BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,608 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Essential for Cross-Device QA Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the way BrowserStack works. The feature that allows me to record my test if something goes wrong, like finding a bug, is very useful since I can record directly from the page. It's a very good tool because I can also open the dev tools to see if something fails around the API. I appreciate that I don't need an outside tool to start recording my sessions; I can do it directly from the page, download, and attach it to my task. The ability to open dev tools on mobile is especially great since it can be difficult on real devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, in some cases, it's a little bit confusing. Because when I enter, it was like, okay. Well, I need a live or I need the other ones. And that's the only thing. But beside that, because we have a lot of options, and for the beginners, it will be a little bit overwhelming because they could know where they need to go when they need to test an app or a web page on mobile. It may be, harm more, clarification about which tool or which services we need to select.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test UI across multiple device sizes, solving the issue of not having enough physical devices, ensuring the UI fits well on each type. It allows me to test on various mobiles, including those I don't own like iPhones.
Fast, Efficient Multi-Device Testing with Minor Video Quality Hurdles
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack's speed and performance, especially since there are no lags or degraded performance noticed on this platform, unlike some other platforms like LambdaTest. The ability to test the same app over multiple devices, whether iOS or Android, and have parallel sessions to see real-time results is very useful. I also find the new features like Image Injection helpful for testing camera scenarios. The provision for testing local apps by setting up a tunnel and storing APKs on Google Drive for easy access is a nice feature. Additionally, integrating BrowserStack with Jira has been seamless, with execution results and evidence getting updated directly in Jira.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, there were some limitations with regards to video recording quality. Since these videos were getting attached in JIRA tickets, we saw the quality was not optimum.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test apps over multiple devices and browsers, including local apps using a tunnel. It enables parallel sessions and offers real-time results. The speed and performance are excellent, with features like Image Injection enhancing testing scenarios.
Centralized Testing Artifacts, Smooth Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I like the centralized place for test artifacts because it enables team collaboration and makes test analysis fast and straightforward. I find the initial setup of BrowserStack very easy with clear documentation.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like the occasional flakiness and slower session startup times with BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for running e2e Selenium tests daily. It solves test results analysis and provides a centralized place for test artifacts, enabling team collaboration and making test analysis fast and straightforward.
Effortless to Use with Impressive, Evolving Features
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use product constantly being updated with great functionaliity
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing really, maybe fact that admin/owner has to be a user and uses a licence even though not an active tester
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
cross device and o/s testing
Versatile Suite Perfect for Testing Needs
What do you like best about the product?
The various applications in the suite that we can use for our testing requirements.
What do you dislike about the product?
Test case management could use some improvements if we are to move away from our current solution TestRail.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It works great for live testing as well as utilizing Percy and App Live as we start to move more into the mobile application testing space.
Effortless Access to Updated Devices, High ROI
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack's fast access to stable mobile devices that provide live feedback. It's valuable because it means I don't always need the latest updated devices for usage. I see it as a very good value and the best return on investment while working with them. Moving from physical devices to BrowserStack gives me constantly updated devices. The initial setup was quite straightforward.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would prefer a better solution for local usage of one mobile device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for access to mobile devices, which provides fast access to stable, updated devices with live feedback. It offers a good return on investment as we switched from physical devices for better and newer device access.
Smooth Testing Experience, Needs AI Tweaks
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for QA test cases, and I really appreciate the easy documented steps it provides. Positive and negative test cases help us a lot in QA, and running a test suite regression is super easy. The prod release makes it comfortable. The initial setup of BrowserStack was pretty easy, which was a plus.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm not a fan of so many test steps being generated through AI, as some of them are repetitive. It would really help if there was a remove button next to each test step to easily get rid of unnecessary ones.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack simplifies running QA test cases. It's easy to run test suite regressions and manage positive and negative test scenarios, making prod releases comfortable.
Streamlined Testing Across Devices and Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate how BrowserStack solves the problem of collecting multiple browsers and multiple devices all in one place without the hassle of arranging for each one separately. The variety of devices and browser versions available is fantastic, allowing me to test on the latest devices and versions which aren't always available with real devices. The automation feature is a big help, especially since it integrates seamlessly with popular frameworks like Selenium and Playwright. Setting up BrowserStack was quite easy with clearly mentioned steps, and the user experience is easy to navigate.
What do you dislike about the product?
Getting access to BrowserStack took some time at the organizational level.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test on multiple devices and browsers without needing real devices, solving cost and procurement issues. It centralizes testing, supports automation with Selenium, and offers various browser and device versions, including the latest ones.
Powerful Device Cloud That Improves Test Coverage and Speed
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s real-device access, reliable automation execution, and excellent debugging insights make it extremely valuable for both manual and automated testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main drawbacks are pricing for smaller teams and occasional device unavailability or session queues during peak usage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of limited device and browser coverage by providing instant access to real devices and environments without the need to maintain physical hardware. This benefits me by enabling faster, more reliable manual and automated testing, reducing environment-related defects, and allowing our team to scale test execution through parallel runs while saving time and maintenance effort.
Effortless Accessibility Testing with Clear, Actionable Reports
What do you like best about the product?
The automatic scans give quick feedback on common accessibility issues like missing labels, color contrast problems, and ARIA misuse. I like that accessibility checks can be run directly on real browsers and devices instead of just static pages or local tools. The issue reports are easy to understand, they clearly explain what’s wrong and why it matters, which helps during discussions with developers.
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
Being able to combine accessibility checks with manual testing in BrowserStack Live is extremely useful. I can inspect screen reader behavior and keyboard navigation in the same session. It fits well into our CI flow, allowing us to catch accessibility regressions early
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Automated scans don’t catch everything, some issues still require careful manual validation.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
2. Reports can get repetitive if the same issue appears across multiple pages.
3. Custom components sometimes need manual interpretation because the tool flags them generically.
4. Deeper guidance on fixing complex ARIA issues would make the reports even better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catches common WCAG violations early in development, not just during final audits. Reduces manual effort by automating baseline accessibility checks across multiple browsers. Helps QA and developers share a common understanding of accessibility issues using clear reports. Prevents regressions by integrating accessibility tests into CI pipelines. Saves time during release cycles by reducing last-minute accessibility fixes.
showing 21 - 30