Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
ALM
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ability to see a good relationship between requirements, bugs and test cases. The ability to produce reports is also helpful.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far not observed any huge disadventages
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Application Developement, from Business requirement gathering, throughout testing and bug fixing
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
We used QC to record testing for a regulated Pharma system.
What do you like best about the product?
Nicely organized and easy to add new records.
What do you dislike about the product?
Long learning curve to get started. Screen flows aren't intuitive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Providing proof of testing for valedated systems.
A Comprehensive Solution
What do you like best about the product?
HP ALM integrates well with other HP products and has all the necessary features required to test code coverage. It also manages test data, thus making it easier to test applications. Excellent bug reporting features and analytics dashboards as well.
What do you dislike about the product?
Learning curve is a bit steep and the application is not intuitive. Missing ability to edit multiple test cases together.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a quality engineer, I used HP ALM to keep track of the entire test suite and track progress. It also served as a communication tool with the development team.
ALM help streamline our testing process and organised the test cases and test scripts into manageable suites and releases.
ALM help streamline our testing process and organised the test cases and test scripts into manageable suites and releases.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Although it is expensive, it is a complete package. You get what you pay for.
Quality Center review
What do you like best about the product?
Quality Center is very good ERP solution for business. I have used it for managing tickets of projects and it was very useful and helpful in tracking all my data.
What do you dislike about the product?
Its home page can be more interactive. It takes very long to load. It should be fast and easily interacting between various features.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I used Quality Center for logging defects and accessing tickets to fix those. It is very organized but few features are very repetitive and not needed.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is good product for managing and logging defects but there are many new open source product available for free which are better than QC.
Unbelievably slow
What do you like best about the product?
It tracks tons of data and is customizeable
What do you dislike about the product?
It's so slow that you have to walk away and come back after it loads!
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Defect tracking and requirements tracking. It's helpful because hundreds of users have access to the data and it keeps records of any changes people make.
Very Good at application life tracking
What do you like best about the product?
Rich UI with good user experience.
Ease to track an application history.
Reports that can be generated are much appealing to clients.
Options for problem description is much better in terms of UI and work also.
Online platform takes less time to load the screen and this is unique among the tools that provide the same sort of needs.
History section and versioning control section are really feasible in order to getting things done easier.
defect tracking has highlights that can be used for sorting and assigning task in an easier way.
Role based access was easy to get things move on.
Ease to track an application history.
Reports that can be generated are much appealing to clients.
Options for problem description is much better in terms of UI and work also.
Online platform takes less time to load the screen and this is unique among the tools that provide the same sort of needs.
History section and versioning control section are really feasible in order to getting things done easier.
defect tracking has highlights that can be used for sorting and assigning task in an easier way.
Role based access was easy to get things move on.
What do you dislike about the product?
There was some time lag in response
Desktop Client has some issue in windows platform .
Generation of graphs needs some technical coding as well.
Support to this was limited I felt.
Community help is also lagging interms of help from support and users.
This need some more additional detail with respect to windows application client.
Documentation part needs some improvement.
Some drawbacks when it comes to testing via this application.
Desktop Client has some issue in windows platform .
Generation of graphs needs some technical coding as well.
Support to this was limited I felt.
Community help is also lagging interms of help from support and users.
This need some more additional detail with respect to windows application client.
Documentation part needs some improvement.
Some drawbacks when it comes to testing via this application.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Easy to track application level defects.
Good to work in Agile methodology
This can also be used in scrum methodology as well.
Good to work in Agile methodology
This can also be used in scrum methodology as well.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Good at tracking defects.
Good at generation customized reports.
Good at generation customized reports.
Solid bug tracking application with bad work flows and it is not user friendly at all.
What do you like best about the product?
HP ALM or HP Quality Center is a solid bug tracking software which has been around for a while. There are plenty of tutorials and help resources online when you need help.
What do you dislike about the product?
- It doesn't have Kanban agile board. HP Quality Center works more like a water fall model.
- The user interface is not very user friendly. It requires many steps to file defect. The work flows is very bad.
- If you write test plans or create defects then it gets timeout, all of yours works will be gone. We had to re-do the works many time because HP Quality Center sometimes doesn't save our works when it gets timeout.
- HP Quality Center's performance is very bad. Sometimes it just hang and crash. QA would have to wait when loading test plans or linking test cases to test labs.
- HP Quality Center's license is very...very expensive.
- The user interface is not very user friendly. It requires many steps to file defect. The work flows is very bad.
- If you write test plans or create defects then it gets timeout, all of yours works will be gone. We had to re-do the works many time because HP Quality Center sometimes doesn't save our works when it gets timeout.
- HP Quality Center's performance is very bad. Sometimes it just hang and crash. QA would have to wait when loading test plans or linking test cases to test labs.
- HP Quality Center's license is very...very expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use software to connect truckers and shippers. HP Quality Center help us to keep track of our software defects. The tool has been around for a while and we're confident that it won't go away anytime in the near future.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Support is very good. The forum is very active in case you need help. However, there are lot of better and cheaper bug tracking tools on the market.
Great Experience with Quality Center.
What do you like best about the product?
Liked how easy it was to use the application. Very user friendly. It was a great tool for SQA and project management.
What do you dislike about the product?
The one think I didn't like was how complex it was to link the requirements to the test cases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps with the documentation of test cases and the execution of these cases. It helped with the testing documentation piece of the project and the metrics for each project. It provided great documentation for reporting status.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Quality center is a great tool for tracking test cases, bugs and create automated test cases.
Extremely unpleasant tool to work with
What do you like best about the product?
There is nothing what I really like.
It works.
Grid view of bugs is good.
Manual test plan design is quite good.
It works.
Grid view of bugs is good.
Manual test plan design is quite good.
What do you dislike about the product?
Its thick client in browser. No way how to open another window. Slow, huge.
Everything is defect. Even if its a change
No easy way how to enforce workflow.
Some workflow states are default which are not possible to change from administration.
I cant do links from defect to a lot of entities, but these entities can create link to defect.
No back - forward button.
All dialogs are modal no way how to look somewhere else with opened detail of defect or anything else - impossible to used advantage of two monitors
No way how to limit some possibilities
Requirements manager is not really working as requirements manager.
Everything is defect. Even if its a change
No easy way how to enforce workflow.
Some workflow states are default which are not possible to change from administration.
I cant do links from defect to a lot of entities, but these entities can create link to defect.
No back - forward button.
All dialogs are modal no way how to look somewhere else with opened detail of defect or anything else - impossible to used advantage of two monitors
No way how to limit some possibilities
Requirements manager is not really working as requirements manager.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Bug tracking, manual testing and test management. Only benefit is that testcases are stored and bugs are tracked. Its also quite easy to see requirements coverage.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Do not even try, there are many more cheaper and better or similarly expensive and much better solutions. Actually there are OS solutions without license cost which will work better then this.
Fits the use-case but interface can definitely use some work.
What do you like best about the product?
Decent organization of test cases (folder structure is nice), able to sort different modules and build a flow of steps.
What do you dislike about the product?
Interface is not particularly nice to work with. Not intuitive...buttons are tiny and not user friendly.
Not easy to move test cases around and build a bank of them that can be easily reused.
Not easy to move test cases around and build a bank of them that can be easily reused.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Organization of test cases
Ability to generate reports
Ttracking of test case completion
Defect tracking/workflow
Ability to generate reports
Ttracking of test case completion
Defect tracking/workflow
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Demo it for sure with both business and technology users
showing 41 - 50