I am using it for personal use.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Wide set of features with easy disaster recovery
Great experience and great hardware
It would be awesome to see an application based firewall, even if it comes with a specific version of pfSense.
Enterprise & Small Business ready
Best and only firewall used for our business and our clients
Easy to setup and understand. Lots of features.
Vpn using MFA and certificates.
Great alternative to edge firewalls / routers
Setup is quite simple. Very sensible defaults out of the box. Uptime is pretty much determined by the frequenc of updates. It's rock stable and solid!
Full featured Layer 3 Solution for SME Networks
Good performance, reliable, and open source
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It is quite easy to manage firewall rules and policies in pfSense. It is not the most user-friendly, but it gets us there. We have to be sure of all the things that we are activating, but it is easy. It is alright.
What is most valuable?
Open source and support are valuable. I have community support.
Its performance is good. It is reliable. I would rate it a solid nine out of ten for performance.
What needs improvement?
There are several levels of firewall configuration such as beginner, advanced, and expert configurations. At each level, it becomes more complex and more tricky to set up the firewall. For example, if you want to install the firewall on your computer system, it would be a lot easier if it just tells you that this is the internet NIC and this is the Wi-Fi NIC.
It would also be interesting if we could add an interface for DNS versions. It will be a multisystem to make all the blocks of the DNS. I know that firewalls are different from DNS, but if we could take advantage of everything in a single system, that would be lovely.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using pfSense for half a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I believe it is scalable. If I need more computers with more NICs, it is scalable, but it is not something related to pfSense.
How are customer service and support?
The support that I have is community support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also use WatchGuard Firebox. It is different from pfSense. I have Firebox on a rack mount server on a cabinet, whereas pfSense is on my computer, so it is quite different because I can use any kind of hardware to implement the firewall.
Firebox can make an open-source version, but that is not the target of the company. pfSense is doing a great job because they have covered both situations. They have an open-source version with community support, and if we purchase the license for hardware, we can also get support from their side. In the long run, pfSense has more advantages.
If I go to a company and they ask me to implement something, I would most definitely go with pfSense. Its price is lower. I have a great knowledge of pfSense. I can very easily find support in the community, and if the company buys a license, I can get support directly from pfSense. I believe it is a win-win for pfSense and for the customers.
How was the initial setup?
I am implementing it in two phases. In the first phase, it was implemented directly on hardware on an old computer with five NICs, and everything went smoothly. The second stage is virtualizing this machine into a Proxmox server, which is a bit more tricky. It is quite difficult to make it work on the NIC hardware system.
The first phase is very easy. It is almost plug-and-play. We just have to install it and activate the NICs. Everything will go smoothly. The second phase is not easy because I have to make double configurations on Proxmox and on pfSense. I would rate it an eight out of ten in terms of the ease of setup.
In terms of our environment, I have one computer connected directly to the Internet's router, and then all the information is passed through and managed, so I can filter everything by MAC address in my network. I have it on one computer, but my whole network is using it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I use the free version.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it. For personal use, it is a great way to start. For companies, it is a great add-on. Companies can get support by buying the license.
I would rate pfSense a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Great pleasure to work with Netgate
With two products, even with free version, we have lot a features, easy support and great fiablilty.
We has some issues but support come back quickly to us.
VPN support compatible with Fortinet VPN