Our customers mainly use Securiti for consent management and a bit of CCPA compliance. We had some integration with Salesforce and were attempting to make it a single source for the consent module.
Securiti
SecuritiExternal reviews
86 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Automation streamlines data privacy tasks with user-friendly features
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The drag-and-drop features make Securiti easy to use, even for individuals who are not tech-savvy. The ongoing improvements to the product are beneficial, and the automation capabilities are useful for automating data privacy tasks. These features help by allowing tasks to be performed without requiring a highly technical person.
What needs improvement?
Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets. There should be a call-oriented support system to address client-specific issues.
For how long have I used the solution?
I worked with Securiti for more than a year but have not been working with it for the past six months.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I followed the usual deployment algorithm, which includes configuration, testing, and production migration. It took three months to deploy one module.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Securiti is stable, but there were occasional issues like delayed transaction updates. The product should operate in real time, but there were rare delays due to server issues. Overall, its stability compares well to other products.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Securiti's scalability is average. It is best when the number of steps is minimal and requirements are clear. The tools allow for quick building and testing, reducing overall deployment time.
How are customer service and support?
Securiti's customer support is mixed. While the product is evolving, focusing more on the support side would make things easier for users.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was mainly working on Securiti AI and OneTrust solutions, comparing the two gave me insights into their differences.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was rated seven out of ten. The documentation needs to be more detailed, and the evolving product leads to a learning curve. Once familiar, it becomes easier, but improving documentation would help.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have also worked with OneTrust's data governance solution.
What other advice do I have?
My overall rating for Securiti is eight. Automating more support systems such as calls with the product team would enhance customer satisfaction. The support should be tailored to various client requirements.
Automated data discovery impresses with robust AI capabilities and competitive pricing
What is our primary use case?
I have been involved with Securiti for almost two years.
What is most valuable?
Their data discovery is a fantastic product. It is AI-enabled for automatic tagging and classifiers. Once a proper data discovery is completed, it suggests tags to automated classifiers. I genuinely appreciate this feature, and they are competitive in pricing compared to other vendors.
Automated tagging helps in identifying sensitive information. I also find their dashboarding to be very good, including their cross-border transfer maps for data movement. I consider access control and monitoring to be particularly useful, with a module in their NFI domain called access controls and monitoring, which is informative and easier to use.
We also employ it for automated data discovery by connecting to source systems to identify and classify personal identifying information (PIIA) across various assets. Code dot ai handles unstructured data sources, identifying sensitive information in OneDrive and ensuring it is secured from a compliance standpoint.
What needs improvement?
I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module. I find that Securiti AI is not as advanced as OneTrust when using OneTrust as a benchmark.
Despite them having connectors and ongoing product improvements, there are challenges with data lineage and updating relationships modules that don't match OneTrust's capabilities. Their data discovery is strong, and their core privacy models are improving, posing a challenge to OneTrust. However, I believe the assessment automation and workflow automation processes require further development.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been involved with Securiti for almost two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is relatively stable. These were read-only accesses, so there was no impact on the production environment.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We haven't seen any scalability issues.
How are customer service and support?
They have a very strong product support team. Even though we face some challenges, they are always there to help us. I find the training modules on their website to be really user-friendly and helpful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
They have a very strong product support team. Even though we face some challenges, they are always there to help us. The training modules on their website are really user-friendly and helpful.
What was our ROI?
To scan 50 terabytes of data, I find their module is almost half the price of their competitors when it comes to data discovery.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
It's a good product. Everyone should at least try Securiti once before making a conscious decision as every organization, environment, and program comes with different objectives. A particular tool choice depends on a small POC, but I definitely recommend Securiti.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Securiti an eight out of ten. I find it very nice.
Improved data governance with comprehensive process mapping
What is our primary use case?
I haven't been using the solution much. I work for a service company, and we resell some products. Security is one of the products that we resell. I have some certification in security, and I know what it does and its functionalities. However, we are a new reseller of security.
What is most valuable?
The process mapping is a good tool. We have a nice view of their data.
What needs improvement?
With the formation and education, specifically the security education, they could update the educational video more often. The most difficult part is the security deployment. It's hard to estimate the cost. They should help with the cost estimation. When you deploy security, you need to deploy the infrastructure. That's the weak point, the difficult point.
For how long have I used the solution?
I haven't been using the solution much. I work for a service company, and we resell some products. Security is one of the products that we resell. I have some certification in security, and I know what it does and its functionalities. However, we are a new reseller of security.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's pretty good in that regard. It's a good tool. Our deployments were inside the client environment. We manage the environment well, and the clients manage it, so it's not crashing. I haven't seen any instability compared to PowerView, for instance.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability.
How are customer service and support?
It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer. That said, we've got a dedicated engineer, and when we get someone, we get the answer.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Purview, however it is not really similar. I wouldn't recommend it to our customers. It's difficult to manage the cost. We looked at Didomi and Purview, however, the most efficient is security.
How was the initial setup?
It usually takes one month if we want to explore all the functionalities.
What about the implementation team?
We do it all by ourselves. We've got a Microsoft-certified professional who helps us. After that, we do everything by ourselves. It's about deploying the security notes in Azure environments.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The most difficult part is security deployment. It's hard to estimate the cost. They should help with the cost estimation. When you deploy security, you need to deploy the infrastructure. That's the weak point, the difficult point.
What other advice do I have?
I would put nine out of ten.
It's a very complete tool. It's easy to make data governance with it, as it relates to data security. However, the documentation can be difficult to read.
Automating compliance processes with effective data classification
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case of Securiti is to scan and classify PII data in our datasets automatically. It helps me identify and classify personal information without manual intervention.
How has it helped my organization?
It saved about 30% of manual effort spent in data classification
What is most valuable?
The automated way of identifying and classifying personal information is very beneficial. Otherwise, I would have to manually go through the data and seek expert knowledge from data owners/ stewards.
This tool makes it easier to automatically scan and classify based on contents. A specific feature I find effective is the sensitive data intelligence (SDI) module, which is very useful for automating compliance processes.
What needs improvement?
One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data. For the remaining data, even if it is PII, it may not be classified correctly. This could be due to incorrect or missing data in the dataset. Therefore, I still need to do some manual review to complete the exercise.
Additionally, it would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI. This would reduce the need for other tools like Snowflake.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for about one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
After 6 months, We reached a stable phase with no significant issues. However, initial challenges required substantial support engagement.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling up and down was not straightforward, requiring support team involvement. The initial phases needed higher capacity for database scanning, but now only operational capacity is needed.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support can be a hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support 4/10.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used Ovaledge as my previous solution. Data classification was done manually, but Securiti offers automated classification.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup faced challenges, and it was not straightforward. Many proof of concepts were conducted to ensure reliable output. I encountered several issues requiring technical support.
What about the implementation team?
We used SaaS version; but implemented in a local cluster. Used a combination of in-house resources and tech support from S.AI (securiti.ai)
What was our ROI?
Securiti reduced my manual effort by 30-40 percent, although our goal is to achieve a 70-80% reduction.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing cost is not very high compared to some products in the market such as Collibera, Alation etc; though it is not the lowest. Ovaledge was more affordable than Securiti.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification. However, if manual classification works for other companies, it's the best option. I rate Securiti as 8/10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Cookie Consent Platform
What do you like best about the product?
The team that assisted us with the implementation was exceptionally helpful and responsive. We successfully rolled out our cookie preference banners across 40 domains well within the established timeline.
What do you dislike about the product?
The platform can be a bit challenging to navigate, but it is to be expected with the types of services that SecuritiAI provides.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We needed a solution that would help ensure that all of our property websites are utilizing a cookie preference banner, and have a centralized consent management platform
Securiti review for cloud security and privacy.
What do you like best about the product?
It helped me automate my companies data security and gaine Better insight on customer data handling.
What do you dislike about the product?
The demo I schedule took longer than I anticipated and it was little hard to understand understand in the beginning.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helped me automate the data security that was taking much more manpower to handle.
User Friendly Tool with Great Educational Materials & PS Support
What do you like best about the product?
Tool is user-friendly. Great UI and educational material, with videos and short readings. Securiti PS engineer Walter Bertelli is a great partner and is always willing to help.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are some features that can be improved and it can take long cycles for them to be addressed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Securiti is helping Confluent streamline its Data Inventory & Data Mapping, as well as generating ROPAs & privacy assessments in accordance with the requirements of GDPR. Also, the Risks Register helps Confluent assess and remediate risks based on ISO 27701 requirements.
Securiti's tools are user friendly, and their support through our deployment has been white glove.
What do you like best about the product?
Securiti had much of the functionality we required, and the willingness and ability to make changes needed to support our deployment.
What do you dislike about the product?
Securiti should have a mobile app and connected/smart TV solution - we are still working through their capabilities here.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Please see above
Great product
What do you like best about the product?
- Easy to set up
- Covers several popular data stores
- Good support and technical documentation
- Training and certifications are available
- Decent pricing
- Covers several popular data stores
- Good support and technical documentation
- Training and certifications are available
- Decent pricing
What do you dislike about the product?
- Scanning unstructured data stores needs improvement. The system has issues when scanning unrecognized file types or large data stores (e.g., S3 buckets); however, this is an issue I've seen with other products.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The system allows us to identify where our sensitive data is so we can take steps to protect or minimize it.
Great encompassing product with an even better sales/implementation team!
What do you like best about the product?
All-encompassing privacy compliance tool
What do you dislike about the product?
Login for technical docs is difficult for engineers to access
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Privacy compliance, data discovery, hosting web forms for DSAR, assists with state-by-state and county privacy compliance laws.
showing 21 - 30