BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
2,608 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Cross-Device Testing with User-Friendly Features
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack provides various features which helps in testing a software efficiently, it becomes easy to test on different devices even to integrate and test on local, it reduces time of checking in physical device also the availability os device reduces. This is being used in daily tasks, also it helps to work from remotely. It provides location change, resolutions, latest versions and many more features. It is user friendly to use, to implement just add the link on which to test and select device which reduces time of understanding. It has a good customer support, ready to help at anytime.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it has perfomance issue, it lags while using different devices which reduces the real device experience and becomes difficult to undertsand. In some places it is high cost with respect to small teams.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack offers a platform for software testing across wide range of devices and browsers, which helps reduce cost associated with purchasing of real devices. It can automate testing tasks and provide a proper process execution.
Crucial for Cross-Browser Testing, Needs Faster Mobile Experience
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack for testing different devices and browsers. Mobile testing in Chrome and Firefox helps me test all the desired features efficiently.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the mobile testing takes time to load and keeps refreshing. iOS mobile testing sometimes gets an error when opening, and when we upload the files in each browser, it takes time to upload. The initial setup was a little bit difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing different devices and browsers, which helps with cross-browser testing.
Easy-to-Use Software Packed with Testing Features
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use software and has lots of functionalities for testing
What do you dislike about the product?
some times local app testing access has problems
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
without buying lots of different hardware we can easily test our apps with different browsers and mobile devices
especially remote workers Browserstack is a life saver
especially remote workers Browserstack is a life saver
Variety of Devices for Effective Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like that BrowserStack has a wide variety of devices to be able to perform any test. The number of phone models and computer devices it offers for testing is impressive.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it could be improved, definitely open sessions faster on some phones, because sometimes they get stuck loading and you have to log out to open on another type of phone or browser.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for manual testing on mobile devices and browsers, verifying compatibility and ensuring there are no errors in the system.
Effortless Accessibility Testing with Clear, Actionable Reports
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack’s accessibility testing makes it easy to run scans on real websites without heavy setup. The Website Scanner quickly highlights common WCAG issues like color contrast, missing labels, and ARIA problems. I like that scans can be run across multiple pages, helping catch issues beyond just a single screen. The reports are easy to understand and clearly explain what’s wrong and why it matters. Combining automated scans with manual testing on real browsers makes accessibility checks part of regular QA, not an afterthought.
What do you dislike about the product?
Automated scans don’t cover all accessibility scenarios; manual validation is still required. The Website Scanner can produce repetitive issues across pages, which adds noise.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helps catch accessibility issues early in the development cycle instead of right before release. Reduces manual effort by automating baseline accessibility checks across multiple web pages. Ensures accessibility testing is consistent and repeatable across releases. Improves collaboration with developers by providing clear, actionable reports. Prevents accessibility regressions by making scans part of regular QA workflows.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing with Minor UI Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ease of use for all the different options for testing different areas of my web application. The initial setup was very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the user interface can be a little bit complicated sometimes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test web applications in different browsers to confirm all pages are loading properly.
Easy to use for helping our customer
What do you like best about the product?
It is easy to use, and there are plenty of models to choose from.
What do you dislike about the product?
I am unable to use the Google App Store or Apple App Store because the store is not logged in. I do not think I should log in using my own account.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are able to understand what our customers need to do and communicate that information to them.
Essential for Cross-Browser Testing, Smooth Selenium Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I love real device and real browser testing with BrowserStack because it gives me confidence that the application behaves just as users experience it, not just in emulators. The seamless Selenium integration is fantastic, as it integrates easily with my Java + Selenium setups, which saves setup time. I also really appreciate the ability to run multiple tests in parallel, which significantly reduces regression execution time, especially during sprint releases. The stable and consistent test runs mean fewer flaky failures compared to locally managed environments. I find the quick environment availability very convenient since there's no need to install or manage different browser versions, drivers, or devices. The debugging tools, such as logs, screenshots, and video recordings, are incredibly useful, making it much easier to analyze failures and report defects accurately.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limited free usage and higher pricing can be challenging for small teams or individual testers
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to address cross-browser compatibility and device availability issues. It eliminates the need for local environments and setups, saves time and cost, and allows early defect detection. Parallel test execution speeds up regression cycles, while debugging tools enhance test reliability.
Transforms Testing with Real Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I really like how BrowserStack makes cross-browser testing so easy and convenient. It allows me to test my projects across different browsers, operating systems, and devices without needing to install or maintain anything locally. The ability to run real-time tests on actual devices, especially mobile ones, is a game-changer. It feels much more reliable than using emulators or simulators. The platform is also intuitive, so I don’t have to spend too much time setting things up. I can just focus on testing and debugging, making the whole process faster and smoother.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that could be improved with BrowserStack is the occasional lag during live testing on remote devices, especially when testing on mobile browsers. While the overall experience is smooth, sometimes the responsiveness isn’t as fast as I’d like, especially when running tests with heavy pages or on lower-end devices. Another area for improvement would be the pricing. While it’s a great tool, it can be a bit expensive for smaller teams or solo developers. More flexible pricing options or lower-cost plans would make it more accessible for everyone. Lastly, some of the device and browser configurations aren’t always up-to-date with the latest versions, which can be a bit frustrating if you need to test with the most recent releases right away.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack saves me time by providing instant access to a wide range of browsers and devices for real-time testing without the hassle of setting up numerous devices or virtual machines.
Elevated Our Testing Efficiency with Intuitive Tools
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile automation, mobile apps manual testing, browser automation, and analytics. It helps us to run our mobile and web automation suites remotely and shows great reports. The wide range of real devices makes manual testing easy to replicate real user conditions. I like its reporting, documentation, UI, and the wide range of devices. The reporting shows build-wise pass failures and includes AI analysis, which helps me identify issues. I can easily search for any use case in the documentation, and they support a good number of iOS and Android devices. The initial setup was very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing about this product disappoints me; everything is good, and the support provided by the team is great.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me run mobile and web automation suites remotely and offers a great report. Its wide range of real devices makes manual testing easy to replicate real user experiences. The build-wise pass-failure reporting and AI analysis are useful for identifying issues.
showing 1 - 10