Hygraph
HygraphReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
716 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Hygraph dependability needs to improve
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of use. The learning of hygraph current features is relatively quick with new employees
What do you dislike about the product?
Dislike how it glitches or crashes and work is lost or not able to be productive because hygraphnis down. It should have spelling review in content boxes. It should be easier to retrieve deleted content. It would be nice to be able to replicate repetitive data on multiple existing pages rather than re-enter
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows us to manage content on our software
Great way to organize a large quantity of content
What do you like best about the product?
The interface is incredibly intuitive, with carefully selected and well-designed tools for editing content. You don't require advanced developer skills to grasp the basics of Hygraph.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing much! Maybe wish that the pages would have specific links for each live page that it represents for NLG templates.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
organizing a large quantity of content
Excellent Tool
What do you like best about the product?
I really enjoyed Hygraph for both my business and my personal projects. It was easy to use and integrate. It can be trusted to use for important projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing, to be honest. Hygraph is flawless for me.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I used Hygraph for the Headless CMS. I create website for my clients and therefore need a content management system.
Create your website with any tech for any platform, thanks to the flexibility of a Headless CMS
What do you like best about the product?
I'm fond of the capabilities offered by Headless CMS, ushering in a new era of sophisticated CMS utilizing cutting-edge technologies. Beyond its array of intelligent features, it boasts remarkable speed and agility. Furthermore, the support staff is not only highly professional but also exceptionally amiable.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I might still miss in a Headless CMS is having an editor like Webflow, which allows for the rapid implementation of new designs with data from one's own data.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have a lot of data on our own servers that we need to implement on our website. Through Hygraph, we've found a simple solution to visualize this data and incorporate it into various pages.
The most tried-and-tested CMS solution I've used
What do you like best about the product?
Hygraph is the most reliable CMS I've used. I've experimented with quite a few different options, but nothing came to the level of reliability & usability as Hygraph.
Implementing it into our codebase is simple, the UI is no-frills & easy-to-manage, and most importantly, it has been reliable.
Our team has increased the volume of content we're adding to the CMS and feel confident in housing it in Hygraph. We're excited to continue using it and see what else they come up with to improve the experience.
Implementing it into our codebase is simple, the UI is no-frills & easy-to-manage, and most importantly, it has been reliable.
Our team has increased the volume of content we're adding to the CMS and feel confident in housing it in Hygraph. We're excited to continue using it and see what else they come up with to improve the experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some of the new kids on the block integrate easier with folks building website on top of the latest framworks (like Next.js). I'm sure this is something the Hygraph team is working on — I'd love to see easier integration of new schemas in a Next.js app.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Non-technical stakeholder adding content to marketing site
- Hosting content
- Hosting content
Good for technical and non technical teams alike
What do you like best about the product?
Our engineering team loved Hygraph because of the ease implementation and the vast set of features. Our non-technical team also appreciated if because it is easy to use and make changes.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's not the cheapest option, especially for a small team.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph allowed us to stood up a website for our business fairly quickly and allowed us to make changes on an ongoing basis really easily.
Very good and intuitive product with helpful and responsive support!
What do you like best about the product?
This is my goto CMS for any project I create.
It's very intuitive, the free plan limitations are just enough for small projects.
Helpful API playground makes any integration simple and fast.
Customer support is very helpful and responsive, even outside the working hours. They were kind enough to grant me an access to the premium feature for a university project!
It's very intuitive, the free plan limitations are just enough for small projects.
Helpful API playground makes any integration simple and fast.
Customer support is very helpful and responsive, even outside the working hours. They were kind enough to grant me an access to the premium feature for a university project!
What do you dislike about the product?
The localization of assets might be easier
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As any content management system, Hygraph helps me separate the struggle of filling the client's content for their webpage by simply allowing them access to the project and do it themselves.
Besides that, it has an excelent set of free features, perfect for creating all startup projects.
Besides that, it has an excelent set of free features, perfect for creating all startup projects.
Great CMS but can get even better
What do you like best about the product?
Hygraph offers most of the features I would expect from a high-end CMS; schedued publishing, customizability of the interface, rich-text editor and more. So far what has made me feel extra good about Hygraph is their swift and helpful customer support.
The localisation is very good and the integration with Lokalise is a great help to our team.
It was very easy to get started, and our editors seem happy with the experience so far.
I know Hygraph are working on a new UI and some other improvements and I'm looking forward to see what they will do.
The localisation is very good and the integration with Lokalise is a great help to our team.
It was very easy to get started, and our editors seem happy with the experience so far.
I know Hygraph are working on a new UI and some other improvements and I'm looking forward to see what they will do.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hygraph are missing some features that I think would elevate it to the next level. For example autosaving entries and being able to save incomplete entries (without required fields). There has been some bugs, but most of them has been resolved quickly after reporting them.
I would also prefer if there were more settings on fields, for example being able to specify that an assets should be an image, or what dimentions are allowed. Also, lists can't be required which to me seems a bit odd.
The documentation is generally good but sometimes a bit difficult to navigate.
I would also prefer if there were more settings on fields, for example being able to specify that an assets should be an image, or what dimentions are allowed. Also, lists can't be required which to me seems a bit odd.
The documentation is generally good but sometimes a bit difficult to navigate.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph allows our editors to work independently, so that they can manage the content on our web products without the need of developer interference.
Great product, great support but still room for improvement.
What do you like best about the product?
We inherited the project from an agency and therefore had no influence on the information architecture in HyGraph. Thanks to the good support, we have learned how to do it right and always get support along the way. The HyGraph team is very helpful and I can only recommend using their expertise at the beginning of the project. The tool is easy to use and the structure makes sense. I particularly like the app area for extending functionality, as you can fall back on useful implementations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Our information architecture in HyGraph is not optimal and we have very high traffic on the system as a result. This is clearly our fault, but it is still annoying. I would like to see more metrics and transparency regarding access to resources and assets. We currently find it difficult to reduce requests per second, for example, as we have little insight into the data. In addition, asset traffic is calculated based on accesses to the resource and not on accesses to the assets. This feels a bit unfair as the image is not always loaded and with a TTL of 30 days, the images are usually in the CDN anyway.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have 40 different markets in our company that broadcast dynamic content and various entities such as products, recipes, etc. on one website. We use the CMS to enable the markets to enter their content and manage it in multiple languages.
Very nice CMS for localization and large scale
What do you like best about the product?
Very responsive to feedback when there's a bug or for feature requests.
They don't implement everything we've asked them to, but they listen and make improvements to their product when the feature makes sense.
Their webhook implementation is good, we use it to notify backend systems about content being updated, but we can opt out of receiving notifications when our automated systems performs the update.
The user interface is intuitive enough that normal people can use it.
The custom app integration is pretty nice. It allows us to do our own content quality checks and give instant feedback to the editor.
They don't implement everything we've asked them to, but they listen and make improvements to their product when the feature makes sense.
Their webhook implementation is good, we use it to notify backend systems about content being updated, but we can opt out of receiving notifications when our automated systems performs the update.
The user interface is intuitive enough that normal people can use it.
The custom app integration is pretty nice. It allows us to do our own content quality checks and give instant feedback to the editor.
What do you dislike about the product?
When you have a lot of data, the user interface can become slow.
You'll have to manually update a default view of each model to reduce the amount of data you fetch when you're just trying to get the overview.
If you have a lot of languages (10+) then the user interface can become a bit messy, but it's a lot nicer than many solutions out there.
You'll have to manually update a default view of each model to reduce the amount of data you fetch when you're just trying to get the overview.
If you have a lot of languages (10+) then the user interface can become a bit messy, but it's a lot nicer than many solutions out there.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hygraph takes the burden of managing our content pieces, many of them very complex, without us having to update a single field.
It enables us to move quickly in content creation, and update our content modeling without having to write many lines of code.
We also don't have to worry about handling the database for the content (our data is easily in the hundreds of gigabytes, if not a few terabytes)
It enables us to move quickly in content creation, and update our content modeling without having to write many lines of code.
We also don't have to worry about handling the database for the content (our data is easily in the hundreds of gigabytes, if not a few terabytes)
showing 491 - 500