Drata Security & Compliance Automation Platform (D)
Automation of audit evidence has reduced manual work and streamlines proactive vendor reviews
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Drata is the automation of audit evidence collection.
Automating evidence collection has changed the way my team prepares for audits by making us more proactive than reactive. We are assigning tasks in advance. Automated monitors collect some portion of the evidence, which cuts down on the actual manual work.
How has it helped my organization?
Drata has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to focus on other work besides just audits. It also gives us a source of truth regarding vendors, dealing with new vendors, and vendor review.
I have seen both specific outcomes and metrics. There is less time spent on audits as a whole, and there is a streamlined ability to add new vendors, handle vendor requests, and perform vendor reviews.
What is most valuable?
I am a big fan of the vendor management portal as well as the Trust Center.
The best features that Drata offers are ease of navigation, the default or built-in integrations for the automated evidence collection, and the ability to create and manage the controls.
The built-in integrations are especially useful for my team because we use the most common ones, and they cut down the amount of manual work that needs to be done to get set up. I can set up Drata pretty easily and very quickly.
What needs improvement?
Regarding how Drata can be improved, I like the old user interface better than the new interface. I would also like to see continued implementation of additional integrations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Drata for a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I find that Drata is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Drata's scalability is good.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed. I do not have the metric in front of me regarding how much actual time it has saved, but I expect it will save us anywhere between 50 and 75% of our time.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy. The reps were great. I have implemented Drata in two organizations this year, so I was already aware of everything, which made it very straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Drata, I did evaluate other options.
I evaluated Vanta as one of the options.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Drata an eight.
I rate it an eight because it is not perfect, but it is not bad. I think eight is a good number.
Regarding Drata's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are good, but it is still in the early stage.
I have not had extensive use of the AI capabilities, but what I have seen has been good so far regarding its accuracy and reliability of output.
My advice to others looking into using Drata is that it is a great product. It is very helpful overall, and it is best when the organization is on the same page regarding what the controls and the frameworks are going to be, and when more people are in the platform using features such as vendor management.
Centralized compliance monitoring has reduced manual tracking and prompts timely control actions
What is our primary use case?
I use Drata to manage the frameworks that my company intends to remain compliant with or that it intends to adopt. It's a tool that is used mostly to monitor requirements, controls and evidences.
I usually use predefined frameworks on Drata, but also sometimes customized frameworks. The predefined ones come with a set of requirements, suggested controls, and suggested evidences to attach to the controls. This is basically how you manage it. There is also some level of customization that is favorable for companies that have information security management systems that are different than what Drata has as a default.
How has it helped my organization?
The most significant improvement is the reduction in manual work and the impression that there is a broad control over governance, risk and controls, which is my area of expertise. It really reduces friction in having to monitor things manually, in having to keep logs and registries in all sorts of different tools. Everything is centralized.
I am prompted to open Drata whenever there is an action that is needed from my side. I can also allocate specific tasks to specific people within the organization, which is quite helpful. In terms of connectivity with other applications, it is quite efficient to be able to retrieve information from other applications or receive notifications in other applications. All of that works quite smoothly.
Drata was adopted before my joining the company. I can only say what I have heard, which is that it significantly reduced time in managing certain tasks.
What is most valuable?
What I use mostly on a day-to-day basis is the monitoring feature that allows me to monitor how my controls are performing and if there is any action needed from my part. The notifications work quite smoothly, and I can just open Drata when I am prompted to and fix whatever needs fixing or attach evidence wherever needed.
The notifications absolutely help me respond faster. I can also schedule them for a certain moment of the day that I would like to allocate time for it on a daily or almost daily basis. The reduction in manual tracking is quite helpful so that I do not have to constantly think about checking Drata manually. I can just wait for a notification to come in.
What needs improvement?
My most relevant comment about the current usage of Drata is that there is not enough level of customization in certain modules, such as the risk management module, which is something I am not using because I cannot customize it to meet my needs. Another thing is that I do not use certain modules such as the vendor management module because it is also not fitting my needs the way I would like it to.
I think Drata could have an additional layer of agentic ownership in the sense that there could be more AI embedded into the product, not as a decision maker, but as a mechanism to provide suggestions, to summarize things in a way that is more robust than the actual summarization that exists these days. That would be my main concern to point out, along with what I have mentioned before, which is the customization of, specifically, the risk management module. It is unfortunate that I cannot use it, but I would really like to use it within Drata.
For me, it is the customization and the AI enablement that is missing in Drata when comparing it to other in-house built solutions or competitors such as Vanta.
The outputs are reliable and accurate. They are just slightly green in terms of what I think they could do more for me. I do not use those outputs. I think there should be a call to action in the outputs most times, and maybe a better explanation of what needs doing and what are the reasons why something needs to be done, perhaps for someone who is using the tool for a shorter period of time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Drata for eight months.
What other advice do I have?
I mean Drata, the compliance management tool.
I have no concerns about Drata's AI capabilities. It is not something that generated concern on my part when it first appeared in Drata.
We did not.
Make sure your connectors are all properly set up. That will really make your onboarding process much more efficient and easier.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Automated controls mapping has transformed ISO 27001 audits and saves weeks of manual effort
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Drata is ISO 27001 implementation.
I use Drata for ISO 27001 implementation by utilizing the templated policies that it provides within the portal, and I also used the controls page to guide me through the implementation of the different ISO 27001 controls.
How has it helped my organization?
Drata has impacted my organization positively by allowing me to have an audit, and it made it so much easier and faster to conduct an audit.
It saved me time during the audit process, so instead of it taking about two weeks in a manual process, it took a few hours for stage one and a few hours for stage two, and everything went by a lot faster with less questioning from the auditor. I was able to upload any missing evidence through Drata and gave them access through Drata itself, so there were no additional access that I needed to give to the auditors.
What is most valuable?
The best features Drata offers would be the controls list that is directly connected with the different services that we provide, so I am able to connect AWS and Microsoft, and Drata can easily track compliance for me.
The connectivity with AWS and Microsoft helps me in my day-to-day work as it makes things faster and makes my job a lot easier, so I do not have to keep track in an Excel file on my end. I can log on to the Drata portal, and everything would already be populated for me.
Regarding Drata's AI capabilities and governance and security, I do not know enough about it, but I know that they already have ISO 42001 certification, therefore I would think that they are already buttoned up with their AI governance. As far as the AI capabilities, I think that they have an AI product available to their customers and over time it will evolve and sharpen.
Regarding Drata's AI capabilities, I think its accuracy and reliability of output are fairly accurate, although I do obviously check any output it provides, and I find it fairly easy to use and accurate.
What needs improvement?
I would say perhaps the customer service experience, meaning the availability from the CSM teams or CSM assigned person, as it would be nice to have more human contact throughout the membership process.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Drata for about three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Drata seems stable.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is very reliable.
I would rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten as a nine.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a previous solution before using Drata.
What was our ROI?
I do not have any specific metrics, but I would say that time was saved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very smooth. From what I remember, the salesperson was not very pushy, and they were able to find a reasonable price for us since we had a tight budget.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Drata, we evaluated Vanta as an option.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Drata a nine.
I choose a nine because nothing is perfect.
We use AWS and Microsoft Azure as our cloud providers.
My advice to others looking into using Drata is that if they have the budget, Drata is absolutely well worth it. My overall product rating for Drata is nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Easy administration, great response from Support
Drata provides a user-friendly dashboard with clear visibility to compliance frameworks and controls
Streamlines SOC 2 Compliance with a Unified Dashboard
Drata's Biggest Risk Is Its Support Team and When You Need Help, You're On Your Own
Cons: Customer support has deteriorated significantly. We were initially promised human support, but most interactions are now handled by AI agents that provide repetitive and often unhelpful responses. Instead of solving problems quickly, support frequently wastes time and creates frustration.
Overall: Great platform, but the support experience has become its biggest weakness.
Today, nearly every support interaction is handled by AI agents that repeatedly provide generic, canned responses that rarely address the actual issue. Instead of helping customers resolve problems, the support process often forces us to spend additional time explaining the same issue over and over again while receiving the same unhelpful answers.
Frankly, Drata's support has become a nightmare. What was once a differentiator has turned into the platform's biggest weakness. The product itself is good, but when customers need help, the lack of effective human support creates frustration, delays, and a poor overall experience.
If Drata wants to maintain customer trust, it needs to bring back accessible, knowledgeable human support instead of relying almost entirely on AI-driven responses.