BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,410 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
automation for web and mobile, chrome expect element not good but Good app live and web live
What do you like best about the product?
The network speed for every device is good.Able to implement easily.
App live, web live, and work smoothly. Apple products are good in response.
Good response at a time when the device works smoothly.
Easy to integration with local machin.
App live, web live, and work smoothly. Apple products are good in response.
Good response at a time when the device works smoothly.
Easy to integration with local machin.
What do you dislike about the product?
After the IPA file upload user is not able to use settings in the app side.
Some apps required to change app settings from phone settings.
Setting option not able to be used.
In automation every time required to upload a new file so there is no way to find out one file or link from the code They download the file and install it in the app the app code is not required to change the BS file.
Also, some apps are more than 100MB, so the Browser stack hangs for some time and responds. They are required to reload the webpage or change the device.
Most importantly every time iPad was not able to access due to unavailability.
Screen rotation does not work very time correctly, they some time different work e.g. landscape mode all app shows vertically.Customer support not good.
Every time need to select a new device , as per user point if I use previous one device so please shows first used device and shows all device e.g. used device list and all device list.
And user was working on previous device so they start from there not from new user device .
Some apps required to change app settings from phone settings.
Setting option not able to be used.
In automation every time required to upload a new file so there is no way to find out one file or link from the code They download the file and install it in the app the app code is not required to change the BS file.
Also, some apps are more than 100MB, so the Browser stack hangs for some time and responds. They are required to reload the webpage or change the device.
Most importantly every time iPad was not able to access due to unavailability.
Screen rotation does not work very time correctly, they some time different work e.g. landscape mode all app shows vertically.Customer support not good.
Every time need to select a new device , as per user point if I use previous one device so please shows first used device and shows all device e.g. used device list and all device list.
And user was working on previous device so they start from there not from new user device .
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
if any device unable they prior send a email to user this this device not working from start time to end time or device will available after some time so user will return after that time.
Need a used device or previu=ious device list and whatever user log in a that device they continue from there so need a work on that functionality. BCZ of each and every time App or play store required to login and then install app and then test this is not a good practice it's wast of more time.Ipad need to available for all day.
If one of device unavailble then please share a error message to customer like not avaible please try again in some time or give a time to customer so customer will back after that time but you not send that error.
Need a used device or previu=ious device list and whatever user log in a that device they continue from there so need a work on that functionality. BCZ of each and every time App or play store required to login and then install app and then test this is not a good practice it's wast of more time.Ipad need to available for all day.
If one of device unavailble then please share a error message to customer like not avaible please try again in some time or give a time to customer so customer will back after that time but you not send that error.
Sometimes buggy and convoluted
What do you like best about the product?
Reporting is great and satisfactory and avaialblity of devices
What do you dislike about the product?
UI is sometimes confusing and hard to get exact data
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Number of real devices
Good software, can enhance a test suite
What do you like best about the product?
Azure Devops integration, makes it easier to organise test run recordings. Before I've recorded test execution with other tools and released them as an artifact, but the BS integration is cleaner
What do you dislike about the product?
It is another tool in my test suite, and I don't really like to use it outside of pipelines. You can't really debug easily with it. I also am finding it hard to get used to the new UI changes. Its a huge change and seems a but unintuitive - its become harder to use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allowing us to provide developers with test recordings for if a bug is captured
Great Service, however can become expensive.
What do you like best about the product?
- Access to multiple real & emulated devices & browsers.
- We use it daily and it is pretty easy to integrate into existing automation suties.
- Customer support is always available.
- We use it daily and it is pretty easy to integrate into existing automation suties.
- Customer support is always available.
What do you dislike about the product?
The cost for automate & the execution speed of automated testing. Additionally manual testing on real devices is very sluggish.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack is solving our problem of not having our own device farm for specifically testing mobile.
Life Savior
What do you like best about the product?
- Ablity to provide various of simulators
What do you dislike about the product?
# Short free time provided for browsing
- Eg: provided only 2mins but when there is slow connection the 30mins will be wasted like 1.5mins to buffer / load the simulators then another 0.5mins to browser over the simulator which is not enought to check through
- Eg: provided only 2mins but when there is slow connection the 30mins will be wasted like 1.5mins to buffer / load the simulators then another 0.5mins to browser over the simulator which is not enought to check through
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ability to simulate other devices
cool, nice, works perfect
What do you like best about the product?
I get to use an iPhone on my Macbook and it's a nice model
What do you dislike about the product?
For the free trial, you only get a few minutes, I feel like we should get more minutes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I don't have my physical phone and it helps me when I need it
Clunky, but works
What do you like best about the product?
Very useful for testing device only bugs that aren't reproducible on chrome dev tools mobile. A lot of devices available.
What do you dislike about the product?
Quite clunky experience using it, doesn't always work so you have to restart and try again.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have some bugs that only show up on real mobile devices and not on Chrome dev tools when you inspect as mobile. Helps us test and fix those bugs
Experience of testing Web Apps and Native Apps in BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
This has been the most useful IE simulator I've ever used. The ability to instantly test and interact with your website across a wide range of browsers, as well as to adjust the display size and operating system, is incredible. I frequently use BrowserStack at work. The screenshot tool, in my opinion, is a good way to find interface flaws fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find BrowserStack to be cumbersome and slow. Furthermore, it does not work with a VPN. The refresh rate is too low for me to test animation effects.
Although the colours are too dim to capture good-looking images during "live" testing, a screenshot service was recently created that allows us to capture screenshots of a URL on nearly any device.
Although the colours are too dim to capture good-looking images during "live" testing, a screenshot service was recently created that allows us to capture screenshots of a URL on nearly any device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Useful in identifying, analysing, and resolving software quality issues, debugging tools offered such as network logs, video capture, and screenshots.
Helped to run automated tests using frameworks like Selenium.
Helped to run automated tests using frameworks like Selenium.
I use browserstack quite often and it does exactly what i need it to
What do you like best about the product?
It's easy to test and reuse over and over
What do you dislike about the product?
I like that i can test on all sorts of operating systems (apple, android, windows etc)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We all work remotely so we do not have a collection of devices. Browserstack allows us to test on a tonne of different devices/OS'
Helps for device coverage
What do you like best about the product?
Recent bug capture tool is very helpful for us. Previously we were just using browserstack to verify things in different devices. Now we are using bug capture a lot. We used to record videos and download network/console logs and share with the developers. Now we just share one bug capture link.
What do you dislike about the product?
We are not able to understand the capabilities of browserstack for automation. Pricing is high. We can't try for some weeks and then take a subscription.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Device coverage. We can't maintain real devices for all the versions in the market and also we cannot install multiple OS versions
showing 31 - 40