Postman Enterprise
PostmanExternal reviews
1,753 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Fast, Efficient API Testing with an Intuitive Workflow and Great Team Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate Postman’s user-friendly interface and intuitive workflow. It makes testing APIs fast and efficient, and the ability to save requests, organize them in collections, and share them with my team greatly improves collaboration. The environment management and scripting features also make automation and testing much smoother.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes Postman can be a bit heavy on system resources, especially when running large collections or multiple environments. Additionally, while most features are excellent, certain advanced integrations and reporting capabilities could be more robust or better documented.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman streamlines API testing and debugging, allowing me to quickly send requests, validate responses, and automate tests. It saves time, reduces errors, and ensures consistent workflows, which improves productivity and collaboration across projects.
Easy to use Tool For API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
one of the best tool available in market for API Testing.
Easy to use interface for testing and validating API's
Can easily collaborate with other members in the team or organization through shared workspace and teams.
Easy to use interface for testing and validating API's
Can easily collaborate with other members in the team or organization through shared workspace and teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
Several important features are available in paid plans only.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a developer, I often need to verify whether an API is working correctly or returning errors. For this purpose, I use Postman, which makes testing APIs quick and efficient.
Fast, Frictionless API Testing with Powerful Scripting and Automation
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most is how quickly I can go from an idea to a real request and a runnable test suite. The app feels straightforward: I open a collection, choose an environment, and I’m immediately running calls without a bunch of setup. I use it a few times a week, and it never feels like a chore to get going. The layout is intuitive, and the console makes debugging a bad request a lot less painful. Collections keep my projects organized, and the runner lets me kick off an entire flow when I need to verify a change end to end. It sounds simple, but that smooth start is what keeps me coming back.
The biggest game changer for me has been scripting. Pre-request scripts and the Tests tab make it easy to chain calls, pull a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next request without manual copy-paste. I can extract values from JSON, set environment or collection variables, and parameterize inputs so the same suite runs cleanly across dev and staging. That saves a ton of time and cuts down on avoidable mistakes. Environments are a lifesaver too: I can switch context and all my base URLs, keys, and flags flip over, so I’m not hunting for hidden settings. After you’ve done it a couple of times, it feels natural—even if you’re not a heavy coder.
On the integration side, it fits well into how teams work. Shared collections and workspaces keep everyone aligned, and generated docs from a collection make handoffs to teammates or clients much smoother. I also like that I can export and run the same tests from the command line through our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is the same thing that runs in automation later. Mock servers and examples help me test front-end flows when a backend is still being wired up, which means I’m not blocked waiting on another team. The learning curve is gentle; the docs and community answers have been enough whenever I’ve gotten stuck, and the updates over time have felt practical rather than gimmicky. Overall, it reduces friction in my week, helps me automate the boring parts, and keeps my API work clean and consistent without wrestling with the tool.
The biggest game changer for me has been scripting. Pre-request scripts and the Tests tab make it easy to chain calls, pull a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next request without manual copy-paste. I can extract values from JSON, set environment or collection variables, and parameterize inputs so the same suite runs cleanly across dev and staging. That saves a ton of time and cuts down on avoidable mistakes. Environments are a lifesaver too: I can switch context and all my base URLs, keys, and flags flip over, so I’m not hunting for hidden settings. After you’ve done it a couple of times, it feels natural—even if you’re not a heavy coder.
On the integration side, it fits well into how teams work. Shared collections and workspaces keep everyone aligned, and generated docs from a collection make handoffs to teammates or clients much smoother. I also like that I can export and run the same tests from the command line through our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is the same thing that runs in automation later. Mock servers and examples help me test front-end flows when a backend is still being wired up, which means I’m not blocked waiting on another team. The learning curve is gentle; the docs and community answers have been enough whenever I’ve gotten stuck, and the updates over time have felt practical rather than gimmicky. Overall, it reduces friction in my week, helps me automate the boring parts, and keeps my API work clean and consistent without wrestling with the tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
I like Postman a lot, but a few things still slow me down. The app can feel heavy when collections get large or responses are big; tabs pile up, and the runner starts to drag. At times, search or the console gets flaky, and I end up restarting just to clear whatever state it seems to get stuck in. Updates are frequent, which I appreciate, but every so often they shuffle things around and I lose a bit of muscle memory. The first day after an update, I’m hunting for simple actions that used to be right where I expected them.
Integrations have a couple of rough edges too. The split between the older command-line route and the newer one can be confusing, and the newer option often needs extra setup and auth that doesn’t always play nicely behind corporate proxies. Some extensions also make the app sluggish, so I keep my setup lean, but that comes at the cost of convenience. Support-wise, the docs are generally helpful, but when I hit a weird bug, the answers are hit or miss and it can take a while to track down a workable workaround. None of these are deal breakers for me since I use it a few times a week, but they’re the parts I like least—and where I feel the time loss most.
Integrations have a couple of rough edges too. The split between the older command-line route and the newer one can be confusing, and the newer option often needs extra setup and auth that doesn’t always play nicely behind corporate proxies. Some extensions also make the app sluggish, so I keep my setup lean, but that comes at the cost of convenience. Support-wise, the docs are generally helpful, but when I hit a weird bug, the answers are hit or miss and it can take a while to track down a workable workaround. None of these are deal breakers for me since I use it a few times a week, but they’re the parts I like least—and where I feel the time loss most.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman takes the messy part out of API work for me, turning what used to be a pile of manual calls and copy-paste into a clean, repeatable workflow. I can spin up a request, group it into a collection, and run a full suite in minutes, so ideas go from rough to verified quickly. The layout is intuitive, the console helps me see what actually happened during a call, and I’m not bouncing between tools just to debug a header or a body. I use it a few times a week, and it consistently feels like time saved rather than one more task to manage.
The scripting is where it really pays off. Pre-request and test scripts let me chain steps end to end: grab a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next call without touching anything. I can extract IDs, timestamps, or whatever else I need, set variables, and parameterize inputs so the same collection runs cleanly across dev and staging. Environments make context switches simple too—I flip one setting and all the base URLs and keys follow—so I make fewer silly mistakes. It sounds minor, but not having to retype values or hunt them down is a huge win when I’m on a deadline.
It also helps a lot with team handoff and consistency. Collections act like living documentation, so the exact requests and tests I run are the same ones a teammate can pick up tomorrow. Mocking and examples let me keep moving when a backend endpoint isn’t ready yet, so front-end work doesn’t stall. I can take the same tests and run them from the command line in our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is what runs in CI, which keeps regressions down and trust up. The net result is fewer surprises, cleaner audits, and faster feedback loops.
Day to day, the benefit is obvious. I spend less time wiring things together and more time verifying, I catch breakage earlier, and I’m not babysitting tokens or headers anymore. When something fails, I can see exactly where and why, fix it, rerun, and move on. It keeps my API work organized, predictable, and honestly calmer, which is exactly what I need when clients are waiting.
The scripting is where it really pays off. Pre-request and test scripts let me chain steps end to end: grab a token from one response, store it, and feed it into the next call without touching anything. I can extract IDs, timestamps, or whatever else I need, set variables, and parameterize inputs so the same collection runs cleanly across dev and staging. Environments make context switches simple too—I flip one setting and all the base URLs and keys follow—so I make fewer silly mistakes. It sounds minor, but not having to retype values or hunt them down is a huge win when I’m on a deadline.
It also helps a lot with team handoff and consistency. Collections act like living documentation, so the exact requests and tests I run are the same ones a teammate can pick up tomorrow. Mocking and examples let me keep moving when a backend endpoint isn’t ready yet, so front-end work doesn’t stall. I can take the same tests and run them from the command line in our pipeline, so what passes on my desk is what runs in CI, which keeps regressions down and trust up. The net result is fewer surprises, cleaner audits, and faster feedback loops.
Day to day, the benefit is obvious. I spend less time wiring things together and more time verifying, I catch breakage earlier, and I’m not babysitting tokens or headers anymore. When something fails, I can see exactly where and why, fix it, rerun, and move on. It keeps my API work organized, predictable, and honestly calmer, which is exactly what I need when clients are waiting.
Effortless API Testing with Robust Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Postman is easy to use and has no limitations on the free edition for testing. It's also simple to maintain the suite among the team. I appreciate that once the endpoint suite is ready, it can be shared with multiple people and changes can be made locally. The initial setup is straightforward, just needing to run the executable and log in.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think comparison of data can be implemented better in Postman. I would like to see improvements in comparing the endpoints with the data.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Postman for API testing before integration, ensuring endpoints are ready for the system. It's easy, has no limitations on the free edition, and is maintainable across the team. I appreciate that the suite can be shared and modified locally.
Easy Offline/Online Collection Management with a Big Boost from MCP Server API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Easy management for offline vs. online collection storage. The addition of the MCP server API testing is a huge improvement.
What do you dislike about the product?
I sometimes run into network issues that prevent my Online collection from loading properly, possibly due to my corporate VPN. It’s inconvenient when that happens.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Right now, I use it for extensive API testing. Recently, I’ve also been using the MP server testing feature, which has a nice interface. All my MCP tools show up clearly, making them easy to experiment with.
Postman Makes API Testing Easy, Organized, and Efficient
What do you like best about the product?
Postman makes API testing and development easy, organized, and efficient, whether working solo or with a team.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman works really well, but it would be great if the free plan offered more team member allocation. This would make collaboration easier for small teams without requiring an upgrade.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman makes API testing, development, and documentation easy. It helps me work faster, avoid errors, and collaborate with teammates. Having more free member slots would make it even more helpful for smaller teams.
Powerful, Flexible API Testing with Postman: Auth Support, Environments & Automation
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Postman is how powerful and flexible it is for API testing. It supports multiple authentication methods—such as Bearer token, Basic Auth, OAuth, and API keys—which makes it straightforward to test secured APIs. I also find environments with shared variables really helpful for managing different setups like dev, staging, and production without having to constantly modify individual requests.
Postman also includes schema validation, pre-request scripts, and test scripts, which are useful for checking response structure, data types, and business logic. Collections make it easy to organize APIs, reuse requests, and run automated test flows. Overall, it cuts down on manual effort, improves testing coverage, and makes API testing faster and more reliable.
Postman also includes schema validation, pre-request scripts, and test scripts, which are useful for checking response structure, data types, and business logic. Collections make it easy to organize APIs, reuse requests, and run automated test flows. Overall, it cuts down on manual effort, improves testing coverage, and makes API testing faster and more reliable.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman works really well for functional and exploratory API testing. However, it can be limiting when you get into very complex automation scenarios.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman solves the challenge of testing and managing APIs in a simple, well-organized way. It makes it easy to quickly validate requests and responses, along with authentication and schemas, without having to write much setup code. As a result, API testing moves faster, coverage improves, and it becomes easier to catch issues early in the development cycle.
Easy to Use, Great for Team Collaboration and Organized API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
It is very easy to use. I can quickly send requests and see results without any extra setup. It helps my teams work together by sharing collections and keeping API tests organized. I also like that it can accept data in JSON or other raw formats, and that I can add any headers I need. Importing collections is straightforward and very easy as well. Also I like the feature to make seperate collections in folder.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes I dont really get why my api has failed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I can test my APIs until our frontend is ready. I’m able to run all my test cases, and it gives a very quick response.
Easy to Use, Feature-Rich, and Backed by a Strong Community
What do you like best about the product?
It’s very easy to use and includes all the important features I need. Also, the community is very strong and helpful.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have some security concerns related to Postman.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us run APIs quickly, and the runner is especially useful when we need to handle large batches.
A Collaboration Standard for Sharing Collections Across Teams
What do you like best about the product?
It’s almost a standard tool, so in collaborative projects you can share your collections with other team members, even across different organizations. That’s especially important when you’re working on integrations, where Post Man is a key part of the workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it isn’t straightforward to configure authentication or set up the required flows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
For testing our APIs, or the ones we need to integrate with, I first connect with Postman so I can confirm, in general, that the integration can be built.
showing 21 - 30