My main use cases with Dynatrace include a plethora of functionalities. Real user monitoring (RUM) is being used extensively. Synthetic monitoring is used extensively. We use Kafka monitoring. I have awareness of how AWS metrics are being sent, whether it's a direct integration or only account-level integration. We use it significantly.

Some of the best features I appreciate about Dynatrace include synthetic monitoring, where you can get into HTTP level monitoring and click browser monitoring, which is available in both Splunk and Dynatrace. This is very useful in our environment. Apart from that, mobile-based monitoring, which we have embedded in some cases with the apps that are connected, is also beneficial for monitoring APIs.

Synthetic monitoring has had a significant impact on my ability to track performance proactively. It has been very useful. It serves two aspects: synthetic monitoring is primarily for the front-end side where availability and tracking whether the website is running, and we can verify if users are able to log in and see things running.

From the infrastructure point of view, the availability of the infrastructure at AWS level with Kafka, EC2 instances, and Lambda functions is covered for the monitoring system and infrastructure team. We are catering to both audiences.

Dynatrace's AI-driven Davis engine absolutely helps identify performance issues by showing root cause analysis for us up to 200%; whatever is integrated, if it is visible, it can stitch and show.

The comprehensive application topology visualization in Dynatrace, called Smartscape, has benefited my understanding of system dependencies. Even though Splunk has something similar, since we are using Dynatrace primarily for observability, we can get top-to-bottom visibility, from infrastructure to network to application front end. When integrated based on application requirements, we get a good grasp of what's happening during issues.

Dynatrace could be improved primarily with regards to pricing. These tools are expensive. They have been the pioneers from inception, and they remain at the top of the Gartner chart. The quicker we learn, the better we can serve is what the team believes.

Learning is another aspect that needs improvement, specifically how the tools can educate users. Education needs to be tailored differently for front-end user monitoring, infrastructure-based monitoring, and centralized monitoring teams. The segregation of educating how to use the tool is something we have recommended to all tools teams and product owners.

They could help with more learning capabilities. A monitoring tool will be used by different types of users. One is from the infrastructure point of view. Another is an application developer who wants to see if strings are getting attached and code-based applications are being stitched together. A front-end monitoring person or business wants to know about website and infrastructure availability, and what kinds of dashboards they can create for their comfort. That's how a tool gains visibility and inclusiveness. It depends on the owner of the tool to address these different aspects and let users choose their preferred way to use the tool.

Regarding the initial setup, while I can't speak for how my company implemented it overall, I can say that the Dynatrace setup is good enough, not an issue. Integration with the cloud is straightforward. In cases of new aspects of cloud, some drilling is needed to determine installation possibilities. That's a challenge in the cloud - whether to integrate with the cloud directly or opt for agent installation. These issues arise when new features or services are enabled in AWS; parallelly, Dynatrace and Splunk and these tools need to adapt to see if these services can be monitored. Users start asking if we can enable new AWS features in our tools. This synchronization should happen at the back end; users should not be involved in that process.

Positive

The monitoring team is able to work without any user intervention, which is appreciable. Comparing to other tools such as Splunk, CloudWatch, or other tools which I have researched for RFPs, I feel DataDog is good enough. However, based on the experience from my users, Dynatrace is more flexible for them.

We deal with APM solutions and monitoring or logging solutions by having Splunk already in place in my environment, along with Dynatrace. We have other tools such as CloudWatch.

I have dealt with Splunk on-call and have all kinds of experience. I have used the PeerSpot platform extensively, and it does help significantly. I will be happy to provide individual product reviews.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Dynatrace an 8 out of 10.

Our primary use case for Dynatrace is full-stack monitoring. We use it to monitor the performance and availability of our applications, infrastructure, and services. It helps us quickly detect issues, analyze user behavior, and perform root cause analysis using AI-powered insights.

Dynatrace has significantly improved our organization by providing full-stack visibility and automated root cause analysis. It helps us detect and resolve issues faster, reduce downtime, and improve user experience. The OneAgent simplifies deployment, and the AI-powered insights allow our team to focus on innovation instead of firefighting.

We use Dynatrace full-stack monitoring because it allows us to trace issues across the entire stack — from user interactions to backend infrastructure. It’s very effective for identifying where problems occur, making it highly valuable for end-to-end observability.

Dynatrace's user behavior monitoring and analysis also works well. It provides powerful insights into user interaction patterns, session behavior, and user experience metrics, which help us understand how our applications are being used.

One of the features I appreciate most is the OneAgent. We only need to install a single agent per host, and it automatically collects metrics, logs, traces, events, and more — without requiring multiple separate tools or manual instrumentation.

We also benefit from Dynatrace’s AI-powered anomaly detection. The Davis AI engine detects unusual patterns, performs root cause analysis, and sends smart alerts — all automatically, which significantly improves our incident response time.

More customizable dashboards

Better log search and retention features

Easier tagging and permission management at scale

Improved mobile app monitoring support

reduction in costpricing 

I have been working with Dynatrace monitoring and other monitoring systems for about three years. During this time, I’ve gained hands-on experience with full-stack observability, user behavior analysis, anomaly detection, and automated root cause analysis using Dynatrace.

Dynatrace is very stable and reliable. Its OneAgent runs with minimal impact on system performance, and the platform itself experiences very few outages. Regular updates and proactive monitoring by Dynatrace ensure high availability and consistent performance, which is critical for our continuous monitoring needs.

Dynatrace scales very well across different environments, from small setups to large enterprise systems. Its automatic discovery and instrumentation make it easy to manage thousands of hosts, containers, and services without significant overhead. The platform handles high data volumes efficiently and maintains performance, making it suitable for dynamic cloud-native and hybrid environments.

My experience with Dynatrace customer service and support has been positive. The support team is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance for technical issues. Additionally, the available documentation and community resources help resolve many questions quickly. Occasionally, complex issues may require escalation, but overall, the support experience is reliable.

Neutral

We previously used a full monitoring system with Zabbix, which worked well but required a lot of manual configuration and maintenance. With Dynatrace, we benefit from extensive automation tools that significantly reduce manual effort. This automation is a key difference that sets Dynatrace apart from Zabbix and other monitoring solutions.

The initial setup of Dynatrace is generally straightforward thanks to the OneAgent, which automates discovery and instrumentation across the environment. However, configuring advanced features, custom dashboards, and integrations can be more complex and may require some learning and planning. Overall, the automation significantly reduces manual effort compared to traditional monitoring tools.

Dynatrace is ideal for clients who need advanced, automated monitoring. However, some clients may not fully understand its value and might not need to invest in a high-end solution if their requirements can be met with free tools like Zabbix.

The SaaS version of Dynatrace is typically suitable only for proof of concept (POC) purposes. When customers commit to Dynatrace, they usually opt for the managed version for production use.

Overall, I would rate Dynatrace 9 out of 10 as a product solution.

I see you did the research into Dynatrace and OpenTelemetry on the website. Are you an expert or user of this product? Let me confirm that you say you're just a user of Dynatrace. Are you a customer? We have your email as ptorres@bankinter.com.

Could you mention some advantages of this product?

Some new features could be added to Dynatrace to make it better. Can you mention some examples of what new functions can be added to Dynatrace to make it better?

What about maintenance? Is it easy to support and maintain the product?

What about the stability of Dynatrace? Do you think the solution is very stable, or maybe you see some glitches or latency issues sometimes?

What about the scalability of Dynatrace? Do you think the solution is scalable or maybe there are some limitations on the scalability part?

What rating would you give to technical support from Dynatrace? 1 is bad support, 10 is very good support?

Positive

What about installation? Is it easy to install, or can installation be difficult?

Does the solution save you time and money? Is it effective for time and money or not effective?

If I would ask you to rate price from 1 to 10, where 1 is cheap and 10 is expensive, how many points would you give to it? Is price the main problem or do you have some other problems with the product?

Buenos días. I apologize for interrupting. This position is for an IT Project Manager. As for this review, we will publish it on the website on peerspot.com in written or audio formats. If you want to stay anonymous, your name will not appear with the review. You will get notifications and the use of the review is subject to PeerSpot's terms of use. You can access it at peerspot.com/tos. We can send you an email with all of this if you want to. The reviewer gave this solution a rating of nine out of ten.

Positive