BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,649 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Browser Stack
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack provides instant access to a wide range of real devices and browsers, eliminating the need to maintain an internal device lab. The platform is extremely reliable, integrates well with existing CI/CD tools, and offers fast, accurate results. Its combination of live testing, automated testing, and debugging tools helps streamline the entire QA workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
My main dislike is the latency when interacting with real devices, which can slow down debugging. Some features feel scattered, and advanced automation capabilities often require higher-tier plans. Device availability during high-traffic times can also be a challenge.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack eliminates the need to manage our own device and browser infrastructure. It solves cross-browser and cross-device compatibility issues by giving us instant access to real devices and a wide range of browser versions. This helps us identify UI bugs early, maintain higher product quality, and ship releases faster with greater confidence.
Essential for Cross-Browser QA, Needs Smoother Slack Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate BrowserStack for its ability to perform cross device and cross browser testing, which has become the core of our QA process when delivering tasks or projects to clients. It's incredibly helpful in spotting issues that we can't identify using a regular browser. The initial setup of BrowserStack was pretty easy for our team, and I didn't find it too complicated once we were given access, as we could start our tests right away.
What do you dislike about the product?
When recording bugs and sending them over to Slack, it always asks me for the organization and the recipient. I hope there's a way for it to remember the last recipient.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for UI/UX cross-device/browser testing to find issues specific to certain devices or browsers, enhancing our QA process.
Reliable Testing with Intuitive UI, but Live Sessions Could Improve
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for native app testing and a test case repository. It allows me to quickly test native apps with different simulators seamlessly. Testing on devices with BrowserStack makes the results more reliable because multiple devices are available, and the UI is very friendly and intuitive. Speed is another feature that makes it stand out; the speed is very fast. Plus, there are multiple operating systems available along with different versions, so I can choose whatever I wish to test with. The initial setup of BrowserStack was very simple and easy, just a simple signup and login without any hassles of installing heavy setups.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the live sessions get disconnected and everything has to be started from the beginning. The live sessions should not get freezed or disconnected, and there should be a pre-instruction set like after how many minutes of inactivity the session will stop.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can quickly test native apps seamlessly with different simulators, making the results reliable due to multiple devices and OS versions. The friendly UI and fast speed enhance the testing experience.
Flexible, Reliable, and Effortless to Use
What do you like best about the product?
Its high flexibility, reliability, availability and ease-of-use.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't think there's any use case so far that BrowserStack hasn't worked well for me.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Availability of real devices, cost in procuring devices, testing time, reliability.
Effortless Cross-Device Testing with Powerful Debugging Tools
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of testing across so many real devices and browsers without managing any infrastructure, plus how quickly you can spin up sessions and debug issues with built‑in tools like logs and screenshots.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dislike that it can sometimes feel slow or laggy on certain devices
or networks, and that debugging complex issues (like performance or
network flakiness) can be harder than on a fully local setup.
or networks, and that debugging complex issues (like performance or
network flakiness) can be harder than on a fully local setup.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It lets us test reliably across many real browsers, OS versions, and
devices without maintaining our own lab. That reduces setup and
maintenance effort, catches cross‑browser issues earlier, and speeds up
our overall testing and release cycles.
devices without maintaining our own lab. That reduces setup and
maintenance effort, catches cross‑browser issues earlier, and speeds up
our overall testing and release cycles.
Effortless Setup, Comprehensive Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack's single interface and how it integrates well with other tools. I also appreciate the stability of the platform and found the initial setup super easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initial navigation is difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for test case execution reports, checking failures and successes. It provides a single interface and offers good integration, which simplifies my work.
BrowserStack Testing with Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is how it makes cross-browser and cross-device testing simple, fast, and reliable.
Real devices & browsers, Instant access, Good for teams, Ease to Integrate and Impkement, Time-saving etc.
Real devices & browsers, Instant access, Good for teams, Ease to Integrate and Impkement, Time-saving etc.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance can be slow at times, Limited debugging control, Pricing can feel high for individuals or small teams, Queue / availability issues (frequncy of use is very less for some times).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Faster testing, Higher confidence in releases, Cost and time savings, Better collaboration, Smooth CI/CD integration
Super Simple and User-Friendly Platform
What do you like best about the product?
I like the plataform, is very simple to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
Need portuguese language, because i from brazil.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use for testing, like QA, help me much.
Effortless Issue Replication Across All Platforms
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to replicate issues on different ssystem (could be browser, mobile, i-pad etc)
What do you dislike about the product?
I haven't noticed problem yet on this. Everthing is good so far.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
while troubleshooting issues in the real time accessibility of various mobile devices or browser is not possible...Browser stack comes to rescue.
Essential Tool for Effortless UI Testing and Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
As a frontend/React developer, it really saves time when validating UI, date/time issues, responsiveness, and browser-specific bugs without needing multiple physical devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional slowness or session lag, especially during peak hours or when using real mobile devices.
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can quickly test my React UI on real browsers and real mobile devices from one place.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
showing 51 - 60