Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Reviews from AWS customer

4 AWS reviews

External reviews

21 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    reviewer2797263

Positive experience, as it provided strong reporting, clear visibility, and effective service control but a unified incident and request table would improve usability.

  • January 15, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for was for Incident/Request Management, Change Management and Knowledge Base.

In Incident Management, when an internal user reports a service disruption or system malfunction; either via phone or by sending an email to the IT service desk, a case is logged as an incident. The assigned IT support team then analyzes the incident, performs troubleshooting, and works toward service restoration.

A ticketing system is critical as it captures all incident related communications, actions, and status updates, creating an auditable history linked to the user and/or device. This historical data supports trend analysis, root cause investigation, and continuous service improvement.

In the context of change management, maintaining proper records was critical. Various IT teams regularly submitted change requests; however, these changes could sometimes have a significant impact on other teams or ongoing operations. For instance, the network team might plan an upgrade of Ruckus switches while the support team is simultaneously supporting a major event.

Change management ensures that when a change request is raised, all relevant teams are notified and given the opportunity to review the proposed change and provide input. If no concerns or queries are raised, the change can proceed through automatic approval. If concerns are identified, cross-functional discussions are conducted to assess risks, dependencies, and scheduling conflicts.

Documenting each step of the change process is essential for auditability, historical reference, and rollback purposes in the event that a change causes service disruption.

How has it helped my organization?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management positively impacted our organization by improving visibility, control, and coordination across teams. Its strong reporting and categorization enabled better analysis of incidents and requests, helping us identify trends and allocate resources more effectively.

The platform enhanced SLA tracking through clear dashboards, resulting in fewer breaches and improved service uptime. It also reduced incident resolution times by helping us quickly identify service-wide issues and prioritize responses. Overall, BMC Helix helped us manage services more efficiently and deliver more reliable outcomes.

What is most valuable?

One of the strongest features of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was its reporting module, which stood out as the most valuable capability of the platform. The solution offered nine distinct categorization layers, including operational and product-based categories, which could be combined to generate highly meaningful reports. This structured categorization, together with the reporting module, significantly simplified our work.

During the launch of our ERP system, which included multiple modules such as HR, Finance and Supply Chain, we leveraged these product categories effectively. The hierarchy was structured with the Business Application as the primary category, followed by ERP, and then Oracle. The operational category further classified items into issues or requests. Under issues, we categorized items such as dashboards, reports, how-to requests, and queries, with an additional tier for specific dashboards. This multi-tier categorization proved extremely useful during reporting, as it gave us clear visibility into areas with the highest number of issues or requests, enabling us to allocate resources more effectively.

Additionally, the user interface allowed us to enable cost tracking, effort hours, and tier services into categories such as Gold and Silver, which added significant operational value.

At the individual team level; whether IT support, infrastructure, network, or security, the impact was minimal, as these teams were already collaborating effectively. However, the real value emerged in cross-team coordination. With BMC Helix in place, all teams had full visibility, and tasks and subtasks could be assigned across teams to support broader organizational objectives. This became even more effective when we onboarded HR modules into the system. We were able to add HR services and agents with restricted visibility, ensuring that IT managed the system while HR retained ownership of policies.

Incident resolution and SLA management became far more controlled due to the platform’s dashboards. Managers and CIOs had clear, real-time visibility into SLA performance, including the ability to track potential breaches within defined timeframes. As a result, we achieved fewer SLA breaches, maintained ninety-nine percent service uptime, and significantly improved service reliability.

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management also excelled in accelerating service restoration, reducing incident resolution time, and maintaining service availability. When multiple incidents were raised across different locations, the system helped us quickly identify service-wide outages and focus our efforts where they were most needed. Rather than reducing resources, the platform enabled us to manage them more efficiently, which was one of its greatest strengths.

What needs improvement?

From my perspective, the main area for improvement in BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was the separation between incident and service request records. These were maintained as two distinct tables with different ticket numbers. If a common or linked ticket number had existed, it would have been much easier to relate incidents to service requests or convert one into the other. In practice, closing an incident and raising a service request resulted in a new ticket number, which often caused confusion as users would continue following up on the original ticket while updates were being made on the new one. Having interchangeability or a stronger linkage between incidents and requests would have been a valuable enhancement.

I rated the solution seven out of ten. Aside from the lack of interrelated incident and service request records, I had no major concerns from a user perspective.

The rating was also influenced by licensing considerations, as other tools in the market offered more flexible licensing models, such as concurrent usage. At the time, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management did not allow reducing the concurrent session timing below ten minutes, which could have improved cost efficiency within the pricing model.

For how long have I used the solution?

2 Years

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my personal experience, I have never experienced any downtime or reliability issues with BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was pretty scalable. As I mentioned earlier, we added the HR module under the same tenant, and it was pretty much scalable. They have scaled it up higher to finance and other modules already.

How are customer service and support?

We had our local partner in the UAE, Magnoos Services. If we had any issues or new requests, we would reach out to them. I think they were very good partners, and we generally did not reach out to BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management directly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I joined the organization when BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was already in place, and it remained the same throughout my tenure; there was no system transition during that time. However, I have personally been exposed to and worked with other ITSM solutions.

How was the initial setup?

I am really not sure how BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was deployed in my organization as this was before I joined. I joined as an admin, and these deployments were mostly handled with the infrastructure team.

What about the implementation team?

Yes, BMC Helix improved efficiency, reduced SLA breaches, and maintained ~99% service uptime, enabling faster issue resolution and better resource allocation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

From what I heard from procurement and management, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management overall is a costly setup. However, since I am in the support and administration team, I do not have much visibility over the cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I think the competitor BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management was evaluated against was ServiceNow.

What other advice do I have?

The only advice I would give from my experience is to categorize the nine available categories properly, as they will be very helpful for reporting.


    Krishna Varchagall

Utilize comprehensive IT service modules while addressing configuration database issues

  • April 29, 2025
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management primarily for IT service management. It supports modules like incident management, change management, problem management, release management, and configuration management.

What is most valuable?

While I cannot provide very particular details about the most helpful features, I also use other tools like ServiceNow and Jira that have similar features. Some of the changes required are at the framework level, which may not be feasible to change immediately. Incorporating features available in ServiceNow would greatly enhance BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

What needs improvement?

There are several areas where BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management could be improved. Currently, ServiceNow has an edge when it comes to the ease of discovering Configuration Items (CIs). In BMC Helix, there are issues with the Configuration Management Database (CMDB), such as duplicate entries and problems with reconciliation. The recently introduced dashboard tool in Helix, which replaced Smart Reporting, has several issues. Reporting has been a consistent problem in BMC, and it would greatly benefit from enhancements.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for about fifteen years now.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

I did encounter issues, but they were not overly complex. Overall, I would rate the complexity of the migration as medium.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the solution could be improved, specifically in the area of the Configuration Management Database (CMDB), where there are issues with duplicate entries and reconciliation.

How are customer service and support?

The support of BMC is generally good and better compared to some competitors. However, there is room for improvement in new products like the dashboard tool.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I previously used the older Remedy solution before migrating to BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

How was the initial setup?

I migrated from an older Remedy to Helix Remedy, which took around six to nine months. It wasn't extremely complex, but there were some issues during the migration.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

While I am not very sure about the pricing, I have heard that the license cost of BMC is relatively lower than its competitors.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Other solutions I work with include ServiceNow and Jira, which also have similar features.

What other advice do I have?

The decision to use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management depends on the specific use case and requirements. Overall, I would recommend considering other tools if their features align better with organizational needs. I would rate the overall solution a 7 out of 10.


    Logistics and Supply Chain

BMC Helix Client Management

  • November 09, 2021
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Easy to deploy, powerful to manage assets
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing to mention other than it is not easy to make sure you have all previous assets being scanned
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
IT asset management and software deplyment


    Justin S.

BMC Endpoint Review

  • December 27, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
It covers the need for inventory and change management services for clients.
What do you dislike about the product?
Cannot think of any dislikes. Offers both on prem and cloud. Although, would be nice to have network hardware compliance control from the console as well.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
My problem was deploying compliance scripts to users endpoints. With BMC it not only provided rapid deployment, but also gave me almost instant feedback on the dashboard.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's a solid win for those looking to manage a large swath of endpoints over different environments. The rapid deployment and control works great. 30 day review is worth the look, give it a shot


    Computer Software

Tool with automated platform and minimal cost

  • December 21, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Inventory Management and Device Management
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing for now, may be come back later if don't like something
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Nothing


    Airlines/Aviation

Its good user friendly

  • December 13, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Progressive web application, support for incident, work order, and custom application.
What do you dislike about the product?
Still I did not find any negative things in this.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its remind me to manage time line to solve client issues within time line.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's good and user friendly in all interface include user admin or consultant and many more.


    Information Technology and Services

Used Bmc, was user friendly tool

  • December 05, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
was user friendly, easy to use ticketing system.
What do you dislike about the product?
not much experience related to support side about the tool
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I was user to raise ticket for issues related to issues related to tools, systems etc.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
NA


    Computer & Network Security

How BMC Helix is great

  • December 02, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
The most helpful thing is the software, it requires my attention but also my soul.
What do you dislike about the product?
It’s hard to say exactly what one thing I dislike about the software, but it would be easier to just not.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I’ve solved many problems with it, and also benefits have been realized greatly.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Yes make more money available to people like me!


    Information Technology and Services

Great itsm tool

  • December 02, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Great ITSM tool with best ever UI and user friendly
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing as so much, the filter options can be upgraded
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It’s great to use and easy to implement


    Prasad D.

BMC Helix Client Management optimizes the service management system.

  • April 03, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Save time, and safe vulnerability endpoints
providing great support to finish customers while minimizing costs, ensuring compliance and reducing security risk.
What do you dislike about the product?
Advanced features such as deployment of photos lack the detailed documentation
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It would be good if search results were exportable
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Management of financial assets is very useful in providing all the details we need to help our process of replacing PC.