BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,173 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Outstanding Experience—Highly Recommended
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to test on various mobile devices, for both web and native apps
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the process to automatically upload apps is not very smooth
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We need to test apps on different devices
Comprehensive Testing Coverage That Exceeds Expectations
What do you like best about the product?
comprehensive coverage for all testing method and tools
What do you dislike about the product?
The trail plans for usage should be for little longer duration
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Responsive testing across multiple devices
Stable and reliable with comperhensive features
What do you like best about the product?
It's a fully fledged platform that I can find almost any feature that I need for different types of testing. Looking at smaller competitors, each of them provides some of the features, and I will need to learn different ecosystems, set them up differently, and it will make the system more complex as well
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to have an easy process to activate free trials for features that have not yet activated by our organization. Many times, developers need to just use the features as a POC to see how it works and to present that POC to their peers and managers, and then decide if it's worth paying for activating that new feature. In my experience, it wasn't a smooth process and needed back-and-forth meetings with BrowseerStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It makes everything we need for testing available through a comprehensive list of features that work without bugs and glitches. I tried many other platforms, and I can say that the stability and diverse features are the main advantages of BrowserStack, which helps us to be more efficient
AI-Powered Testing Platform That Saves Time
What do you like best about the product?
What stands out to me is how useful the entire testing platform is, especially with its advanced use of AI to reduce the amount of time testers need to spend. This combination makes the platform particularly effective.
What do you dislike about the product?
The speed of device cloud applications can be a concern. When running manual tests on multiple devices, the process of clearing the device, installing the application, and launching the app—or even just opening a website—can sometimes take twice as long as performing the same tests on a local device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack supports us across various testing functions throughout our testing processes. Currently, our primary use is for Test Management, where we manage 18 projects and several thousand test cases. In addition, we rely on Browserstack for cross-browser testing on a range of device types, including phones, tablets, and desktops. We also use it to test native apps on real devices. Recently, we have started exploring the Low Code Automation tool, as well as the accessibility tools, to ensure our public-facing applications meet accessibility standards.
Excellent variety of devices and OS versions
What do you like best about the product?
The variety of devices and OS/browser versions
What do you dislike about the product?
Delays sometimes observed in certain uses of the product (lags between clicks and effect on devices)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monitor and verify the rendering of the sites created by our agency for our clients as an end user
Effortless Accessibility Testing with Actionable Reports
What do you like best about the product?
App accessibility scans are easy to run on real Android and iOS devices, not just emulators. It helps catch common accessibility issues early - missing labels, low contrast, improper focus order, and touch target problems. I like that accessibility checks can be combined with regular functional testing instead of being a separate activity. The reports are clear and actionable, which makes discussions with developers easier. Running accessibility checks as part of regular app QA builds awareness instead of treating accessibility as a last-minute task.
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Automated checks don’t cover all real-world accessibility scenarios, manual validation is still needed.
2. Some custom UI components get flagged in a generic way, requiring interpretation.
2. Some custom UI components get flagged in a generic way, requiring interpretation.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helps identify accessibility issues early in the mobile development cycle instead of right before release. Reduces manual effort by automating baseline accessibility checks across devices. Makes accessibility part of standard QA, not a one-time audit. Improves collaboration with developers by providing clear issue reports. Prevents accessibility regressions by catching issues repeatedly across builds.
Seamless Testing Across Devices, Some Latency Issues
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack because it solves a big challenge for us developers, allowing us to test features and new changes in real-time scenarios without needing all available devices globally. It helps me test applications on thousands of devices simultaneously, covering various testing scenarios, and even aids in documentation and unit testing. It's a really helpful tool, not only for me but also for the QA team who use it extensively. The setup was totally easy as I didn't have to do any extra installations since it's primarily a cloud service. It's very user-friendly and easy to start working on BrowserStack.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel like there's a kind of latency when I have multiple devices active at the same time on BrowserStack. Also, there are a couple of scenarios not possibly covered in the BrowserStack experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for remote testing on various devices. It solves the challenge of not having all physical devices by allowing me to test applications across thousands of them. It's a very useful tool for testing purposes.
Essential for Cross-Device QA Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the way BrowserStack works. The feature that allows me to record my test if something goes wrong, like finding a bug, is very useful since I can record directly from the page. It's a very good tool because I can also open the dev tools to see if something fails around the API. I appreciate that I don't need an outside tool to start recording my sessions; I can do it directly from the page, download, and attach it to my task. The ability to open dev tools on mobile is especially great since it can be difficult on real devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, in some cases, it's a little bit confusing. Because when I enter, it was like, okay. Well, I need a live or I need the other ones. And that's the only thing. But beside that, because we have a lot of options, and for the beginners, it will be a little bit overwhelming because they could know where they need to go when they need to test an app or a web page on mobile. It may be, harm more, clarification about which tool or which services we need to select.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test UI across multiple device sizes, solving the issue of not having enough physical devices, ensuring the UI fits well on each type. It allows me to test on various mobiles, including those I don't own like iPhones.
Fast, Efficient Multi-Device Testing with Minor Video Quality Hurdles
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack's speed and performance, especially since there are no lags or degraded performance noticed on this platform, unlike some other platforms like LambdaTest. The ability to test the same app over multiple devices, whether iOS or Android, and have parallel sessions to see real-time results is very useful. I also find the new features like Image Injection helpful for testing camera scenarios. The provision for testing local apps by setting up a tunnel and storing APKs on Google Drive for easy access is a nice feature. Additionally, integrating BrowserStack with Jira has been seamless, with execution results and evidence getting updated directly in Jira.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, there were some limitations with regards to video recording quality. Since these videos were getting attached in JIRA tickets, we saw the quality was not optimum.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test apps over multiple devices and browsers, including local apps using a tunnel. It enables parallel sessions and offers real-time results. The speed and performance are excellent, with features like Image Injection enhancing testing scenarios.
Centralized Testing Artifacts, Smooth Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I like the centralized place for test artifacts because it enables team collaboration and makes test analysis fast and straightforward. I find the initial setup of BrowserStack very easy with clear documentation.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't like the occasional flakiness and slower session startup times with BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for running e2e Selenium tests daily. It solves test results analysis and provides a centralized place for test artifacts, enabling team collaboration and making test analysis fast and straightforward.
showing 331 - 340