NGINX Open Source Certified by Bitnami
Bitnami | 1.18.0-47-r55 on Debian 10Linux/Unix, Debian 10 - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Nginx Reviews
What do you like best?
Nginx is reliable and easy to use and good for every environment.
What do you dislike?
Nginx integration for ModSecuirty is somehow difficult but once done its good to use.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
I faced lot of issue before nginx, but once i used nginx i solved load balancing issue in my system infra.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
it's good when it comes to load balancing
What do you like best?
highly available server and good in loadbalancing.
What do you dislike?
nothing as such . Everything works so good with nginx
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
I am using nginx as load balancer to all my front end servers
Highly responsive
What do you like best?
Most efficient to handle concurrent http requests
What do you dislike?
More efficient server to serve webpages
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
I used Nginx to host web application using PHP, MySQL and Linux. Server response issue got sorted out.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Nginx most efficient web sever
One of the best http servers
What do you like best?
Nginx is very easy to use, Nginx is very easy to configure and you config a very complex setup in just a few hours.
What do you dislike?
Nothing really, but if I have to, my main comment would be it is much harder to compile nginx from scratch compared to Apache specially on custom OSs.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Serving web applications, I can configure very complicated setup by just a few commands. Also it is very issue to add support for ssl.
Excellent lean web server
What do you like best?
Performance and reliability has been very good.
What do you dislike?
Sometimes Nginx can be tedious to configure
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
None currently main benefit has been better caching and performance.
The reverse proxy product that does everything you need
What do you like best?
The best feature of nginx is its reliability and simplicity. It's very easy to start - when it start it installs the default "pure html" website. It's compatible with all web-add-on on the market. And its free version is capable to provide all that developer needs. It forces developer to use best practices and do not leave major vulnerabilities.
Nginx is free and it was my choice to host all our websites. It has a huge popularity, so any question on Stack Overflow is answered immediately.
Nginx is free and it was my choice to host all our websites. It has a huge popularity, so any question on Stack Overflow is answered immediately.
What do you dislike?
It's documentation is not logically structured and contains "long sentences that does have much sense". It's probably was automatically translated from Russian language.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Website hosting, the major advantage that it has anything the major web-developer needs, generate logs that can be analyzed by almost all log-analytical system.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Just try to use nginx especially with nodejs or simple html websites. Use letsencrypt to automatically generate SSL certificate
Best Web Server i have used
What do you like best?
One main advantage of Nginx over a web server like Apache is that Nginx does not set up a new process for each web request but rather the default configuration is to have one worker process per CPU. Nginx can also be used in various of scenarios like:
It can act as a reverse proxy server for TCP, UDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMTP, POP3, and IMAP protocols
It can act as a load balancer and an HTTP cache
It is very lightweight hence requires fewer resources / memory
Able to handle 10k+ simultaneous connections with a low memory footprint
It can act as a reverse proxy server for TCP, UDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMTP, POP3, and IMAP protocols
It can act as a load balancer and an HTTP cache
It is very lightweight hence requires fewer resources / memory
Able to handle 10k+ simultaneous connections with a low memory footprint
What do you dislike?
Less community support and documentation than other web servers like Apache, but probably more than enough depending on your expertise and use case. Not as many modules / extensions as Apache. Could be difficult to understand how to configure initially, but once you get the hang of it its pretty simple to use.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
We run multiple websites using nginx. Including websites serving static contents like Angular and also dyanmic content like Ruby on Rails Projects. The benifits i have realised are monetory as nginx can be used on small configurations like 1gb ram and 1 cpu on VM's on azure/aws and works flawlessly for websites built using angular which are very common these days
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Go for it. Its a very lightwieght web server with miniminum needs for resources. Very usefull for deploying websites for small companies/startups on a small VM on aws/azure works even with 1 cpu and 1 gb ram
Amazing Proxy and Application Web Server
What do you like best?
Few things are simply amazing:
1. Very dev friendly configurations.
2. Powerful.
3. Active Community and very good documentation.
4. configurable and pluggable
1. Very dev friendly configurations.
2. Powerful.
3. Active Community and very good documentation.
4. configurable and pluggable
What do you dislike?
TCP protocol is not supported. more LB algo support.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Proxing, Reverse Proxing and Application and Web Server. We used Nginx as our gateway for all HTTP trafic. Logging is very easy and it is very easy to change LB algo anytime without downtime. It supports multiple use-cases and solving real problems.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Best HTTP proxing and LB mechanism.
One of the base pillars of the internet as of now
What do you like best?
The configuration is really easy without removing any advanced options and it has a huge community backing it up
What do you dislike?
I dont really find any disadvantage big enough to highlight it
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
Mainly I use Nginx as a reverse proxy and load balancer and web server in some instances, in most cases is faster than similar software and faster to implement
I worked on a freelance django project, and used Nginx
What do you like best?
- Easy to set-up
- never crashes
- open source
- never crashes
- open source
What do you dislike?
- you need to have a minimum skill of bash programming
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
no need to care about static files, routes...
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Do not hesitate to ask the large community supporting Nginx
showing 1 - 10