The main use cases for Cisco Duo are for people who don't have a multi-factor authenticator. This is concerning because when you work in IT, you assume you are talking to technical people. Sometimes they are a director of the IT department, and when I ask them, "What do you have for an MFA?" they respond, "We don't." So I say, "Okay, let's talk about Cisco Duo and how you can implement it in order to secure your organization." That's the main case.

We place Cisco Duo Identity Intelligence with the customers against Shadow IT because sometimes we have the feeling that the customers have a lot of platforms. They have thousands of accounts they are using. In general, customers are using around 100 SaaS applications in a company, and sometimes they don't really know what they have. Sometimes, some workers are not there anymore, and it's possible that they can lose track of who is still in the company and who is not. That's why with Cisco Duo Identity Intelligence, I am able to provide a complete overview of what they have. Now they can check who is still using the system. It's good against Shadow IT, but it's also good if you are paying for an app and you don't use it anymore. You can cancel the subscription and get some money back.

What is good with Cisco Duo is I have to explain that it's not just an MFA because some customers already have an MFA in place. I can talk about other products from Microsoft or any other product, and they say, "We already have an MFA." So I have to explain to them that Cisco Duo is not just an MFA. With an MFA, you want to access something, and the MFA is going to check if you can enter, yes or no. It's not going to check your background or what you have. Cisco Duo is a pre-MFA and post-MFA. With Cisco Duo it's checking if you are allowed to submit a request to access this. If your company is just working with Windows and you are trying to access with a Mac, Cisco Duo is going to be able to say, "Why are you working with a Mac? It's not allowed," so you're not going to have a request. Or if you are, for example, working in Germany and you only have workers in Germany, and suddenly your IP address is in Spain, then I can explain to the customer, "Okay." The customer might say, "Okay, I have a request from Spain, but we don't have people working in Spain, even remotely. So we will block it directly." That's the good thing. It's comparable to when you want to go to a nightclub, they ask you if you are 18, but they also check it with your ID card and everything. It's the same with Cisco Duo. They do a complete check of you before you access.

I have not implemented Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing-resistant capabilities such as proximity verification.

I have not deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage the user identities, not yet, because since a lot of customers already have their own directories, it was not necessary with Cisco Duo. We still talk about it, but it was not necessary as of right now.

I have been using Cisco Duo for two years.

I would assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo as good. I have nothing to say. It's never had downtime, nothing. Cisco Duo cannot see your password. It's just sending the request. At no point in time does it see or save your password. That's also the good thing. And it's working with everything, and it's native on Linux. This means with some other products, I can get Linux to work, but I have to do some tricks. With Cisco Duo, it's already in. So if I have a server with Linux, it's perfect.

I think Cisco Duo is scalable in a growing company and it works well. It's very scalable. I can add users, and as far as I remember, if I cross the line with the users, I will get a notification stating, "You need to upgrade," but it's not blocked. This means it's not that I add one user and now everything is locked. I have a lot of leeway. I can improve, and I will have a notification and still have time to pay more. Regarding the scalability, I just add one new customer, and after I upgrade my license directly from the dashboard as an admin, that's it. There's nothing else to do.

I had something before Cisco Duo. It was a Windows MFA. I don't know the name. A Windows solution. But once again, the Windows solution is like, "Can you go in, or not? Is it you?" "But where are you? And is it really you?" That's the problem.

The experience of the deployment with Cisco Duo is pretty rough. The software itself is good. The software itself is not the problem. The problem with customers is I have to change their habits. There are some people who don't want an MFA on their phone. It's easy for people who have a company phone and people who have a private phone. In some companies, they just have a private phone; they don't have a company phone. Since it's not always GDPR-friendly, with an MFA I can still send some information. Some people don't want to do it. I think it's rough in the sense that I have to educate the customers to use it and install it, because some people don't want to install it. Or if they really don't want an app, I still have the possibility to buy keys or to install a token on a USB key. But the deployment with the software itself is good. It's more about doing the education for the customers.

I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Duo. The good thing is the MFA is free. I can use it. I have Cisco Duo on my phone for free, so everybody can use and install it, up to 10 users. So it's good. I can start with this. The return on investment is that I present the product, and the customer, even if he doesn't click immediately about the features, after that, he will just log himself into the panel and see, "Oh, there's this. I would like to try this feature." So he will upgrade your service because as soon as he discovers new functionalities and thinks it is cool, then he will buy it. The return on investment is very nice.

I did not really consider another solution before selecting Cisco Duo.

I haven't noticed an increase in phishing attacks lately. We do have some in our company. We saw an improvement. I think it's always the same as before, but now it's more improved. It's comparable to the following scenario: "We are the police and you did access a website you were not supposed to. This is the company headquarters. Please click here in order to report yourself or you will be fired." I think there's been an improvement in creativity. Not in numbers, but in creativity. Before there was, "You've won an iPhone" or "You've won one million. Please click here." Now they cannot do this anymore. You have to improve your creativity to find a new way to trick the customers.

The pricing for Cisco Duo is really good in the sense that you can try it. There are different packages, and you can choose the one that fits you the most, and you can try it for free for 30 days. So it's a very good catch. And for the price, I think it's worth it. I have not received any bad feedback about the price. I think it's okay.

We were talking about proximity with Bluetooth for Cisco Duo, but now it's been released, which is good because sometimes attackers use MFA fatigue, which means they will bombard you with push requests for everything. But now you need the device you're using to log in to be connected via Bluetooth next to the device you are also using to log yourself in. So that's good. It was one feature I had the idea for, and now I saw that they are doing it. That's excellent.

I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

I mainly use Cisco Duo for 2FA and sell that to our customers and the engineering team.

I would like to sell Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance more to customers.

We are talking with a customer to sell them Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identities.

I appreciate the secured push feature of Cisco Duo because you have to choose a number.

I value this feature because it is a security feature that enhances the security of your users, and if you also have geolocation for verified push, that would be even better.

It benefits our company as well as our customers because it is more secure. You can have geolocation or know which network the users are on, so if they do not have a push when they are in the company, but if they are on holidays or traveling somewhere, they have a push verified login, which is much more secure.

It is difficult to say how Cisco Duo can be improved. I think it is a good product, but we do not have many customers that use it, so perhaps in marketing, we should bring it more to our customers and show them the use cases for Cisco Duo.

I have been using Cisco Duo for one and a half years.

The experience my clients have with Cisco Duo is mainly good. There are sometimes some problems, but not major ones, so it is a solid security product.

My clients have never had major problems with Cisco Duo. Everything works fine most of the time, and maybe sometimes there are minor problems, but these are more configuration problems than problems with the product itself.

Cisco Duo is really good for scalability. As with almost every cloud product, the scalability is really good, so it does not matter how many users you have.

I have never had experience with customer service and technical support.

The setup process for Cisco Duo is quite easy and can be done really quickly. You can have test users, and I think the rollout process is great. They really think about how you deploy it, and it is fair and easily done.

The return on investment, like every security product, has to be done. It is much more costly if you do not deploy security in your company.

I think the prices of Cisco Duo are quite fair, but the main problem is that Microsoft Authenticator is built-in with M365, so everyone is switching to that and using it instead of Cisco Duo because it costs extra as a standalone product.

I would give Cisco Duo a rating of 9 out of 10. I do not give it a 10 because I think it is a great product that is easily set up and enhances security. My advice for other companies considering Cisco Duo is to reach out to Netcloud to help. I do not have anything else to add about my experience with Cisco Duo.

My main use cases with Cisco Duo involve managing access. I've integrated it into my platform so that customers can connect using Cisco Duo. It manages all the users connecting on my platform and provides SAML integration so they can use their Cisco Duo account credentials to connect.

The feature I appreciate most about Cisco Duo is the ease of integration with my platform. It's straightforward with all the APIs they have to integrate with my platform. After that, I just put a Cisco Duo button on my login page, and then people can use their credentials. The integration is what I value the most.

Cisco Duo benefits my organization by making it easy for me to reach out to customers using Cisco Duo so they can integrate on my platform using their credentials. They don't have to change the way they connect, and it makes the whole experience seamless. That's why it's truly beneficial for my organization.

In Cisco Duo, what could be improved is having more features. We are using a front-end broker because the integration was something we struggled with. I would suggest releasing some API endpoints so we can have additional integration options beyond the basic one we used to have.

I have been using Cisco Duo for four years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo as having some slowness at certain points, but it's not really an issue. Overall, the performance is good.

I didn't have to use customer service regarding Cisco Duo.

The experience of deploying Cisco Duo was straightforward and easy.

I can say that I've seen a return on investment from having Cisco Duo.

Cisco Duo has provided a return on investment by integrating and increasing my reach to people and customers using Cisco Duo. It has had an impact on my revenue because I was able to integrate more customers. There is a clear ROI to this.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that I've been working with Cisco for a long time, so it's straightforward. Pricing is per user, so it's easy to understand.

Before adopting Cisco Duo, I considered other solutions. I've worked extensively with Azure AD and Okta. However, because Cisco Duo is a Cisco product, it makes sense for me to integrate with it.

I am not using Identity Intelligence in Cisco Duo.

I haven't noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently.

I haven't implemented Cisco Duo end-to-end phishing resistance with proximity verification, though I may consider it if needed. I wasn't aware of the feature until now.

I have deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identity.

I use a front-end broker with Cisco Duo that manages all the IDPs for my platform. It integrates with Cisco Duo and different SAML providers.

I would not say that Cisco Duo helped reduce the overall authentication-related costs, but it definitely helped specifically for managing those customers.

I did not discover any feature in Cisco Duo that I didn't think I would use initially and later discovered along the way. I believe we are knowledgeable about all these SAML providers, so we knew what we wanted to leverage.

I would rate this review as an eight out of ten.

My main use cases for Cisco Duo are two-factor authentication and single sign-on for different solutions.

The feature I like the most about Cisco Duo is the dashboard to have everything in one single place and manage multiple customers and multiple tenants simultaneously.

Cisco Duo benefits my organization because we do not have too many logins since everything is in one place and we can use Cisco Duo for VPN, applications, and cloud solutions. This is a main benefit and the core purpose of the product that we are utilizing.

I think Cisco Duo can be improved. I found the onboarding was very difficult, even for engineers who have been using similar solutions before. For our specific implementation, we needed to have multiple groups, multiple companies, and multiple third parties, and I felt that the examples and material provided were insufficiently detailed. The onboarding videos, materials, how-to guides, and documentation should be improved dramatically.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately three years.

I did not notice any downtime or crashes with Cisco Duo. We focused on making modifications and changes only during maintenance windows, and afterwards in production, we did not have any downtime.

Cisco Duo's scalability works well with the growth of our company and does not seem to have a limit. We could add as many users and as many sites as needed, so scalability is not an issue.

Before implementing Cisco Duo for this particular customer, I did not consider another solution. However, for other customers, we also use some open-source solutions and cloud providers, which unfortunately seem to be winning over Cisco Duo.

I cannot say I have seen a clear return on investment. However, as I was only the integrator, it is difficult for me to make an estimation on the customer's actual ROI. That said, considering that they did not have any more attacks, it is probably positive, but I am not able to fully evaluate that.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that it is not an expensive product. The issue was that we had a customer migrate away because they moved to one of the cloud providers for identity management as well. The difference in cost to upgrade to directory services on that platform was cheaper than having Cisco Duo. However, generally, if a customer is not tied to a specific cloud vendor, then the pricing is acceptable.

I do not recall seeing Cisco Identity Intelligence or using it.

I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks recently, and this was exactly the reason one of our customers asked us to implement Cisco Duo because they were attacked before and lost quite a bit of money. After that incident, we deployed Cisco Duo for them. While using Cisco Duo, we did not have any issues regarding other attacks.

When implementing Cisco Duo, I implemented end-to-end phishing resistance with the proximity verification as the full solution.

I deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identity.

I am using it as an identity broker because we were not integrating to the customer's Active Directory. It was actually functioning as an identity proxy rather than as a directory per se.

The organization's overall cost for authentication was higher, but the indirect cost of being attacked and losing data is significantly greater.

I discovered new benefits after initial implementation when we started with basic VPN authentication and then developed many other flows based on that. We learned that there were not enough examples or documentation available so we could start from the beginning knowing everything about the product.

The deployment experience was complicated as it was a trial and error process. We had multiple existing systems, and for each system we wanted to integrate with Cisco Duo, the approach was different. One was connecting directly, one was using the API, one was using SAML, and one was using directory services, making the process quite challenging.

I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

Cisco Duo is used primarily for access management, zero trust architecture, and identity management, with MFA serving as the main feature.

My favorite feature in Cisco Duo is the remote app access.

The remote app access feature helps our company by providing strong MFA protection in the event of password and username leakage from any employee, ensuring that we can protect our applications more effectively. Cisco Duo integrates smoothly with our environment, avoiding challenges that might arise with third-party products, making it an ideal solution given that we work with Cisco for support and AI technology.

Cisco Duo could be improved by building the agent with the many agents we already use, such as Cisco AMP and Cisco Secure Client, which would simplify our environment by eliminating the need for a third agent for secure applications.

We began using Cisco Duo in 2024 as a demo, and after 30 days of evaluation, we transitioned to live production for almost four applications. We plan to increase to six applications in 2025 and ultimately expand to 12 or 16 applications by 2026.

The stability and reliability of Cisco Duo depend on the environment and Cisco's cloud infrastructure, which is beneficial since Cisco does not compete with your applications but rather secures them.

I believe there is no need for scalability concerns with Cisco Duo because it is designed to handle future expansions from the beginning.

My experience with Cisco Duo's customer service and technical support has been perfect, as I had an interaction that went very well. I would rate the customer service and technical support from Cisco Duo a ten.

Before choosing Cisco Duo, we were using a legacy VPN and did not publish applications that were not critical to the public, utilizing them only on a remote site.

The deployment process of Cisco Duo is not straightforward; you need some knowledge of best practices because you are facing attackers, and it is better to let professionals handle it, especially when working in a critical environment.

We did consider other solutions before choosing Cisco Duo and took several products for demos, ultimately deciding on Cisco Duo.

The biggest return on investment for us when using Cisco Duo includes disabling the public IP in our environment, which is a key goal for us.

Looking back at the initial investment in Cisco Duo, I find that the choice has paid off for our company, especially considering the difficulties of transitioning from traditional and legacy technology, and I hope we will continue to realize its value.

I am not certain if Cisco Duo has reduced our overall authentication-related costs, but it has helped us manage and keep everything under control, which is our priority for safety.

The decision to choose Cisco Duo is based on the many features it offers that we did not find in other applications, and since we were already using Cisco for our other needs, it made sense not to switch to a competitor.

Recently, we have noticed a heavy increase in phishing attacks targeting products not protected by Cisco Duo that are still published on the public network, as attackers are trying to obtain data.

I believe this significant spike in phishing attacks is due to AI bots, which are easier to acquire, as the cost of using them is reduced, making the attacks more commonplace despite the number of human attackers remaining the same or even decreasing.

We have deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identities. We are using Cisco Duo Directory today as a standalone identity provider, connected with Microsoft Azure SAML as an identity broker.

We have implemented Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance with capabilities such as proximity verification. Our implementation of Cisco Duo strengthens our company's ability to defend against modern phishing and identity-based attacks through compliance with various benchmarks, offering multiple defense points, and isolating applications to prevent the use of shared resources among them, even ensuring isolation at the DNS system level via Umbrella.

We hope to use Cisco Identity Intelligence in the future, but we have not implemented it yet.

My advice to other companies considering Cisco Duo is to purchase it, as it really addresses security concerns and transforms the way you feel about security. My overall rating for this review is nine.

My main use case for Cisco Duo is to protect the OT environment from remote access.

The feature I like the most about Cisco Duo is that I can choose which device I want to sign in.

It is valuable for me that I can choose because not all people have a corporate phone, so they can use their personal phone for access or different methods for performing second-factor authentication.

I can say that it is difficult to measure the direct return on investment, but what I can say is that we are safer and feel more comfortable having this security implemented than before.

I cannot think of any improvements for Cisco Duo at this time.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately half a year.

I do not have problems with stability or reliability. Being a cloud solution, I think it is difficult to have problems, and we also use Umbrella with Cisco, which is very reliable and has high availability.

The solution is scalable for our growth.

We used Okta sometime before Cisco Duo.

We used Okta in a different environment, and we finished our license; we were not seeing the need to keep using Okta. For this new environment, we chose Cisco because we wanted to have a homogeneous solution, and our colleagues in other countries were happy, so it was easy for us to choose.

The deployment experience was more difficult than we expected because we had some problems with the version of the OS that we have in our servers. We also had concerns about opening the mandatory connection to a specific URL and port from our OT environment.

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that the price is acceptable because the license is by user.

We were considering different solutions, but we are a global company, and in another place in our company, they were using Cisco Duo, so it was our first option because we want to have a homogeneous scenario.

I do not think I am using Cisco Identity Intelligence.

I have not seen an increase in phishing attacks recently; I think they are more or less constant, but not increasing, particularly in the last three or four months.

We have seen the number of phishing attacks increase every year, but I do not know if that surprises us; we are accustomed to having this type of risk.

I think I have deployed Duo Directory to manage the user identities.

I think I used it as an identity broker in front of the IDPs.

My review rating for Cisco Duo is 8.

Cisco Duo primarily secures our environment.

I appreciate the features that Cisco Duo offers. Cisco Duo's team sent us some questions, for example, about the feature called Identity Intelligence. I have tried using the Identity Intelligence feature and have been working with it. I can confidently say that Identity Intelligence has improved my visibility into identity risk and has helped me make defenses against identity-based threats better.

The main issue with Cisco Duo is dependency. For example, it verifies the subscription with features Duo Push, OTP code, and phone dependency. If you lose or break your phone, users without smartphones will face connectivity issues. There is also integration challenges, support for legacy systems and cloud connectivity, management overhead, and the system can be bypassed by phishing techniques.

To improve these issues, users should be required to confirm a number to approve authentication requests. This would enable disabling auto push and then enable trust-based authentication with new device detection, new location detection, and VPN detection.

Additionally, Cisco Duo is subscription-based depending on the number of users and has a dependency on mobile devices for advanced features. The cost will become expensive for large user accounts. The system requires approve push and either OTP, with push deployments through Duo mobile applications. There is limited offline support, it requires internet connectivity and cloud dependency. Internet outages can cause authentication issues affecting VPN, Windows login, and cloud applications.

I have been using Cisco Duo in my career for three years.

I do see instances of lagging, crashing, or downtime. We used to experience downtime, for example, during code upgradations and OS upgrades on the server, switches, and firewalls. We try to mitigate it, but we need to implement upgrades without downtime. Sometimes the device will not come up after reboot, which can cause downtime.

Cisco Duo performs well regarding scalability. The scalability depends mostly on the number of users. The system has good scalability and can handle more users, more logins, and more locations without performance issues. This depends on the cloud-based, globally distributed infrastructure with no dependency on on-premises services. It can scale from 10 users up to thousands and hundreds of users. The system also has load balancing, high availability, and failover capabilities. A small office can support up to 50 users, while a large office can support more than 10,000 users.

I have contacted customer support regarding Cisco Duo for assistance. The quality and speed of support depend on various factors. For example, when we receive any ticket, we need to assign it to ourselves first and then depend upon the SLA to work on the ticket. We need to resolve it within the SLA timeframe.

Regarding Proximity Verification feature, I have seen it in action last year.

Cisco Duo's initial deployment is easy. We need to have a mobile application and need to install it for users on VPN, servers, clouds, cloud applications, and for admins and passwords. We need to have a security policy required and identity source such as LDAP, local users, Active Directory, and Azure AD. We need to have VPN devices for servers and firewalls with HTTP 443 port number. We need to have web applications and cloud applications, and Windows login. We need to have end-user devices for MFA, such as a smartphone and SMS. We need to have synchronization for security policy purposes, licensing, and many other components.

Regarding the pricing for Cisco Duo, it is somewhat expensive. Cisco Duo costs depend on the technology. Up to 10 users, it is free. Premium versions go for dollars, such as $10 per user per account. As the number of members increases, the cost increases. It is very useful to have for multi-factor authentication.

I would rate the return on investment at an 8 or a 9.

I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently. There has been a significant spike in the number of attacks, and they feel more sophisticated, which makes them more difficult to deal with. We used to get phishing attacks through our emails, SMS, WhatsApp, and fake website links. The domain may show a hyphen, for example, Microsoft hyphen login, and attackers will try to send a link. If you click on that link, all our data will be hijacked. We need to protect our devices and environment and should not click any unknown links. That is why we need to enter MFA with valid credentials.

Alternatives to Cisco Duo that we have been using in our organization include third-party applications. We can use Okta and Microsoft SSO, Microsoft Azure MFA, Rublon MFA, Twilio, and PingID from Ping Identity. There is also Secure Authentication and RSA SecurID in the market. There are many third-party alternatives available.

The main issue with Cisco Duo is dependency. For example, it verifies the subscription with features Duo Push, OTP code, and phone dependency. If you lose or break your phone, users without smartphones will face connectivity issues. There is also integration challenges, support for legacy systems and cloud connectivity, management overhead, and the system can be bypassed by phishing techniques.

To improve these issues, users should be required to confirm a number to approve authentication requests. This would enable disabling auto push and then enable trust-based authentication with new device detection, new location detection, and VPN detection.

Additionally, Cisco Duo is subscription-based depending on the number of users and has a dependency on mobile devices for advanced features. The cost will become expensive for large user accounts. The system requires approve push and either OTP, with push deployments through Duo mobile applications. There is limited offline support, it requires internet connectivity and cloud dependency. Internet outages can cause authentication issues affecting VPN, Windows login, and cloud applications.

My overall review rating for Cisco Duo is 8.

My main use cases for Cisco Duo involve implementing zero trust very early. We launched a project to do so, evaluated the market space, and chose Cisco Duo as a platform for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for the end user.

The features I appreciate most about Cisco Duo are its simplicity for the end user and its integration into conditional access for Entra.

These features benefit my company by providing ease of use for our user base, thus driving fewer support tickets. It is easier to deploy, integrates into Intune and Jamf for end-user platforms, and fits very well with our bring-your-own-device policy for mobiles.

Cisco Duo can be improved by having easier integration into UbiKeys, which would be fantastic. While they are fairly easy to implement, an easier mechanism for rolling out UbiKeys with Cisco Duo would also be fantastic. Additionally, we could benefit from easier app updating procedures and notifications prior to updates to aid end users when they need to complete updates. We are going through that at the moment, but Cisco Duo is a fantastic product that is great for our end users. It is secure, flexible, and fits very well into the architecture we are trying to establish.

I have been using Cisco Duo for eight years.

Cisco Duo has not helped my company reduce its overall authentication-related costs, as it is a cost above what we already have. Because we are on Entra, we do have those licenses bundled in with Entra, but the benefits of Cisco Duo outweigh that.

Cisco Duo scales perfectly with the growing needs of my company. There are no problems as it scales up, scales down, and integrates into our IDP, so I have no complaints with the scalability.

Regarding its scalability and reliability, we have sometimes found issues, particularly with iOS updates, only to the point that we were not getting the notifications. However, Cisco Duo support has been fantastic with that. We have a great relationship with Cisco, so they take that feedback very readily.

The customer support and technical service from Cisco have been fantastic throughout. We speak to the product development team as part of that relationship, and they listen to our ideas readily, including the UbiKey ideas, for example.

I would rate the customer service and technical support as a nine out of ten, only because of the slight issues we had last year with the prompts that took a while to fix. It was one isolated incident.

Before choosing Cisco Duo, I considered native Entra, which was very much in its infancy at that time.

The deployment experience of Cisco Duo was straightforward. Another gentleman handled the workload that was fairly easy to roll out. It touched multiple teams because we had end-user support, operations, and integration to Entra, so it was a multi-phase approach and a multi-team effort, with change management throughout the organization. The key here is that the most important part, and the most difficult part to do, is our end-user base. At the end of the day, that is what Cisco Duo was picked for because the app is so easy to use for our end-user base on its multiple platforms. If you are going to look at the most challenging thing with a rollout, that is where you need to focus, rather than behind the scenes in the work for integrating it into your conditional access policies.

From my point of view, the biggest return on investment when using Cisco Duo is the low support costs. Obviously, you have to have MFA, it is non-negotiable, and the fact that the platform is so easy to use and so flexible provides that return.

Looking back at my initial investment in Cisco Duo versus the total value it has delivered over time, that choice has paid off for my company massively. We were able to implement zero trust extremely quickly because of the platform and its ongoing developments, including Cisco Duo Network Gateway, which enabled that transition to zero trust extremely quickly. This has been a fantastic journey for us and our strategic objective.

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Cisco Duo shows that it is a cost above our Entra costs, which we are always reviewing. The benefits outweigh the cost in terms of its simplicity, its ease of use for the end-user base, and its flexibility with other components we can use and integrate, such as OTP when needed on the odd occasion. Those benefits outweigh the extra cost that we have had to deploy.

I picked Cisco Duo at the end of the day again for its flexibility and the range of features that it has, particularly with ease of use for our end user. That is paramount. Providing that extra layer of security with that ease of use for our end user has been superb.

Cisco Duo was the first multifactor authentication platform that I decided on, approximately ten years ago.

I would rate Cisco Duo overall as an eight out of ten because it is a solid product that works incredibly well for our end-user base. It is secure and adaptable, but it does come at a cost above what competitors offer as part of packages we have to pay for already. We could do a better job in informing our users how to update the app ahead of time when that is necessary.

My advice to other companies considering Cisco Duo is to consider it very carefully for the points I have stated. It is a fantastic product that is easy to use and easy to roll out for our end-user base. However, that does come with a cost, which you are probably already paying for as part of well-known IDPs. We have found it a very valuable product to have, and that ROI has been shown specifically in the reduction in support costs.

There is another aspect I would love to share about Cisco Duo. We operate a good number of partnership relationships, and that is another part of the platform that we have found very easy to administer and track, especially for compliance measures.

My main use case for Cisco Duo is as a two-factor authentication. A quick specific example of how I use Cisco Duo is through 2FA. Everything is fine with my main use case.

In my opinion, the best features Cisco Duo offers include its 2FA authentication, which is very good. Everything is perfect about the features; it is very easy to use, and the integration with other systems is very good.

Cisco Duo has positively impacted my organization, and I have noticed specific improvements since using it. The improvements I have noticed include making security very good and increasing our overall security.

I believe Cisco Duo can be improved, but I think the current state is sufficient. I don't really wish for any specific changes regarding needed improvements.

I have been working in my current field as an infrastructure engineer for approximately 15 years.

Cisco Duo is very stable.

Regarding Cisco Duo's scalability, it meets our requirements.

Customer support for Cisco Duo is very good. I would rate the customer support as a nine on a scale of 1 to 10.

I have not used a different solution before Cisco Duo, as it was the first solution I implemented.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that it's not getting worse; it's better now.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Cisco Duo as a nine because it's a very good solution.

Looking back at my initial investment in Cisco Duo versus the total value it has delivered over time, I have seen a return on investment.

Before choosing Cisco Duo, we had IPV as an option.

My advice to others looking into using Cisco Duo is to recommend they use Cisco Duo. My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

I have not implemented Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance, and we don't have capabilities such as proximity verification. I still need to check about using Cisco Identity Intelligence. I have noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently; the attacks are getting more frequent, which is why we improved the security for 2FA.

I give Cisco Duo an overall review rating of 9.

I mainly help customers to setup Cisco Duo for multi-factor authentication.

Duo significantly increases phishing resistance for application access. So the main benefit is improved security.

Passwordless authentication - This is the future of secure access. By eliminating passwords entirely through FIDO2/WebAuthn, Duo removes the primary attack vector for credential theft while also simplifying the login experience for users.

Cisco Duo is technically excellent, but the main challenge is market positioning rather than product capability. Microsoft Authenticator comes bundled with Microsoft 365 at no additional cost, so many organizations default to that solution rather than purchasing Duo as a standalone product.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately one and a half years.

Cisco Duo is very stable. I have never experienced major outages or service disruptions. The product itself is reliable - any minor issues we've encountered were typically user configuration errors rather than platform problems.

The scalability is excellent. Being cloud-based, Duo handles any user count without infrastructure concerns. We've scaled it across multiple customers without performance issues.

I have no experience with their support - I have never encountered issues that required contacting Cisco. The product documentation and admin portal have been sufficient

Yes, I used Microsoft Authenticator but only as a end user. In my opinion, Duo is simpler and more intuitive. From an admin perspective, I can't give a review.

The initial setup is straightforward and fast. Duo's phased rollout approach shows they understand real-world deployment challenges. Overall, it's very easy to implement.

My company is a Cisco Duo reseller and partner, so we perform the deployments ourselves for our clients rather than using external integrators or consultants.

I don't have quantifiable ROI data. The value is primarily in risk mitigation - preventing phishing and credential theft. The cost of a single breach would far exceed the investment in Duo. I cannot speak to operational cost savings like reduced password reset tickets.

The pricing is fair and straightforward - per-user licensing makes budgeting simple. Setup is easy and intuitive. The licensing tiers are well-structured and easy to understand.

9 out of 10. Duo is technically excellent - stable, feature-rich, with outstanding passwordless capabilities and straightforward deployment.

My advice: Take advantage of the free tier (up to 10 users) and 30-day trial to test it in your environment.