My main use case for BrowserStack is automating some of the test cases. A quick specific example of a test case I automate with BrowserStack is some of the application URLs.
BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,628 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Super Simple and User-Friendly Platform
What do you like best about the product?
I like the plataform, is very simple to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
Need portuguese language, because i from brazil.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use for testing, like QA, help me much.
Effortless Issue Replication Across All Platforms
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to replicate issues on different ssystem (could be browser, mobile, i-pad etc)
What do you dislike about the product?
I haven't noticed problem yet on this. Everthing is good so far.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
while troubleshooting issues in the real time accessibility of various mobile devices or browser is not possible...Browser stack comes to rescue.
Essential Tool for Effortless UI Testing and Debugging
What do you like best about the product?
As a frontend/React developer, it really saves time when validating UI, date/time issues, responsiveness, and browser-specific bugs without needing multiple physical devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional slowness or session lag, especially during peak hours or when using real mobile devices.
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
Session timeouts / disconnections can interrupt longer debugging sessions
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can quickly test my React UI on real browsers and real mobile devices from one place.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
It helps me catch layout, date/time, and CSS issues early before release.
I can reproduce client issues accurately, even if they occur only on specific browser versions.
It speeds up QA and release cycles by integrating easily with automation tools like Cypress or Playwright
Overall, it saves time, reduces risk, and increases confidence in production releases.
Real Device Testing Made Effortless and Reliable
What do you like best about the product?
As a QA engineer, being able to test on real hardware instead of just some fake simulator is the best thing, because those simulators always lie, right? It just means when I find a bug, I know its a real bug the customer will actually hit. And the ability to fire up a test on some obscure old browser in like, two seconds? So smooth. It just makes the whole testing process way less painful.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main thing is that it can get real slow and laggy sometimes. You're trying to quickly check an animation on an old Android, but the mouse movements and screen updates are delayed, and it throws off the whole test.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack basically solves the nightmare of device fragmentation. Before this, we had to either buy a giant rack of test phones and computers, or just kinda cross our fingers that the site would not break on some obscure browser. Now, We just use BrowserStack and know for sure it works on literally everything.
Highly Efficient Testing Tool for Web and Mobile Apps
What do you like best about the product?
Looking from my eyes browserstack seems very efficient software for testing website as well as mobile applications.
I also refer to my friend who are working in IT industry
I also refer to my friend who are working in IT industry
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing seems to be dislike. As it is very efficient tools they are providing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing our mobile applications and helping hands in friends group
User-Friendly Cross-Browser Testing with Excellent Support
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate BrowserStack for its user-friendly interface and the convenience it offers for cross-browser testing. It provides a wide range of features, such as live testing, mobile testing, and debugging, which I find very useful. Integrating it into our system was straightforward, and it also connects easily with CI/CD pipelines. The customer support is excellent, and I find myself using it frequently.
What do you dislike about the product?
I like most of the features, but there are a few common issues I haven't liked about BrowserStack. It is expensive, and the debugging capabilities are limited on some devices. Additionally, the performance feels slower compared to using a real device.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Sometimes, we encounter situations where real devices are not available. In those cases, we use BrowserStack instead, which helps us save both time and costs. Additionally, there is no need for in-house maintenance.
Automated browser testing has reduced manual effort and saves significant testing time
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
BrowserStack has helped us with automating our test cases by reducing the time by almost 60%. The best features BrowserStack offers include giving us an automated way to simulate different browsers or devices, and I mostly use the browser simulation features. BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by helping us reduce the human capacity by 50%, with that reduction mostly being in manual testing efforts.
What needs improvement?
I feel there is not much to improve about BrowserStack.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using BrowserStack for a year now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
BrowserStack is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have had no issues with BrowserStack's scalability so far.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for BrowserStack is great.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before choosing BrowserStack, I did not evaluate other options.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with BrowserStack, specifically a 50% reduction in human capacity.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using BrowserStack is to consider purchasing via AWS Marketplace if the purchase price is high. I would rate this review a 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Effortless Test Case Writing, Impressive Results
What do you like best about the product?
Writeitng Test cases converting from house to seconds
What do you dislike about the product?
The accuracy of AI-generated results should ideally be 100%. Anything less places an unnecessary burden on the tester.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Writing test cases, maintaining a shared repository, and manually adding data sets are all valuable practices. Combining these methods with AI-generated test cases makes the process even more effective and enjoyable.
Effortless Mobile Testing with Powerful Automation and Seamless Evidence Capture
What do you like best about the product?
App Live makes repros trivial. Upload APK/IPA, pick the exact device/OS, and capture video + screenshots + logcat/syslog in one link, perfect for crisp Jira tickets.
Evidence in one place. Session URLs bundle video, network/HAR, device metadata, and WebView console logs, no tool-hopping. The tunnel hits feature-branch APIs behind VPN, we toggle locale/RTL, timezone, geolocation, and 3G/4G/offline profiles to mimic real users.
App Automate scales fast. We shard Appium suites across ~30 real devices (e.g., Pixel 8, iPhone 13), tag by branch/commit, and finish PR gates in ~15 minutes instead of ~60.
Evidence in one place. Session URLs bundle video, network/HAR, device metadata, and WebView console logs, no tool-hopping. The tunnel hits feature-branch APIs behind VPN, we toggle locale/RTL, timezone, geolocation, and 3G/4G/offline profiles to mimic real users.
App Automate scales fast. We shard Appium suites across ~30 real devices (e.g., Pixel 8, iPhone 13), tag by branch/commit, and finish PR gates in ~15 minutes instead of ~60.
What do you dislike about the product?
Peak-time queues on popular iPhones, making cold starts slower than simulators. iOS signing quirks (entitlements/universal links) can stall first-time setup.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Real devices/OS combos surface emulator-only misses, “works on my machine” escapes dropped ~30–40%. Faster, trustable CI signal - Parallel App Automate cuts PR loop to ~15 minutes with artifacts that speed triage/MTTR by ~60–70%. Reproducible edge cases which means deep links, SSO, RTL, and throttled-network bugs are provable in App Live in minutes, not days.
Automation Dashboard and App Automate Make Testing Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
Automation Dashboard & App Automate for mobile automation
What do you dislike about the product?
Not feel any issue with browser stack for mobile app
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Quick integration with mobile apps
Easy access for automation dashboard
Easy access for automation dashboard
showing 51 - 60