HAProxy Enterprise Basic - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 AMI
HAProxy TechnologiesExternal reviews
890 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Satisfied Interaction All Around with good response
What do you like best about the product?
I had a satisfying interaction with HA Proxy. The best part was the solid setup, and it felt like a strong option for security. I also appreciated being able to talk with them in detail and get my questions addressed.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nope nothing about this HA Proxy. Learning new things with them
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It's solving the problems of security
Fast, Reliable HAProxy with Fine-Grained Traffic Control
What do you like best about the product?
HAProxy is fast, reliable, and gives very fine control over how traffic is routed.
You can change things without downtime and clearly see what’s happening when something breaks.
It’s simple, predictable, and works well at large scale without surprises.
You can change things without downtime and clearly see what’s happening when something breaks.
It’s simple, predictable, and works well at large scale without surprises.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hard to manage and configure at the start.
Troubleshooting needs deeper knowledge; not beginner-friendly.
Troubleshooting needs deeper knowledge; not beginner-friendly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Api management in service mesh across multiple clusters
Open Source Flexibility That Fits My Homelab
What do you like best about the product?
The open source aspect was a really nice addition when trying this out on my homelab
What do you dislike about the product?
Honestly, I'm not sure. It was the only product recommended when researching
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Load balance with a cluster
HAProxy: Bulletproof Reliability and High-Performance Traffic Routing
What do you like best about the product?
HAProxy is celebrated for its unmatched balance of high-performance and deep, granular control. Its lightweight, event-driven architecture handles massive traffic volumes with minimal overhead. Engineers value it for its "bulletproof" reliability, sophisticated health checks, and powerful Layer 4/7 routing, making it an essential, high-efficiency bridge for modern, scalable infrastructure deployments.
What do you dislike about the product?
HAProxy's main downsides revolve around usability:
Configuration Complexity: Managing monolithic configuration files at scale is difficult and prone to error.
Dated UI: The native stats dashboard is purely functional and lacks modern, intuitive management features.
No Static Hosting: It cannot serve static assets, requiring additional infrastructure.
Steep Learning Curve: Configuring complex routing requires significant expertise.
Configuration Complexity: Managing monolithic configuration files at scale is difficult and prone to error.
Dated UI: The native stats dashboard is purely functional and lacks modern, intuitive management features.
No Static Hosting: It cannot serve static assets, requiring additional infrastructure.
Steep Learning Curve: Configuring complex routing requires significant expertise.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Problems Solved:
Server Overload: Prevents traffic spikes from crashing single servers by distributing requests.
Downtime: Automatically removes unresponsive servers from the pool, preventing 503 errors.
Resource Inefficiency: Offloads SSL/TLS encryption, freeing backend servers to focus on application logic.
Routing Complexity: Manages sophisticated Layer 4/7 routing logic, like content-based splitting.
Server Overload: Prevents traffic spikes from crashing single servers by distributing requests.
Downtime: Automatically removes unresponsive servers from the pool, preventing 503 errors.
Resource Inefficiency: Offloads SSL/TLS encryption, freeing backend servers to focus on application logic.
Routing Complexity: Manages sophisticated Layer 4/7 routing logic, like content-based splitting.
Best proxy there is
What do you like best about the product?
HAProxy excels by seamlessly merging legendary high-throughput performance and QUIC efficiency with the intelligent real-time traffic control of stick tables, robust integrated security through its WAF and DDoS protection, and granular observability driven by its deterministic configuration.
What do you dislike about the product?
steep learning curve driven by a complex, verbose configuration syntax that can feel intimidatingly rigid
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Load balancing preventing uneven load and crashes
Fast, Straightforward, and Easy to Use
What do you like best about the product?
Very fast, straightforward, and easy to use. Very approachable to read the config too.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing I can think of that I dislike.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Load balancing hundreds of customer web sites
Reliable and Dependable Performance
What do you like best about the product?
its reliability and performance under heavy load.
What do you dislike about the product?
compared to newer solutions, it can feel less developer-friendly out of the box.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
helps me manage and distribute traffic across multiple backend servers
HAproxy or Trefik
What do you like best about the product?
I’d rate it around 8 or 9 out of 10. I would definitely recommend HAProxy for most use cases, especially where you need a high-performance, reliable load balancer.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I find challenging about HAProxy is the learning curve, especially when dealing with more advanced configurations. The syntax is powerful, but it’s not always the most intuitive, so it can take time to get comfortable with it.
Another aspect is that compared to some newer tools, it’s less ‘plug-and-play.’ For example, solutions like Traefik or Envoy offer more native integration with dynamic environments like Kubernetes, whereas HAProxy often requires additional setup or external tooling to achieve similar flexibility.
Another aspect is that compared to some newer tools, it’s less ‘plug-and-play.’ For example, solutions like Traefik or Envoy offer more native integration with dynamic environments like Kubernetes, whereas HAProxy often requires additional setup or external tooling to achieve similar flexibility.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
HAProxy is primarily solving the problem of distributing traffic efficiently and reliably across multiple backend services. In a production environment, sending all traffic to a single server creates a bottleneck and a single point of failure. HAProxy eliminates that by acting as a high-performance load balancer and reverse proxy.
It's good
What do you like best about the product?
Yes it's very useful in our organisation
What do you dislike about the product?
It's downsize the critical times.Yes it's very useful in our organisation
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It's used this product
Versatile, Secure, and Backed by Great Support
What do you like best about the product?
The versatility and advanced security and your support
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing everything is good but maybe have a playground for the end dev
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have multiple sites in multiple clusters across regions and you help in managing the traffic
showing 41 - 50