BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,244 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Reliable, User-Friendly Test Management with Seamless Jira Integration
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack Test Management is a reliable and user-friendly platform for managing test cases and tracking testing activities. One of its strongest features is the seamless integration with Jira, which makes it very easy to link test cases, test runs, and defects directly with development tickets. This improves traceability and ensures that the development and QA teams stay aligned throughout the testing lifecycle.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack Test Management is a strong tool overall, there are a few areas where improvements could make the experience even better. At times, navigating between large test suites can feel slightly slow, especially when managing a high number of test cases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It simplifies the management of test cases and test plans. The platform makes it easy to organize, update, and maintain our test repository, which saves time and reduces manual effort for the QA team.
BrowserStack: Essential for Cross-Browser Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate BrowserStack for its ability to use multiple browsers to ensure automation works seamlessly. I find it valuable how many options there are when testing in different browsers to make sure everything functions correctly.
What do you dislike about the product?
loading
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing automation across multiple browsers to ensure everything works.
BrowserStack Makes Testing Across Any Environment Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
The best thing about browser stack is how it provides option to run test cases in any environment.
What do you dislike about the product?
It feels bit slow can be improved better site speed will help alot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browser stack is solving our execution of e2e automation test cases which we execute in multiple devices and in multiple pipelines.
Seamless, Reliable Cross-Device Testing with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
I’ve been using BrowserStack for a little while now, and it’s quickly become one of those tools I can’t imagine working without. Since I spend a lot of time on testing, dependable cross‑browser and cross‑device coverage is essential, and BrowserStack delivers it in a smooth, straightforward way.
What stands out most to me is how easy it is to start real device testing with virtually no setup. Performance has been consistently solid, and moving between devices or browsers feels almost immediate. It’s also been great for catching UI issues early—especially the kinds of problems that never show up in local environments.
The integration options are another big plus. Connecting BrowserStack to our CI pipeline was simple, and it’s helped improve both the speed and reliability of our test cycles. The documentation is clear, and on the occasions I’ve needed support, the responses have been fast and genuinely helpful.
If I had to call out one area to improve, it would be that real device sessions can sometimes take a little longer to initialize during peak hours. That said, it’s a minor inconvenience compared to the overall value the platform provides.
Overall, BrowserStack has made cross‑platform testing easier, faster, and much more dependable. I’d recommend it to any team looking to strengthen their testing workflow.
What stands out most to me is how easy it is to start real device testing with virtually no setup. Performance has been consistently solid, and moving between devices or browsers feels almost immediate. It’s also been great for catching UI issues early—especially the kinds of problems that never show up in local environments.
The integration options are another big plus. Connecting BrowserStack to our CI pipeline was simple, and it’s helped improve both the speed and reliability of our test cycles. The documentation is clear, and on the occasions I’ve needed support, the responses have been fast and genuinely helpful.
If I had to call out one area to improve, it would be that real device sessions can sometimes take a little longer to initialize during peak hours. That said, it’s a minor inconvenience compared to the overall value the platform provides.
Overall, BrowserStack has made cross‑platform testing easier, faster, and much more dependable. I’d recommend it to any team looking to strengthen their testing workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
It is not a dislike but an observation: When new OS versions or devices are released, it can sometimes take a little while for them to show up. It’s not a long delay, but it’s noticeable when you’re trying to reproduce issues on the newest device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack has helped us eliminate the overhead of managing physical devices, browser setups, and test environments. Rather than spending time configuring and maintaining countless OS/browser combinations, I can instantly access a broad range of real devices and browsers on demand. That saves a huge amount of time and makes our testing more accurate and reliable.
It has also addressed inconsistencies between local and production environments. With BrowserStack, we can quickly reproduce user-reported issues on the exact device, OS, and browser they’re using, which speeds up debugging and cuts down on back-and-forth.
From a performance and quality perspective, the platform makes it straightforward to validate responsiveness, UI behavior, and user flows across different environments—something that would be extremely difficult to manage internally. Its CI/CD integrations also help us run automated tests at scale, improving coverage and catching issues earlier in the development cycle.
Overall, BrowserStack helps us ship more stable, polished releases with less manual effort and fewer surprises after deployment.
It has also addressed inconsistencies between local and production environments. With BrowserStack, we can quickly reproduce user-reported issues on the exact device, OS, and browser they’re using, which speeds up debugging and cuts down on back-and-forth.
From a performance and quality perspective, the platform makes it straightforward to validate responsiveness, UI behavior, and user flows across different environments—something that would be extremely difficult to manage internally. Its CI/CD integrations also help us run automated tests at scale, improving coverage and catching issues earlier in the development cycle.
Overall, BrowserStack helps us ship more stable, polished releases with less manual effort and fewer surprises after deployment.
Fast, Simple, and Smooth Cross-Device Testing with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is easy to use and makes my daily testing work smooth. As a manual tester, I use it every day to test apps on different devices, and it works well. Launching apps, installing builds, device response, UI performance, and switching devices all work smoothly. Device availability is also good. It is easy to implement and integrate with our testing process. If any issue happens, the support team is helpful and responds quickly. Compared to Kobiton, BrowserStack feels faster and simpler to use, which saves time and makes testing more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that when testing on multiple devices, if the internet gets interrupted or disconnected during execution, the device may freeze. After reconnecting, the device usually goes into loading, and only in rare cases it reconnects, that too sometimes only one device. Most of the time it disconnects after a few minutes of loading. Then we have to take the devices again and start the whole setup from the beginning, which takes extra time during testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the problem of needing many devices for testing. As a manual tester, I have to check the app on different devices and OS versions. It is not easy to keep so many physical devices. With BrowserStack, I can access many real devices in one place and test the app easily. I can launch builds, check UI, and switch between devices quickly. This makes my daily testing work faster and easier.
BrowserStack Makes Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Fast and Infrastructure-Free
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser testing without needing to maintain any local infrastructure. As a TA working on projects at the University of Limerick, I often need to check how my web applications behave across different browsers and operating systems. With BrowserStack, I can quickly run my automated tests on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on different OS versions without setting up multiple machines or virtual environments.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
For smaller teams working on different projects, the pricing of some advanced plans might feel a bit high if you need access to more parallel sessions or additional features. That said, for cross-browser testing on real environments without maintaining your own device lab, it still provides a lot of value overall.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the problem of testing web applications across multiple browsers and operating systems without having to maintain different machines or complex local setups. Normally, ensuring compatibility across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on various OS versions requires significant infrastructure. BrowserStack provides these environments in the cloud, which makes it much easier to run automated tests and verify that applications behave consistently.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
Effortless UI and Powerful Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like the UI and options that BrowserStack offers, especially because of its ease of use and clarity. I love using the BrowserStack Automate tool, and it was very easy to set up. IT set it up when I got my computer.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it's fine but improvements to keep up with current industry changes would be great
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing emails and sites. I like its easy-to-use UI and options, especially the BrowserStack Automate tool.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast, Easy, and Reliable
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing extremely easy without needing to maintain physical devices or complex virtual machine setups. The platform provides access to a wide range of real browsers and operating systems, which helps ensure that applications behave consistently across environments. The interface is intuitive, the setup is straightforward, and integrations with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines work smoothly. It significantly speeds up debugging and improves confidence before releasing to production.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is very powerful, the platform can occasionally feel slower when running tests on remote devices compared to local environments. Session startup time and network latency can sometimes impact productivity when running many tests. Additionally, pricing can be relatively high for smaller teams, especially when scaling automation sessions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without maintaining a large in-house device lab. For development teams, this reduces infrastructure costs and eliminates the overhead of managing different environments. It helps catch browser-specific issues early in the development cycle, which improves software quality and reduces production bugs. For our workflow, it enables faster release cycles and allows the QA and development teams to collaborate more efficiently.
Real Devices That Make Troubleshooting Easy with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
This is truly a hardware device, not a simulator or emulator. Whenever I run into a device-specific issue, BrowserStack is the first—and usually the last—place I go to troubleshoot it.
What do you dislike about the product?
If I had to point to one drawback, I’d say performance is the only downside I’ve experienced when using BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In my experience, the issues I run into are typically iOS-specific “quirks.”
Effortless Testing with Complete Device Coverage
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack because of the vast number of devices it gives me access to. It's really easy to get new versions for testing, and the automation it provides is great. It ensures that my product works properly across all devices and allows me to do testing very quickly. I also found the initial setup to be very easy, with no issues at all.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing comes to mind.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I find BrowserStack makes it convenient to test quickly, iterate, and launch products faster. It ensures my product works properly across all devices, allowing quick testing with automation.
showing 141 - 150