Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Hygraph is great!
What do you like best about the product?
Javascript based projects are built much faster using Hygraph.
What do you dislike about the product?
It doesn't have perfect integrations with MERN stack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It simplifies the entire process of managing APIs making it much better than Firebase. Makes development easier and hasslefree.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Hygraph :A very nice Flexible Solution for Ambitious Projects
What do you like best about the product?
interface and intuitive content management features make it easy to use, even for non-technical users.
very easy to work and very good interface.
scalable architecture for high-traffic applications.
content modeling feature and extensible architecture.
headless architecture and GraphQL API .
very easy to work and very good interface.
scalable architecture for high-traffic applications.
content modeling feature and extensible architecture.
headless architecture and GraphQL API .
What do you dislike about the product?
doesn't have built-in SEO optimization, e-commerce integrations, or user management features.
The costs can add up quickly, especially for large-scale projects or those with high traffic.
small community of developers.
limited media management capabilities
The costs can add up quickly, especially for large-scale projects or those with high traffic.
small community of developers.
limited media management capabilities
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph CMS is designed to solve several real-world problems that content creators, developers, and businesses face when building and managing content-driven applications. it simplifies content management by providing a flexible and scalable way to manage content across multiple channels and devices, also it solves the problem of content deliverywith a fast and reliable way to deliver content to any device or platform. the other benefit of this CMS is providing a flexible and customizable way to model content structures.
one of the best content management tools out there
What do you like best about the product?
I like best the easy integration with GraphQL API, developer-friendly tools
What do you dislike about the product?
Learning curve for GraphQL itself, it's not for everyone
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Managing content outside of the codebase
Great experience
What do you like best about the product?
The possibility to customize almost everything
What do you dislike about the product?
The lack of support for react libraries.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Easily manage content
Hygraph has everything we need for our app's content
What do you like best about the product?
I have found Hygraph to be very intuitive, giving me (someone who isn't a tech expert) the ability to do everything our company needs for the content of our app once the structure was set up.
What do you dislike about the product?
The downsides of Hygraph for me are when I've needed to make a change to the structure and don't know how to do so. In this case, I go to our app developer team and they make the changes for me. This means more money spent.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our app is comprised of thousands of profile. Each profile includes a review, a cover, and a variety of data points about a book. Hygraph works perfectly for this. We are able to use the system to create and manage each profile. We also use Hypgraph to send out push notifications connected to the profiles and to link customers to internal and external URLs.
CMS with potential, but lacking many features
What do you like best about the product?
- Conditional fields
- Cloud-based
- API Playground
- Webhooks – they allow for easy integration of ISR in Next.js applications
- Cloud-based
- API Playground
- Webhooks – they allow for easy integration of ISR in Next.js applications
What do you dislike about the product?
Unfortunately, there are more things to dislike:
- It lacks such a basic feature as content duplication, which is terrible! When we have an array with items that have identical data and differ in only one element, you still have to input it 20 times!
- Singletons! Oh my, why is this important feature missing? Sometimes, and even often, it's necessary to create a model that allows setting globals like Navigation, Footer, etc.
- Conditionals: It's great that they exist, but they need refinement. When you don't select a value in the Enum that is used as the basis for multiple conditionals, they all show up.
- There's no option to group components, enums, models, etc., in the Schema view. When you have a larger number of them, they start to overwhelm the screen.
- Why, if I want to create an array of some objects, do I have to create a special new component for that? It's very cumbersome and unnecessarily consumes the maximum number of components! This essentially makes it impossible to implement a larger site that allows the dynamic creation of subpages based on the design system introduced into the CMS.
- If a component is required and it’s a single component, the options within that component should be available to fill in immediately, not only after clicking the “add” button.
- There should be an option to create enums with a local scope, not just a global one. Global enums are also nice, but there's a lack of local scope options.
- This is not a crucial feature, but it would simplify CMS implementation for developers: the ability to define schemas directly in code, as done by PayloadCMS, Sanity, or TinaCMS.
- It lacks such a basic feature as content duplication, which is terrible! When we have an array with items that have identical data and differ in only one element, you still have to input it 20 times!
- Singletons! Oh my, why is this important feature missing? Sometimes, and even often, it's necessary to create a model that allows setting globals like Navigation, Footer, etc.
- Conditionals: It's great that they exist, but they need refinement. When you don't select a value in the Enum that is used as the basis for multiple conditionals, they all show up.
- There's no option to group components, enums, models, etc., in the Schema view. When you have a larger number of them, they start to overwhelm the screen.
- Why, if I want to create an array of some objects, do I have to create a special new component for that? It's very cumbersome and unnecessarily consumes the maximum number of components! This essentially makes it impossible to implement a larger site that allows the dynamic creation of subpages based on the design system introduced into the CMS.
- If a component is required and it’s a single component, the options within that component should be available to fill in immediately, not only after clicking the “add” button.
- There should be an option to create enums with a local scope, not just a global one. Global enums are also nice, but there's a lack of local scope options.
- This is not a crucial feature, but it would simplify CMS implementation for developers: the ability to define schemas directly in code, as done by PayloadCMS, Sanity, or TinaCMS.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am just a frontend developer implementing a large website. Unfortunately, there are much better alternatives on the market within a similar pricing range. All the problems I mentioned in the previous section highlight the difficulties in implementing Hygraph. It's also worth mentioning the component limit! In the pricing, there is a mention of a 150-component limit. If this is true, then implementing any large website that relies on dynamically building pages using a design system within the CMS becomes impossible!
Great Content Management System
What do you like best about the product?
* The admin API and ease of content/module building
* Ease of connecting between environments
* Speed
* Ease of connecting between environments
* Speed
What do you dislike about the product?
* The User Interface is engineering friendly, but some of our content editos are not as into it
* Could see some improvements in migrating models between environments
* Could see some improvements in migrating models between environments
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Creating a way for our marketing team to create content quickly
Great tool for use directly out-of-box
What do you like best about the product?
It's easy to setup, integrate and use in your system or platform. They are also active on teaching/learning and provided some talks in our company showcasing the platform.
What do you dislike about the product?
We miss a page builder with a rich preview.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It saves us time when in need to implement a content management system that is easy to use and we can put directly in non technical hands.
Great platform for your interfacing for data
What do you like best about the product?
I use hygraph for creating interfaces for my datasets. It works perfectly for that. It is very developer friendly (and oriented in a way) but results in a simple cms ui. I think it is powerful, though it comes with a cost (if you need more than the free plan)
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing plans are enterprise minded. The cms ui could be simplified for non technical users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
A cms i can bring to customers for a nextjs websites.
Good CMS with Some Complex Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like using Hygraph because it provides a good overview and is easy to navigate. The user interface is clean, making it simple to manage content. Overall, Hygraph is a solid choice for managing content, especially if you’re looking for a modern solution. Just be prepared to spend a little time learning some of the more advanced features.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some features can feel a bit too complex or intricate, which might be challenging for beginners.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It enables the unification of data from multiple sources into a single API, which simplifies the content operations and reduces redundancy.
showing 31 - 40