Postman Enterprise
PostmanExternal reviews
1,783 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Simple Setup, Powerful API Validation
What do you like best about the product?
I really like Postman's ease of use, especially the clean layout that provides a good context for what each button is used for. The support documentation is also really helpful, as it provides sample API calls, which assists new users to set up, implement, and test effectively. I find Postman's collections feature very valuable because it allows me to store multiple calls and keys for all customers. It also makes it easy to duplicate calls and create new collections for new customers. The setup was a breeze too, with a small file and quick, easy install, plus the convenience of signing in with SSO.
What do you dislike about the product?
The screen could use some shading or color. The entire screen is black and white with only the button colored orange. Exporting all collections to share with colleagues could be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Postman to validate API customer issues, ensuring the API portal is active. It has a clean layout and helpful documentation, making setup easy. Collections let me store multiple calls, keys, and easily create new ones for customers.
Easy-to-Use Interface and Collections Make API Testing Smooth
What do you like best about the product?
First, I want to talk about the Postman interface. It’s very easy to use for API testing and development, and I mostly use it for client-side testing. With support for multiple methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE, I can work smoothly and test different requests without any hassle. Another helpful feature is the ability to create Collections, which makes it easier to organize APIs in a clear, structured way.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main issue is that the free version offers only limited access to the advanced features. There’s also a learning curve, especially when it comes to more complex scripting and automation.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
With its user-friendly interface, it simplifies API testing and validation without needing to write full code. It also reduces the complexity of debugging API requests and responses, making it easier to spot issues quickly. Environment variables are the most important feature for me, because they make testing across different setups straightforward and save time during testing. Team collaboration is another strong point, and it helps improve overall API quality and reliability.
Postman Is Great Overall—Perfect QA Tool for API testing
What do you like best about the product?
Postman helps me complete robust API testing with the press of a few buttons, which is crucial for software testers that need to quickly validate that release builds are ready for more vigorous testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman is great overall - there's occasionally a minor bug I've run into, but they are usually resolved quickly
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It makes API testing easier. When utilizing features such as custom environments, I can quickly jump between all the test servers and related parameters that would take a while to setup manually otherwise.
I particularly like the Flows feature which allows me to set up a chain of events I would like to happen based on the results of previous actions in the chain - I'm not super deep into it yet, but liking it so far.
I particularly like the Flows feature which allows me to set up a chain of events I would like to happen based on the results of previous actions in the chain - I'm not super deep into it yet, but liking it so far.
Postman Makes API Testing Simple and Easy to Configure
What do you like best about the product?
Postman is a great way to test your APIs. It’s pretty easy to configure, and it’s straightforward to use, which makes the whole API testing process feel simpler and more manageable.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only downside of Postman for me is that it doesn’t include a clear guide for new users on how to navigate through the software.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman solves the problem of accessing and testing my APIs without requiring a frontend.
Intuitive API Testing and Collaboration with Room for Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I love Postman for its intuitive interface, which makes it quick to create and send requests without confusion. The organized collections help me group and reuse requests, keeping projects structured. I appreciate the powerful features like environment variables, automated tests, and response visualization, which save time and enhance my workflow. Being able to switch between setups easily with environment variables reduces manual changes and errors. Automated tests and response visualization allow me to validate APIs quickly, catch issues early, and understand data more effectively. The initial setup was very easy, facilitating a smooth transition from manual API testing and basic HTTP clients. Postman allows me to test endpoints quickly in one place, catch errors early, and debug responses easily while ensuring APIs work correctly. It also helps me validate endpoints quickly, automate tests, and collaborate easily with my team.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that could be improved in Postman is its caching behavior. Sometimes, responses or environment changes don't update immediately, and I have to restart Postman to get successful runs, which can interrupt workflow and slow down testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Postman for testing and debugging REST APIs by sending HTTP requests and analyzing responses. It helps me validate endpoints quickly, automate tests, and collaborate easily with my team.
Postman Simplifies API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use Postman mainly to test APIs. It’s easy to send requests, check responses, and debug things quickly. Postman helps me test and debug APIs without writing extra code, and I can quickly try different requests, check responses, and catch issues early. It also makes it easier to work with auth, headers, and different environments, which would be annoying to do manually. Saving collections and environments is super helpful, especially when switching between dev and prod. Cloud sync is useful since everything stays available across devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman can feel heavy and slow at times, especially on startup. There were also some big bugs in the past that broke things for a while. It works fine now, but performance and stability could still be better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Postman to test and debug APIs quickly without writing code. It simplifies switching environments, managing auth and headers, and avoids repetitive work with saved collections and cloud sync.
Fast, Efficient API Testing with an Intuitive Workflow and Great Team Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate Postman’s user-friendly interface and intuitive workflow. It makes testing APIs fast and efficient, and the ability to save requests, organize them in collections, and share them with my team greatly improves collaboration. The environment management and scripting features also make automation and testing much smoother.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes Postman can be a bit heavy on system resources, especially when running large collections or multiple environments. Additionally, while most features are excellent, certain advanced integrations and reporting capabilities could be more robust or better documented.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman streamlines API testing and debugging, allowing me to quickly send requests, validate responses, and automate tests. It saves time, reduces errors, and ensures consistent workflows, which improves productivity and collaboration across projects.
Easy to use Tool For API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
one of the best tool available in market for API Testing.
Easy to use interface for testing and validating API's
Can easily collaborate with other members in the team or organization through shared workspace and teams.
Easy to use interface for testing and validating API's
Can easily collaborate with other members in the team or organization through shared workspace and teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
Several important features are available in paid plans only.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a developer, I often need to verify whether an API is working correctly or returning errors. For this purpose, I use Postman, which makes testing APIs quick and efficient.
Fast, Frictionless API Testing with Powerful Scripting and Automation
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most is how quickly I can go from an idea to a real request and a runnable test suite. The app feels straightforward: I open a collection, choose an environment, and I’m immediately running calls without a bunch of setup. I use it a few times a week, and it never feels like a chore to get going. The layout is intuitive, and the console makes debugging a bad request a lot less painful. Collections keep my projects organized, and the runner lets me kick off an entire flow when I need to verify a change end to end. It sounds simple, but that smooth start is what keeps me coming back.
The biggest game changer for me has been scripting. Pre-request scripts and the Tests tab make it easy to chain calls, pull a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next request without manual copy-paste. I can extract values from JSON, set environment or collection variables, and parameterize inputs so the same suite runs cleanly across dev and staging. That saves a ton of time and cuts down on avoidable mistakes. Environments are a lifesaver too: I can switch context and all my base URLs, keys, and flags flip over, so I’m not hunting for hidden settings. After you’ve done it a couple of times, it feels natural—even if you’re not a heavy coder.
On the integration side, it fits well into how teams work. Shared collections and workspaces keep everyone aligned, and generated docs from a collection make handoffs to teammates or clients much smoother. I also like that I can export and run the same tests from the command line through our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is the same thing that runs in automation later. Mock servers and examples help me test front-end flows when a backend is still being wired up, which means I’m not blocked waiting on another team. The learning curve is gentle; the docs and community answers have been enough whenever I’ve gotten stuck, and the updates over time have felt practical rather than gimmicky. Overall, it reduces friction in my week, helps me automate the boring parts, and keeps my API work clean and consistent without wrestling with the tool.
The biggest game changer for me has been scripting. Pre-request scripts and the Tests tab make it easy to chain calls, pull a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next request without manual copy-paste. I can extract values from JSON, set environment or collection variables, and parameterize inputs so the same suite runs cleanly across dev and staging. That saves a ton of time and cuts down on avoidable mistakes. Environments are a lifesaver too: I can switch context and all my base URLs, keys, and flags flip over, so I’m not hunting for hidden settings. After you’ve done it a couple of times, it feels natural—even if you’re not a heavy coder.
On the integration side, it fits well into how teams work. Shared collections and workspaces keep everyone aligned, and generated docs from a collection make handoffs to teammates or clients much smoother. I also like that I can export and run the same tests from the command line through our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is the same thing that runs in automation later. Mock servers and examples help me test front-end flows when a backend is still being wired up, which means I’m not blocked waiting on another team. The learning curve is gentle; the docs and community answers have been enough whenever I’ve gotten stuck, and the updates over time have felt practical rather than gimmicky. Overall, it reduces friction in my week, helps me automate the boring parts, and keeps my API work clean and consistent without wrestling with the tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
I like Postman a lot, but a few things still slow me down. The app can feel heavy when collections get large or responses are big; tabs pile up, and the runner starts to drag. At times, search or the console gets flaky, and I end up restarting just to clear whatever state it seems to get stuck in. Updates are frequent, which I appreciate, but every so often they shuffle things around and I lose a bit of muscle memory. The first day after an update, I’m hunting for simple actions that used to be right where I expected them.
Integrations have a couple of rough edges too. The split between the older command-line route and the newer one can be confusing, and the newer option often needs extra setup and auth that doesn’t always play nicely behind corporate proxies. Some extensions also make the app sluggish, so I keep my setup lean, but that comes at the cost of convenience. Support-wise, the docs are generally helpful, but when I hit a weird bug, the answers are hit or miss and it can take a while to track down a workable workaround. None of these are deal breakers for me since I use it a few times a week, but they’re the parts I like least—and where I feel the time loss most.
Integrations have a couple of rough edges too. The split between the older command-line route and the newer one can be confusing, and the newer option often needs extra setup and auth that doesn’t always play nicely behind corporate proxies. Some extensions also make the app sluggish, so I keep my setup lean, but that comes at the cost of convenience. Support-wise, the docs are generally helpful, but when I hit a weird bug, the answers are hit or miss and it can take a while to track down a workable workaround. None of these are deal breakers for me since I use it a few times a week, but they’re the parts I like least—and where I feel the time loss most.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman takes the messy part out of API work for me, turning what used to be a pile of manual calls and copy-paste into a clean, repeatable workflow. I can spin up a request, group it into a collection, and run a full suite in minutes, so ideas go from rough to verified quickly. The layout is intuitive, the console helps me see what actually happened during a call, and I’m not bouncing between tools just to debug a header or a body. I use it a few times a week, and it consistently feels like time saved rather than one more task to manage.
The scripting is where it really pays off. Pre-request and test scripts let me chain steps end to end: grab a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next call without touching anything. I can extract IDs, timestamps, or whatever else I need, set variables, and parameterize inputs so the same collection runs cleanly across dev and staging. Environments make context switches simple too—I flip one setting and all the base URLs and keys follow—so I make fewer silly mistakes. It sounds minor, but not having to retype values or hunt them down is a huge win when I’m on a deadline.
It also helps a lot with team handoff and consistency. Collections act like living documentation, so the exact requests and tests I run are the same ones a teammate can pick up tomorrow. Mocking and examples let me keep moving when a backend endpoint isn’t ready yet, so front-end work doesn’t stall. I can take the same tests and run them from the command line in our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is what runs in CI, which keeps regressions down and trust up. The net result is fewer surprises, cleaner audits, and faster feedback loops.
Day to day, the benefit is obvious. I spend less time wiring things together and more time verifying, I catch breakage earlier, and I’m not babysitting tokens or headers anymore. When something fails, I can see exactly where and why, fix it, rerun, and move on. It keeps my API work organized, predictable, and honestly calmer, which is exactly what I need when clients are waiting.
The scripting is where it really pays off. Pre-request and test scripts let me chain steps end to end: grab a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next call without touching anything. I can extract IDs, timestamps, or whatever else I need, set variables, and parameterize inputs so the same collection runs cleanly across dev and staging. Environments make context switches simple too—I flip one setting and all the base URLs and keys follow—so I make fewer silly mistakes. It sounds minor, but not having to retype values or hunt them down is a huge win when I’m on a deadline.
It also helps a lot with team handoff and consistency. Collections act like living documentation, so the exact requests and tests I run are the same ones a teammate can pick up tomorrow. Mocking and examples let me keep moving when a backend endpoint isn’t ready yet, so front-end work doesn’t stall. I can take the same tests and run them from the command line in our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is what runs in CI, which keeps regressions down and trust up. The net result is fewer surprises, cleaner audits, and faster feedback loops.
Day to day, the benefit is obvious. I spend less time wiring things together and more time verifying, I catch breakage earlier, and I’m not babysitting tokens or headers anymore. When something fails, I can see exactly where and why, fix it, rerun, and move on. It keeps my API work organized, predictable, and honestly calmer, which is exactly what I need when clients are waiting.
Effortless API Testing with Robust Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Postman is easy to use and has no limitations on the free edition for testing. It's also simple to maintain the suite among the team. I appreciate that once the endpoint suite is ready, it can be shared with multiple people and changes can be made locally. The initial setup is straightforward, just needing to run the executable and log in.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think comparison of data can be implemented better in Postman. I would like to see improvements in comparing the endpoints with the data.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Postman for API testing before integration, ensuring endpoints are ready for the system. It's easy, has no limitations on the free edition, and is maintainable across the team. I appreciate that the suite can be shared and modified locally.
showing 111 - 120