeting together there would be a lesser need to set up for a meeting. Anybody with Webex or Microsoft Teams can still join the same meeting that has been set up on Zoom. The ability to join a meeting should not depend on which application one uses.

The video quality of the product is good. There has been a lot of improvement in the tool's video quality.

I think the tool has security features because most of the calls on it are encrypted, so you can be sure that nobody is trying to listen or eavesdrop on the different sessions you have on the product. Depending on how a host o has set up the meeting, others can join and connect easily. When you closely look at the sessions in the tool, I think the tool has improved, and everything seems fine.

I suggest others start using the product since they can see added features in the product over a period of time. I recommended the product to those who plan to use it.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

My company mostly uses it for internal purposes.

We mainly use it for team communication and meetings, as well as the chatbot feature.

Webex is primarily for remote work and virtual meetings, such as screen sharing. We don't use it for anything beyond basic meetings.

Webex improved our overall team collaboration.

Webex keeps our data secure. The security features are good in this product.

I also like the chatbot feature. If we have an incident or aren't sure about something, we type in a keyword, and the chatbot provides relevant information or helps us find the right resources.

However, the chatbot is the only integration we have with Webex.

There could be more some AI-related features.

I have been using it for more than two years.

It has been a stable product for me.

It is a scalable product and works well for our company.

I have used Microsoft Teams.

When compared to other tools, I find Webex easy to use for setting up groups and conversations. It's also good for integrating with other applications. Everything I need is available - including document sharing.

The initial setup wasn't too difficult. The setup process was clear.

We could install it on our systems if needed.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the appointment scheduler that sends messages and communicates the meeting time to the parties involved in the meeting. Webex's share control feature is also good.

The accessibility of the share screen option provided by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.

I have been using Webex for the past nine months. I am a user of the product.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

There are 15,000 to 25,000 uses of the product in my company.

Webex is used once a week in my company. Most of our company's customers prefer Google Meet or Microsoft Teams.

I hardly have experience with the solution's technical support. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

My company has experience with other solutions, but we switched to Webex since it provides an appointment scheduler compatible with Cisco solutions.

I rate the product's setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult process and ten means it is an easy process.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I was involved in the deployment of the product in my company.

Our company prefers to use IBM Video Streaming and Zoom to handle large-scale virtual events or webinars. For large-scale events, I do not use Webex.

For daily team collaboration in my company, we don't use Webex since we have a product named Slack.

I cannot comment on the video quality offered by the product since I am not very aware of it.

The unique integrations offered by the product include the appointment scheduler. The appointment scheduler is a good option because it schedules meetings. The tool also integrates with the CASE command and updates the calendar and Salesforce tool. The integration with the calendar looks fine.

I rate the ability of the product's security and privacy features to meet our organization's requirements as a ten out of ten.

I recommend the product to those who want a product that could help them with their communication and collaboration needs.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Webex greatly improves our team's collaboration by being our main communication tool and meeting platform, helping us work effectively regardless of location.

The chat and meeting scheduling features in Webex are most valuable for our team's productivity. The video quality during remote meetings is quite good, enhancing our communication and collaboration.

There is room for improvement in the chat history and search functionality in Webex, making it easier to find past conversations and commands by keywords.

I have been using Webex for about three years.

I would rate the stability of Webex as a ten out of ten.

Around 1,000 users in our company use Webex. I find it easy to scale since we have been able to scale it smoothly as our usage increases.

I prefer Teams over Webex because it integrates better with the other tools we use. In terms of features and functionalities, they are similar, as far as I know.

I would rate the Webex user interface and ease of use at around seven out of ten in terms of complexity.

Overall, I would rate Webex as an eight out of ten. It is a great product.

I use Webex in my company to optimize communication and meetings.

The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required.

In the future, I would like to see Webex provide integration capabilities with Microsoft.

The quality of the services offered by the support team needs to be improved.

I have been using Webex for two or three years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Though I am not sure, I feel that the tool does not allow an increase in the number of users.

In our company, we use around 30 rooms in the product. Depending on the size of the room, somewhere between 10 to 30 people can attend a meeting in Webex.

I have experience with the solution's technical support. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

In comparison to Webex and Microsoft Teams, I feel that Zoom is better.

The product's initial setup phase was complex.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. For mobile phones, my company uses the on-premises version of the product.

I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price.

The product improves team collaboration in our company since it integrates with Microsoft Teams or other vendors. The last time I studied Cisco CVI was to know about how to integrate it with Microsoft Teams.

Our company prefers Webex and Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings since both tools offer valuable functionalities. My company uses Microsoft Teams since we have licenses like Office 365 E1 or Microsoft 365 E3. Though my company installs Webex for Cisco Room Bar, our organization uses Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings.

The video and audio quality offered by the product is okay. The staff members in my company are comfortable using Microsoft Teams. Webex is a bit difficult to use for the staff members in my company.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.

The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.

There could be a feature available to record the meetings.

I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.

Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.

Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.

It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use Webex to conduct online meetings with our customers.

The product's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with multiple products.

Webex's translation feature could work more accurately.

We have been using Webex for five years.

I rate the platform's stability a seven out of ten.

We have enterprise companies as our customers for Webex. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

I rate the initial setup process a seven out of ten. It takes a few days to complete.

I rate the platform's pricing a six out of ten.

I rate Webex an eight out of ten.

I like Webex because it is easy to work with.

In terms of improvement, every time I want to join a meeting on the web, I have to download an extension or the desktop app. It would be better if I could just join meetings directly on the web without extra downloads and steps. Simplifying this process would make things more straightforward and convenient for users like me.

I have been working with Webex for almost four years.

I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten. It is most suitable for small to medium businesses.

I have used Microsoft Teams along with other solutions like Webex, and in comparison, Teams stands out for its seamless integration with Office 365. The compatibility with business needs makes Teams a preferred choice. While both Teams and Webex serve their purposes, the ease of use and integration with Microsoft's suite of tools make Teams a more convenient option for me.

The initial setup was not overly difficult, but it was time-consuming.

For those considering using Webex, my advice would be to explore automation options, especially if there is an outside team involved. Automating certain tasks can streamline processes and make using Webex more efficient. Overall, I would rate Webex as an eight out of ten.

The platform helped us a lot during COVID-19 to schedule meetings remotely.

We can access and conduct meetings remotely from anywhere using Webex. It saves a lot of challenges dealing with documents while preparing for meetings or interview sessions.

The product's price could be better.

We have been using Webex for seven years.

I use Skype, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom as well. Some functions like screen sharing are challenging to use in Microsoft Teams. For Skype, it is more complicated to establish a powerful network.

We have to connect to the network and download the software using the browser for installation.

I implemented the product myself.

We purchase the product's yearly license. It is expensive.

I rate Webex an eight out of ten.