Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Auth0 Platform

Okta, Inc

Reviews from AWS customer

9 AWS reviews

External reviews

271 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


4-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    reviewer2809026

Security has become faster to implement and supports AI-powered apps across platforms

  • March 13, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I am using Auth0 Platform to implement security in the applications that I build. I build applications for myself or for customers, so Auth0 Platform usually provides security authentication to the users of those applications.

Whatever application in whichever language I have built, I can use Auth0 Platform's security for that application because it is easy to implement since they have already built the SDKs and related tools for particular languages. In whichever language my application is, I can use that SDK because they were already pre-built. Using that means that my application development time and the time to implement security for my application will be less. I scheduled a call to provide a review on Auth0 Platform.

Auth0 Platform is very easy to use and very intuitive in nature. For developers, it is mainly a great platform to implement the security framework in their applications because they have already built some previously. It is easy to use that instead of building from scratch in my application. The customizations for the end user, such as the domain or the interface which the user is directly facing, can be customized with Auth0 Platform. The hooks, all these actions, and all triggers are parts which I liked more in Auth0 Platform.

I can serve almost every category because whichever application I have built can use Auth0 Platform since it supports all web applications, mobile applications, API services, back-end services, and all of this. I can use Auth0 Platform for any sector that has been built with web applications or mobile applications.

What is most valuable?

One of the positive impacts I have seen since starting to use Auth0 Platform is time saving, and the SDKs are the main thing. They are already built, so it is easy to use. They documented it very well, so whenever I send it to some other developer to develop this application or to change anything in this configuration, it is easy to understand. When passing it to someone, it is straightforward.

The recently launched AI agents for Auth0 Platform is also a positive one, which is a growing feature in this technology. I appreciate that aspect as well.

Auth0 Platform is very easy to use and very intuitive in nature. For developers, it is mainly a great platform to implement the security framework in their applications because they have already built some previously. It is easy to use that instead of building from scratch in my application. The customizations for the end user, such as the domain or the interface which the user is directly facing, can be customized with Auth0 Platform. The hooks, all these actions, and all triggers are parts which I appreciated more in Auth0 Platform.

What needs improvement?

Auth0 Platform has an extension in the marketplace to see whatever applications I have assigned to the user. It would be easier if, as developed in Okta, they had an end-user dashboard integrated directly with Auth0 Platform's dashboard itself. That is one thing I can say could be improved. Other than that, I did not find any big impact areas for improvement because they have almost given all the features for a customer-facing platform.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Auth0 Platform for four to five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of Auth0 Platform as a nine.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability of Auth0 Platform an eight. The features I have explained before indicate that it is easy to implement Auth0 Platform, and I found its scalability to be an eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

I did not need to communicate with technical support during the initial setup because, while working with my test applications, I did not encounter any disturbance or ambiguity in implementing Auth0 Platform with my application, so I did not contact technical support yet.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have started the CIAM with Auth0 Platform itself. Previously, I used similar platforms for workforce identity, not for customer identity. Customer identity and workforce identity provide almost similar features, but workforce requires more security. I did not check previously about the competitors of Auth0 Platform, but I can say I have worked on similar workforce identity solutions, making this my first experience with customer identity.

How was the initial setup?

The installation was easy because they have a lot of documentation mentioning how to start and where to start. It is easy to deploy Auth0 Platform to my applications because their documentation is very well organized, making it user-friendly.

What about the implementation team?

I participate in the implementation process with Auth0 Platform, so I have worked with that.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I have just explored the pricing and licensing of Auth0 Platform, but I cannot recollect the exact figure. I know that pricing is mentioned in the documentation, such as how much they will charge for a certain number of users, but I did not collect the exact amount.

I think Auth0 Platform is not expensive compared to other platforms. It is affordable, and as the number of users grows, the pricing fluctuates. Considering the amount of features I use, such as multi-factor authentication, it is affordable and comparatively less for the features it is giving compared to other existing platforms.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options or vendors before choosing Auth0 Platform. As I mentioned, I worked on workforce identity and did not check the alternatives, so I have used this only.

What other advice do I have?

The cross-app connection Auth0 Platform has built allows access to other applications also with the AI agent without asking for consent from the user, which is a very good feature.

What attracted me to Auth0 Platform is how simple and easy it is to implement with my applications. Other platforms might provide similar APIs and features, but Auth0 Platform has a vast variety of language-specific SDKs. Whatever language I want, I can take that SDK and implement it right away in my applications, which is an easy aspect that attracted me most. I am using Auth0 Platform to secure AI-powered applications, as I previously mentioned. The AI agents is the feature that is introduced new to Auth0 Platform. I can secure my AI agents while interacting with them.


    reviewer2805510

Identity workflows have transformed how we secure logins and manage user access daily

  • March 13, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

Our main use case for Auth0 Platform is to work with our partners to take to the customers, with Auth0 Platform being an identity and access management platform that helps developers add authentication and authorization to apps. We are working with a lot of companies that have many developers, allowing us to help implement and service Auth0 Platform services. We can build a login system from scratch, handling user login, identity verification, and access controls for their applications.

I can give a quick, specific example of a project where we used Auth0 Platform for these purposes, keeping it anonymous. We did a large project for a customer that wanted admin versus regular user permissions. We provided access to certain APIs and implemented role-based access control, controlling what different users were allowed to do when logging in or after logging in. A big part of that was the authorization point, along with daily tasks such as providing single sign-on, allowing users to log in once and access multiple apps without repeated logins. We essentially created a whole login to a company portal that automatically accesses internal tools such as Salesforce, HiBob, and Outlook.

What is most valuable?

There are different elements to the best features Auth0 Platform offers, and I have touched on them, particularly the ability to help applications authenticate and authorize their users and manage their identities. A big point is identity federation, allowing connections across multiple identity providers, enabling users to log in using existing accounts due to databases and enterprise identity systems.

A strong security feature is provided, particularly with their MFA, multi-factor authentication, which includes bot detection and brute-force protection, along with breached password detection, which is really good as an added extra.

Auth0 Platform has positively impacted our organization, particularly in terms of usability. While we are not selling it directly, I find the platform easy to use for authenticating different users. Our own services team handles the implementation, so I cannot comment on the ease of that process. However, whenever we have had contracts and bids to roll out services, it has been really easy.

We have seen improved security due to the implementation of Auth0 Platform. User management, such as creating and deleting users, is all about enhancing the user experience, which is massive. We assist with password resets and account linking. The time to implement is shorter, and we maintain a consistent user experience with a secure login flow, benefiting from a faster implementation due to the universal login, providing a hosted login page customizable by developers.

What needs improvement?

I am not involved on the development side, so I cannot speak to the technical aspects that could be improved on the implementation. However, the core cloud-based identity and access management is solid, and the workflow could always improve. There are a few hitches, but customer feedback has generally been very good.

The only negative feedback I have heard is about the decision to go direct rather than through partners or distribution channels. However, this is not a product-related issue; it is more feedback from channel partners.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with Auth0 for about eighteen months now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Auth0 Platform is completely stable, built on a strong security baseline covering the API gateways for user data. It is 100% reliable, especially with the support of our implementation services partner.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is quite vast, but it does lead to higher pricing as usage increases.

It is designed to be highly scalable, capable of managing millions of users and billions of authentication requests globally. This scalability comes from its cloud-native architecture and its token-based systems, operating effectively across AWS, which also helps reduce bottlenecks through JSON Web Tokens and is built on microservices architecture.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support has been really good; we manage our own support for our channel partners through Okta, along with the support from our implementation services partner in Berlin.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate customer support a 10, as they have always been very attentive and effective. It could be a nine if considering direct engagements, but overall, the product and customer service have been excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used a different solution because we distribute the products and have been working with Okta for eight or nine years. After Okta acquired Auth0 Platform in 2021, we have been using Auth0 Platform since.

How was the initial setup?

Auth0 Platform has moved its infrastructure to a single cloud architecture on AWS to simplify operations and scale globally. The services run across multiple AWS regions to handle billions of login requests and ensure high availability, meaning the applications calling an Auth0 Platform API for logins or tokens are all managed by AWS infrastructure. Additionally, Azure is key for private deployments.

What about the implementation team?

As for deployment, we utilize a services partner in Berlin for the implementation, and we use a cloud-based software approach.

What was our ROI?

While I do not have specific numerical metrics, there has been a noticeable reduction in the number of security team personnel needed due to the robust security provided by Auth0 Platform. The implementation and service time for deployment have been quick, with great feedback from Auth0 Platform and Okta's customer service.

Developers benefit from not having to expand their teams to handle manual user integrations. While I cannot definitively claim time savings, I suspect it is significant as fewer employees are needed for user management due to the efficiencies gained through Auth0 Platform.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Regarding pricing and licensing, it seems reasonable; however, I noted a bit of negativity at scale due to the vast user base and high costs associated with government clients. Some competitors were considered for their pricing models, but overall, the service has been well received.

A downside I remember mentioning is that pricing can be high at scale, though that is not a product issue; it relates more to the nature of large enterprise solutions.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have not evaluated any other options since we have been exclusively with Okta for nearly a decade, especially since we will not typically engage with other competitors within the Microsoft stack.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others considering Auth0 Platform is to definitely look into it. Running a proof of value reveals how it leads to cost reduction, time savings, and improved scalability, demonstrating how easy it is to work with. Auth0 Platform is effective for businesses looking to simplify authentication and identity management, and I would strongly recommend it.

Auth0 Platform secures APIs and microservices by acting as a central identity provider. It uses modern token-based authentication standards by issuing JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) that provide identity and permissions for requesters. Tokens are normally signed and can be optionally encrypted, allowing APIs to verify authenticity without querying Auth0 Platform each time. Additionally, OAuth 2.0 and some role-based access controls enable APIs to check roles within the JWT, differentiating admin capabilities from those of regular users.

My overall review rating for Auth0 Platform is 9.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    Sebastian Micu

Platform has strengthened user security, improved sign-on journeys, and supported future growth

  • March 13, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

Auth0 Platform's main use case is to serve as an identity provider for all the applications that users want to access. This enables achieving single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, migrating users, and keeping them stored safely.

Auth0 Platform secures external API calls during the authentication flow through a feature called Action Secrets. When you write custom Node.js code to extend the login process via Auth0 Actions, you use Action Secrets to securely store and inject API tokens or sensitive credentials so they are not exposed to potential attackers.

What is most valuable?

The main benefit that Auth0 Platform brings to the table is security. Everyone knows they are investing a lot in their security, keeping the product up to date and improving it consistently. The other benefit would be the ease of use and the total amount of features offered.

The best features in Auth0 Platform are Forms for Actions. They are a standout feature that allows you to seamlessly collect additional information during the onboarding process and save that data directly inside the user profile. Advanced customization for Universal Login is another great feature that was recently launched, allowing businesses to fully customize and host the login pages themselves.

Auth0 Platform supports SaaS or multi-tenant architecture running on public cloud infrastructure through the Organizations feature. This is a really helpful feature that allows you to achieve multi-tenancy inside one tenant to support complex multi-organization structures.

What needs improvement?

Regarding areas for improvement, Auth0 Platform is a premium product, and its pricing reflects its enterprise-grade capabilities. While the cost can sometimes make smaller businesses hesitate, the return on investment usually outweighs the initial price tag when the platform is architected and implemented correctly. The comprehensive feature set, top-tier security, and reduced development time justify the investment for organizations prioritizing scalability.

On the technical side, I would like to see Auth0 introduce more no-code branding options for Universal Login. Currently, achieving a highly specific, bespoke login experience often requires utilizing Liquid page templates or the newly released Advanced Customizations for Universal Login. While these are incredibly powerful tools, they do require some technical expertise to execute flawlessly. Having more robust, out-of-the-box customization options would be a great enhancement in the future.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Auth0 Platform for the past three years. However, this isn't just occasional use—it has been my primary, full-time focus. I have spent eight hours a day, every single working day, actively architecting, implementing, and navigating the platform for various enterprise use cases.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience architecting and implementing identity solutions, Auth0 Platform's stability has been exceptional. I have not encountered any downtime, latency spikes, or reliability issues so far.

Because authentication is a mission-critical component of any application, high availability is entirely non-negotiable. Auth0 consistently delivers on that front, providing a highly robust and resilient infrastructure that ensures seamless, uninterrupted access for end users.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is undeniably one of Auth0 Platform's strongest points. It is built to scale effortlessly, capable of supporting anywhere from thousands to hundreds of millions of users without compromising performance, even when utilizing its more complex identity features.

While I don't share specific client telemetry, the positive impact on developer velocity, security posture, and system stability within cloud environments is immediately noticeable post-implementation. Because Auth0 handles the immense infrastructure load behind the scenes, organizations can confidently scale their user bases without worrying about authentication bottlenecks.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support and customer success teams at Auth0 Platform are consistently exceptional. Over the past few years, I've found their approach to be highly proactive; they frequently offer to jump on a call to discuss support tickets in depth rather than relying solely on back-and-forth emails. As an architect, having the ability to screen-share complex tenant configurations directly with their team is invaluable for rapid troubleshooting.

Furthermore, Auth0 provides a highly effective escalation path. If a unique technical edge case arises, support can seamlessly loop in the core engineering team, ensuring you get assistance directly from the people building the product. Because of this high-touch, expert-level service, I give Auth0 Platform's technical support a solid nine out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

In addition to Auth0 Platform, I have experience working with Keycloak, which is an open-source identity option, as well as Okta Workforce Identity Cloud (WIC). While I have evaluated and utilized these other solutions for different identity use cases, my current primary focus and technical expertise remain dedicated to Auth0 Platform.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Auth0 Platform is highly straightforward. For standard identity flows, anyone with baseline IAM (Identity and Access Management) knowledge can have a functional configuration up and running very quickly, greatly aided by Auth0's exceptional, well-structured documentation.

However, because Auth0 is an enterprise-grade solution with a vast array of extensibility features, there is naturally a steeper learning curve to master the entire platform. This complexity is entirely appropriate given the depth of functionality provided. While getting started is fast, fully optimizing the architecture and leveraging advanced capabilities—like custom Actions and multi-tenant Organizations—takes time and dedicated expertise.

What was our ROI?

The return on investment with Auth0 Platform is substantial and can be categorized into two main areas: user experience and risk mitigation. On the experience side, providing a frictionless and secure login journey directly translates to better user retention and fewer support tickets. Additionally, by offloading complex identity infrastructure to a fully managed service, development teams save countless hours that can be redirected toward building core business features.

However, the most critical ROI comes from security and risk avoidance. If a company suffers a data breach, any money saved by utilizing cheaper, less secure tools is instantly negated by reputational damage, potential compliance fines, and customer churn. Investing in an enterprise-grade platform like Auth0 is essentially investing in the long-term trust and safety of your user base, which provides the ultimate return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As an identity consultant, my primary focus is on the technical side of the platform—specifically architecture design, technical reviews, and hands-on implementation. Because of this role, I am not typically involved in the commercial negotiations or direct licensing agreements with Auth0.

However, from a setup perspective, the technical onboarding is very straightforward. The platform provides excellent documentation and a logical structure, which significantly reduces the developer hours required to get up and running. By minimizing the time spent on complex custom coding, the overall technical setup costs are kept highly efficient for the business.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before fully focusing on Auth0 Platform, I evaluated a few other solutions, including OneLogin, Amazon Cognito, and Keycloak.

While each has its merits, they didn't quite fit the broader requirements. OneLogin leans heavily toward workforce identity, Amazon Cognito lacks flexibility in UI customization, and Keycloak—while a great free open-source option—requires significant operational overhead to host and maintain the infrastructure yourself.

Auth0 Platform ultimately stood out because it delivers a fully managed, highly extensible, and future-proof SaaS experience. It completely removes the maintenance burden while offering superior, developer-centric customization, which is why it remains my primary focus.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Auth0 Platform a solid nine out of ten. For organizations considering the platform, my advice is to confidently move forward with it, especially if you are looking for an identity architecture that is built to last.

From an integration standpoint, it works seamlessly with enterprise identity providers like Azure AD, making it highly adaptable for various business environments. Ultimately, Auth0 is scalable, secure by design, and equipped with all the features a business might need as it grows, making it a truly future-proof solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    Satvik D.

Auth0 Makes Secure Authentication Easy with Clear, Beginner-Friendly Docs

  • March 12, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Auth0 makes it straightforward to add secure login, social authentication, and user management to student projects, without a lot of extra setup.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing structure can be a bit confusing, and the free student plan limits access to some of the more advanced features.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Auth0 addresses the challenge of building secure authentication from scratch by offering ready-made login, user management, and security features. This saves development time and lets me focus more on the project’s core functionality.


    Thanuj Igalawithana

Authentication has become seamless across platforms and has reduced integration time significantly

  • March 05, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

We use Auth0 Platform for our clients, and we started in 2019, which means we have been using it for around four years.

Auth0 Platform is used for user authentication. We use it for our clients who are using Google authentication. We have integrated with Azure Connect for another client from outside. Basically, we use Auth0 Platform for authentication.

Regarding the flexibility of customizable authentication, we do not have a specific need because we only authenticate, and the endpoint sends the verification, which is really easy. We have even tried SAML connection because another client suggested that there should be more clients with SAML connection.

The impact of Auth0 Platform's centralized, customizable universal login on the user experience is significant because we have to adapt to the client's email since most clients are from Google with a Google IDP. In that case, we use the universal login to separate them and cooperate with that.

We do not utilize the Fine Grained Authorization feature as we only use it for authentication. For authorizations, we use our internal system.

What is most valuable?

The best features of Auth0 Platform are that it is easy to integrate and is cross-platform. We use it with the Angular front end and the UWP application, and it also works with the iOS application, so it is really easy to integrate within the dashboard without any complications.

Regarding the flexibility of customizable authentication, we do not have a specific need because we only authenticate, and the endpoint sends the verification, which is really easy. We have even tried SAML connection because another client suggested that there should be more clients with SAML connection.

What needs improvement?

Auth0 Platform could improve by allowing more than three enterprise connections, as I remember it being three. We are stuck with that because I am not sure how the plan works, but it should be at least five.

The areas for improvement in Auth0 Platform include the UWP functionality, which works fine with the SDK. The support is also good as we read the documents available. In comparison to Keycloak, Auth0 Platform is my ultimate choice due to the ease of integration and strong support when we raise a ticket.

The amount of enterprise accounts could be improved, as that is my concern.

For how long have I used the solution?

We use Auth0 Platform for our clients, and we started in 2019, which means we have been using it for around four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The reason I rate scalability a seven is not due to downtime, bugs, or glitches, as we have not experienced any. My concern is more about scaling connection-wise. For the last four years, we have not experienced any bugs from Auth0 Platform.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

When assessing scalability, I would rate it around a seven, but the plans raise some concerns for me.

Auth0 Platform is scalable, and I would rate it around ten for being able to downsize or upsize based on our requirements.

How are customer service and support?

Auth0 Platform requires maintenance as we have done some updates, and recently we have not done anything. However, we are in touch with Auth0 Platform team for any required security updates.

Maintenance is easy because we can handle everything using their Auth0 Platform configuration site.

I would rate the technical support of Auth0 Platform around nine, as it is one of the perfect supports I have had.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have been using Keycloak for around two years, and we worked with it for around one year for that project. Now we are not working at the moment, but for the support, we are working on that.

Regarding the use case, we do not use Okta platform; we use Keycloak instead. Okta and Keycloak are two different things.

When comparing Auth0 Platform to other solutions and vendors on the market, it stands out for being easy in terms of integration, which is the main thing as a developer. It supports all the libraries, and when going to Angular, there are NPM packages and the SDK available. In comparison to Keycloak being a free open-source option, I prefer Auth0 Platform.

The pricing of Auth0 Platform is a consideration when choosing the technology. While comparing Auth0 Platform and Keycloak, I note that they are two different things—one is free and the other is paid. Therefore, we cannot directly compare a free option to a paid one, but I prefer Auth0 Platform's pricing.

How was the initial setup?

For others looking to implement Auth0 Platform, I recommend that it is very easy to integrate, and they offer free plans to support everything. While pricing might be slightly higher than other options, the support and documentation provided are perfect. The only concern remains the plans, as small organizations like us just need around four to five connections.

What was our ROI?

I would estimate that the return on investment with Auth0 Platform saves around thirty to forty percent of my time in comparison to integrating with Keycloak.


    reviewer2805462

Modern identity access has unified customer logins and strengthened risk‑based protection

  • February 27, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I work with Okta, and I also work with SailPoint, Veza, and IBM tools because I am overseeing many sales engagements, and I must deal with many tools. We are a service company, and we offer different kinds of products to our clients.

For example, there is an enterprise customer XYZ Corporation using Microsoft Azure AD as an IDP, who logs into a multi-tenant HR application through an Auth0 tenant managing connections, RBAC, and tokens. The user visits the HR application and logs in with their email, Auth0 redirects them to Azure AD for authentication, which sends tokens back to Auth0, allowing the user to access the HR app with the roles assigned.

Working on Veza at this stage includes preparation for migrating systems; I will begin this process in the coming months after thorough research and planning.

What is most valuable?

Auth0 Platform from Okta, which is for access management and single sign-on, is basically for dividing modern IM into categories. The first is workforce identity, meaning SSO and access management solutions for users, partners, and temporary employees, which is catered by a traditional Okta Platform. Customer identity speaks about internet application customers, such as logging into an FMCG application through mobile or laptop applications like Flipkart, Amazon, and Alibaba.com. If security is needed for these applications, it is called customer identity and access management solution, CIAM, and requires a different tool because the user base will be in millions or billions. For instance, banking apps and airline applications fall under CIAM solutions, and Auth0 Platform will be implemented for these requirements.

Most integrations will not be done by traditional connectors but by exchanging metadata between the application and Auth0 Platform. Once metadata is exchanged, certificate information and cryptographic keys are also exchanged, making transactions secure. Different methodologies for onboarding users are available, including bulk onboarding and risk score features. If someone logs into a banking app normally from the UK, but they log in from Namibia after stealing a mobile phone, the application detects this change of location as a zero trust model. Policies such as restricting app access based on location can also be implemented using Auth0 Platform, along with self-service user registration features similar to opening a bank account.

Universal login, while I do not think it has a major impact, allows a seamless experience by authenticating multiple app logins from one entry point, which would be particularly useful in healthcare applications.

Auth0 Platform is quite affordable compared to IBM Security Access Verify, which is on the higher end. ForgeRock and Okta are in the same bucket for pricing.

What needs improvement?

Auth0 Platform is not as flexible compared to ForgeRock or IBM Security Access Manager.

Auth0 Platform will only play on the outer boundary of the application. Once the application team requests to handle their entire system and APIs, then only ForgeRock and IBM Security Access Manager can help; Auth0 Platform cannot assist.

The only area for improvement is that Auth0 Platform cannot handle requests for developing APIs for legacy systems, such as mainframe models, where ForgeRock and IBM Security Verify Access can be utilized.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been dealing with Auth0 Platform for more than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not experienced any downtime with Okta; in the last one and a half years, including production environments with higher availability setups, the systems ensure uptime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Auth0 Platform is very scalable, and Okta handles CI/CD deployments effectively to adjust to needs.

Using enhanced features improves multi-tenant management for B2B SaaS.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support from Okta is quite good; I know people personally, and their learning portal is also effective. They need to hire more resources, though, especially as they expand products. Okta is capable of being competitive but is limited due to resource constraints.

I would rate their customer support a nine; I have not seen any complaints.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have been working recently with Veza through a client looking to replace SailPoint. Veza, acquired by ServiceNow, offers an IM solution at a lower cost by bundling it with the ServiceNow license.

How was the initial setup?

Auth0 Platform is SaaS based. They spin up a tenant for me upon deal closure, and I can access it immediately, establishing different roles for administrative and user purposes to start implementation without delay.

What about the implementation team?

I can enable attack protection in Auth0 Platform, which protects applications from automated attacks such as brute force, credential stuffing, and password spraying by analyzing various detection signals including IP reputation and suspicious login velocity. If a risk is detected, Auth0 Platform can trigger mitigation actions such as blocking requests, initiating captcha challenges, throttling login attempts, and sending logs to SIEM systems.

What was our ROI?

Regarding ROI with Auth0 Platform, they offer various subscription plans including free basic options for a few hundred users, but comprehensive ROI reflects better with the full Okta platform, which is robust in providing a unified security solution. Okta is unique in offering comprehensive services including single sign-on, IGA, privileged access, and endpoint security, making it a worthwhile investment compared to deploying multiple vendors.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Auth0 Platform is quite affordable compared to IBM Security Access Verify, which is on the higher end. ForgeRock and Okta are in the same bucket for pricing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Veza's entire SDK is built on Python, which enhances integration capabilities with AI tools and chatbots. As the market shifts toward cost-effective solutions, especially in expectation of an economic slump, Veza is positioned to gain traction.

What other advice do I have?

Auth0 Platform will only play on the outer boundary of the application. Once the application team requests to handle their entire system and APIs, then only ForgeRock and IBM Security Access Manager can help. Auth0 Platform cannot assist, making Auth0 Platform slightly better in terms of user migration.

Detecting automated traffic is vital for security measures, as it provides end-to-end security. It protects login and signup endpoints and deals with attacks through various implementations, including breach detection.


    kamal b.

Simple, Versatile Dashboard with Powerful AI Agents and Apps

  • February 07, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
its dashboard and simplicity and diversity of services like authentication and authorization of my applications
What do you dislike about the product?
i dont like the pricing and the platform sometimes stuck
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
i like the Passwordless Authentication which help my app users login directly using emails


    Daniel G.

Fast, Secure Identity Management with Easy MFA and Strong IAM

  • February 02, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
We use Auth0 for smooth identity management and it ensure fast and secure authentication.
The MFA feature is easy to setup and makes authentication process easy and fast.
I like that Auth0 also offers freat IAM features which ensures smooth access to business resources/apps/data.
We also leverage Auth0 when it comes to customer identity and access management and I must agree it offers best capabilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far Auth0 has been awesome. No serious flaws.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Auth0 to protect identities and to ensures smooth access management. The tool also features amazing SSO and IAM features thus handling access and identity management smoothly.


    Computer Software

Secure, Standards-Based Identity with Straightforward, Developer-Friendly Integration

  • January 28, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Auth0 provides a secure, standards-based identity platform with strong support for OAuth2, OIDC, SSO, and MFA, while keeping integration and ongoing management straightforward and developer-friendly.
What do you dislike about the product?
While Auth0 is a powerful platform, some customizations and more advanced features are locked behind higher pricing tiers. Also, when authentication flows get complex, debugging can sometimes feel less transparent and harder to trace.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Auth0 provides SSO, risk-based authentication, and CIAM out of the box, making it easier to deliver secure, scalable user access without having to build and maintain complex identity infrastructure from scratch.


    Radhika R.

Auth0: Fast Setup, Flexible Security, and Clear Docs That Scale

  • January 17, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Auth0 makes handling authentication much simpler and more secure without adding unnecessary complexity. What i like best is how quickly you can set up login, signup and social authentication without having to build everything from scratch. It also gives a lot of flexibility with security features like multi-factor authentication, role-based access, and integration with different identity providers. The documentation is clear and the platform scales well as applications grow. Overall, it saves a lot of development time while still keeping security strong and reliable.
What do you dislike about the product?
Auth0 can feel a bit complex once you move beyond basic authentication. There are a lot of settings, rules and configurations, which can be overwhelming at first and take time to fully understand. Another downside is pricing. As your user base grows or you need advance features, costs can increase quickly which may not be ideal for similar teams or early stage products.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Auth0 solves the tricky problem of building and maintaining secure login and user access systems from scratch. Instead of spending weeks writing and maintaining your own authentication logic, you get a flexible platform that handles sign-ups, logins, social logins, multi factor authentications, SSO and access control out of the box. This means you don't have to reinvent the wheel every time you launch a new app or service. For me, this is super helpful because it takes one of the most complex and security sensitive parts of app development off my plate. I can integrate secure authentication quickly, support different login expertise. It also gives my users a smoother, more reliable login experience, while i spend more time building core features instead of wrestling with identity and access code.