My main use cases with Cisco Duo involve managing access. I've integrated it into my platform so that customers can connect using Cisco Duo. It manages all the users connecting on my platform and provides SAML integration so they can use their Cisco Duo account credentials to connect.

The feature I appreciate most about Cisco Duo is the ease of integration with my platform. It's straightforward with all the APIs they have to integrate with my platform. After that, I just put a Cisco Duo button on my login page, and then people can use their credentials. The integration is what I value the most.

Cisco Duo benefits my organization by making it easy for me to reach out to customers using Cisco Duo so they can integrate on my platform using their credentials. They don't have to change the way they connect, and it makes the whole experience seamless. That's why it's truly beneficial for my organization.

In Cisco Duo, what could be improved is having more features. We are using a front-end broker because the integration was something we struggled with. I would suggest releasing some API endpoints so we can have additional integration options beyond the basic one we used to have.

I have been using Cisco Duo for four years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo as having some slowness at certain points, but it's not really an issue. Overall, the performance is good.

I didn't have to use customer service regarding Cisco Duo.

The experience of deploying Cisco Duo was straightforward and easy.

I can say that I've seen a return on investment from having Cisco Duo.

Cisco Duo has provided a return on investment by integrating and increasing my reach to people and customers using Cisco Duo. It has had an impact on my revenue because I was able to integrate more customers. There is a clear ROI to this.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that I've been working with Cisco for a long time, so it's straightforward. Pricing is per user, so it's easy to understand.

Before adopting Cisco Duo, I considered other solutions. I've worked extensively with Azure AD and Okta. However, because Cisco Duo is a Cisco product, it makes sense for me to integrate with it.

I am not using Identity Intelligence in Cisco Duo.

I haven't noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently.

I haven't implemented Cisco Duo end-to-end phishing resistance with proximity verification, though I may consider it if needed. I wasn't aware of the feature until now.

I have deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identity.

I use a front-end broker with Cisco Duo that manages all the IDPs for my platform. It integrates with Cisco Duo and different SAML providers.

I would not say that Cisco Duo helped reduce the overall authentication-related costs, but it definitely helped specifically for managing those customers.

I did not discover any feature in Cisco Duo that I didn't think I would use initially and later discovered along the way. I believe we are knowledgeable about all these SAML providers, so we knew what we wanted to leverage.

I would rate this review as an eight out of ten.

My main use cases for Cisco Duo are two-factor authentication and single sign-on for different solutions.

The feature I like the most about Cisco Duo is the dashboard to have everything in one single place and manage multiple customers and multiple tenants simultaneously.

Cisco Duo benefits my organization because we do not have too many logins since everything is in one place and we can use Cisco Duo for VPN, applications, and cloud solutions. This is a main benefit and the core purpose of the product that we are utilizing.

I think Cisco Duo can be improved. I found the onboarding was very difficult, even for engineers who have been using similar solutions before. For our specific implementation, we needed to have multiple groups, multiple companies, and multiple third parties, and I felt that the examples and material provided were insufficiently detailed. The onboarding videos, materials, how-to guides, and documentation should be improved dramatically.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately three years.

I did not notice any downtime or crashes with Cisco Duo. We focused on making modifications and changes only during maintenance windows, and afterwards in production, we did not have any downtime.

Cisco Duo's scalability works well with the growth of our company and does not seem to have a limit. We could add as many users and as many sites as needed, so scalability is not an issue.

Before implementing Cisco Duo for this particular customer, I did not consider another solution. However, for other customers, we also use some open-source solutions and cloud providers, which unfortunately seem to be winning over Cisco Duo.

I cannot say I have seen a clear return on investment. However, as I was only the integrator, it is difficult for me to make an estimation on the customer's actual ROI. That said, considering that they did not have any more attacks, it is probably positive, but I am not able to fully evaluate that.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that it is not an expensive product. The issue was that we had a customer migrate away because they moved to one of the cloud providers for identity management as well. The difference in cost to upgrade to directory services on that platform was cheaper than having Cisco Duo. However, generally, if a customer is not tied to a specific cloud vendor, then the pricing is acceptable.

I do not recall seeing Cisco Identity Intelligence or using it.

I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks recently, and this was exactly the reason one of our customers asked us to implement Cisco Duo because they were attacked before and lost quite a bit of money. After that incident, we deployed Cisco Duo for them. While using Cisco Duo, we did not have any issues regarding other attacks.

When implementing Cisco Duo, I implemented end-to-end phishing resistance with the proximity verification as the full solution.

I deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identity.

I am using it as an identity broker because we were not integrating to the customer's Active Directory. It was actually functioning as an identity proxy rather than as a directory per se.

The organization's overall cost for authentication was higher, but the indirect cost of being attacked and losing data is significantly greater.

I discovered new benefits after initial implementation when we started with basic VPN authentication and then developed many other flows based on that. We learned that there were not enough examples or documentation available so we could start from the beginning knowing everything about the product.

The deployment experience was complicated as it was a trial and error process. We had multiple existing systems, and for each system we wanted to integrate with Cisco Duo, the approach was different. One was connecting directly, one was using the API, one was using SAML, and one was using directory services, making the process quite challenging.

I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

Cisco Duo is used primarily for access management, zero trust architecture, and identity management, with MFA serving as the main feature.

My favorite feature in Cisco Duo is the remote app access.

The remote app access feature helps our company by providing strong MFA protection in the event of password and username leakage from any employee, ensuring that we can protect our applications more effectively. Cisco Duo integrates smoothly with our environment, avoiding challenges that might arise with third-party products, making it an ideal solution given that we work with Cisco for support and AI technology.

Cisco Duo could be improved by building the agent with the many agents we already use, such as Cisco AMP and Cisco Secure Client, which would simplify our environment by eliminating the need for a third agent for secure applications.

We began using Cisco Duo in 2024 as a demo, and after 30 days of evaluation, we transitioned to live production for almost four applications. We plan to increase to six applications in 2025 and ultimately expand to 12 or 16 applications by 2026.

The stability and reliability of Cisco Duo depend on the environment and Cisco's cloud infrastructure, which is beneficial since Cisco does not compete with your applications but rather secures them.

I believe there is no need for scalability concerns with Cisco Duo because it is designed to handle future expansions from the beginning.

My experience with Cisco Duo's customer service and technical support has been perfect, as I had an interaction that went very well. I would rate the customer service and technical support from Cisco Duo a ten.

Before choosing Cisco Duo, we were using a legacy VPN and did not publish applications that were not critical to the public, utilizing them only on a remote site.

The deployment process of Cisco Duo is not straightforward; you need some knowledge of best practices because you are facing attackers, and it is better to let professionals handle it, especially when working in a critical environment.

We did consider other solutions before choosing Cisco Duo and took several products for demos, ultimately deciding on Cisco Duo.

The biggest return on investment for us when using Cisco Duo includes disabling the public IP in our environment, which is a key goal for us.

Looking back at the initial investment in Cisco Duo, I find that the choice has paid off for our company, especially considering the difficulties of transitioning from traditional and legacy technology, and I hope we will continue to realize its value.

I am not certain if Cisco Duo has reduced our overall authentication-related costs, but it has helped us manage and keep everything under control, which is our priority for safety.

The decision to choose Cisco Duo is based on the many features it offers that we did not find in other applications, and since we were already using Cisco for our other needs, it made sense not to switch to a competitor.

Recently, we have noticed a heavy increase in phishing attacks targeting products not protected by Cisco Duo that are still published on the public network, as attackers are trying to obtain data.

I believe this significant spike in phishing attacks is due to AI bots, which are easier to acquire, as the cost of using them is reduced, making the attacks more commonplace despite the number of human attackers remaining the same or even decreasing.

We have deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identities. We are using Cisco Duo Directory today as a standalone identity provider, connected with Microsoft Azure SAML as an identity broker.

We have implemented Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance with capabilities such as proximity verification. Our implementation of Cisco Duo strengthens our company's ability to defend against modern phishing and identity-based attacks through compliance with various benchmarks, offering multiple defense points, and isolating applications to prevent the use of shared resources among them, even ensuring isolation at the DNS system level via Umbrella.

We hope to use Cisco Identity Intelligence in the future, but we have not implemented it yet.

My advice to other companies considering Cisco Duo is to purchase it, as it really addresses security concerns and transforms the way you feel about security. My overall rating for this review is nine.

My main use case for Cisco Duo is to protect the OT environment from remote access.

The feature I like the most about Cisco Duo is that I can choose which device I want to sign in.

It is valuable for me that I can choose because not all people have a corporate phone, so they can use their personal phone for access or different methods for performing second-factor authentication.

I can say that it is difficult to measure the direct return on investment, but what I can say is that we are safer and feel more comfortable having this security implemented than before.

I cannot think of any improvements for Cisco Duo at this time.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately half a year.

I do not have problems with stability or reliability. Being a cloud solution, I think it is difficult to have problems, and we also use Umbrella with Cisco, which is very reliable and has high availability.

The solution is scalable for our growth.

We used Okta sometime before Cisco Duo.

We used Okta in a different environment, and we finished our license; we were not seeing the need to keep using Okta. For this new environment, we chose Cisco because we wanted to have a homogeneous solution, and our colleagues in other countries were happy, so it was easy for us to choose.

The deployment experience was more difficult than we expected because we had some problems with the version of the OS that we have in our servers. We also had concerns about opening the mandatory connection to a specific URL and port from our OT environment.

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that the price is acceptable because the license is by user.

We were considering different solutions, but we are a global company, and in another place in our company, they were using Cisco Duo, so it was our first option because we want to have a homogeneous scenario.

I do not think I am using Cisco Identity Intelligence.

I have not seen an increase in phishing attacks recently; I think they are more or less constant, but not increasing, particularly in the last three or four months.

We have seen the number of phishing attacks increase every year, but I do not know if that surprises us; we are accustomed to having this type of risk.

I think I have deployed Duo Directory to manage the user identities.

I think I used it as an identity broker in front of the IDPs.

My review rating for Cisco Duo is 8.

Cisco Duo primarily secures our environment.

I appreciate the features that Cisco Duo offers. Cisco Duo's team sent us some questions, for example, about the feature called Identity Intelligence. I have tried using the Identity Intelligence feature and have been working with it. I can confidently say that Identity Intelligence has improved my visibility into identity risk and has helped me make defenses against identity-based threats better.

The main issue with Cisco Duo is dependency. For example, it verifies the subscription with features Duo Push, OTP code, and phone dependency. If you lose or break your phone, users without smartphones will face connectivity issues. There is also integration challenges, support for legacy systems and cloud connectivity, management overhead, and the system can be bypassed by phishing techniques.

To improve these issues, users should be required to confirm a number to approve authentication requests. This would enable disabling auto push and then enable trust-based authentication with new device detection, new location detection, and VPN detection.

Additionally, Cisco Duo is subscription-based depending on the number of users and has a dependency on mobile devices for advanced features. The cost will become expensive for large user accounts. The system requires approve push and either OTP, with push deployments through Duo mobile applications. There is limited offline support, it requires internet connectivity and cloud dependency. Internet outages can cause authentication issues affecting VPN, Windows login, and cloud applications.

I have been using Cisco Duo in my career for three years.

I do see instances of lagging, crashing, or downtime. We used to experience downtime, for example, during code upgradations and OS upgrades on the server, switches, and firewalls. We try to mitigate it, but we need to implement upgrades without downtime. Sometimes the device will not come up after reboot, which can cause downtime.

Cisco Duo performs well regarding scalability. The scalability depends mostly on the number of users. The system has good scalability and can handle more users, more logins, and more locations without performance issues. This depends on the cloud-based, globally distributed infrastructure with no dependency on on-premises services. It can scale from 10 users up to thousands and hundreds of users. The system also has load balancing, high availability, and failover capabilities. A small office can support up to 50 users, while a large office can support more than 10,000 users.

I have contacted customer support regarding Cisco Duo for assistance. The quality and speed of support depend on various factors. For example, when we receive any ticket, we need to assign it to ourselves first and then depend upon the SLA to work on the ticket. We need to resolve it within the SLA timeframe.

Regarding Proximity Verification feature, I have seen it in action last year.

Cisco Duo's initial deployment is easy. We need to have a mobile application and need to install it for users on VPN, servers, clouds, cloud applications, and for admins and passwords. We need to have a security policy required and identity source such as LDAP, local users, Active Directory, and Azure AD. We need to have VPN devices for servers and firewalls with HTTP 443 port number. We need to have web applications and cloud applications, and Windows login. We need to have end-user devices for MFA, such as a smartphone and SMS. We need to have synchronization for security policy purposes, licensing, and many other components.

Regarding the pricing for Cisco Duo, it is somewhat expensive. Cisco Duo costs depend on the technology. Up to 10 users, it is free. Premium versions go for dollars, such as $10 per user per account. As the number of members increases, the cost increases. It is very useful to have for multi-factor authentication.

I would rate the return on investment at an 8 or a 9.

I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently. There has been a significant spike in the number of attacks, and they feel more sophisticated, which makes them more difficult to deal with. We used to get phishing attacks through our emails, SMS, WhatsApp, and fake website links. The domain may show a hyphen, for example, Microsoft hyphen login, and attackers will try to send a link. If you click on that link, all our data will be hijacked. We need to protect our devices and environment and should not click any unknown links. That is why we need to enter MFA with valid credentials.

Alternatives to Cisco Duo that we have been using in our organization include third-party applications. We can use Okta and Microsoft SSO, Microsoft Azure MFA, Rublon MFA, Twilio, and PingID from Ping Identity. There is also Secure Authentication and RSA SecurID in the market. There are many third-party alternatives available.

The main issue with Cisco Duo is dependency. For example, it verifies the subscription with features Duo Push, OTP code, and phone dependency. If you lose or break your phone, users without smartphones will face connectivity issues. There is also integration challenges, support for legacy systems and cloud connectivity, management overhead, and the system can be bypassed by phishing techniques.

To improve these issues, users should be required to confirm a number to approve authentication requests. This would enable disabling auto push and then enable trust-based authentication with new device detection, new location detection, and VPN detection.

Additionally, Cisco Duo is subscription-based depending on the number of users and has a dependency on mobile devices for advanced features. The cost will become expensive for large user accounts. The system requires approve push and either OTP, with push deployments through Duo mobile applications. There is limited offline support, it requires internet connectivity and cloud dependency. Internet outages can cause authentication issues affecting VPN, Windows login, and cloud applications.

My overall review rating for Cisco Duo is 8.

My main use case for Cisco Duo is as a two-factor authentication. A quick specific example of how I use Cisco Duo is through 2FA. Everything is fine with my main use case.

In my opinion, the best features Cisco Duo offers include its 2FA authentication, which is very good. Everything is perfect about the features; it is very easy to use, and the integration with other systems is very good.

Cisco Duo has positively impacted my organization, and I have noticed specific improvements since using it. The improvements I have noticed include making security very good and increasing our overall security.

I believe Cisco Duo can be improved, but I think the current state is sufficient. I don't really wish for any specific changes regarding needed improvements.

I have been working in my current field as an infrastructure engineer for approximately 15 years.

Cisco Duo is very stable.

Regarding Cisco Duo's scalability, it meets our requirements.

Customer support for Cisco Duo is very good. I would rate the customer support as a nine on a scale of 1 to 10.

I have not used a different solution before Cisco Duo, as it was the first solution I implemented.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that it's not getting worse; it's better now.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Cisco Duo as a nine because it's a very good solution.

Looking back at my initial investment in Cisco Duo versus the total value it has delivered over time, I have seen a return on investment.

Before choosing Cisco Duo, we had IPV as an option.

My advice to others looking into using Cisco Duo is to recommend they use Cisco Duo. My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

I have not implemented Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance, and we don't have capabilities such as proximity verification. I still need to check about using Cisco Identity Intelligence. I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently; the attacks are getting more frequent, which is why we improved the security for 2FA.

I give Cisco Duo an overall review rating of 9.

I mainly help customers to setup Cisco Duo for multi-factor authentication.

Duo significantly increases phishing resistance for application access. So the main benefit is improved security.

Passwordless authentication - This is the future of secure access. By eliminating passwords entirely through FIDO2/WebAuthn, Duo removes the primary attack vector for credential theft while also simplifying the login experience for users.

Cisco Duo is technically excellent, but the main challenge is market positioning rather than product capability. Microsoft Authenticator comes bundled with Microsoft 365 at no additional cost, so many organizations default to that solution rather than purchasing Duo as a standalone product.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately one and a half years.

Cisco Duo is very stable. I have never experienced major outages or service disruptions. The product itself is reliable - any minor issues we've encountered were typically user configuration errors rather than platform problems.

The scalability is excellent. Being cloud-based, Duo handles any user count without infrastructure concerns. We've scaled it across multiple customers without performance issues.

I have no experience with their support - I have never encountered issues that required contacting Cisco. The product documentation and admin portal have been sufficient

Yes, I used Microsoft Authenticator but only as a end user. In my opinion, Duo is simpler and more intuitive. From an admin perspective, I can't give a review.

The initial setup is straightforward and fast. Duo's phased rollout approach shows they understand real-world deployment challenges. Overall, it's very easy to implement.

My company is a Cisco Duo reseller and partner, so we perform the deployments ourselves for our clients rather than using external integrators or consultants.

I don't have quantifiable ROI data. The value is primarily in risk mitigation - preventing phishing and credential theft. The cost of a single breach would far exceed the investment in Duo. I cannot speak to operational cost savings like reduced password reset tickets.

The pricing is fair and straightforward - per-user licensing makes budgeting simple. Setup is easy and intuitive. The licensing tiers are well-structured and easy to understand.

9 out of 10. Duo is technically excellent - stable, feature-rich, with outstanding passwordless capabilities and straightforward deployment.

My advice: Take advantage of the free tier (up to 10 users) and 30-day trial to test it in your environment.

Cisco Duo is primarily used for MFA purposes, whether for remote server login or dual login. It has not been integrated onto an application yet, but it has been integrated across all remote servers, including Windows, Linux, and heterogeneous environments with dual MFA.

We work with major cloud providers and integrate Cisco Duo wherever there is a critical workload to maintain the balance between cost and security. It is not a blind deployment everywhere.

Cisco Duo is very user-friendly. You do not need to struggle, and you do not need to teach non-technical users or executives how to use it. If you miss a device or change your phone or handheld devices, you can still reactivate on your new device very easily. It is very user-convenient, and there are many methodologies available. You can get SMS alerts, web plug-ins, and push notifications. It is available for both Android and iOS.

As long as we are clearing the audits, that confirms that we are secure enough. We have been able to convince our security auditors that we are compliant with all the laws, at least from an MFA standpoint, regarding the return on investment from using Cisco Duo.

There are some areas for improvement. Cost could be one opportunity, as if the cost is further reduced, we can increase it to the maximum user base. Since DPD is becoming very aggressive and active, especially in countries like India, once the cost is reduced, we can probably scale it to all 6,000 to 7,000 users. Right now, it is only limited to the production environment and could be extended to all applications.

Scalability could also be better if the price were reduced, as scaling is quite expensive. The account manager could reach out for the next level of expansion and offer certain premium support along with a lower cost.

The main areas for improvement regarding Cisco Duo are cost and scalability, which are directly connected.

We have been using Cisco Duo for almost more than seven or eight years.

Cisco Duo is quite stable when using it recently.

Scalability could be better if the price were reduced, as scaling is quite expensive.

Cisco's technical support is good, as in the last couple of years, we have not needed to reach out to them. Since I have not dealt with it a lot, I would rate them a six or seven in terms of support.

We used a couple of products in the past, but the main reason for not adopting them was that the convenience was not comparable. There were no such two or three methodologies through which a user could get alerts, especially push notifications. Google Authenticator is available, but it does not offer push notifications. It offers them only for Google products, but may not work for other third-party applications. Microsoft Authenticator has some capabilities, but it runs quite smoothly on the Microsoft platform but may not work on any third party. Cisco Duo is quite neutral from a product standpoint.

We ran POCs for a couple of months with Cisco Duo. After seeing the usability and user-friendliness, we slowly expanded it to a couple of users. Although it is a costly product, the features themselves enabled us to adopt it.

The deployment of Cisco Duo has been done in-house.

As long as we are clearing the audits, that confirms that we are secure enough. We have been able to convince our security auditors that we are compliant with all the laws, at least from an MFA standpoint, regarding the return on investment from using Cisco Duo.

It has not reduced the cost for authentication-related functions, but the cost remains the same. There have not been many changes in the cost. However, because of the user convenience, we are pretty good with the existing cost.

We have not deployed Duo Directory to manage user identities.

We have not implemented Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance with capabilities like proximity verification.

We are using CrowdStrike and we are not using SentinelOne.

We certainly use Cisco Duo and Cisco switches and pre-switches, but those are the products.

We are a customer of Cisco.

We are not using Cisco Identity Intelligence.

Phishing attacks in our organization have increased, which is very common. It keeps fluctuating both ways, but we have been able to mitigate this quite well.

Cisco Duo is quite easy to deploy, and I do not see much technical challenges. Any technical team can adopt it quite easily. The overall rating for this review is nine out of ten.

My main use case for Cisco Duo is to integrate with Active Directory, and I am using it for two-factor authentication.

Cisco Duo has positively impacted my organization by securing our agents using the VPN.

Cisco Duo has helped secure our agents with the VPN, ensuring they must make approvals through mobile devices to verify the person's identity.

The best features Cisco Duo offers are device discovery, which identifies whether a device is iOS or Android.

The device discovery feature helps me in my day-to-day work by assisting with our monthly check since the Android and iOS discovery capabilities identify devices without updates for specific versions. When I export the users, I can see those device versions.

Cisco Duo can be improved because people have their own personal mobile devices.

I chose a rating of nine out of ten for Cisco Duo because we missed the Duo Desktop integration, as it is not working as well as the Duo Desktop agent.

I have been using Cisco Duo for more than five years.

My advice to others looking into using Cisco Duo is that it is a great product, and I recommend it for everyone, specifically for those using Cisco Secure Client.

I am currently using Cisco Identity Intelligence, and it has helped improve my visibility into identity risk and strengthen my defenses against identity-based threats.

Cisco Duo serves as the primary multi-factor authentication solution for our company.

The simplicity and the number of integrations available in Cisco Duo are the two aspects I appreciate the most.

Cisco Duo is remarkably easy to use. You log in, receive a push notification on the Cisco Duo app, and simply confirm it to gain access. The number of integrations available is exceptional as well. I believe no other MFA service has as many integrations available, and for those who prefer not to use the app, an SMS fallback remains available.

The benefits of such simplicity in Cisco Duo are significant. Employees spend considerably less time logging in and approving logins. They do not grow tired of the multi-factor push notifications because it is easy, fast, and not repetitive, so we do not experience much attrition from it.

Cisco Duo has provided substantial value, primarily in saved time, but also in low cost because administrators do not have a significant workload with Cisco Duo. It simply works, and I believe it has been a great investment for our company.

I genuinely appreciate Cisco Duo as it is, and I value the fact that the company has been improving on identity management as well. My advice for the developers is to continue doing what you are doing because you are performing excellently. Perhaps focus even more on identity management because it can become a strong alternative to either Entra ID, Okta, or any other identity access management provider.

We have not yet deployed Cisco Duo Directory for managing user identities.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately five to six years, essentially as long as I have been with the company.

I have not received any negative reviews about the stability of Cisco Duo, and I do not believe we have experienced any downtime with Cisco Duo. The stability has been excellent.

Cisco Duo scales exceptionally well. Adding another user is straightforward and simple. We are a fairly small company by global standards but a fairly large one for our country, so scalability has not been an issue for us. Even if we grow twofold, it will not present a problem for management. You would not need any more engineers to manage Cisco Duo even if we scale up to 500 employees because it is so simple to manage.

The customer experience for me through using Cisco Duo has been excellent, but I cannot speak about technical support because that is handled by our engineers, and I do not have any information on that.

We also have a Microsoft group in our company and they mostly use Microsoft products, of course. So for us, as an integrator, it mostly comes down to the vendor you are working with. But my clients and most organizations in our market also often consider Microsoft products, and perhaps FortiToken or YubiKey, which is a hardware multi-factor authenticator, helpful in FIDO-related use cases.

The biggest return on investment when using Cisco Duo is time, primarily because it is so simple to use that many employees save considerable time signing in to applications and can focus on other more important tasks.

The time saved with Cisco Duo is at least a couple of minutes per day per employee. If you multiply that by over 300 employees, you can see how much time is saved and how much more time people can spend on actual projects instead of signing on.

The reason clients choose Cisco Duo is the same as mine: the number of integrations that Cisco Duo has over other solutions such as Microsoft Authenticator, and also the simplicity of management.

Being a partner of Cisco, we have many benefits price-wise, but with our customers, I believe Cisco Duo is very competitively priced, and it should remain that way because it is easier to position. Many customers are accustomed to having Microsoft products in their environment because of how Microsoft licensing operates, so having competitive pricing for Cisco Duo makes it easier to implement Cisco with customers.

My clients mostly consider Microsoft products because the Microsoft licensing system is designed in such a way as to encourage customers to consume as much of Microsoft services as possible.

There has been a considerable increase in phishing attacks recently, not just at my customers but also at our company. We attempt to mitigate that by running phishing campaigns for our customers to prepare them to react, as part of our cybersecurity portfolio.

But that is more a question for our cyber intelligence group. They have, however, been discussing mostly the use of AI in attacks and how much more sophisticated the attacks have become. Using AI also means that the attack is easier to perform, which subsequently also means there are more of them.

Companies that are considering Cisco Duo should not hesitate any longer. Simply implement it because it is a great product, and I believe it surpasses other multi-factor authentication solutions, and you will not regret it. I would rate this review 9.5 out of 10.