Bynet ServiceNow CSM
Centralized client portal has improved case tracking and now streamlines customer support workflows
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for ServiceNow Customer Service Management is that I use it as an end user to provide customer support to our clients.
For a specific example of how I use it to provide customer support, the client raises their issues on the customer support desk through which we handle tickets and then we resolve them for the customers and then customers give their feedback for the cases being resolved.
I can add that we have a portal on which all our clients have access to, and they raise their cases onto that portal, and then we get those cases and that's how we operate and then we resolve those cases for our clients.
What is most valuable?
The best features ServiceNow Customer Service Management offers are a platform to manage all our clients at one place.
Having all our clients in one place helps us to make things faster and easier to track as well. We can see all our clients in one place and then we can manage what all clients are raising queries or issues about the platform and then we help them resolve. Seeing all our clients at one place helps us to know what client is progressing better and which ones are not.
ServiceNow Customer Service Management has positively impacted my organization because it helps client issues resolve, thus helping positively.
What needs improvement?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management could be improved by incorporating Gen AI into ServiceNow. Though ServiceNow has a Now Assist feature for their CSM module, it still needs a lot of work to do.
I would like to add that the Gen AI aspect is the main focus and there is a need for automated workflows also, but the primary suggestion is that Gen AI is the need. Quick case resolutions through AI is one of the most valuable use cases.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for more than four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is stable as of now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management's scalability is such that it is scalable to a large extent as it can be integrated with other applications as well. We can have our own infrastructure, but then we can integrate it with ServiceNow Customer Service Management.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support from ServiceNow is good. Whenever we raise high cases, we do get a response in minimum TAT.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using ServiceNow Customer Service Management, we used a manual solution where customers used to call us directly and then we manually created cases in our Excels or maybe recorded them in our notebooks and that's how we used to resolve issues for the customers.
How was the initial setup?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is deployed in my organization using ServiceNow's database only, so it is a private cloud.
What about the implementation team?
Our company has a business relationship with this vendor as we are a reseller. We are also a sort of a partner when it comes to specific modules, but mainly we are a reseller. We provide support to the customers in licensing and then we implement the modules for the customer.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment because if Gen AI could come, then there could be a reduction in the number of employees needed to solve the customer support cases for the clients. Since we are growing our customer base, we need more employees actually. ServiceNow Customer Service Management saves time because of the CSM module and it saves money as well.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that these were done by the VP of our company, thus I have no idea about the same.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing ServiceNow Customer Service Management, we did not evaluate other options as we were using Excel as our customer service management tool. While choosing a better software, we knew that ServiceNow is the best leading in CSM. That's why we chose ServiceNow Customer Service Management.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using ServiceNow Customer Service Management is that while purchasing the ServiceNow Customer Service Management module, do take care of the requested and useful APIs and plugins. Also, once you purchase your CSM instance, do choose a better vendor or a third party for all your implementations on the ServiceNow instance.
I have no additional thoughts about ServiceNow Customer Service Management before we wrap up as it is a good tool, and I would suggest every company to switch to ServiceNow Customer Service Management. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.
Structured ticket workflows have improved resolution speed and have supported SLA-driven support
What is our primary use case?
I use ServiceNow Customer Service Management for managing ticket flows, raising change requests, and managing support activities. Whenever a customer faces any issues, they raise a ticket on ServiceNow Customer Service Management; once they raise the ticket, it comes to the service desk queue, and we route it to the respective teams so that the correct team receives the ticket and assists the user with their issue.
What is most valuable?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is a great tool that is very interactive. All details are managed effectively, and even if a large number of customers raise multiple tickets in a very short time, everything is handled within the system. We can generate reports and track everything, and the SLA calculation is very reliable using this tool.
ServiceNow Customer Service Management has impacted our organization positively; we have formed a very good process with this tool that has helped increase the productivity of the team.
When it comes to ticket resolution, the time taken decreases significantly. Considering the high volume of tickets, there is often the same pattern with the same kind of issue. Whenever the ticket team receives a ticket, by checking the pattern, they can find if this kind of issue has occurred in the past, and with the resolution notes stored in those tickets, they can provide faster resolution while making everyone aware of the issue and what steps need to be taken.
What needs improvement?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is offering very good things, but I felt improvements to our process would allow us to depend on this tool in many other ways.
Regarding the interface, currently the user who creates the ticket has a very limited interface with only the options for creating a ticket and providing details, while the support team has a much larger interface with many options, including SLA details and report generation. While this classification is great, I felt that some modifications could be brought to the interface.
I felt that further modifications can be made so that it could be a perfect tool.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for seven years, and for the last four years, I have been using ServiceNow Customer Service Management.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is very scalable; according to our process, we can use it in any way we want.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support provides a lot of help and responds immediately, offering very good service.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
What was our ROI?
When it comes to time and money, I felt a lot of savings have occurred because this process has helped significantly. In our organization, downtime and criticality have been addressed in a very short time, and the revenue and outcomes from this have increased. Time and money savings have helped tremendously in these specific areas.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When we started evaluating other options, we immediately received feedback about ServiceNow Customer Service Management. Everyone was telling us about the positives, so there was no other option we considered, as we did not experience much difficulty or put much effort into searching for alternatives.
What other advice do I have?
Based on each ticket, we assign a criticality level; for higher criticality tickets, we have allotted a certain amount of time for the support team to work on it, meaning they must find a resolution and clear the issue within that timeframe. This is how we have prepared a process based on criticality.
Apart from that, I think the major aspect is the SLA process; if the SLA is not met, managers are immediately alerted that a ticket has come to the team's queue and they have failed to meet this SLA, and they take necessary action so that such scenarios will not happen in the future.
If you are looking to establish a good process in your environment, ServiceNow Customer Service Management provides a very good interface tool for this purpose. Ticketing and change management can be managed using this tool, and it is very helpful. I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.
Customer experience has improved through automation, actionable insights, and advanced self-service capabilities
What is our primary use case?
The use cases for ServiceNow Customer Service Management were mainly for integration purposes, mid-server installations, and playbook configurations.
I utilize ServiceNow Customer Service Management's automation for service requests by using integration hub, APIs, and third-party connectors.
How has it helped my organization?
Resolution speed has immensely improved because of ServiceNow Customer Service Management, especially the actionable insights, IT performances, and incident trends. Overall service health has improved in terms of the incident and response ratio.
The benefits of having automation in place are that it has automated the process and most items are auto-populated within the services. Most of the time, there are pre-installed solutions where consumers can navigate before dealing with the developer side.
The self-service portal has helped in creating and maintaining reports and dashboards with key metrics, and the resolution time and customer satisfaction have improved.
Automated root cause analysis has improved for us, leveraging basic machine learning and identifying basic issues, reducing resolution times, and enhancing operational efficiencies.
What is most valuable?
The most beneficial aspect of ServiceNow Customer Service Management is its portal enhancement. Users can perform all kinds of configurations, and it is very easy to use for the consumer. The problem is sorted out when there are many options and solutions to be aware of.
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is a module that supports customer-specific requirements. Users can change the forms and data fields, and create and maintain reports and dashboards with key metrics.
What needs improvement?
There should be many more automations and customizations available in ServiceNow Customer Service Management to help both users and developers, including quality testers.
Many integrations are needed currently. Sometimes that helps in terms of scripting if workflows are not needed. There should be an integration of workflows and less scripting to enhance and move the flow more efficiently.
In terms of the initial setup of ServiceNow Customer Service Management, the complexity of scripting is challenging. Sometimes, extensive scripting is required and many checks have to be made to add basic functionality.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using ServiceNow Customer Service Management for approximately three years.
What about the implementation team?
I have handled the deployment of ServiceNow Customer Service Management myself and also used third parties including partners, consultants, and integrators for the initial deployment. Most deployments were done through third parties with assistance from managers and other developers.
What was our ROI?
I cannot provide specific information regarding measurable benefits from working with ServiceNow Customer Service Management in terms of time saving, resource saving, efficiency improvements, or return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I did not purchase ServiceNow Customer Service Management as it was assigned to me with a fully loaded version. All purchases were made prior to my involvement.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
ServiceNow Customer Service Management and portal solutions are separate, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. Both functionalities serve different purposes. Portal is a self-sufficient, one-way window, while ServiceNow Customer Service Management helps navigate consumers.
What other advice do I have?
I work as a ServiceNow developer with modules including ITAM and ITSM. I have integrated AWS, Jira, Salesforce Slack, and handle portal design. I track metrics and efficiency improvements from incident management workflows by navigating through key metrics shown within the dashboard graphs and performance indicators. I would recommend more automation improvements in ServiceNow Customer Service Management. I am working with a cloud-based version of ServiceNow Customer Service Management. On a scale of 1-10, I rate ServiceNow Customer Service Management an 8.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Integrating departments for unified service while managing complexity and learning curve
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
What was our ROI?
What other advice do I have?
Provides customizable, low-code options to streamline customer interactions
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
What about the implementation team?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
What other advice do I have?
Automated workflows optimize event management but connectivity with AI tools needs enhancement
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
What other advice do I have?
Delivers seamless incident and change management with effective issue tracking
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
Workflow automation and integration capabilities drive efficiency
What is our primary use case?
I am mainly involved in service management, specifically change management, internal management, problem management, service request management, and knowledge management. These are the key areas.
What is most valuable?
The integration capabilities of ServiceNow are wonderful. I can integrate it with different tools and various platforms to get the job done. This is one of the most powerful features. The workflows provided by the platform are amazing. They save me a lot of time, and the automatic notification process eliminates the need for me to seek approvals or send reminders. The roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, and the process is driven by the workflow, which is a significant advantage of ServiceNow.
What needs improvement?
I do not have any notes for improvements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for roughly seven to eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have experienced no issues.
How are customer service and support?
I have not directly interacted, however, we have a dedicated team for this purpose.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It was very small and systematic, and we did not encounter any issues.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Choosing ServiceNow was an organizational decision, so it was not my personal choice. I have always worked with ServiceNow.
What other advice do I have?
ServiceNow is the best platform for our kind of work. No other platform comes close. I would rate it ten out of ten.
Provides flexibility to manage and categorize incidents and has good reporting features
What is our primary use case?
The solution is used for the Incident, Problem, and Change modules. The CMDB module was also used for asset management. We evaluated the ITOM solution for integrating the cloud landscape. Since we had some budgetary issues, we did the first scan using the tool and later maintained it offline using the standard copy.
What is most valuable?
The product provides flexibility in managing and categorizing the incidents. The reporting features helped us understand the trends well. Integrations are very easy.
What needs improvement?
The pricing must be more flexible. The vendor could provide some modules with limited features for a lower price.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool was stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. We did not face any challenges or major downtimes.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. Many cross-functional teams in our organization used the product. We had more than 50 support personnel. The number of end users was quite high. The whole organization was in a self-service mode. We could create requests ourselves. It allowed us to streamline the IT processes and the request management system.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support was good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is simple. The SaaS module is easier. We have deployed the product in a hybrid environment.
What other advice do I have?
I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Helps to track customer complaints and requests
What is our primary use case?
Our clients' most common use case is integrating their IVR system with a robust ticketing solution. This allows for tracking customer complaints and requests. Typically, clients implement this solution to easily control and manage all customer tickets.
What is most valuable?
One of the solution's most valuable features is its integration with the ITSM suite. When you acquire it, you also get access to incident and problem management from ITSM. This allows you to register a ticket in the product to work with the end user while using ITSM to handle the internal resolution process.
What needs improvement?
One area for improvement would be integrating IVR systems. Many customers need the ticketing solution and a native IVR system within the same platform. ServiceNow Customer Service Management doesn't offer an IVR solution that works natively or comes in the same package. Customers often have to integrate their IVR with third-party solutions like Twilio. However, the agreement between ServiceNow and Twilio ended some months ago, making it more challenging to integrate IVR functionalities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for a couple of months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool is very stable. The system can handle a large number of transactions and users, which often include your end users or customers. It can manage the amount of transactions it's processing. Typically, it's quite stable. Sometimes, issues arise with the portals, but that often relates to the development techniques used and how the portals are distributed. If you have many customers or lines of business, you should distribute the incoming traffic across several portals to enhance stability. But overall, it is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool can handle many users and transactions without experiencing issues like system crashes due to bulk loads. The initial contract typically provides ample space, around four terabytes, for transactions, users, and document attachments. If more space is needed, it automatically expands to a certain point. In my entire career with ServiceNow, spanning about ten years, I haven't encountered any instance where a customer exceeded their allocated space to the extent that ServiceNow needed to charge them additionally. So, regarding scalability and the number of users it can support, it's not a problem.
How are customer service and support?
The tool's customer support is excellent. They respond promptly to tickets, usually within the same day, sometimes within one to two hours, depending on the urgency. They provide support in multiple languages, including Spanish, English, and possibly Portuguese. They also closely track incidents, sending frequent emails to update ticket status and actions taken. Overall, their support is fast, responsive, and effective.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up the ServiceNow Customer Service Management can be quite complex. It generally takes time because the platform is oriented towards large enterprises. Implementing it involves working with multiple teams and ensuring they agree on the processes you plan to manage. You must provide clear guidelines and facilitate team discussions to align the processes. Although the setup isn't quick, taking the necessary time for implementation can result in a fast return on investment.
The overall deployment can take three to five months, depending on the complexity of processes and customization. The deployment process for the ServiceNow Customer Service Management solution largely depends on how much customization you need. If you follow ServiceNow's recommendations, take the time to participate in workshops, and adapt your processes accordingly, the technical deployment can be straightforward and relatively easy.
However, the deployment can become complex if you need a lot of customization or don't invest time in reviewing and aligning your processes with the platform. Essentially, the more you stick to the standard recommendations, the smoother the deployment process.
If heavily customized, the solution can require extensive maintenance. The partner you hire to implement or customize it may not always follow best practices in ServiceNow development. As a result, maintaining these customizations can be complicated once the implementation is done. However, if you don't customize the solution, maintaining the platform is generally straightforward and not difficult.
What was our ROI?
When organizations adopt ServiceNow Customer Service Management, they often do so because they have costly processes, like managing customer communications or tracking product issues. Organizations can handle customer complaints, manage service requests, and address these challenges, leading to a better return on investment. You can track all incoming tickets efficiently and manage replacement orders more effectively. This reduces the costs associated with these tasks, providing a quick return on your business investment.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.