BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,244 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Instant Device Access, Minor Speed Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test websites and apps, and I like having access to real devices in the cloud. It provides instant access to a wide range of real devices, which solves the problem of testing on multiple real devices and browsers. The initial setup of BrowserStack was very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
test execution speed occasional latency
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to solve the problem of testing on multiple real devices and browsers. It gives me instant access to a wide range of real devices in the cloud.
A Review on BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
Website can be tested both manually and automated using BrowserStack
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing of upgrade plan is bit higher
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test my club website
Accessible Cloud Testing with Room for Speed Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack provides access to real devices in the cloud. It gives me instant access to these devices, which is highly valuable for testing websites and apps. The initial setup was easy, making it convenient to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find issues with test execution speed and occasional latency.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing on multiple real devices. It provides instant access to devices in the cloud.
Essential for Cross-Device QA Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack easy to use, especially since it runs on real devices and even shows the hardware info. I appreciate the ease of switching to any OS or browser, and the initial setup was straightforward with just setting up an account and going. It's also incredibly valuable for testing multiple devices to ensure websites meet QA needs. It's particularly handy for testing specific issues that users report, like with an iPhone 16 on Safari, without needing to have the actual device. Running in Citrix is a great experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes network connection is buggy over VPN, especially if QA is offshore
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for website testing across multiple devices to ensure quality. It's easy to use, runs on real devices, shows hardware info, and allows easy OS/browser switching. It lets me test specific issues reported by users, like on an iPhone 16, without the actual device.
Effortless Cross-Browser UX Flow Comparisons That Save Time and Money
What do you like best about the product?
I love that we can compare our UX flows across different browsers, platforms, and devices to analyze and suggest improvements, as well as fix flaws in the overall UX flow. It also reduces the time we spend on manual testing, saving us both time and money.
What do you dislike about the product?
My experience has been wonderful, and I honestly have nothing negative to say. If any compatibility issues come up, BrowserStarck assures us they’ll be handled properly, rather than turning into serious problems for the customer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We need to use real devices to test our product from start to finish. We use real BrowserStack devices to simulate end-to-end testing, making sure the entire typical workflow is covered.
Convenient Testing Across Devices and Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I enjoy using BrowserStack because of the ease of use and the availability of devices and browsers, which is so convenient. It saves me time as I can instantly switch between devices and browsers, making testing easier since it's all in one place. The initial setup was easy, and I used it with VS Code to test and debug my projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it's slow/laggy, but it's good as it is.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack lets me test my website on various browsers and devices without owning them, saving time as I switch instantly between them, making testing easier since it's all in one place.
Essential for Mobile Testing, with Minor Performance Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I like the variety of devices and platforms that BrowserStack offers, which makes mobile testing more efficient. It provides access to a wide range of devices, including various operating systems, which makes it easy for us to test on multiple platforms. The initial setup was perfect, making it straightforward to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes performance issues appear, and the speed of remote devices can be very slow.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for mobile testing, accessing a farm of devices. It supports a variety of platforms, making multi-OS testing easy.
Simple and Efficient Way to Test Across Browsers and Devices.
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack has been extremely valuable for validating web applications across browsers, devices, and operating system without the overhead of maintaining a physical device. It fits naturally into modern development workflows, especially when working with CI/CD pipelines and automated test suites.
The real-device cloud is a major advantage-being able to instantly test on actual iOS and Android devices helps catch real-world issues that emulators often miss, such as touch behavior, rendering differences, and performance incosistencies.
I also appreciate how smoothly it integrates with automation frameworks and supports parallel execution, which significantly reduces testing time. The UI is clean, sessions are easy to manage, and debugginh tools like logs, screenshots, and video recordings make issue tracing much more efficient. Overall, it helps maintain high quality release which keeping the process fast and reliable.
The real-device cloud is a major advantage-being able to instantly test on actual iOS and Android devices helps catch real-world issues that emulators often miss, such as touch behavior, rendering differences, and performance incosistencies.
I also appreciate how smoothly it integrates with automation frameworks and supports parallel execution, which significantly reduces testing time. The UI is clean, sessions are easy to manage, and debugginh tools like logs, screenshots, and video recordings make issue tracing much more efficient. Overall, it helps maintain high quality release which keeping the process fast and reliable.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about BrowserStack is that sometimes it takes a little time to start or switch between devices. But this is okay because it is working with real devices.
Overall, it's a small issue and does not affect my work much.
Overall, it's a small issue and does not affect my work much.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the challenge of checking applications across many browsers and devices without setting everything up manually. Instead of managing different systems, I can access everything in one place.
This makes my work much easier and faster. I can quickly test changes, catch issues early, and ensure the application runs properly for users on any devices or browser.
This makes my work much easier and faster. I can quickly test changes, catch issues early, and ensure the application runs properly for users on any devices or browser.
From Chaos to Control in Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how seamlessly it addresses real-device and cross-browser testing without requiring any physical infrastructure.
In my day-to-day QA work, the biggest benefit is being able to test instantly across multiple browsers and devices in parallel. Rather than maintaining device labs or constantly switching environments, I can quickly validate key flows across different OS and browser combinations, which has noticeably reduced our overall testing cycle time.
From an automation standpoint, its integration with frameworks like Selenium and with CI/CD pipelines makes execution much smoother. Running tests in parallel has helped bring execution time down from hours to minutes in some cases. On top of that, features such as session recordings and detailed logs make debugging far easier, especially when collaborating with distributed teams.
I also find the platform easy to use. Even for new team members, onboarding is fast because the interface is intuitive. And being able to test behind firewalls and in staging environments without a complex setup was something I didn’t expect at first, but it has turned into a major advantage.
Overall, BrowserStack has improved both the speed and reliability of our testing process while reducing our dependence on physical setups.
In my day-to-day QA work, the biggest benefit is being able to test instantly across multiple browsers and devices in parallel. Rather than maintaining device labs or constantly switching environments, I can quickly validate key flows across different OS and browser combinations, which has noticeably reduced our overall testing cycle time.
From an automation standpoint, its integration with frameworks like Selenium and with CI/CD pipelines makes execution much smoother. Running tests in parallel has helped bring execution time down from hours to minutes in some cases. On top of that, features such as session recordings and detailed logs make debugging far easier, especially when collaborating with distributed teams.
I also find the platform easy to use. Even for new team members, onboarding is fast because the interface is intuitive. And being able to test behind firewalls and in staging environments without a complex setup was something I didn’t expect at first, but it has turned into a major advantage.
Overall, BrowserStack has improved both the speed and reliability of our testing process while reducing our dependence on physical setups.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about BrowserStack mainly comes down to performance consistency, pricing, and a few limitations in newer capabilities such as AI-driven insights.
At times—especially during peak usage—the platform can feel a bit slow or laggy when running tests or accessing live sessions. This can hurt productivity when you’re trying to validate fixes quickly or debug issues on tight release timelines. Better stability and lower latency would make the overall experience noticeably smoother.
From a pricing and ROI standpoint, BrowserStack can feel expensive, particularly for smaller teams or when usage isn’t fully optimized. Even though the platform offers strong features, not every team uses the full suite, which can make the cost feel harder to justify. More flexible options, including usage-based pricing, could improve the perceived ROI.
On the AI and intelligent-features side, there’s been progress, but it still feels somewhat limited compared with where the industry is heading. More advanced capabilities—like intelligent test case generation, predictive failure analysis, or deeper insights from test data—could add a lot of value. As it stands, users still need to rely heavily on external tools or manual analysis.
Test management and reporting could also be improved, with more customization and clearer insights, especially for stakeholders who need high-level summaries.
Overall, these aren’t major blockers, but addressing them would further improve efficiency and make the platform even more competitive.
At times—especially during peak usage—the platform can feel a bit slow or laggy when running tests or accessing live sessions. This can hurt productivity when you’re trying to validate fixes quickly or debug issues on tight release timelines. Better stability and lower latency would make the overall experience noticeably smoother.
From a pricing and ROI standpoint, BrowserStack can feel expensive, particularly for smaller teams or when usage isn’t fully optimized. Even though the platform offers strong features, not every team uses the full suite, which can make the cost feel harder to justify. More flexible options, including usage-based pricing, could improve the perceived ROI.
On the AI and intelligent-features side, there’s been progress, but it still feels somewhat limited compared with where the industry is heading. More advanced capabilities—like intelligent test case generation, predictive failure analysis, or deeper insights from test data—could add a lot of value. As it stands, users still need to rely heavily on external tools or manual analysis.
Test management and reporting could also be improved, with more customization and clearer insights, especially for stakeholders who need high-level summaries.
Overall, these aren’t major blockers, but addressing them would further improve efficiency and make the platform even more competitive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Before using BrowserStack, we used to struggle a lot with cross-browser and device testing. We had limited devices available, and setting up different environments was time-consuming. Because of this, testing used to take longer, and sometimes we couldn’t cover all important browser-device combinations before release.
After moving to BrowserStack, things became much smoother. Now we can instantly test on multiple real devices and browsers without worrying about setup or maintenance. What earlier took hours or even days can now be done much faster using parallel testing.
It has also really helped from an automation point of view. We integrated it with our existing automation framework and CI/CD pipeline, so builds get tested quickly and issues are caught early. Debugging has also improved a lot with features like logs, screenshots, and session recordings.
Overall, we went from a slow and resource-heavy process to a much faster and more efficient workflow. It has helped us save a good amount of time, improve test coverage, and release with more confidence.
After moving to BrowserStack, things became much smoother. Now we can instantly test on multiple real devices and browsers without worrying about setup or maintenance. What earlier took hours or even days can now be done much faster using parallel testing.
It has also really helped from an automation point of view. We integrated it with our existing automation framework and CI/CD pipeline, so builds get tested quickly and issues are caught early. Debugging has also improved a lot with features like logs, screenshots, and session recordings.
Overall, we went from a slow and resource-heavy process to a much faster and more efficient workflow. It has helped us save a good amount of time, improve test coverage, and release with more confidence.
Tester
What do you like best about the product?
What I liked most is that it allows to test the website and mobile application by providing various tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
I want UI must be more interactive and there should be documentation of each tool
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is solving problems of testing of websites and tools
showing 1 - 10